... In contrast to the intuitive, instinctive approach to POR revealed by participants of this research, previous studies have used well-controlled prescriptive high-volume (Fatouros et al., 2006;Wilson et al., 2013;Lowery et al., 2016) and high-intensity (Fry et al., 1994a(Fry et al., ,c,d, 1998(Fry et al., , 2000b(Fry et al., , 2006Sharp and Pearson, 2010;Nicoll et al., 2016;Sterczala et al., 2017) resistance exercise POR protocols to investigate potential diagnostic markers of FOR and NFOR/OTS. Such protocols have incorporated either single exercise (typically the barbell back squat) (Fry et al., 1994a(Fry et al., ,c,d, 1998(Fry et al., , 2000b(Fry et al., , 2006Nicoll et al., 2016;Sterczala et al., 2017) and multiple exercises (Ratamess et al., 2003;Volek et al., 2004;Fatouros et al., 2006;Kraemer et al., 2006;Sharp and Pearson, 2010;Lowery et al., 2016;Drake et al., 2017), and both traditional strength-based exercises (squat variations, pulls and presses) and sport-specific exercises (snatch, clean and jerk, throwing drills) (Fry et al., 1993(Fry et al., , 2000aHartman et al., 2007;Bazyler et al., 2017) have been selected. Overall, the number of studies reporting either no performance maladaptation (i.e., return to baseline) or performance improvement outweigh those that have observed NFOR/OTS (Bell et al., 2020;Grandou et al., 2020b). ...