Article

Microbial Astronauts: Assembling Microbial Communities for Advanced Life Support Systems

Dynamac Inc., DYN-3, John F. Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, USA.
Microbial Ecology (Impact Factor: 2.97). 03/2004; 47(2):137-49. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-003-1060-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Extension of human habitation into space requires that humans carry with them many of the microorganisms with which they coexist on Earth. The ubiquity of microorganisms in close association with all living things and biogeochemical processes on Earth predicates that they must also play a critical role in maintaining the viability of human life in space. Even though bacterial populations exist as locally adapted ecotypes, the abundance of individuals in microbial species is so large that dispersal is unlikely to be limited by geographical barriers on Earth (i.e., for most environments "everything is everywhere" given enough time). This will not be true for microbial communities in space where local species richness will be relatively low because of sterilization protocols prior to launch and physical barriers between Earth and spacecraft after launch. Although community diversity will be sufficient to sustain ecosystem function at the onset, richness and evenness may decline over time such that biological systems either lose functional potential (e.g., bioreactors may fail to reduce BOD or nitrogen load) or become susceptible to invasion by human-associated microorganisms (pathogens) over time. Research at the John F. Kennedy Space Center has evaluated fundamental properties of microbial diversity and community assembly in prototype bioregenerative systems for NASA Advanced Life Support. Successional trends related to increased niche specialization, including an apparent increase in the proportion of nonculturable types of organisms, have been consistently observed. In addition, the stability of the microbial communities, as defined by their resistance to invasion by human-associated microorganisms, has been correlated to their diversity. Overall, these results reflect the significant challenges ahead for the assembly of stable, functional communities using gnotobiotic approaches, and the need to better define the basic biological principles that define ecosystem processes in the space environment.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jay L Garland, Mar 17, 2014
    • "Earth's natural biosphere [57] [60] [61]. As we prepare for longer human stays in space stations, it is also critical that we develop a better understanding of the changes that may be induced in the various types of microbial relationships in this unique environment [62]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biological significance: Space experiments and operational flight experience have identified detrimental effects on human health and performance because of exposure to weightlessness, even when currently available countermeasures are implemented. Many experimental tools and methods have been developed to study microgravity induced physiological changes. Recently, genomic and proteomic approaches have received a significant amount of attention. This review summarizes the recent research studies of the proteome response to microgravity inmicroorganisms, plants, mammalians cells and animals. Current proteomic tools allow large-scale, high-throughput analyses for the detection, identification, and functional investigation of all proteomes. Understanding gene and/or protein expression is the key to unlocking the mechanisms behind microgravity-induced problems and to finding effective countermeasures to spaceflight-induced alterations but also for the study of diseases on earth. Future perspectives are also highlighted.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of proteomics
  • Source
    • "Urban ecologists study green roofs to determine the relationships between their functioning and various aspects of their ecology (external and internal influences). While green roofs are mainly approached as outdoor habitats, they also have much in common with a variety of other " constructed ecosystems, " including waste treatment wetlands , indoor and outdoor living walls, bioreactors, and even closed-system advanced life-support systems for space travel (Roberts et al. 2004; Ranalli & Lundholm 2008; Soreanu et al. 2013) (Figure 1). Constructed ecosystems are engineered to produce specific goods and services and evaluated on their ability to do so efficiently (for the least cost in terms of money, energy and environmental impacts). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Green roofs and other constructed environments represent novel ecosystems, yet have potential to contribute to biodiversity conservation goals. Constructed ecosystems are intentionally managed to produce specific services, and thus could be viewed as highly artificial or controlled. Yet all constructed ecosystems exhibit spontaneous dynamics, as community structure changes due to internal or external ecological processes. While all green roofs have some element of design and human control over ecological trajectories, the level of ongoing management can vary greatly. I discuss “wildness” as a characteristic of green roofs in response to their spontaneous dynamics after initial setup, and their potential to provide ecosystem services related to human psychological well-being, aesthetics and habitat for biodiversity. This approach suggests new design possibilities in interaction with spontaneous ecosystem dynamics and highlights a need for greater ecological understanding of green roof systems.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
  • Source
    • "In rich communities it is more likely that at least one of the community members has an antagonistic activity against pathogenic invaders . The beneficial effect of a higher richness on pathogen invasion resistance was described by Roberts et al. (2004). It seemed that a lower diversity in the microbial rhizosphere community in dwarf wheat led to a higher susceptibility to invasion by Pseudomonas. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For most marine aquaculture species, one of the main bottlenecks is the stable production of high quality juveniles. The high and unpredictable mortality in the first weeks after hatching of marine fish larvae remains a challenging problem that needs to be solved. The severity of the problem differs between species, but cannot be considered adequately solved for any species. Both scientific evidence and experience in hatcheries for a variety of fish, shrimp and shellfish species are accumulating as support for the hypothesis that detrimental fish–microbe interactions are the cause of these problems. Host–microbe interactions in reared fish are still poorly understood, except for a few pathogens, and empirical data of the quality required to test this hypothesis, are lacking. This article provides an overview on the current knowledge of the microbial environment of fish larvae, including methodological aspects to characterize the microbial community (both using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods). Further, the current knowledge of the immunology of fish larvae is reviewed, including recent advances in the understanding of toll-like receptors, inflammatory cytokines, mast cells and piscidins, and the ontogeny of the adaptive immune system. Finally, we provide an overview of the state of the art with respect to steering of microbial communities associated with fish larvae – both steering of community composition and of its activity (e.g. by quorum sensing interference).
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2012 · Reviews in Aquaculture
Show more