INTERCLONAL COMPETITION IN CD8
T CELL RESPONSES TO CMV AND EBV | Price et al.1360
Online supplemental material. Fig. S1 shows representative intracellu-
lar IFN plots and the gating strategy used to generate Fig. 5. Online sup-
plemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/
We thank D. Ambrozak for cell sorting.
D.A. Price is a Medical Research Council (UK) Clinician Scientist.
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 7 July 2005
Accepted: 19 September 2005
1. van der Merwe, P.A., and S.J. Davis. 2003. Molecular interactions me-
diating T cell antigen recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:659–684.
2. Kedl, R.M., J.W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 2003. Epitope dominance,
competition and T cell affinity maturation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15:
3. Butz, E.A., and M.J. Bevan. 1998. Massive expansion of antigen-specific
T cells during an acute virus infection. Immunity. 8:167–175.
4. Smith, A.L., M.E. Wikstrom, and B. Fazekas de St Groth. 2000. Visu-
alizing T cell competition for peptide/MHC complexes: a specific
mechanism to minimize the effect of precursor frequency. Immunity.
5. Kedl, R.M., W.A. Rees, D.A. Hildeman, B. Schaefer, T. Mitchell, J.
Kappler, and P. Marrack. 2000. T cells compete for access to antigen-
bearing antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:1105–1113.
6. Kedl, R.M., B.C. Schaefer, J.W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 2002. T
cells down-modulate peptide-MHC complexes on APCs in vivo. Nat.
7. McHeyzer-Williams, M.G., and M.M. Davis. 1995. Antigen-specific de-
velopment of primary and memory T cells in vivo. Science. 268:106–111.
8. Savage, P.A., J.J. Boniface, and M.M. Davis. 1999. A kinetic basis for
T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. Immu-
9. Busch, D.H., and E.G. Pamer. 1999. T cell affinity maturation by se-
lective expansion during infection. J. Exp. Med. 189:701–710.
10. Rees, W., J. Bender, T.K. Teague, R.M. Kedl, F. Crawford, P. Mar-
rack, and J. Kappler. 1999. An inverse relationship between T cell re-
ceptor affinity and antigen dose during CD4() T cell responses in
vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:9781–9786.
11. Lanzavecchia, A. 2002. Lack of fair play in the T cell response. Nat. Im-
12. Malherbe, L., C. Hausl, L. Teyton, and M.G. McHeyzer-Williams.
2004. Clonal selection of helper T cells is determined by an affinity
threshold with no further skewing of TCR binding properties. Immu-
13. Bousso, P., A. Casrouge, J.D. Altman, M. Haury, J. Kanellopoulos, J.P.
Abastado, and P. Kourilsky. 1998. Individual variations in the murine
T cell response to a specific peptide reflect variability in naive reper-
toires. Immunity. 9:169–178.
14. De Boer, R.J., and A.S. Perelson. 1994. T cell repertoires and compet-
itive exclusion. J. Theor. Biol. 169:375–390.
15. Wolpert, E.Z., P. Grufman, J.K. Sandberg, A. Tegnesjo, and K. Karre.
1998. Immunodominance in the CTL response against minor histo-
compatibility antigens: interference between responding T cells, rather
than with presentation of epitopes. J. Immunol. 161:4499–4505.
16. Grufman, P., E.Z. Wolpert, J.K. Sandberg, and K. Karre. 1999. T cell
competition for the antigen-presenting cell as a model for immuno-
dominance in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against minor his-
tocompatibility antigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:2197–2204.
17. Riddell, S.R., and P.D. Greenberg. 1995. Principles for adoptive T cell
therapy of human viral diseases. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:545–586.
18. Douek, D.C., M.R. Betts, J.M. Brenchley, B.J. Hill, D.R. Ambrozak,
K.L. Ngai, N.J. Karandikar, J.P. Casazza, and R.A. Koup. 2002. A
novel approach to the analysis of specificity, clonality, and frequency of
HIV-specific T cell responses reveals a potential mechanism for control
of viral escape. J. Immunol. 168:3099–3104.
19. Kjer-Nielsen, L., C.S. Clements, A.W. Purcell, A.G. Brooks, J.C.
Whisstock, S.R. Burrows, J. McCluskey, and J. Rossjohn. 2003. A
structural basis for the selection of dominant T cell receptors in an-
tiviral immunity. Immunity. 18:53–64.
20. Stewart-Jones, G.B., A.J. McMichael, J.I. Bell, D.I. Stuart, and E.Y.
Jones. 2003. A structural basis for immunodominant human T cell re-
ceptor recognition. Nat. Immunol. 4:657–663.
21. Price, D.A., S.M. West, M.R. Betts, L.E. Ruff, J.M. Brenchley, D.R.
Ambrozak, Y. Edghill-Smith, M.J. Kuroda, D. Bogdan, K. Kunstman,
et al. 2004. T cell receptor recognition motifs govern immune escape
patterns in acute SIV infection. Immunity. 21:793–803.
22. Lim, A., L. Trautmann, M.A. Peyrat, C. Couedel, F. Davodeau, F.
Romagne, P. Kourilsky, and M. Bonneville. 2000. Frequent contribu-
tion of T cell clonotypes with public TCR features to the chronic re-
sponse against a dominant EBV-derived epitope: application to direct
detection of their molecular imprint on the human peripheral T cell
repertoire. J. Immunol. 165:2001–2011.
23. Pittet, M.J., V. Rubio-Godoy, G. Bioley, P. Guillaume, P. Batard, D.
Speiser, I. Luescher, J.C. Cerottini, P. Romero, and A. Zippelius.
2003. 3 domain mutants of peptide/MHC class I multimers allow the
selective isolation of high avidity tumor-reactive CD8 T cells. J. Immu-
24. Choi, E.M., J.L. Chen, L. Wooldridge, M. Salio, A. Lissina, N. Lissin,
I.F. Hermans, J.D. Silk, F. Mirza, M.J. Palmowski, et al. 2003. High
avidity antigen-specific CTL identified by CD8-independent tetramer
staining. J. Immunol. 171:5116–5123.
25. Bodinier, M., M.A. Peyrat, C. Tournay, F. Davodeau, F. Romagne,
M. Bonneville, and F. Lang. 2000. Efficient detection and immuno-
magnetic sorting of specific T cells using multimers of MHC class I and
peptide with reduced CD8 binding. Nat. Med. 6:707–710.
26. Whelan, J.A., P.R. Dunbar, D.A. Price, M.A. Purbhoo, F. Lechner, G.S.
Ogg, G. Griffiths, R.E. Phillips, V. Cerundolo, and A.K. Sewell. 1999.
Specificity of CTL interactions with peptide-MHC class I tetrameric
complexes is temperature dependent. J. Immunol. 163:4342–4348.
27. Couedel, C., M. Bodinier, M.A. Peyrat, M. Bonneville, F. Davodeau,
and F. Lang. 1999. Selection and long-term persistence of reactive
CTL clones during an EBV chronic response are determined by avid-
ity, CD8 variable contribution compensating for differences in TCR
affinities. J. Immunol. 162:6351–6358.
28. Kerry, S.E., J. Buslepp, L.A. Cramer, R. Maile, L.L. Hensley, A.I.
Nielsen, P. Kavathas, B.J. Vilen, E.J. Collins, and J.A. Frelinger. 2003.
Interplay between TCR affinity and necessity of coreceptor ligation:
high-affinity peptide-MHC/TCR interaction overcomes lack of CD8
engagement. J. Immunol. 171:4493–4503.
29. Maile, R., C.A. Siler, S.E. Kerry, K.E. Midkiff, E.J. Collins, and J.A.
Frelinger. 2005. Peripheral “CD8 tuning” dynamically modulates the
size and responsiveness of an antigen-specific T cell pool in vivo. J. Im-
30. Purbhoo, M.A., J.M. Boulter, D.A. Price, A.L. Vuidepot, C.S.
Hourigan, P.R. Dunbar, K. Olson, S.J. Dawson, R.E. Phillips, B.K.
Jakobsen, et al. 2001. The human CD8 coreceptor effects cytotoxic T
cell activation and antigen sensitivity primarily by mediating complete
phosphorylation of the T cell receptor zeta chain. J. Biol. Chem. 276:
31. van Bergen, J., Y. Kooy, and F. Koning. 2001. CD4-independent T
cells impair TCR triggering of CD4-dependent T cells: a putative
mechanism for T cell affinity maturation. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:646–652.
32. Huang, J.F., Y. Yang, H. Sepulveda, W. Shi, I. Hwang, P.A. Peterson,
M.R. Jackson, J. Sprent, and Z. Cai. 1999. TCR-mediated internalization
of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science. 286:952–954.
33. Tomaru, U., Y. Yamano, M. Nagai, D. Maric, P.T. Kaumaya, W.
Biddison, and S. Jacobson. 2003. Detection of virus-specific T cells and
CD8() T-cell epitopes by acquisition of peptide-HLA-GFP com-
plexes: analysis of T-cell phenotype and function in chronic viral infec-
tions. Nat. Med. 9:469–476.
34. Alexander, M.A., C.A. Damico, K.M. Wieties, T.H. Hansen, and J.M.
Connolly. 1991. Correlation between CD8 dependency and determi-
nant density using peptide-induced, Ld-restricted cytotoxic T lympho-