MCE-IMCI Technical Advisors. Programmatic pathways to child survival: Results of multi-country evaluation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness

Cornell University, Итак, New York, United States
Health Policy and Planning (Impact Factor: 3.47). 01/2006; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i5-i17. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czi055
Source: PubMed


To summarize the expectations held by World Health Organization programme personnel about how the introduction of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) strategy would lead to improvements in child health and nutrition, to compare these expectations with what was learned from the Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Effectiveness, Cost and Impact (MCE-IMCI), and to discuss the implications of these findings for child survival policies and programmes. Design: The MCE-IMCI study designs were based on an impact model developed in 1999-2000 to define how IMCI would be implemented at country level and below, and the outcomes and impact it would have on child health and survival. MCE-IMCI studies included: feasibility assessments documenting IMCI implementation in 12 countries (1999-2001); in-depth studies using compatible designs in Bangladesh, Brazil, Peru, Tanzania and Uganda; and cross-site analyses addressing the effectiveness of specific subsets of IMCI activities.
The IMCI strategy was successfully introduced in the great majority of countries with moderate to high levels of child mortality in the period from 1996 to 2001. Seven years of country-based evaluation, however, indicates that some of the basic expectations underlying the development of IMCI were not met. Four of the five countries (the exception is Tanzania) had difficulties in expanding the strategy at national level while maintaining adequate intervention quality. Technical guidelines on delivering interventions at family and community levels were slow to appear, and in their absence countries stalled in their efforts to increase population coverage with essential interventions related to care-seeking, nutrition, and correct care of the sick child at home. The full weight of health system limitations on IMCI implementation was not appreciated at the outset, and only now is it clear that solutions to larger problems in political commitment, human resources, financing, integrated or at least coordinated programme management, and effective decentralization are essential underpinnings of successful efforts to reduce child mortality.
This analysis highlights the need for a shift if child survival efforts are to be successful. Delivery systems that rely solely on government health facilities must be expanded to include the full range of potential channels in a setting and strong community-based approaches. The focus on process within child health programmes must change to include greater accountability for intervention coverage at population level. Global strategies that expect countries to make massive adaptations must be complemented by country-level implementation guidelines that begin with local epidemiology and rely on tools developed for specific epidemiological profiles.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert Scherpbier
  • Source
    • "The three waves of KMC implementation are linked to global trends in health focus. The first two waves correspond to Shiffman's observations that until the 1990s the work in low-income countries was focused on infant and child survival[65], with programs such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI)[66]. The increased focus on newborn survival started around 2005 with the publication of the Neonatal Survival Series in The Lancet and the increased support from agencies other than Save the Children/SNL and informal networks of professionals[65]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Kangaroo mother care has been highlighted as an effective intervention package to address high neonatal mortality pertaining to preterm births and low birth weight. However, KMC uptake and service coverage have not progressed well in many countries. The aim of this case study was to understand the institutionalisation processes of facility-based KMC services in three Asian countries (India, Indonesia and the Philippines) and the reasons for the slow uptake of KMC in these countries. Methods: Three main data sources were available: background documents providing insight in the state of implementation of KMC in the three countries; visits to a selection of health facilities to gauge their progress with KMC implementation; and data from interviews and meetings with key stakeholders. Results: The establishment of KMC services at individual facilities began many years before official prioritisation for scale-up. Three major themes were identified: pioneers of facility-based KMC; patterns of KMC knowledge and skills dissemination; and uptake and expansion of KMC services in relation to global trends and national policies. Conclusions: This paper illustrates the complexities of implementing a new healthcare intervention. Although preterm care is currently in the limelight, clear and concerted country-led KMC scale-up strategies with associated operational plans and budgets are essential for successful scale-up.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2016 · BMC International Health and Human Rights
  • Source
    • "In 1995, the clinical algorithm for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) was developed to address case management of the most common illnesses for children below 5 years: pneumonia, diarrhoea, malaria, measles and malnutrition (WHO 1997). The IMCI programme was originally articulated as being three pronged: improving (1) facility-based case management, (2) health systems and (3) family and community health practices (WHO 2013); however, the community component was often not successfully implemented in many African countries (Lambrechts et al. 1999; WHO 2003; Bryce et al. 2005). The evidence base for the delivery of curative services at the community level for the individual pathologies of diarrhoea, malaria and pneumonia is substantial (Sazawal and Black 1992; 2003; Delacollette et al. 1996; Bhutta et al. 1999; Kidane and Morrow 2000; Victora et al. 2000; Baqui et al. 2002; 2004), while the research supporting the 'integrated' delivery of these services is more sparse (Lewin et al. 2010; Yeboah-Antwi et al. 2010; Christopher et al. 2011; Chinbuah et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integrated Community Case Management of Childhood Illness (iCCM) is a policy for providing treatment for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia for children below 5 years at the community level, which is generating increasing evidence and support at the global level. As countries move to adopt iCCM, it becomes important to understand how this growing evidence base is viewed and used by national stakeholders. This article explores whether, how and why evidence influenced policy formulation for iCCM in Niger, Kenya and Mozambique, and uses Carol Weiss’ models of research utilization to further explain the use of evidence in these contexts. A documentary review and in-depth stakeholder interviews were conducted as part of retrospective case studies in each study country. Findings indicate that all three countries used national monitoring data to identify the issue of children dying in the community prior to reaching health facilities, whereas international research evidence was used to identify policy options. Nevertheless, policymakers greatly valued local evidence and pilot projects proved critical in advancing iCCM. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) functioned as knowledge brokers, bringing research evidence and experiences from other countries to the attention of local policymakers as well as sponsoring site visits and meetings. In terms of country-specific findings, Niger demonstrated both Interactive and Political models of research utilization by using iCCM to capitalize on the existing health infrastructure. Both Mozambique and Kenya exhibit Problem-Solving research utilization with different outcomes. Furthermore, the persistent quest for additional evidence suggests a Tactical use of research in Kenya. Results presented here indicate that while evidence from research studies and other contexts can be critical to policy development, local evidence is often needed to answer key policymaker questions. In the end, evidence may not be enough to overcome resistance if the policy is viewed as incompatible with national goals.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Health Policy and Planning
  • Source
    • "Research is needed to understand how fathers, who are often neglected in programmes to improve complementary feeding, can be positively engaged. Beyond health services, other platforms are needed to address the contextual factors at the base of the conceptual framework developed by Stewart et al. (2013), which may act to either enable or impede progress towards improving child growth and development (Victora et al. 2005). These include services related to agriculture and food systems, and water, sanitation and the environment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although there are some examples of successful complementary feeding programmes to promote health growth and prevent stunting at the community level, to date there are few, if any, examples of successful programmes at scale. A lack of systematic process and impact evaluations on pilot projects to generate lessons learned has preculded scaling up of effective programmes. Programmes to effect positive change in nutrition rarely follow systematic planning, plementation and evaluation (PIE) proceses to enhance effectiveness over the long term. As a result a set of programme-oriented key principles to promote healthy growth remains elusive. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by proposing a set of principles to improve programmes and interventions to promote healthy grwoth and development. Identifying such principles for programmessuccess has three requiremetns rethinking tradiitonal paradigms used to promote improved infant and young child feeding; ensuring better linkages to delivery platforms; and, improving programming. Following the PIE model for programmes and learning from experiences from four relatively large-scale programmes described in this paper, 10 key principles are identifed in the areas of programme planning, program implementation, programme evaluation, and dissemination, replication, and scaling up. Nonetheless, numerous operational research questions remain, some of which are highlighted in this paper.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013 · Maternal and Child Nutrition
Show more