Article

Beerli P.. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics 22: 341-345

School of Computational Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA.
Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 4.98). 03/2006; 22(3):341-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti803
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Comparison of the performance and accuracy of different inference methods, such as maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference, is difficult because the inference methods are implemented in different programs, often written by different authors. Both methods were implemented in the program MIGRATE, that estimates population genetic parameters, such as population sizes and migration rates, using coalescence theory. Both inference methods use the same Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm and differ from each other in only two aspects: parameter proposal distribution and maximization of the likelihood function. Using simulated datasets, the Bayesian method generally fares better than the ML approach in accuracy and coverage, although for some values the two approaches are equal in performance. MOTIVATION: The Markov chain Monte Carlo-based ML framework can fail on sparse data and can deliver non-conservative support intervals. A Bayesian framework with appropriate prior distribution is able to remedy some of these problems. RESULTS: The program MIGRATE was extended to allow not only for ML(-) maximum likelihood estimation of population genetics parameters but also for using a Bayesian framework. Comparisons between the Bayesian approach and the ML approach are facilitated because both modes estimate the same parameters under the same population model and assumptions.

Full-text preview

Available from: bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org
  • Source
    • "Coalescent-based simulations as implemented in DnaSP were used to predict the expected relationship between h and p under drift– mutation equilibrium and constant population size as proposed by Simon et al. (2011). Effective population size of native populations assuming mutation–drift equilibrium and absence of migration among watersheds was estimated using MIGRATE-n v.3.6.5 (Beerli, 2006). The Bayesian inference option was used with the default search strategy settings. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Following its introduction in the late nineteenth century, rainbow trout gradually spread to become one of the most widespread non-native fishes. Nevertheless, despite continuous introductions, they have become self-sustaining in only a limited number of European rivers, most of which are located in the Prealps. There is no consensus on the reasons for the absence of self-sustaining populations over most of Europe, though genetic differences have been suggested as a potential underlying factor. We conducted a population genetic study of the structure and origin of European populations to help resolve these questions. We examined variation in mitochondrial D-loop and the Y-linked marker of 41 self-sustaining, stocked, and hatchery populations from Europe and compared them to native and hatchery populations in North America. High levels of genetic diversity but little inter-population genetic variation suggests that European populations are derived from multiple sources, with a great majority of parental populations belonging to steelhead and coastal rainbow trout from Central and Northern California. Our study revealed no considerable genetic differences among European self-sustaining, stocked, and hatchery populations. The mitochondrial DNA data do not allow evaluation of selection and adaptive traits and thus cannot explain potential population differences arising in their naturalization success.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Hydrobiologia
  • Source
    • "Historical Gene Flow and Contemporary Interisland Dispersal We used program MIGRATE 3.6.6 (Beerli 2006, 2009 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Mariana Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus guami) is a highly endangered taxon, with fewer than 300 individuals estimated to occur in the wild. The subspecies is believed to have undergone population declines attributable to loss of wetland habitats on its native islands in the Mariana Islands. We analyzed mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences (control region and ND2 genes) and nuclear microsatellite loci in Mariana Common Moorhens from Guam and Saipan, the two most distal islands inhabited by the subspecies. Our analyses revealed similar nuclear genetic diversity and effective population size estimates on Saipan and Guam. Birds from Guam and Saipan were genetically differentiated (microsatellites: FST = 0.152; control region: FST = 0.736; ND2: FST = 0.390); however, assignment tests revealed the presence of first-generation dispersers from Guam onto Saipan (1 of 27 sampled birds) and from Saipan onto Guam (2 of 28 sampled birds), suggesting the capability for long-distance interpopulation movements within the subspecies. The observed dispersal rate was consistent with long-term estimates of effective numbers of migrants per generation between islands, indicating that movement between islands has been an ongoing process in this system. Despite known population declines, bottleneck tests revealed no signature of historical bottleneck events, suggesting that the magnitude of past population declines may have been comparatively small relative to the severity of declines that can be detected using genetic data.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · The Condor
  • Source
    • "Historical and contemporary gene flow To estimate historical gene flow between the STRUCTURE clusters and between populations within each STRUCTURE cluster, we used the software package MIGRATE version 3.6 (Beerli, 2006) to estimate the effective number of migrants (2Nm, where N is the effective population size and m is the migration rate per generation ), assuming a migration matrix model with asymmetric migration rates and different population sizes. The MIGRATE software calculates maximum-likelihood (ML) estimates for both historical migration rates and effective population size between pairs of populations using a coalescent approach (Beerli and Felsenstein, 1999 "

    Full-text · Dataset · Aug 2015
Show more