Prevalence of Negative Chest Radiography Results in the Emergency Department Patient With Decompensated Heart Failure

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
Annals of emergency medicine (Impact Factor: 4.68). 02/2006; 47(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.003
Source: PubMed


Although chest radiography is quick and inexpensive, previous research suggests that it is often misleading in emergency department (ED) patients with decompensated heart failure, resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This study determines the rate of negative chest radiography results in patients found to have disease and the potential contribution of negative findings to a diagnosis discordant with heart failure by an emergency physician.
We used data from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE), a registry of patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure. We compared initial ED admitting diagnosis to the criterion standard of a hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure and related these to radiographic findings of heart failure (interstitial edema, pulmonary edema, or vascular congestion, as determined by a staff radiologist) for patients first treated in the ED. The proportion of patients with a non-heart failure ED diagnosis and the diagnostic sensitivity of radiographic findings of heart failure are calculated.
There were 85,376 patients with chest radiograph results and an ED admitting diagnosis. Overall, there were 15,937 patients with no signs of congestion on ED chest radiography, giving a negative rate of 18.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.4% to 18.9%). The proportion of patients with an ED non-heart failure admitting diagnosis was higher in patients with a negative chest radiograph result (23.3%; 95% CI 22.6% to 23.9%) than in patients with a positive chest radiograph result (13.0%; 95% CI 12.7% to 13.2%).
Approximately 1 of every 5 patients admitted from the ED with acute decompensated heart failure had no signs of congestion on chest radiography. Patients lacking signs of congestion on ED chest radiography were more likely to have an ED non-heart failure diagnosis than patients with signs of congestion. Clinicians should not rule out heart failure in patients with no radiographic signs of congestion.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Moreover, most of the times it is impossible to acquire posteroanterior and lateral projection in supine patients in the emergency setting; furthermore, ionizing radiation can cause damage to pregnant women. Finally, the report is not immediately available, and, above all, it has limited accuracy in detecting some diseases [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Dyspnea is one of the most frequent complaints in the Emergency Department. Thoracic ultrasound should help to differentiate cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic causes of dyspnea. We evaluated whether the diagnostic accuracy can be improved by adding a point-of-care-ultrasonography (POC-US) to routine exams and if an early use of this technique produces any advantage. Methods One hundred sixty-eight patients were enrolled and randomized in two groups: Group 1 received an immediate POC-US in addition to routine laboratory and instrumental tests; group 2 received an ultrasound scan within 1 h from the admission to the Emergency Department. The concordance between initial and final diagnosis and the percentage of wrong diagnosis in the two groups were evaluated. Mortality, days of hospitalization in Emergency Medicine department and transfers to other wards were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of the routine protocol and the one including ultrasonography for the diagnosis of the causes of dyspnea were also analyzed. Results Eighty-eight patients were randomized in group 1 and 80 in group 2. The concordance rate between initial and final diagnoses was significantly different (0.94 in group 1 vs. 0.22 in group 2, p < 0.005). The percentage of wrong initial diagnosis was 5% in group 1 and 50% in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Adding POC-US to routine exams improves the diagnostic accuracy of dyspnea and reduces errors in the Emergency Department.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · Critical ultrasound journal
  • Source
    • "This method, in an acute setting, is at times difficult to interpret and has a certain inter-observer variability [15]. Moreover, increased values of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) do not necessarily produce radiographic data indicative of APE [16]. The gold standard for evidencing pulmonary congestion is the measuring of PCWP by catheterization, a procedure not carried out routinely in respiratory units, even intensive ones. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chest ultrasonography can be a useful diagnostic tool for respiratory physicians. It can be used to complete and widen the general objective examination also in emergency situations, at the patient’s bedside. The aim of this document is to promote better knowledge and more widespread use of thoracic ultrasound among respiratory physicians in Italy. This document II is focused on advanced approaches to chest ultrasonography especially in diagnosing sonographic interstitial syndrome with physical hypotheses about the genesis of vertical artifacts, differential diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, raising diagnostic suspicion of pulmonary embolism, ultrasound characterization of lung consolidations and the use of ultrasonography to guide procedural interventions in pulmonology. Finally, document II focuses on chest ultrasonography as useful diagnostic tool in neonatal and pediatric care.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine
  • Source
    • "The signs and symptoms of ADHF are frequently nonspecific and highly variable as well [15,18–20], especially among the increasingly larger group of patients with coexisting respiratory illness such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Plain chest radiographs have limited correlation with CHF exacerbation [21] [22]; and although natriuretic peptides may lend weight to a suspected diagnosis, they are insufficiently accurate to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of ADHF [1] [11] [16] [23] and have a "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Rapid diagnosis (dx) of acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) may be challenging in the emergency department (ED). Point-of-care ultrasonography (US) allows rapid determination of cardiac function, intravascular volume status, and presence of pulmonary edema. We test the diagnostic test characteristics of these 3 parameters in making the dx of ADHF among acutely dyspneic patients in the ED. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study at an urban academic ED. Inclusion criteria were as follows: dyspneic patients, at least 18 years old and able to consent, whose differential dx included ADHF. Ultrasonography performed by emergency sonologists evaluated the heart for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the inferior vena cava for collapsibility index (IVC-CI), and the pleura sampled in each of 8 thoracic regions for presence of B-lines. Cutoff values for ADHF were LVEF less than 45%, IVC-CI less than 20%, and at least 10 B-lines. The US findings were compared with the final dx determined by 2 emergency physicians blinded to the US results. Results: One hundred one participants were enrolled: 52% male, median age 62 (25%-75% interquartile, 53-91). Forty-four (44%) had a final dx of ADHF. Sensitivity and specificity (including 95% confidence interval) for the presence of ADHF were as follows: 74 (65-90) and 74 (62-85) using LVEF less than 45%, 52 (38-67) and 86 (77-95) using IVC-CI less than 20%, and 70 (52-80) and 75 (64-87) using B-lines at least 10. Using all 3 modalities together, the sensitivity and specificity were 36 (22-51) and 100 (95-100). As a comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of brain natriuretic peptide greater than 500 were 75 (55-89) and 83 (67-92). Conclusion: In this study, US was 100% specific for the dx of ADHF.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · The American journal of emergency medicine
Show more