Medical students' clinical skills do not match their teachers' expectations: Survey at Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia

Medical students, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Croatian Medical Journal (Impact Factor: 1.31). 03/2006; 47(1):169-75.
Source: PubMed


To evaluate self-assessed level of clinical skills of graduating medical students at Zagreb University School of Medicine and compare them with clinical skill levels expected by their teachers and those defined by a criterion standard.
The study included all medical students (n=252) graduating from the Zagreb University School of Medicine in the 2004-2005 academic year and faculty members (n=129) involved in teaching clinical skills. The participants completed anonymous questionnaire listing 99 clinical skills divided into nine groups. Students were asked to assess their clinical skills on a 0-5 scale, and faculty members were asked to assess the minimum necessary level of clinical skills expected from graduating medical students, using the same 0-5 scale. We compared the assessment scores of faculty members with students' self-assessment scores. Participants were grouped according to their descriptive characteristics for further comparison.
The response rate was 91% for students and 70% for faculty members. Students' self-assessment scores in all nine groups of clinical skills ranged from 2.2-/+0.8 to 3.8-/+0.5 and were lower than those defined by the criterion standard (3.0-4.0) and those expected by teachers (from 3.1-/+1.0 to 4.4-/+0.5) (P<0.001 for all). Students who had additional clinical skills training had higher scores in all groups of skills, ranging from 2.6-/+0.9 to 4.0-/+0.5 (P<0.001 for all). Male students had higher scores than female students in emergency (P<0.001), neurology (P=0.017), ear, nose, and throat (P=0.002), urology (P=0.003), and surgery skills (P=0.002). Teachers' expectations did not vary according to their sex, academic position, or specialty.
Students' self-assessed level of clinical skills was lower than that expected by their teachers. Education during clinical rotations is not focused on acquiring clinical skills, and additional clinical skills' training has a positive influence on students' self-assessed level of clinical skills. There was no consensus among teachers on the required level of students' clinical skills.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Based on these scientific results, initiatives to improve education in clinical skills and emergency care were set up in several countries. These initiatives involve, for example, reviewing of university curricula in medicine,21 supporting rural family physicians in acquiring and retaining urgency skills,22,23 formulating clearer final qualifications for medicine graduates,24,25 evaluating clinical skills using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations11 and incorporating clinical skills assessments in medical license exams.25 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Practical knowledge of emergency medical care among physicians seems to be insufficient worldwide. Research specifically aimed at family physicians is rather scarce. Additionally, in Belgium there are no data on this subject. Our aim was to ascertain how confident Belgian family physicians feel about their ability to give adequate emergency care and to examine their assessment of their knowledge of relevant medical conditions. We used a web-based questionnaire for which a convenience sample of 974 Dutch-speaking family practitioners was invited through email. The survey assessed how these physicians perceived their own emergency skills and their knowledge of relevant medical conditions. The survey had a recruitment rate of 22% (n = 210), with a 75% completion rate. The minimum criteria formulated pertaining to skills and knowledge were met by 64% and 55% of the participants, respectively. The mean cumulative scores on skills and knowledge were 2.5 and 3.2, respectively (on a scale from 0 to 4). Physicians with additional training in emergency care (3.07 versus 2.72), or with a spirometry certificate (2.94 versus 2.72) scored better than those without. Practitioners from rural areas felt more confident than those from urbanized regions (3.25 versus 3.15). Physicians felt more competent in aspects of emergency care where they had experience. Almost half of the Dutch-speaking family physicians in Belgium felt insufficiently competent to offer emergency medical care.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · International Journal of General Medicine
  • Source
    • "Although some of the aforementioned reasons to some extent may justify the disagreement between faculty and student attitudes, further studies are definitely needed to identify the real reasons. The results of several studies provide a general consensus about some apparent dimensions of selfevaluation condition in society (Motlagh, 2000; Evans, 2002; Sicaja, 2006).These include (1) the lack of assuring conditions for self-assessment, (2) the lack of the culture of self-evaluation in the society, (3) and necessity for change in the society's culture to make a successful self- assessment. A review on the teaching evaluation questionnaire, item by item, showed that there was a significant statistical difference between faculty self-rating scores and student rating scores for most items, and this to some extent corresponded with the results from similar studies so far conducted in Iran (Aghamolayi, 2008, Mohammad, 2007; Adhami, 2005; Najafi, 2000). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was designed to compare the faculty self-ratings with the student ratings at school of pharmacy in AJUMS in 2009. This study was designed as a descriptive cross-sectional study. All 180 students and 25 faculty members of the school of pharmacy were participated in the study. Both groups accomplished the same questionnaire including 15 evaluation items. The questionnaire was based on 5-point, Likert scale from poor to excellent (1 to5). The mean of faculty self-ratings was 4.52±0.34 and of student ratings was 4.04±0.39, (p<0.001). 92.6% of faculty members evaluated themselves as excellent (more than 4). However, 48.1% of students evaluated their faculties as excellent (more than 4). Correlation between student ratings and faculty self-ratings was 0.40(p=0.039). Faculty self-ratings and the evaluation of faculty teaching by students was significantly different. It means that either the methods of teaching were not satisfied to the students or the faculty members were selfcentered.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2011
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although, early clinical skills training is emphasized in many medical schools, students still feel unprepared and anxious about starting their clerkships. KAU medical college introduced the clinical skill module to the 4th year students of the new curriculum before they enter to the clerkships. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this module in preparing students to clerkships and to compare their perceptions to those of the 5th year. A comparative cross sectional study was conducted on 4th year after finishing the module as well the fresh 5th year students. A well constructed questionnaire, included clinical skills taught was distributed to the students.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2010
Show more