Article

Gregory, K. B. & Lovley, D. R. Remediation and recovery of uranium from contaminated subsurface environments with electrodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 8943-8947

Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, 203 Morrill 4 North, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
Environmental Science and Technology (Impact Factor: 5.33). 12/2005; 39(22):8943-7. DOI: 10.1021/es050457e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have demonstrated that Geobacter species can effectively remove uranium from contaminated groundwater by reducing soluble U(VI) to the relatively insoluble U(IV) with organic compounds serving as the electron donor. Studies were conducted to determine whether electrodes might serve as an alternative electron donor for U(VI) reduction by a pure culture of Geobacter sulfurreducens and microorganisms in uranium-contaminated sediments. Electrodes poised at -500 mV (vs a Ag/AgCl reference) rapidly removed U(VI) from solution in the absence of cells. However, when the poise at the electrode was removed, all of the U(VI) returned to solution, demonstrating that the electrode did not reduce U(VI). If G. sulfurreducens was present on the electrode, U(VI) did not return to solution until the electrode was exposed to dissolved oxygen. This suggeststhat G. sulfurreducens on the electrode reduced U(VI) to U(IV) which was stably precipitated until reoxidized in the presence of oxygen. When an electrode was placed in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments, U(VI) was removed and recovered from groundwater using poised electrodes. Electrodes emplaced in flow-through columns of uranium-contaminated sediments readily removed U(VI) from the groundwater, and 87% of the uranium that had been removed was recovered from the electrode surface after the electrode was pulled from the sediments. These results suggest that microorganisms can use electrons derived from electrodes to reduce U(VI) and that it may be possible to remove and recover uranium from contaminated groundwater with poised electrodes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Kelvin B Gregory, Jan 21, 2015
    • "For example, as direct electron donors to bacterial cells or the in-situ production of electron donors such as H 2 . Furthermore, diffusion of metal ions to bacterial cells immolated on electrodes could be improved by capacitive deionisation[64]. Finally, acid functional groups or cell wall enzymes implicated in metal sorption and reduction could be influenced by applied potential. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A process evaluation of AuCl4− (<300 mg/L, <pH 3, H2 e-donor) sorption kinetics and mass transfer analysis by initially viable Shewanella putrefaciens is presented here. Following on from previous reports of a thermodynamically spontaneous reaction, high sorption capacity of 1346 mg/g and significant evidence of zero valent gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) deposited within the bacterial cell wall. Linear and non-linearized kinetic modelling of the data shows a good fit to a pseudo second-order model and theoretical analysis of diffusional limiting steps suggest diffusion on the surface or through the cell wall to be the process rate limiting step. Process analysis of microbial gold synthesis, provides a foundation for the design of smart reactor systems for process intensification.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015
    • "This interest and the associated progress in research and development during the last decade led to the foundation of the emerging field of microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) [6]. MET now cover different concepts of applications ranging from its archetype the microbial fuel cells (MFCs) [7] [8] via bioelectrochemical resource recovery [9] [10] and microbial electrosynthesis [11] to biocomputing [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A modeling platform for microbial electrodes based on electroactive microbial biofilms performing direct electron transfer (DET) is presented. Microbial catabolism and anabolism were coupled with intracellular and extracellular electron transfer, leading to biofilm growth and current generation. The model includes homogeneous electron transfer from cells to a conductive biofilm component, biofilm matrix conduction, and heterogeneous electron transfer to the electrode. Model results for Geobacter based anodes, both at constant electrode potential and in voltammetric (dynamic electrode potential) conditions, were compared to experimental data from different sources. The model can satisfactorily describe microscale (concentration, pH and redox gradients) and macroscale (electric currents, biofilm thickness) properties of Geobacter biofilms. The concentration of electrochemically accessible redox centers, here denominated as cytochromes, involved in the extracellular electron transfer, plays the key role and may differ between constant potential (300mM) and dynamic potential (3mM) conditions. Model results also indicate that the homogeneous and heterogeneous electron transfer rates have to be within the same order of magnitude (1.2s(-1)) for reversible extracellular electron transfer. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
  • Source
    • "Reduction of uranium using several materials has been well investigated: (1) Nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) (Fiedor et al. 1998, Noubactep et al. 2006, Riba et al. 2008); (2) electrodes (Gregory and Derek 2005); (3) sulfide minerals (Wersin et al. 1994); and (4) iron-bearing soil minerals (Kriegman-King and Reinhard 1994, Butler and Hayes 1998, Lee and Batchelor 2002, Kim and Batchelor 2009, Descostes et al. 2010). Iron-bearing soil minerals such as vivianite, maghemite, and green rust showed high reductive capacity to reduce toxic chemicals including radioactive compounds (Lee et al. 2000, Zachara et al. 2001, Roden et al. 2002, Jung et al. 2012). "

    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015
Show more