Ab interno trabeculectomy via Trabectome (MicroSurgical Technology, Redmond, WA), gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT), or goniotomy with Kahook Dual Blade (New World Medical, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, CA) are minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) that increase the conventional outflow pathway in patients with ocular hypertension, open-angle glaucomas, and certain types of angle closure glaucoma by removing or ablating the trabecular meshwork (TM), which is considered the greatest site of resistance to aqueous outflow. Ab interno trabeculectomy with Trabectome ablates the TM and inner wall of the Schlemm’s canal (IWSC) and accesses multiple collector channels in multiple clock hours (typically nasally and/or inferiorly) using an electrode handpiece coupled with an irrigation/aspiration port, while GATT relies on a catheter or prolene suture threaded through Schlemm’s canal (SC) to incise the TM and IWSC, typically 360 degrees. KDB goniotomy is a single-use ophthalmic knife that lifts and completely excises the trabecular meshwork in multiple clock hours of treatment (typically nasally and/or inferiorly) with a similar mechanism of action as Trabectome and GATT. In all these techniques, these blebless procedures generate direct communication between the anterior chamber and multiple aqueous collector channels within Schlemm’s canal, restoring more physiologic outflow in patients where the primary site of aqueous resistance is felt to be at the level of the TM. In contrast to traditional incisional goniotomy, which uses a microvitreoretinal blade in pediatric glaucomas, histologic studies on these more recent modifications to this angle-based procedure have revealed clean edges and minimal residual leaflets of tissue (which, if left in place, can produce inflammation, fibrosis, and consequently, increased risk of scarring of the induced surgical cleft and functional failure of the procedure). Each procedural variation—which can be thought of conceptually as variations upon a theme of either ablation, incision, or excision of a section of trabecular meshwork tissue to produce an incomplete or complete window into Schlemm’s canal— can be utilized in mild, moderate, or severe open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and in some cases of angle-closure where there is no active neovascularization, and goniosynechialysis is still possible. Now 20 years since the advent of the Trabectome, high-quality Level-I prospective evidence, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by now exist regarding the safety and effectiveness of ab interno goniotomy, Trabectome, and GATT for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open-angle glaucoma. Studies have also suggested that angle procedures are effective in congenital glaucoma and secondary open-angle glaucoma. Goniotomy and trabeculotomy can be combined elegantly with phacoemulsification in patients with visually significant cataract and uncontrolled intraocular pressure or patients intolerant of glaucoma medications. Surgical techniques are similar between the procedures and easily integrate with incisions and techniques used in phacoemulsification cataract surgery, with the added requirements of patient and microscope positioning for direct visualization of angle structures, surgeon comfort with identification of key landmarks, and proficiency with surgical gonioscopy. The majority of surgical complications encountered are typically transient and self-limited, as compared to the more potentially serious complication profile of the majority of glaucoma surgical alternatives. Ab interno angle procedures are favorable because of comparable efficacy, better safety profile, and shorter operating time, are typically conducted under local (intracameral) anesthesia, offer patients faster visual recovery, and lack implant- and bleb-related complications when compared to traditional incisional glaucoma surgery. The authors hope that this chapter helps non-MIGS surgeons better appreciate and approach the procedure both conceptually and practically and can help new MIGS surgeons approach the practical aspects of approaching these techniques with greater confidence, while maintaining a broader perspective of the role of angle-based procedures in the surgical management of glaucoma.