Adverse Effects Associated With High-Dose Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Use in Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.3). 04/2006; 31(5):542-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201424.27509.72
Source: PubMed


A retrospective review of patients who underwent an anterior cervical fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 with an absorbable collagen sponge (INFUSE; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, MN).
To ascertain the complication rate after the use of high-dose INFUSE in anterior cervical fusions.
The rhBMP-2 has been primarily investigated in lumbar spine fusions, where it has significantly enhanced the fusion rate and decreased the length of surgery, blood loss, and hospital stay.
We present 151 patients who underwent either an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (n = 138) or anterior cervical vertebrectomy and fusion (n = 13) augmented with high-dose INFUSE between July 2003 and March 2004. The rhBMP-2 (up to 2.1 mg/level) was used in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusions.
A total of 35 (23.2%) patients had complications after the use of high-dose INFUSE in the cervical spine. There were 15 patients diagnosed with a hematoma, including 11 on postoperative day 4 or 5, of whom 8 were surgically evacuated. Thirteen individuals had either a prolonged hospital stay (> 48 hours) or hospital readmission because of swallowing/breathing difficulties or dramatic swelling without hematoma.
A significant rate of complications resulted after the use of a high dose of INFUSE in anterior cervical fusions. We hypothesize that in the cervical area, the putative inflammatory effect that contributes to the effectiveness of INFUSE in inducing fusion may spread to adjacent critical structures and lead to increased postoperative morbidity. A thorough investigation is warranted to determine the optimal dose of rhBMP-2 that will promote cervical fusion and minimize complications.

Download full-text


Available from: Lisa B E Shields
  • Source
    • "Secondly, the safety and efficacy of key parameter allocation involving trade-off of the 4Fs are difficult to validate before a wide application in clinics, because the assessment of patient responses is a more complex task for heterogeneity of genetic background and dissimilarity of bone defect types and bone loss pat- terns [114]. Finally, the controlled biologic release system in a scaffold makes it difficult to match desirable delivery dose and time scale; existing biologic carriers use a very higher dose delivered over a relatively short timescale, which has led to many side effects such as oedema, heterotopic bone and vascular formation, and increased cancer risk [101,115]. The above issues require more investigation in preclinical and clinical trials. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Size and location of the lesion, subchondral collapse occurrence, and articular cartilage involvement are general disease progression criteria for direct osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) classifications. Treatment options for ONFH are usually based on individual factors and lesion characteristics. Although spontaneous repair of ONFH occurs in some cases, untreated ONFH is unlikely to escape the fate of subchondral collapse and usually ends up with total hip arthroplasty. Operations to preserve the femoral head, e.g., core decompression and bone grafting, are usually recommended in younger patients. They are helpful to relieve pain and improve function in the affected femoral head without subchondral collapse, however, poor prognosis after surgical procedures remains the major problem for ONFH. Pharmacological and physical therapies only work in the early stage of ONFH and have also been recommended as a supplement or prevention treatment for osteonecrosis. Following advances in basic science, many new insights focus on bone tissue engineering to optimize therapies and facilitate prognosis of ONFH. In this review, disease classifications, current treatment options, potential therapies, and the relevant translational barriers are reviewed in the context of clinical application and preclinical exploration, which would provide guidance for preferable treatment options and translation into novel therapies.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015
  • Source
    • "However, there are problems associated with its clinical application such as the large doses of BMPs required (2.1–12.0 mg), a short half-life in vivo, and high cost [19] [20] [21]. To overcome these shortcomings, investigators have been looking for alternative drugs. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) scaffolds have been widely used in orthopedic and dental fields as osteoconductive bone substitutes. However, BCP scaffolds are not satisfactory for the stimulation of osteogenic differentiation and maturation. To enhance osteogenic differentiation, we prepared alendronate- (ALN-) eluting BCP scaffolds. The coating of ALN on BCP scaffolds was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). An in vitro release study showed that release of ALN from ALN-eluting BCP scaffolds was sustained for up to 28 days. In vitro results revealed that MG-63 cells grown on ALN-eluting BCP scaffolds exhibited increased ALP activity and calcium deposition and upregulated gene expression of Runx2, ALP, OCN, and OPN compared with the BCP scaffold alone. Therefore, this study suggests that ALN-eluting BCP scaffolds have the potential to effectively stimulate osteogenic differentiation.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015
  • Source
    • "The figure is annotated by the publication dates of studies by Shields et al. [18], Pradhan [19], Lewandrowski et al. [20], Vaidya et al. [21], and Buttermann [22], which were among the first case series to report wound complication, osteolysis, and dysphagia with BMP in anterior cervical fusion. Those by Mindea et al. [6], Wong et al. [7], Joseph and Rampersaud [23], and Carragee et al. [10] were the first to raise concerns about postoperative radiculitis and retrograde ejaculation with lumbar fusions involving BMP. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) as an adjunct to spinal fusion surgery proliferated following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2002. Major safety concerns emerged in 2008. To examine whether published concerns about the safety of BMP altered clinical practice. Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 through 2012. Adults (age >20) undergoing an elective fusion operation for common degenerative diagnoses, identified using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9(th)revisions, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Proportion of cervical and lumbar fusion operations, over time, that involved BMP. We aggregated the data into a monthly time series and reported the proportion of cervical and lumbar fusion operations, over time, that involved BMP. Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average, a regression model for time series data, was used to test whether there was a statistically significant change in the overall rate of BMP use following a FDA Public Health Notification in 2008. The study was funded by federal research grants, and no investigator had any conflict of interests. Use of BMP in spinal fusion procedures increased rapidly until 2008, involving up to 45.2% of lumbar and 13.5% of cervical fusions. BMP use significantly decreased following the 2008 FDA Public Health Notification and revelations of financial payments to surgeons involved in the pivotal FDA approval trials. For lumbar fusion, the average annual increase was 7.9 percentage points per year from 2002 to 2008, followed by an average annual decrease of 11.7 percentage points thereafter (p = <0.001). Use of BMP in cervical fusion increased 2.0% per year until the FDA Notification, followed by a 2.8% per year decrease (p = 0.035). Use of BMP in spinal fusion surgery declined subsequent to published safety concerns and revelations of financial conflicts-of-interest for investigators involved in the pivotal clinical trials. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society
Show more