Opposite roles of neutrophils and macrophages in the pathogenesis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury

Division of Molecular Bioregulation, Kanazawa University Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa, Japan.
European Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 4.03). 04/2006; 36(4):1028-38. DOI: 10.1002/eji.200535261
Source: PubMed


Neutrophils and macrophages infiltrate after acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury starts to develop. However, their precise roles still remain elusive. In untreated and control IgG-treated wild-type (WT) mice, intraperitoneal APAP administration (750 mg/kg) caused liver injury including centrilobular hepatic necrosis and infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, with about 50% mortality within 48 h after the injection. APAP injection markedly augmented intrahepatic gene expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and heme oxygenase (HO)-1. Moreover, neutrophils expressed iNOS, which is presumed to be an aggravating molecule for APAP-induced liver injury, while HO-1 was mainly expressed by macrophages. All anti-granulocyte antibody-treated neutropenic WT and most CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2)-deficient mice survived the same dose of APAP, with reduced neutrophil infiltration and iNOS expression, indicating the pathogenic roles of neutrophils in APAP-induced liver injury. However, APAP caused more exaggerated liver injury in CXCR2-deficient mice with reduced macrophage infiltration and HO-1 gene expression, compared with neutropenic WT mice. An HO-1 inhibitor, tin-protoporphyrin-IX, significantly increased APAP-induced mortality, implicating HO-1 as a protective molecule for APAP-induced liver injury. Thus, CXCR2 may regulate the infiltration of both iNOS-expressing neutrophils and HO-1-expressing macrophages, and the balance between these two molecules may determine the outcome of APAP-induced liver injury.

Download full-text


Available from: Naofumi Mukaida, Dec 26, 2014
  • Source
    • "The authors contend that production of iNOS by neutrophils leads to increased injury, but that macrophage derived heme-oxygenase (HO)-1 is protective. CXCR2 KO mice exhibit increased injury compared with the neutrophil depleted mice due to the additional loss of macrophage derived HO-1 (Ishida et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chemokines are small molecular weight proteins primarily known to drive migration of immune cell populations. In both acute and chronic liver injury, hepatic chemokine expression is induced resulting in inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenesis, and cell activation and survival. During acute injury, massive parenchymal cell death due to apoptosis and/or necrosis leads to chemokine production by hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, and sinusoidal endothelial cells. The specific chemokine profile expressed during injury is dependent on both the type and course of injury. Hepatotoxicity by acetaminophen for example leads to cellular necrosis and activation of Toll-like receptors while the inciting insult in ischemia reperfusion injury produces reactive oxygen species and subsequent production of pro-inflammatory chemokines. Chemokine expression by these cells generates a chemoattractant gradient promoting infiltration by monocytes/macrophages, NK cells, NKT cells, neutrophils, B cells, and T cells whose activity are highly regulated by the specific chemokine profiles within the liver. Additionally, resident hepatic cells express chemokine receptors both in the normal and injured liver. While the role of these receptors in normal liver has not been well described, during injury, receptor up-regulation, and chemokine engagement leads to cellular survival, proliferation, apoptosis, fibrogenesis, and expression of additional chemokines and growth factors. Hepatic-derived chemokines can therefore function in both paracrine and autocrine fashions further expanding their role in liver disease. More recently it has been appreciated that chemokines can have diverging effects depending on their temporal expression pattern and the type of injury. A better understanding of chemokine/chemokine receptor axes will therefore pave the way for development of novel targeted therapies for the treatment of liver disease.
    Preview · Article · Jun 2012 · Frontiers in Physiology
    • "Halothane hepatitis (You et al., 2006), alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT) toxicity (Kodali et al., 2006;Roth and Dahm, 1997), and carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury (Ohta et al., 2006) are examples for drug toxicity with evidence for neutrophil involvement. The conclusion that neutrophils contribute to APAP hepatotoxicity (Liu et al., 2006;Ishida et al., 2006) has been questioned because of offtarget effects of the neutropenia-inducing antibody used in these studies (Jaeschke and Liu, 2007) and extensive experimental evidence that hepatic or peripheral neutrophils are not activated for ROS formation after APAP (Williams et al., 2010a). This is consistent with the absence of hypochlorite-modified proteins in the liver, indicating that the accumulating neutrophils during APAP overdose do not produce ROS (Cover et al., 2006), and the fact that NADPH oxidase-deficient mice are not protected against APAP hepatotoxicity (James et al., 2003a). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatotoxicity is a serious problem during drug development and for the use of many established drugs. For example, acetaminophen overdose is currently the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in the United States and Great Britain. Evaluation of the mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury indicates that mitochondria are critical targets for drug toxicity, either directly or indirectly through the formation of reactive metabolites. The consequence of these modifications is generally a mitochondrial oxidant stress and peroxynitrite formation, which leads to structural alterations of proteins and mitochondrial DNA and, eventually, to the opening of mitochondrial membrane permeability transition (MPT) pores. MPT pore formation results in a collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential and cessation of adenosine triphosphate synthesis. In addition, the release of intermembrane proteins, such as apoptosis-inducing factor and endonuclease G, and their translocation to the nucleus, leads to nuclear DNA fragmentation. Together, these events trigger necrotic cell death. Alternatively, the release of cytochrome c and other proapoptotic factors from mitochondria can promote caspase activation and apoptotic cell death. Drug toxicity can also induce an inflammatory response with the formation of reactive oxygen species by Kupffer cells and neutrophils. If not properly detoxified, these extracellularly generated oxidants can diffuse into hepatocytes and trigger mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidant stress, which then induces MPT and necrotic cell death. This review addresses the formation of oxidants and the defense mechanisms available for cells and applies this knowledge to better understand mechanisms of drug hepatotoxicity, especially acetaminophen-induced liver injury.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2012 · Drug Metabolism Reviews
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acetaminophen (AAP) overdose and the resulting hepatotoxicity is an important clinical problem. In addition, AAP is widely used as a prototype hepatotoxin to study mechanisms of chemical-induced cell injury and to test the hepatoprotective potential of new drugs and herbal medicines. Because of its importance, the mechanisms of AAP-induced liver cell injury have been extensively investigated and controversially discussed for > 30 years. This review highlights recent new insight into intracellular events critical for liver cell death. In addition, the relevance of the inflammatory response is addressed, including cytotoxic and inflammatory mediators generated by activated inflammatory cells, that is, resident macrophages and lymphocytes as well as newly recruited blood-derived leukocytes. Inflammation is a critical component of the overall pathophysiology, not only as a potential factor that may aggravate cell damage, but more importantly as a vital response to limit cell injury, remove cell debris and promote regeneration.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2005 · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Show more