The office candy dish: Proximity's influence on estimated and actual consumption

Cornell Food and Brand Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
International Journal of Obesity (Impact Factor: 5). 06/2006; 30(5):871-5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803217
Source: PubMed


OBJECTIVE AND PURPOSE: Although there is increasing interest in how environmental factors influence food intake, there are mixed results and misunderstandings of how proximity and visibility influence consumption volume and contribute to obesity. The objective of this paper is to examine two questions: first, how does the proximity and salience of a food influence consumption volume? Second, are proximate foods consumed more frequently because they are proximate, or are they consumed more frequently because people lose track of how much they eat?
The 4-week study involved the chocolate candy consumption of 40 adult secretaries. The study utilized a 2 x 2 within-subject design where candy proximity was crossed with visibility. Proximity was manipulated by placing the chocolates on the desk of the participant or 2 m from the desk. Visibility was manipulated by placing the chocolates in covered bowls that were either clear or opaque. Chocolates were replenished each evening, and placement conditions were rotated every Monday. Daily consumption was noted and follow-up questionnaires were distributed and analyzed.
There were main effects for both proximity and visibility. People ate an average of 2.2 more candies each day when they were visible, and 1.8 candies more when they were proximately placed on their desk vs 2 m away. It is important to note, however, that there was a significant tendency for participants to consistently underestimate their daily consumption of proximately placed candies (-0.9) and overestimate their daily consumption of less proximately placed candies (+0.5).
These results show that the proximity and visibility of a food can consistently increase an adult's consumption of it. In addition, these results suggest that people may be biased to overestimate the consumption of foods that are less proximate, and to underestimate those that are more proximate. Knowing about these deviation tendencies is important for those attempting effectively monitor their consumption of fat and sugar.

Download full-text


Available from: james e Painter, Jan 19, 2015
  • Source
    • "JOURNAL OF FOODSERVICE BUSINESS RESEARCH 2016, VOL. 19, NO. 1, 122–130 factors such as proximity to snacks (Wansink, Painter, & Lee, 2006 ) and coworker presence (de Castro & Brewer, 1992). Thus, the contextual factors that define various break situations need to be better understood in order to inform caterers, health professionals, and choice architects, (Hansen & Jespersen, 2013) to ensure that we reduce caloric intake from snacking preferably in ways that are as little invasive as possible. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: More and more people eat out and, therefore, foodservice business has an increasing influence on people’s dietary intake. Foodservice business should, first and foremost, deliver a nice tasting meal of high quality—but health should not be neglected. Nudging and choice architecture is a field of foodservice business research that is gaining interest and this article offers original research in this field.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2016 · Journal of Foodservice Business Research
  • Source
    • "opaque) jar and when it is within arm's reach (vs. several feet away; Wansink, Painter, & Lee, 2006). Students are more likely to make healthier food choices when they encounter those foods in the beginning, rather than the middle, of the cafeteria line. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exercising self-control is often difficult, whether declining a drink in order to drive home safely, passing on the chocolate cake to stay on a diet, or ignoring text messages to finish reading an important paper. But enacting self-control is not always difficult, particularly when it takes the form of proactively choosing or changing situations in ways that weaken undesirable impulses or potentiate desirable ones. Examples of situational self-control include the partygoer who chooses a seat far from where drinks are being poured, the dieter who asks the waiter not to bring around the dessert cart, and the student who goes to the library without a cell phone. Using the process model of self-control, we argue that the full range of self-control strategies can be organized by considering the timeline of the developing tempting impulse. Because impulses tend to grow stronger over time, situational self-control strategies—which can nip a tempting impulse in the bud—may be especially effective in preventing undesirable action. Ironically, we may underappreciate situational self-control for the same reason it is so effective—namely, that by manipulating our circumstances to advantage, we are often able to minimize the in-the-moment experience of intrapsychic struggle typically associated with exercising self-control.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Source
    • "Phrased differently, the availability of a means signals an opportunity for action (Shah et al., 2009). For example, when candy was placed in transparent containers in an office environment, employees ate more than when the candy was placed in opaque containers (Wansink, Painter, & Lee, 2006). Placing items in prominent locations within grocery stores increases sales of those items (Chevalier, 1975;Curhan, 1972Curhan, , 1974Frank & Massey, 1970;Nakamura, Pechey, Suhrcke, & Jebb, 2014), and individuals shopping in stores with high sugar and high fat products placed in such locations are more likely to have a higher body mass index (BMI;Cohen, Collins, Hunter, Ghosh-Dastidar, & Dubowitz, 2015). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity represents a serious public health issue. One major contributor to obesity is the quality and quantity of foods one consumes. Psychological research trying to understand overeating and unhealthy eating behavior has often attributed it to homeostatic malfunction and/or lack of self-regulatory ability. We propose a different approach here, suggesting that eating behavior represents goal pursuit and that obesity is the result of reliance on foods that fulfill convenience goals and price goals at the expense of health goals. We propose and present empirical evidence suggesting that people are capable of making healthier choices when health (rather than convenience and price) concerns predominate and healthy options are available. Based on this existing evidence we suggest that (1) future research should further explore individuals’ food choice as a function of the multiple goals they attempt to achieve rather than as a lack of willpower, and (2) policy may contribute to healthy eating by reprioritizing these goals and emphasizing health while increasing the availability and affordability of healthy foods.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Social Issues and Policy Review
Show more