Article

Constraints and Triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in Negotiation

John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 01/2006; 89(6):951-65. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The authors propose 2 categories of situational moderators of gender in negotiation: situational ambiguity and gender triggers. Reducing the degree of situational ambiguity constrains the influence of gender on negotiation. Gender triggers prompt divergent behavioral responses as a function of gender. Field and lab studies (1 and 2) demonstrated that decreased ambiguity in the economic structure of a negotiation (structural ambiguity) reduces gender effects on negotiation performance. Study 3 showed that representation role (negotiating for self or other) functions as a gender trigger by producing a greater effect on female than male negotiation performance. Study 4 showed that decreased structural ambiguity constrains gender effects of representation role, suggesting that situational ambiguity and gender triggers work in interaction to moderate gender effects on negotiation performance.

Full-text preview

Available from: hbs.edu
  • Source
    • "Unfortunately, many negotiations in and out of the classroom never happen because the parties fail to recognize a negotiable moment or to ask for what they want due to fear of confrontation/conflict (Bowles et al., 2005; Small, Gelfand, Babcock, & Gettman, 2007; Volkema & Fleck, 2012). As a consequence , one if not all participants can fail to achieve their preferred outcomes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Negotiation is an interpersonal process common to everyday personal and professional success. Yet individuals often fail to recognize opportunities for initiating negotiations and the immediate and long-term implications of these oversights for themselves and others. This article describes a simple yet rich negotiation exercise that learners can undertake outside the classroom in a familiar and highly accessible setting, an exercise that offers insights into and reinforcement of principles and theories from the individual (e.g., perception, personality, motivation), interpersonal/group (e.g., communication media, group dynamics, power), and organizational/ environmental (e.g., design/structure, ethics) dimensions of organizational behavior and management. The application of these and other lessons to negotiations across organizational levels are offered, along with specific observations from learners of the parallels to asking one's boss for a raise.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2016 · Journal of Management Education
  • Source
    • "To date, most of it has been conducted in the classroom or laboratory. Few field studies of negotiation have taken place (for exceptions , see Curhan, Elfenbein, & Kilduff, 2009; Bowles, Babcock , & McGinn , 2005 ; Gerhart & Rynes , 1991). Students who elect to take negotiations courses form the vast majority of samples , including our own studies . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Women’s relatively worse performance in negotiation is often cited as an explanation for gender differences in advancement and pay within organizations. We review key findings from the past twenty years of research on gender differences in negotiation. Women do underperform relative to men in negotiation, but only under limited circumstances, which means the performance gap is unlikely due to lesser skills on their part. The barriers between women and negotiation excellence are of three types: cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic. Cognitive barriers stem from negative stereotypes about women’s negotiating abilities. Motivational barriers stem from desire to prevent women negotiators from excelling in a masculine domain. Paradigmatic barriers stem from how negotiation is currently studied. We call for greater attention to motivational barriers and for changes to the negotiation paradigm. Women negotiators are not incompetent, and training them to negotiate more like men is not obviously the solution. In fact, women have greater concern for others than men do, and their cooperativeness elevates collective intelligence and enables ethical behavior. Under a new paradigm of negotiation, the value of these strengths could become more readily apparent. In particular, we advocate for greater attention to long-term relationships, subjective value, and relational capital, all of which may have important economic implications in real world negotiations.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Research in Organizational Behavior
  • Source
    • "Stereotypes, sex, and femininity As Kulik and Olekalns (2012) note in their review, when it comes to negotiated employment contracts, women come away from the table with relatively lower salaries and less advantageous terms (e.g.,Blau & Kahn, 2007). What explains these systematic outcome differences has been the subject of empirical scrutiny for the past decade or so (Bowles, Babcock, & McGinn, 2005;Haselhuhn & Kray, 2012;Kray & Gelfand, 2009;Stuhlmacher & Walters, 1999;Walters, Stuhlmacher, & Meyer, 1998). Focusing on the behavior and cognitions of the negotiators themselves,Contents lists available at ScienceDirect "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Show more