ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The Sleep Hygiene Index was developed to assess the practice of sleep hygiene behaviors. The Sleep Hygiene Index was delivered to 632 subjects and a subset of the subjects participated in a readministration of the instrument. Test-retest reliability analyses suggested that sleep hygiene behaviors are relatively stable over time for a nonclinical population. Results confirmed that sleep hygiene is strongly related to sleep quality and modestly related to perceptions of daytime sleepiness. As predicted, support of the sleep hygiene construct was also provided by strong correlations with the associated features of a diagnosis of inadequate sleep hygiene. The Sleep Hygiene Index, a much shorter sleep hygiene instrument than previously published, demonstrated comparable psychometric properties with additional evidence of validity and a clear item selection rationale.
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 3, June 2006 (
C
2006)
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-006-9047-6
Assessment of Sleep Hygiene Using the Sleep Hygiene Index
David F. Mastin,
1,5
Jeff Bryson,
2,3,4
and Robert Corwyn
1
Accepted for publication: January 23, 2006
Published online: March 24, 2006
The Sleep Hygiene Index was developed to assess the practice of sleep hygiene behaviors.
The Sleep Hygiene Index was delivered to 632 subjects and a subset of the subjects partici-
pated in a readministration of the instrument. Test–retest reliability analyses suggested that
sleep hygiene behaviors are relatively stable over time for a nonclinical population. Results
confirmed that sleep hygiene is strongly related to sleep quality and modestly related to per-
ceptions of daytime sleepiness. As predicted, support of the sleep hygiene construct was also
provided by strong correlations with the associated features of a diagnosis of inadequate sleep
hygiene. The Sleep Hygiene Index, a much shorter sleep hygiene instrument than previously
published, demonstrated comparable psychometric properties with additional evidence of va-
lidity and a clear item selection rationale.
KEY WORDS: sleep; hygiene; quality; sleepiness; causal indicators.
In recent years there has been increased atten-
tion and interest in poor sleep habits. A steady de-
cline in the time adults in the United States spend
asleep (National Sleep Foundation, 2002) and an es-
timated yearly cost to society of sleep problems rang-
ing in the tens of billions of US dollars (i.e. Leger,
1994) has created an interest in sleep quality and
sleep habits (also known as sleep hygiene). Sleep hy-
giene may be described as practicing behaviors that
facilitate sleep and avoiding behaviors that interfere
with sleep (Riedel, 2000). Inadequate sleep hygiene
is defined in the International Classification of Sleep
Disorders (American Sleep Disorders Association,
1990) as a “sleep disorder due to the performance
of daily living activities that are inconsistent with the
maintenance of good quality sleep and full daytime
alertness” (p. 73).
1
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas.
2
Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, Alabama.
3
Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, California.
4
Behavioral Health Associates of North Alabama, P.C., Gadsden,
Alabama.
5
To whom correspondence should be addressed at Depart-
ment of Psychology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock,
2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas; e-mail:
dfmastin@ualr.edu.
The current authors are aware of two existing in-
struments intended to assess adult sleep hygiene: the
Sleep Hygiene Awareness and Practice Scale (Lacks
and Rotert, 1986) and the Sleep Hygiene Self-Test
(Blake and Gomez, 1998). These instruments have
been found to have only fair internal consistency as
measured by Cronbach’s α (Sleep Hygiene Aware-
ness and Practice Scale = 0.47; Sleep Hygiene Self-
Test = 0.54). The Sleep Hygiene Self-Test has not
been shown to correlate with any external measure
of sleep quality and a reported correlation (Brown
et al., 2002) between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality In-
dex and the Sleep Hygiene Awareness and Practice
Scale is questionable due to overlapping instrument
items. Further, authors of these instruments failed to
provide a clear rationale for item selection or present
data relating these instruments to subjective experi-
ences of sleepiness.
The objectives of the current paper are to (a) de-
scribe the psychometric assumptions relevant to the
measurement of sleep hygiene; (b) introduce and re-
port on the psychometric properties and construction
of a new instrument, the Sleep Hygiene Index (see
Appendix), an instrument with 13 items derived from
the diagnostic criteria for a diagnosis of inadequate
sleep hygiene as defined in the International Classifi-
cation of Sleep Disorders (American Sleep Disorders
223
0160-7715/06/0600-0223/0
C
2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
224 Mastin, Bryson, and Corwyn
Association, 1990); (c) report on the relationship be-
tween sleep hygiene, subjective sleepiness, and sleep
quality in a nonclinical population; and (d) discuss
the utility of the construct of sleep hygiene and im-
plications for clinical practice and research.
Sleep hygiene is assessed by measuring be-
haviors and environmental variables thought to
cause or lead to relatively poor sleep quality rather
than measuring outcomes. For example, a typical
sleep hygiene item would query the subject as to
caffeine intake before bedtime. This use of items
thought to have a causal impact on the variable being
measured (causal items) necessitates a different set
of assumptions and design processes than is typical
in classical test theory (Bollen and Lennox, 1991;
Diamantopoulos and Winklhofer, 2001; MacCallum
and Browne, 1993; Streiner, 2003). For example,
one does not necessarily expect causal indicators
to be highly related with one another. Therefore,
Cronbach α should not be the only measure to report
in assessing the reliability of instruments that consist
of causal items. Following the guidelines of classical
test theory, authors of previous sleep hygiene instru-
ments may have discarded indicators with evidence
that items reduced overall or subscale coefficient α,
exhibited poor item-total correlations, or failed to fit
a factor analysis. Alternately, items with question-
able selection rationale may have been retained due
to their contributions to a favorable coefficient α.
Instead, especially in the case of the use of causal
items, authors are urged to look toward additional
indices of reliability relevant to the instrument being
designed (Bollen and Lennox, 1991). Test–retest
reliability is reported for the Sleep Hygiene Index
as an indicator of reliability over time as well as
Cronbach’s α as a measure of internal reliability.
It should also be understood that an instru-
ment that consists primarily of causal items is defin-
ing the variable of interest by these items (Bollen
and Lennox, 1991; Diamantopoulos and Winklhofer,
2001). It is understandable then that possessing a
clear rationale for item selection is critical. Although
the diagnosis of inadequate sleep hygiene has been
met with some criticism (Reynolds et al., 1991), the
current authors believe the International Classifica-
tion of Sleep Disorders diagnostic criteria for this dis-
order provides a suitable reference for agreement as
to what poor sleep hygiene is and therefore how sleep
hygiene as a construct may be defined.
The model proposed in Fig. 1 presents the causal
items derived from the diagnostic criteria for inade-
quate sleep hygiene as x
1
through x
13
. The variable
of interest, sleep hygiene, is identified by η
1
. It should
be noted that the arrows point from the causal indica-
tors to the latent construct. Effect indicators derived
from the associated features of inadequate sleep hy-
giene (American Sleep Disorders Association, 1990)
are identified by y
1
through y
5
. Here, arrows repre-
senting the relation between latent construct and in-
dicators for these effect indicators point from the la-
tent construct to the indicators. Bollen and Lennox
(1991) have suggested that some measurement of ef-
fect is necessary for adequate latent variable iden-
tification. Two linked constructs, sleep quality and
subjective sleepiness, are identified by η
2
and η
3
,re-
spectively, measured here with the Pittsburgh Sleep
Quality Index (Buysse et al., 1989) and the Epworth
Sleepiness Scale (Johns, 1991).
METHOD
Participants
Subjects were recruited from a midsized uni-
versity in the Midwest United States. Data were
collected from 632 volunteering psychology univer-
sity students over two academic semesters: alpha and
beta (alpha set: 103 males and 205 females, mean age
21.6; beta set: 125 males and 199 females, mean age
22.7). Less than 5% of the data was spoiled due to
skipped items or illegible handwriting. Students were
offered extra points upon completing the research
during class. No student rejected the opportunity. A
subset of group beta 141 (55 males and 86 females,
mean age 23.9) retook the Sleep Hygiene Index after
a 4–5-week interval to measure test–retest reliability.
Subset beta was comprised of attending students who
had participated in the first research opportunity
earlier in the semester. The research was reviewed
and approved by a university institutional review
board and participants gave informed consent to
participate.
Procedure
All subjects completed the assessment in a
classroom setting in one sitting of less than 1 h.
All participants completed the Sleep Hygiene In-
dex and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Group
alpha also completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality
Index. Participants were debriefed in an effort
to answer any questions regarding the study and
Sleep Hygiene Assessment 225
x1-x13:
Sleep Hygiene
Causal Indicators
1:
Sleep hygiene
y1-y5: Inadequate Sleep
Hygiene Associated Features
r
2
(599) = .06
r
2
(269) = .23
3:
Subjective Sleepiness
2:
Sleep Quality
I have more trouble paying attention
and thinking than I used to.
I feel sleepy during the day.
I worry about my sleep.
I feel I am more moody now than
I used to be.
I feel it takes more effort to get
things done than it used to.
r
2
(600) = .21
r
2
(598) = .14
r
2
(597) = .20
r
2
(600) = .19
r
2
(600) = .19
η
η
η
Fig. 1. Diagnostic criteria for inadequate sleep hygiene are x
1
through x
11
. Variable of interest, sleep hygiene,
is identified by η
1
. Associated features of inadequate sleep hygiene are identified by y
1
through y
5
. Two linked
constructs, sleep quality and subjective sleepiness, are identified by η
2
and η
3
, respectively. All correlations in this
figure were significant at the 0.05 level or less.
were provided an educative handout of sleep hy-
giene guidelines. Participants were offered access
to the results of the research upon completion of
the study.
Instruments
Sleep Hygiene Index
The Sleep Hygiene Index, first presented here,
is a 13-item self-administered index intended to as-
sess the presence of behaviors thought to comprise
sleep hygiene. Participants were asked to indicate
how frequently they engage in specific behaviors (al-
ways, frequently, sometimes, rarely, never). Items
constructing the Sleep Hygiene Index were derived
from the diagnostic criteria for inadequate sleep
hygiene in the International Classification of Sleep
Disorders (American Sleep Disorders Association,
1990). Item scores were summed providing a global
assessment of sleep hygiene. Higher scores are in-
dicative of more maladaptive sleep hygiene status.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-report
8-item questionnaire producing scores from 0 to
24. Scores greater than 10 suggest significant day-
time sleepiness (Johns, 1991). The Epworth Sleepi-
ness Scale has good psychometric properties (Johns,
1991), correlates with objective measures of sleepi-
ness (Chervin et al., 1997), and has been shown to
differentiate between individuals with and without
sleep disorders (Chervin et al., 1997) and those who
are and are not sleep deprived (Johnson, 1997).
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-
rated 19-item instrument intended to assess sleep
quality and sleep disturbance over a 1-month period
in clinical and nonclinical populations (Buysse et al.,
1989). Scores range from 0 to 21 with the higher
scores indicating poorer sleep quality. The Pittsburgh
Sleep Quality Index has been demonstrated to have
226 Mastin, Bryson, and Corwyn
good internal reliability, stability over time, evidence
of validity (Buysse et al., 1989), and is well regarded
in the sleep research community.
RESULTS
Descriptives
There were 603 complete data sets for the Sleep
Hygiene Index resulting in M = 34.66 (SD = 6.6)
and a range of 17–55.
Reliability
Although Cronbach’s α for the Sleep Hygiene
Index (α = 0.66) was found to be superior to previ-
ously published sleep hygiene instruments, we only
report it to give a general idea of internal con-
sistency. More importantly, the Sleep Hygiene In-
dex was found to have good test–retest reliability
(r(139) = 0.71, p < 0.01).
Validity
The Sleep Hygiene Index was positively cor-
related (p < 0.01) with all associated features of
inadequate sleep hygiene (American Sleep Dis-
orders Association, 1990)(y
1
through y
5
; Pearson
r values ranged from 0.371 to 0.458). The Sleep
Hygiene Index correlated positively with the Ep-
worth Sleepiness Scale (r(599) = 0.244, p < 0.01)
and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score
(r(269) = 0.481, p < 0.01). The Sleep Hygiene Index
also positively correlated (p < 0.05 or less) with
all the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index component
scores (this is noteworthy in that some subcompo-
nents are more clearly independent from the sleep
hygiene construct in item design than others).
DISCUSSION
Our results support the sleep hygiene model
proposed in Fig. 1. Reliability analyses suggested that
sleep hygiene behaviors as measured by the Sleep
Hygiene Index are relatively stable over time for a
nonclinical population. Results confirmed the finding
by Brown et al. (2002) that sleep hygiene is strongly
related to sleep quality. For the first time, we are able
to report that sleep hygiene is modestly related to
perceptions of daytime sleepiness as would be ex-
pected in that poor sleep hygiene is thought to be
related to poor sleep quality. As predicted, support
of the sleep hygiene construct, as measured by the
Sleep Hygiene Index, was also provided by strong
correlations with the associated features of a diagno-
sis of inadequate sleep hygiene. The Sleep Hygiene
Index, a much shorter sleep hygiene instrument than
previously published, demonstrated comparable psy-
chometric properties with additional evidence of va-
lidity and a clear item selection rationale. This study
was limited in that a nonprobability sample was used.
The extent to which the Sleep Hygiene Index results
could be generalized across age groups for example,
is unknown.
Possessing a valid and reliable instrument may
be necessary, but may not be sufficient in under-
standing and modifying sleep hygiene behaviors. An
incongruity between sleep hygiene knowledge and
practices in clinical (Lacks and Rotert, 1986) and
non-clinical populations (Brown et al., 2002) suggests
that an understanding of sleep hygiene in context
may be important. We suggest that clinically it is im-
portant to understand that sleep hygiene does not ex-
ist in isolation and may be better understood when
considering the psychosocial context of the patient
(e.g., precipitation and/or maintenance of maladap-
tive sleep hygiene behaviors may not be addressed
by education alone). Further, it is likely to be unnec-
essary to create a core, or alternately, a comprehen-
sive list of sleep hygiene behaviors in the pursuit of
a quantitative assessment of sleep hygiene. With re-
gard to research it is important to (a) understand the
psychometric implications of the use of causal vari-
ables in the assessment of sleep hygiene (Bollen and
Lennox, 1991), (b) create more complete models of
sleep hygiene in an effort to understand and explain
the precipitation and maintenance of sleep hygiene
related behaviors, and (c) examine sleep hygiene be-
haviors independently in an effort to understand the
relative contribution of each to constructs of interest
(as suggested by Stepanski and Wyatt, 2003).
APPENDIX
Sleep Hygiene Index Items
1. I take daytime naps lasting two or more
hours.
2. I go to bed at different times from day to day.
Sleep Hygiene Assessment 227
3. I get out of bed at different times from day to
day.
4. I exercise to the point of sweating within 1 h
of going to bed.
5. I stay in bed longer than I should two or three
times a week.
6. I use alcohol, tobacco, or caffeine within 4 h
of going to bed or after going to bed.
7. I do something that may wake me up before
bedtime (for example: play video games, use
the internet, or clean).
8. I go to bed feeling stressed, angry, upset, or
nervous.
9. I use my bed for things other than sleeping or
sex (for example: watch television, read, eat,
or study).
10. I sleep on an uncomfortable bed (for exam-
ple: poor mattress or pillow, too much or not
enough blankets).
11. I sleep in an uncomfortable bedroom (for ex-
ample: too bright, too stuffy, too hot, too cold,
or too noisy).
12. I do important work before bedtime (for ex-
ample: pay bills, schedule, or study).
13. I think, plan, or worry when I am in bed.
REFERENCES
American Sleep Disorders Association (1990). International Clas-
sification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Man-
ual, American Sleep Disorders Association, Rochester, MN,
pp. 73–77.
Blake, D. D., and Gomez, M. H. (1998). A scale for assessing sleep
hygiene: Preliminary data. Psychol. Rep. 83: 1175–1178.
Bollen, K. B., and Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on
measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychol.
Bull. 110: 305–314.
Brown, F. C., Buboltz, W. C., and Soper, B. (2002). Relationship
of sleep hygiene awareness, sleep hygiene practices, and sleep
quality in university students. Behav. Med. 28: 33–39.
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., and Timothy, H.
(1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A New Instru-
ment for Psychiatric Practice and Research. Psychiatry Res.
28: 193–213.
Chervin, R. D., Aldrich, M. S., and Pickett, R. (1997). Comparison
of the results of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the multi-
ple sleep latency test. J. Psychosom. Res. 42: 145–155.
Diamantopoulos, A., and Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index con-
struction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale de-
velopment. J. Mark. Res. 38: 269–277.
Johns, M. W. (1991). A new method for measuring daytime
sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 14: 540–
545.
Johnson, S. (1997). How sleepy are practicing physicians? A field
trial of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep Res. 26: 671.
Lacks, P., and Rotert, M. (1986). Knowledge and practice of sleep
hygiene techniques in insomniacs and good sleepers. Behav.
Res. Ther. 24: 365–368.
Leger, D. (1994). The cost of sleep-related accidents: A report for
the National Commission on Sleep Disorders Research. Sleep
17: 84–93.
MacCallum, R. C., and Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal
indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical is-
sues. Psychol. Bull. 114: 533–541.
National Sleep Foundation (2002). Sleep in America Poll, National
Sleep Foundation, Washington, DC.
Reynolds, C. F., Kupfer, D. J., and Buysse, D. J. (1991). Subtyp-
ing DSM-III-R primary insomnia: A literature review by the
DSM-IV work group on sleep disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry
148: 432–438.
Riedel, B. W. (2000). Sleep hygiene. In Lichstein, K. L., and Morin,
C. M. (Eds.), Treatment of Late-life Insomnia, Sage, Thousand
Oaks, CA, pp. 125–146.
Stepanski, E. J., and Wyatt, J. K. (2003). Use of sleep hy-
giene in the treatment of insomnia. Sleep Med. Rev. 7: 215–
225.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When
coefficient α does and doesn’t matter. J. Pers. Assess. 80: 217–
222.
... The SHI is a self-report scale developed by Mastin et al., comprising 13 questions, to evaluate the frequency of engagement (ranging from always to never) in various sleep hygiene practices such as daytime napping, tobacco consumption, and screen usage before bedtime [34]. Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 [never] to 4 [always]). ...
... Higher scores indicate more maladaptive sleep hygiene practices. Test-retest reliability of the original questionnaire was evaluated with a sample of approximately 600 subjects and revealed consistent and stable reliability over the testing period (Pearson r = 0.71) [34]. Evidence for the construct validity was also found as the SHI score was strongly correlated with all features of inadequate sleep hygiene and significant daytime sleepiness demonstrated by the Epworth Sleepiness scale [34]. ...
... Test-retest reliability of the original questionnaire was evaluated with a sample of approximately 600 subjects and revealed consistent and stable reliability over the testing period (Pearson r = 0.71) [34]. Evidence for the construct validity was also found as the SHI score was strongly correlated with all features of inadequate sleep hygiene and significant daytime sleepiness demonstrated by the Epworth Sleepiness scale [34]. In our study, an Arabic-validated version of the SHI was used [35] and showed an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.65. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Determining sleep quality and duration and the factors influencing the quality of sleep among the military is crucial for designing effective interventions. Given the strict and demanding nature of the military setting, it becomes essential to explore factors impacting sleep quality in such a context. Additionally, research in the Middle East and among females on this subject is scarce. This study aims to investigate sleep quality and different sleep-related variables such as sleep duration and sleep hygiene practices in addition to the correlates of sleep quality among recruits. Methods This is a cross-sectional study that included 178 (Mean age = 19 years) military recruits during their basic training at two medical military colleges in Jordan. Sleep quality and sleep hygiene practices were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) respectively. Physical activity and dietary behaviors were measured using the Arab Teens Lifestyle Study (ATLS). Results The majority of recruits demonstrated poor sleep quality (80%) and suboptimal sleep hygiene practices (mean SHI = 21) with significantly poorer sleep hygiene practices among male recruits. The average duration of actual sleeping hours per day was around 6 h (± 2.3 h). Multiple regression analysis showed that age and SHI score were positively associated with the global sleep quality score (PSQI), while sleep knowledge score was negatively associated with sleep quality among the whole sample (adjusted R² = 0.11). However, the association between sleep hygiene practices and sleep quality was not modified by gender. Conclusions Jordanian military recruits on average had short sleep duration and poor sleep quality. Results showed that better sleep hygiene practices (especially among women) and more sleep knowledge (particularly among men) were associated with better sleep quality. Interventions that use cognitive and behavioral change methods to promote sleep hygiene and improve sleep knowledge are recommended to improve sleep quality among military recruits.
... A 5-point Likert scale was used for the rating of each item, which ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with an increasing score indicating poor sleep hygiene [32]. A cut-off score of 16 was found to be appropriate for categorizing students with poor sleep quality, considering a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 47.5% [33]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Caffeine is one of the world’s most frequently consumed central nervous system stimulants. Moderate caffeine intake has beneficial health effects, while increased caffeine intake may have harmful effects in the human body. Existing literature indicated that undergraduates consume caffeine excessively. Till this date, little is known about the consumption pattern of caffeine among Palestinian undergraduates. Therefore, the current study aimed to estimate the percentage of caffeine consumption among Palestinian undergraduates, to assess their caffeine daily intake, and to identify factors associated with unsafe caffeine consumption. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in Palestine between March and May 2022. Undergraduates were recruited by random sampling after a personal invitation. Undergraduates aged between 18 and 25 were included in the study, while those who were taking medications, had medical conditions affecting the data collection process, and had incomplete responses were excluded from the study. Caffeine consumption was assessed using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed by the research team. The content validity of the FFQ was done by three reviewers. Also, a questionnaire was used to collect data related to sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, lifestyle habits, sleeping quality, physical activity, and psychological status. Data were analyzed through the descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test). Results The final analysis included 486 undergraduates with a mean age of 20.1 ± 1.48 years. The majority of the undergraduates were female (65.0%) and single (89.5%). The sample was distributed almost equally between the first (26.3%), second (23.0%), third (22.8%), and fourth (18.7%) academic years, and only 44 undergraduates (9.1%) were in their fifth year. The vast majority of university students (96.5%) consumed caffeinated products, with coffee ranking first place. Nearly half of the participants (32.7%) exceeded the safe levels of caffeine consumption. Males, smokers, poor physical activity, higher Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) scores, and greater anxiety, stress, and depression scores had significantly higher rates of unsafe caffeine intake than their peers (p < 0.05). The total caffeine consumption was significantly associated with gender, low household income, smoking status, physical activity level, SHI score, as well as anxiety (p < 0.05). Conclusion Caffeine consumption in the studied sample was significantly high and exceeded the safe levels. The current study revealed that unsafe caffeine consumption was more common among males, smokers, and physically active individuals. Caffeine intake was also linked to poor-quality sleep and higher psychological concerns. Therefore, educational programs are recommended to increase awareness of the adverse effects of high caffeine intake.
... The diagnostic criteria for poor sleep hygiene were obtained from the International Classification of Sleep Disorders to create the SHI [17]. The overall evaluation of sleep hygiene was performed by summing the item ratings [18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: An overwhelming number of working women report sleep difficulties, which in turn lead to various health issues. However, there is a dearth of studies focusing on increasing health problems. Consequently, the objective of the current investigation was to ascertain the potential determinants that contribute to this escalating health concern. Methodology: A sample of 343 working women aged 25 to 50 years were recruited from the community. They completed an online/offline assessment performed for demographic details along with self-reported questionnaires (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), PROMIS 8b, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Dysfunctional Attitudes and Beliefs about sleep (DBAS), Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Short-Form (SF) – 12. Sleep quality, sleep health, daytime sleepiness, attitudes and beliefs about sleep, sleep hygiene, physical activity level and quality of life were examined respectively, as predictors of poor quality of sleep. Results: The results revealed that 83.1% of the working women were poor sleepers. Linear regression analysis identified that sleep health, daytime sleepiness, attitudes and beliefs about sleep, and physical component scores of Quality of Life (QoL) were significant predictors of poor sleep quality. Conclusion: Poor sleep quality is correlated with factors such as daytime sleepiness, sleep health, attitudes and beliefs about sleep, and the physical component scores of quality of life in working women.
... Each question is scored as 0 (never), 1 (rarely), 2 (sometimes), 3 (frequently), and 4 (always). The sum of scores ranges from 0 to 52, whereby higher scores denote a greater manifestation of behaviors that undermine sleep hygiene in the subjects [36]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate the relationship between sleep hygiene and sleep quality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to compare the sleep hygiene and sleep quality outcomes across three distinct groups: SSc patients, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and healthy controls (HC). This study employed an observational, cross-sectional, and parallel group design. SSc-related and RA-related variables, depression and anxiety were assessed. Physical function and quality of life, pain and fatigue of SSc patients were also evaluated. Sleep quality using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and sleep hygiene using the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) were evaluated for all participants. Linear regression analysis was performed to show the relationship between the SHI scores and the other variables. Total PSQI and SHI scores were found to be significantly higher in SSc patients than in RA patients and HC. Fatigue, smoking, all SF-36 domains, depression and anxiety scores were associated with SHI scores in SSc patients. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, SSc patients exhibited 4.50 times higher odds (95% CI 2.165–9.353, p < 0.001) of experiencing poor sleep than RA patients and HC. In SSc patients, for every incremental increase in SHI score, the odds of poor sleep quality were 1.15 times higher (95% CI 1.093–1.220, p < 0.001). Sleep hygiene and sleep quality exhibit a more pronounced deterioration in SSc patients. Inadequate sleep hygiene is associated with compromised sleep quality in SSc. Therefore, improving sleep hygiene practices may be a key strategy to enhance the overall sleep quality in this population.
... Finally, organizations and supervisors should foster workplace health programs that encourage adequate sleep habits for their employees. As Sonnentag and colleagues (2008) noted, sleep hygiene measures (e.g., regular bedtime and avoiding alcohol and caffeine before bedtime) could help enhance sleep quality (Mastin et al., 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Among the most important outcomes related to workaholism for its implications for both organizations and employees is job performance. However, previous studies that have analyzed this relationship report inconsistent results. Drawing on achievement motivation theory and the work, non-work, and sleep model, the present study aims to understand why workaholism is related to job performance through two opposing paths: a motivational path, in which workaholism is indirectly and positively related to job performance via work engagement, and a recovery path, where workaholism is indirectly and negatively related to job performance through poor sleep quality. The hypothesized relationships were investigated by testing a structural equation model with Mplus 8 on 389 Italian workers (60.9% women; Mage = 38.40 years; SD = 11.54 years). The results showed a significant indirect effect of workaholism on job performance through both work engagement and poor sleep quality, thus supporting the two hypothesized mediating mechanisms. Although the study’s cross-sectional design and self-reported measures represent limitations, our results help uncover two opposing mechanisms linking workaholism to job performance. Theoretically, we further advanced our knowledge about the complex relationship between these two variables by providing empirical evidence on the indirect positive (via work engagement) and negative (via poor sleep quality) relationships that workaholism has on job performance. From a practical perspective, interventions should be implemented to assess workaholism risk, promote work engagement, and prevent poor sleep quality using recovery strategies for employees.
Article
Um sono comprometido está relacionado à sonolência excessiva diurna (SED). A higiene do sono está atrelada a uma boa qualidade de sono, podendo reduzir a ocorrência de SED. Tem-se por objetivo avaliar fatores associados à higiene do sono e à SED em estudantes de medicina e identificar se há correlação entre elas. É um estudo transversal analítico com abordagem quantitativa, Utilizou-se a Escala de Avaliação da Higiene do Sono (IHG) e a Escala de Sonolência de Epworth (ESE). A amostra foi de 318 estudantes de medicina de todos os períodos, foi realizada uma pesquisa via Google Forms entre os meses de outubro a dezembro de 2023 para estudantes de todo Brasil. Um total de 58,5% possuía de 18 a 22 anos, 67,6% eram do sexo feminino e 59,4% dedicam-se de 5 a 10 horas por dia ao curso de medicina, 69,5% dormem menos de Quanto à higiene do sono, observou-se relação positiva com dormir menos de 7 horas por noite (p=0,0010) e frequentar bares/festas (p=0,0044). Maior escore de IHG foi evidenciado em estudantes insatisfeitos com o rendimento acadêmico (p=0,0120), que consideram abandonar/trancar o curso (p=0,0010), têm insônia (p=0,0010), consomem álcool (p=0,0020) e utilizam substâncias para ficarem acordados (p=0,0080) ou dormirem (p=0,0160). Quanto à SED, houve relação direta com estudantes do internato (p=0,0056), do sexo feminino (p=0,0430) e que dormem menos de 7 horas por noite (p=0,0170). Maior escore de ESE foi observado em estudantes insatisfeitos com o rendimento acadêmico (p=0,0170), que consideram abandonar/trancar o curso (p=0,0310) e usam substâncias para ficarem acordados (p=0,0020). Houve ainda correlação entre uma má IHG e a ocorrência de SED. Constatou-se baixos níveis de higiene do sono e altos níveis de SED nos estudantes de medicina. Diversos fatores estão associados os dois fenômenos investigado.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Knowledge about transdiagnostic factors associated with global symptom severity among patients diagnosed with various mental disorders remains limited. This study examined the cross-sectional associations between transdiagnostic processes including global emotion regulation and specific emotion regulation strategies (i.e., amount of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, repetitive negative thinking and sleep routines) with global symptom severity, while controlling for sociodemographic data (age, gender, employment status, relationship status, and educational level) and fear of the coronavirus. Methods: Data from 401 outpatients, aged 42.08 years on average (SD = 13.26; 71.3% female), diagnosed with depressive disorders, non-organic primary insomnia, agoraphobia, panic disorder and/or post-traumatic stress disorder were examined. This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Data were collected from 10 different study sites between March 2021 and May 2022 for cross-sectional analysis. The influence of predictors of global symptom severity was determined using three-step hierarchical multiple regression: (1) control variables, (2) global emotion regulation and (3) specific emotion regulation strategies. Global symptom severity was measured using the Global Severity Index, derived from the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. Predictors were measured using validated scales, and physical activity was additionally assessed via accelerometer-based sensors. Results: In the first step, control variables accounted for 4% of variance in global symptom severity. The inclusion of global emotion regulation in the second step explained 26% of the outcome variance, and the incorporation of specific emotion regulation strategies in the third step increased the explained variance to 37%. Significant predictors included global emotion regulation (β = 0.28), repetitive negative thinking (β = 0.26) and sleep routines (β = 0.25). Conclusion: Global emotion regulation along with repetitive negative thinking and sleep routines as specific emotion regulation strategies are identified as transdiagnostic psychological processes that may serve as treatment targets for evidence-based interventions designed to enhance emotion regulation, particularly in transdiagnostic samples of stress-related disorders. Additional prospective longitudinal studies with transdiagnostic samples are necessary to explore possible causal relationships.
Article
Australia's mine sites are largely situated in remote locations and operate around the clock. Many shift workers fly to site, where they work 12‐hr shifts and sleep in camp accommodation before they return home for the period rostered off work. Mining shift workers experience poor sleep, yet limited research is available on contributing factors. This study investigated, for the first time, the relationship between the sleep health and sleep hygiene in this population. A survey was disseminated to shift workers in the mining industry, utilising a cross‐sectional study design. The Sleep Health Index and Sleep Hygiene Index questionnaires were used to evaluate their sleep health and sleep hygiene, respectively. In total, 470 shift workers (mean age [years]: 39 ± 12, mean body mass index [kg m ⁻² ]: 28 ± 5) were included, which involved 132 females. Average scores for the Sleep Health Index and Sleep Hygiene Index were 76 ± 15 and 30 ± 7, respectively. Better sleep health was observed in shift workers with better sleep hygiene ( β = −0.52, SE = 0.09 [−0.71, −0.34], p < 0.001). Differences in Sleep Health Index scores were found for individual Sleep Hygiene Index items related to “sleep regularity”, “sleep environment”, “mental health” and “time in bed extension”. However, no differences in Sleep Health Index scores were found for items related to “caffeine, alcohol or nicotine consumption” or “exercise” close to bedtime and “bedtime activities” ( p > 0.05 for all). These findings demonstrate a relationship between sleep hygiene and sleep health; therefore, it may be possible to improve the sleep of shift workers by improving their sleep hygiene.
Article
Full-text available
The applicability of 5 conventional guidelines for construct measurement is critically examined: (1) Construct indicators should be internally consistent for valid measures, (2) there are optimal magnitudes of correlations between items, (3) the validity of measures depends on the adequacy with which a specified domain is sampled, (4) within-construct correlations must be greater than between-construct correlations, and (5) linear composites of indicators can replace latent variables. A structural equation perspective is used, showing that without an explicit measurement model relating indicators to latent variables and measurement errors, none of these conventional beliefs hold without qualifications. Moreover, a "causal" indicator model is presented that sometimes better corresponds to the relation of indicators to a construct than does the classical test theory "effect" indicator model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
The development and use of a new scale, the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), is described. This is a simple, self-administered questionnaire which is shown to provide a measurement of the subject's general level of daytime sleepiness. One hundred and eighty adults answered the ESS, including 30 normal men and women as controls and 150 patients with a range of sleep disorders. They rated the chances that they would doze off or fall asleep when in eight different situations commonly encountered in daily life. Total ESS scores significantly distinguished normal subjects from patients in various diagnostic groups including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. ESS scores were significantly correlated with sleep latency measured during the multiple sleep latency test and during overnight polysomnography. In patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome ESS scores were significantly correlated with the respiratory disturbance index and the minimum SaO2 recorded overnight. ESS scores of patients who simply snored did not differ from controls.
Article
Full-text available
This report, prepared for the National Commission on Sleep Disorders Research, explores the economic implications of sleepiness in relation to accidents. In Part One, I describe the frequency of accidents in the United States and explain a method for estimating the economic cost of these of accidents. Accidents are the fourth leading cause of mortality in the United States, and motor-vehicle accidents represent 51% of total deaths caused by accidents. The method used for calculating the cost of accidents is called "the human capital approach". It is based on the principle that "one person produces a sum of output during his/her life-time, which can be approximated by his/her earnings". It is necessary to understand that this estimate of human value is not intended to reduce human beings to a sum of earnings during his/her lifetime. It does, however, serve as a useful indicator in making decisions regarding public health policy for the country. The results of the total cost of accidents and the relative costs for work-related, home-based and public accidents in 1988 are discussed. In Part Two, I explore the role sleepiness plays in contributing to the total number of accidents. The difficulty of researching this subject is compounded by the fact that reports of rates of accidents related to sleepiness differ significantly from author to author. This is true both for drivers with sleep disorders and those without. We have calculated two different rates for estimating the number of motor-vehicle accidents caused by sleepiness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Article
Although the methodological literature is replete with advice regarding the development and validation of multi-item scales based on reflective measures, the issue of index construction using formative measures has received little attention. The authors seek to address this gap by (1) examining the nature of formative indicators, (2) discussing ways in which the quality of formative measures can be assessed, and (3) illustrating the proposed procedures with empirical data. The aim is to enhance researchers' understanding of formative measures and assist them in their index construction efforts.
Article
The authors review the usefulness, reliability, and validity of recently proposed subtypes of primary insomnia. DSM-III uses "primary insomnia" to indicate chronic insomnia not associated with other diagnosable mental or medical disorders, whereas the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) recognizes three subtypes: psychophysiological insomnia, idiopathic insomnia, and sleep state misperception. After reviewing all of the primary source references for each insomnia disorder in the ICSD and all of the additional primary sources cited in each of these, the authors conducted an automated literature search using Medline. Of the 48 primary sources located, the authors selected 27 studies that were reported in peer-reviewed journals, had the largest available subject groups, used diagnostic reliability procedures, and included control groups. The studies reviewed contained limited empirical support for the proposed distinction between idiopathic and psychophysiological insomnia. Sleep state misperception appears, however, to be a highly prevalent feature of chronic insomnia generally, rather than only a specific disorder per se. The authors conclude that there is not yet sufficient empirical evidence to warrant the abandonment of DSM-III-R "primary insomnia" and the adoption of the ICSD subtypes in DSM-IV. However, they affirm the heuristic value of the ICSD subtypes and the need for field trials to compare the performance characteristics of the DSM-III-R and ICSD systems with respect to 1) interrater reliability, 2) effects of rater expertise (generalist versus specialist) on rates of agreement, and 3) effects of polysomnographic data on rates of agreement.
Article
Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
Article
An instrument was developed to assess sleep hygiene knowledge and practice in 44 sleep-onset insomniacs, 49 sleep-maintenance insomniacs and 50 good sleepers. Multivariate ANOVAs revealed that insomniacs had more general sleep hygiene knowledge than good sleepers, but practiced it less often. Sleep-onset and sleep-maintenance insomniacs had equivalent hygiene awareness, but the former group had less healthy hygiene practices. Hygiene knowledge was most deficient regarding the effects of nicotine, sleep medication, alcohol and exercise; hygiene practice needed most improvement in the areas of regular exercise, prebedtime relaxation and managing prebedtime worry. The results suggest that poor sleep hygiene is not a primary cause of insomnia; however, behavior therapists should continue to include this element in treatment to help insomniacs avoid exacerbation cycles.