ArticlePDF Available

In the beginning. The 1952-1953 Danish epidemic of poliomyelitis and Bjørn Ibsen

Occasional essay
(revised November 2003)
In the beginning.
The 1952-1953 Danish
epidemic of poliomyelitis
and Bjørn Ibsen
“The modern specialty of intensive care medicine
began with the poliomyelitis epidemic in Denmark”. That
quotation from the golden jubilee book of the Royal
Australasian College of Physicians1 is a characteristic
statement found in the limited writings on the history of
Intensive Care Medicine, because it was during the 1952-
1953 Danish epidemic of poliomyelitis that the foundations
of our specialty were laid. The epidemic was “unprecedented
in the history of Denmark, in size as well as severity…..and
by far the worst ever recorded in Europe”.2 Comprehensive
and excellent accounts of it have been published.2-5a
Now that the 50th anniversary of the end of the
epidemic has passed, at the variously given dates of
March 2nd 1953,6 or, it has been argued, May 1st 1953,7 it
seems an appropriate time to consider the epidemic’s role
in the development of our specialty. Further,
the anniversary allows us to honour the innovative
contributions made by the clinicians involved. They were
principally the anaesthetist Bjørn Ibsen and his multi-
disciplinary colleagues in H.C.A. Lassen’s Department of
Communicable Diseases at Copenhagen’s Blegdams-
Ibsen’s introduction of new treatment methods
dramatically reduced mortality among those patients who
needed artificial ventilation for acute respiratory failure
arising out of breathing and/or swallowing deficits.2,3,5 His
ideas and practices during this time also started the
development of the intensive care unit towards what it is
today;4 and, together with the collaborative enthusiasm of
laboratory chief Poul Astrup, fostered the introduction of
regular blood-gas and acid-base analyses into daily
management of the intensive care patient.8,9
The novel approach at Copenhagen4,5,5a
Before Ibsen introduced his methods, infectious
diseases departments often treated respiratory failure in
polio patients with either a cabinet “respirator” or a body
cuirass respirator, both providing negative pressure
ventilation. Since 1948, tracheostomy had also been used
at Blegdamshospitalet, where indicated, although Lassen
found that did not improve mortality.2
At Copenhagen, for the month until Ibsen was recruited
to the Blegdam treatment team, the death of 27 of the 31
epidemic patients treated by negative pressure ventilation
(mostly by body-cuirass respirators) highlighted the
limitations of this form of treatment.10 With an inadequate
number of machines to supply negative pressure ventilation
(one Emerson cabinet and six cuirass respirators, probably
Kifas, were available)10 and because of the ineffectiveness
of this form of treatment, on 27th August 1952 Ibsen
demonstrated on an adolescent polio patient the benefits
of an alternative approach. He showed that patients could
be ventilated successfully by using a technique of manual
intermittent positive pressure ventilation (m-IPPV).4,10
The method used a rhythmical “bag-ventilation, through
a Water’s to-and-fro’ carbon dioxide absorber connected
to a cuffed endotracheal (tracheostomy) tube. The
ventilation method was a known anaesthetic technique
used in the operating theatre and the same anaesthetic
system could be applied to critically ill patients.
To supply the labour for m-IPPV in the months ahead,
Lassen organised shifts of approximately 1500 volunteer
medical students,5 (later joined by dental students5), 600
trained nurses and hundreds of auxiliary personnel,2
student nurses and semi-retired nurses. They were
supervised by anaesthetists and assisted by each patient’s
‘special’ nurse. With these teams, “despite the unabating
severity of the fresh cases”,2 the mortality among ventilated
patients had decreased from 87% recorded prior to
introduction of the new system, to 26% for the sixth cohort
of 50 patients admitted after August 25 and treated by the
“new methods”11. By the time of these patients, much of
the mortality was obligatory (e.g. due to the severity of
necrotising brain lesions caused by the polio virus).12 For
the group with the combination of “paralysis of respiratory
muscles, pharynx and/or larynx and with cerebralia
…mortality approaches 100 percent”;2 also many of the
deaths occurred, with “catastrophic rapidity”,2 soon after
At the end of this Denmark-wide epidemic, the 1953
provincial Denmark epidemic followed,7 and an out-break
also occurred in Sweden,13 where mechanical IPPV with
tracheostomy was successfully employed in 54 patients,
and the mortality among “55 cases of bulbo-spinal
respiratory paralysis” was 27%.13
Multiple factors contributed to Ibsens striking success.
These included his clinical and laboratory acumen regarding
the nature and origin of the clinical features in many of
the patients treated by negative pressure ventilation, and
his recognition of the essential nature of lethal problems,
which were fully detailed in the accounts of the epidemic.4,5
In addition, once Lassen was convinced of the efficacy of
Ibsen’s revolutionary ideas, he immediately accepted them.10
R. V. TRUBUHOVICH Critical Care and Resuscitation 2003; 5: 227-230
2. Intensive care units
When polio patients were concentrated into “a
special department”5 for best management (at the
Blegdam the large number required three floors),
impetus was given to the development of these as
specific units. Because Ibsen could see the benefits
in always having an area with its own trained staff
and multi-disciplinary team, he was foremost in
advocating a separate location to be established in
hospitals where intensive care management could
be supplied to the critically ill.4,9 These dedicated
areas became known as intensive care units.
By demonstrating the success of a team approach
for such patients (the team at Blegdam had
anaesthetic, epidemiological/medical, “otolaryngeal”,
student, nursing, laboratory, and physiotherapy
components), the organisation needed to run such
a unit came to be determined.2,8 Ibsen established
his own intensive care unit, a general one and
Denmark’s first, at (Copenhagen’s) Kommune-
hospital in 1954.4 Though this lead was soon
followed in the United Kingdom,15 and in the mid
to late 1950s the United States, it was not until the
end of the decade that any kind of formal intensive
care unit was established in Australasia.21
3. Intensive Care Medicine
When serviced by staff trained and certified
in the specialty, the practice and success of what
rapidly expanded into early Intensive Care
Medicine opened the way for evolution to its
present state. For their polio patients, anaesthetists
had to go beyond applying just the basic principles
of anaesthetic4 and respiratory care for the
preservation of vital functions (airway, ventilatory,
circulatory and acid-base balance). With guidance
from their epidemiologist and physician
colleagues they became acquainted with, and
involved in, management of other complications
(e.g. “cerebralia,2 sepsis, azotaemia, paralytic
ileus, myocarditis22) and saw how to extend their
particular skills to areas involving prolonged,
whole-body support. This started with an
expanded role for IPPV, exemplified by its use in
“vasomotor shock” and pulmonary oedema.3
Anaesthetists became intensivists and were now
involved in systems of treatment tailored to relieve
the physiological disturbances from spino-bulbar-
cerebral complications. For those 345 victims of
the epidemic who fitted the Blegdam criteria for
having “Life-threatening poliomyelitis”3 their
clinicians had devised a “mixed anatomico-clinical
classification” into six patient groups from A to
F.2 Specific treatments were determined and
applied to the needs of each group.
Besides saving many lives, the achievements of that time
produced important outcomes in three major respects:
1. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation
The successful use of m-IPPV resulted in a
changeover from manual to mechanical, longer-term
intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), a
concept that spread through Scandinavia, the United
Kingdom14,15 and elsewhere in Europe.5a,14 That change
was accomplished by the rapid development and
production of a range of new IPPV machines, dubbed
“mechanical students”,16 reliable for the task of
providing long-term artificial ventilation. Apart from
the Engström prototype, the European IPPV machines,
which were available before the time of the epidemic,
were primarily anaesthetic ventilators, and had not
been tried outside the operating theatre or for long
term use.14,18 These machines included the Blease
Pulmoflator, the Frenckner, the Aga and the original
Mørch-1 respirator (i.e. E. Trier Mørch’s original World
War II Danish modification of the Swedish Aga). The
Bang ventilator, which was developed provincially
during the epidemic and also used at the Blegdam
from 1953,3 could not compare with the Engström.
The Gullberg positive pressure attachment for the Kifa
cuirass also became available later in the epidemic,
although it was not used in the acute phase of the
illness and was only used for weaning.3
The sophisticated Engström volume-controlled
ventilator18 was foremost among these machines and
had been developed in 1950 after Dr Carl-Gunner
Engström realised that it was underventilation which
caused many of the polio deaths in Stockholm.18 His
ventilator was carefully evaluated at the Blegdam, and
was found to be the only one of several types of IPPV
machines that were tested, that functioned
satisfactorily.8 Its merits were also evident in Sweden’s
1953 polio epidemic.13
Further valuable developments from the epidemic
included humidifying systems,2,4 and non-rebreathing
valves19,20 enabling the soda-lime canister to be
dispensed with.
After the Danish epidemic, IPPV was not taken
up generally in polio units in the United States, despite
new designs from Mørch (the 1954 Morch-3 Piston
Ventilator) and from Van Bergen et al.14 Negative
pressure ventilation still reigned supreme for polio
patients for the rest of the decade in most of North
America as well as in Australia and New Zealand. In
the latter two countries this was largely due to the
ubiquity of a useful local product (the cabinet respirator
of the Both brothers of Adelaide), which was freely
donated by Lord Nuffield before World War II to
hospitals of the British Commonwealth.15
R. V. TRUBUHOVICH Critical Care and Resuscitation 2003; 5: 227-230
Hospital, for large-scale and successful use in a
polio epidemic (e.g. “294 respirator cases” in 1948,
with 1949 mortality figures at 17% of 130
respirator cases). Ibsen, as he has already written
concerning the two papers of Bower et al,4
confirms that he “saw it in the library” (personal
communication). That was fortunate, because
although he had been in the United States of
America after the time the two relevant papers
appeared, he was not aware of them while he was
there. Also in North America, and prior to the
Copenhagen achievements, it was recognised that
“the all-important problem in life-threatening
poliomyelitis is respiratory”.2 In 1949, Sjøberg
introduced the treatment with tracheostomy and
bronchoscopic drainage to “maintain free airways
in these patients.18 Nonetheless, Engström - an
epidemiolgist at that time - later lamented that
mortality figures still stayed high in the Stockholm
Hospital for Contagious Diseases.18 Before Bower
and Bennett’s work there had never been any long-
term use of IPPV for artificial ventilation.18
Prolonged artificial ventilation had been achieved
in polio units only with intermittent negative
pressure ventilation.14
3. A team effort
It should be acknowledged that the results
achieved could not have occurred without a team
of colleagues and supporting staff. The logistics
at the Blegdam were very impressive, coping with
the 31811 patients “treated according to the new
therapeutic principles” (from the hospital’s
epidemic total of 2,241 verified polio cases).3 Some of
the advances described can appear to be attributable
solely to Ibsen. Notwithstanding his inspired
innovations, what was achieved came from a closely
collaborative effort among many professionals.
The 50th anniversary of the Copenhagen polio-
myelitis epidemic has recently passed. On considering
the outstanding achievements towards the development
of Intensive Care Medicine, the epidemic needs to be
remembered for the influence it had on the
establishment of our individual specialty. At the same
time we acknowledge with gratitude our indebtedness
to these pioneers, Bjørn Ibsen and his colleagues, whose
fore-sight, dedication and application made the
development of Intensive Care Medicine possible.
Department of Critical Care Medicine,
Auckland Hospital,
Thus, during the poliomyelitis epidemic and
with a backing of “good clinical research” from
Astrup and his team,8 began the development of
Intensive Care Medicine.4 In anticipation of further,
perhaps irretrievable, deterioration, the principle
of preventive intervention was recognised and
developed. To quote Ibsen: “keeping the patient out
of the respirator [i.e. ventilator] as long as possible
can let pulmonary complications develop”.4
Management of patients during the epidemic
included the development of safe methods of
transportation to the Blegdam by road or air from
other hospitals or locations, rather than waiting for
the unsecured patient to arrive at the door of the
intensive care unit. Clinicians travelled out in
ambulances and aircraft to safeguard and stabilise
the patient for safe transport.4 Recognition of this
need was made at a time when Australia’s flying
doctor system was well established, which Ibsen
himself acknowledged.4
Intensivists were strategically placed to take
advantage of rapid developments in blood gas and
acid-base analysis, the value of which was
exemplified by successful ventilatory and clinical
practice during the epidemic.5a,8 Such application
gave a substantial boost towards further refinements.
Other considerations
Whatever innovative thinking Ibsen brought to
existing Scandinavian practice, certain considerations
should not be overlooked.
1. Previous manual-IPPV
Within the confines of the operating theatre,
anaesthetists were familiar with manual ventilatory
support, to the extent of controlling the patient’s
breathing completely. Credit for initiating this
technique is usually given to Arthur Guedel and
David Treweek,23 who in 1934 documented “four
years of clinical observation” of rhythmic manual
ventilation (with CO2 absorption) for ether-induced
apnoea. However, Engström pointed out that “In
Sweden, KH Giertz had, as early as 1916, advocated
the use of rhythmic insufflation ventilation in
intrathoracic operations and [at that time] had
made a critical review of all previous publications”.18
Before 1952, occasional use of various forms of
m-IPPV, often delivered through an external mask
when not by tracheostomy, had also occurred outside
the operating theatre for certain medical and surgical
2. Previous mechanical-IPPV for polio patients
A method of mechanical IPPV had already been
developed outside Europe in 1948, by Ray Bennett
for Albert Bower,25,26 at Los Angeles County
R. V. TRUBUHOVICH Critical Care and Resuscitation 2003; 5: 227-230
14. Historical background to automatic ventilation. In:
Automatic Ventilation of the Lungs. Mushin WW,
Rendell-Baker L, Thompson PW, Mapleson WW,
Hillard EK. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific
Publications, 1980:p206-211.
15. Crampton Smith A. The Respiration Unit. In: The
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics Oxford 1937-
1962. Bryce-Smith R, Mitchell JV, Parkhouse J (eds).
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963:p52.
16. Christie AB, Esplen JR. Poliomyelitis in Denmark.
Lancet 1953; 1: 492-493.
17. Engström C-G. Treatment of severe cases of respiratory
paralysis by the Engström universal ventilator. Br Med
J 1954;2:666-669.
18. Engström C-G. The clinical application of prolonged
controlled ventilation. Introduction. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand Suppl 1963:13:7-10.
19. Rattenborg C. A non-return valve, designed to ventilate
polio patients with respiratory paralysis by manual
positive pressure ventilation. Acta Med Scand
20. Ruben H. A new non-rebreathing valve. Anesthesiology
21. Trubuhovich RV, Judson JA. In: Intensive Care in New
Zealand. A History of the New Zealand Region of
ANZICS. Auckland, 2001:p.1-2.
22. Bjerre-Christensen K. Electrocardiographic changes
in acute poliomyelitis. In: Lassen HCA (ed).
Management of Life-threatening Poliomyelitis,
Copenhagen 1952-1956. With a survey of autopsy
findings in 115 cases. London & Edinburgh: E&S
Livingstone Ltd, 1956: p.126-140.
23. Guedel AE, Treweek DN. Ether apnoeas. Anesth Analg
24. Colice GL. Historical perspective on the development
of mechanical ventilation. In: Tobin MJ (ed). Principles
and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation. New York:
McGraw-Hill Inc 1994: p.27.
25. Bower AG, Bennett VR, Dillon JB, Axelrod B.
Investigation on the care and treatment of poliomyelitis
patients. Ann West Med Surg 1950;4:561-582.
26 Bower AG, Bennett VR, Dillon JB, Axelrod B. Part II:
Physiological studies of various treatment procedures
and mechanical equipment. Ann West Med Surg
Regarding Reference 5a.
The writer regrets that at the time this essay went to printing he was
unaware of the admirable description of the Danish epidemic and the
consequences arising from it, contained within the paper now given
above as reference 5a. There are multiple sites in the essay where this
paper should have been cited. However, Poul Astrup - despite being
an active participant at Prof. Ibsen's demonstration with the test
patient5 – in collaboration with John Severinghaus, had earlier seemed
to imply,9 but now in this paper actually stated,5a that the date of Prof.
Ibsen’s initial demonstration was August 26. They wrote that date
notwithstanding previous papers by HCA Lassen himself2,10 (and later,
the 1994 paper from Ger Wackers5), giving the August 1952 date for
the Ibsen demonstration as the 27th. Which date is the one repeated
here in this Critical Care and Resuscitation essay.
1. Byth P. The History of the Australian and New Zealand
Intensive Care Society. In: Wiseman JC (ed). To Follow
Knowledge. Sydney: Royal Australasian College of
Physicians, 1988:p95-96.
2. Lassen HCA. The management of respiratory and
bulbar paralysis in poliomyelitis. In: World Health
Organization Monograph Series No. 26: Poliomyelitis.
Geneva: WHO. 1955: 157-211. (http://whqlibdoc.who.
3. Lassen HCA (ed). Management of Life-threatening
Poliomyelitis, Copenhagen 1952-1956. With a survey
of autopsy findings in 115 cases. London & Edinburgh:
E&S Livingstone Ltd, 1956.
4. Ibsen B. From anaesthesia to anaesthesiology. Personal
experiences in Copenhagen during the past 25 years.
Chapter V The polio epidemic. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand Suppl 1975;61:21-28.
5. Wackers GL. Modern anaesthesiological principles for
bulbar polio: manual IPPR in the 1952 polio-epidemic
in Copenhagen. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:
5a. Severinghaus JW, Astrup PB, Murray JF. Blood gas
analysis and critical care medicine. Am J Resp Crit Care
Med 1998;157:S114-122.(
6. Andersen EW, Ibsen B. The anaesthetic management
of patients with poliomyelitis and respiratory paralysis.
Br Med J 1954;1:786-788.
7. Hamtoft H. The epidemics of acute anterior
poliomyelitis in Denmark in 1952 and 1953. Danish
Med Bull 1954;I:12-18.
8. Astrup P, Gotzche H, Neukirch F. Laboratory
investigations during treatment of patients with
poliomyelitis and respiratory paralysis. Br Med J
9. Astrup P, Severinghaus JW. The History of Blood
Gases, Acids and Bases. Copenhagen: Munksgaard,
Radiometer. 1986:p.268.
10. Lassen HCA. Preliminary report on the 1952 epidemic
of poliomyelitis in Copenhagen with special reference
to the treatment of acute respiratory insufficiency.
Lancet 1954;1:37-41.
11. Neukirch F, Søttrup T. Results. In: Lassen HCA (ed).
Management of Life-threatening Poliomyelitis,
Copenhagen 1952-1956. With a survey of autopsy
findings in 115 cases. London & Edinburgh: E&S
Livingstone Ltd, 1956:p.147-150.
12. Vimtrup B, Christensen E, Schourup K. Autopsy
findings. In: Lassen HCA (ed). Management of Life-
Threatening Poliomyelitis, Copenhagen 1952-1956.
With a survey of autopsy findings in 115 cases. London
& Edinburgh: E&S Livingstone Ltd, 1956: p.151-173.
13. Ström J (ed). The poliomyelitis epidemic in Stockholm
1953. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory
investigations. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1956;316:1-157.
R. V. TRUBUHOVICH Critical Care and Resuscitation 2003; 5: 227-230
... La mencionada bolsa se comprimía entre 16 a 30 veces por minuto de acuerdo a la condición y edad del paciente, decidiéndose las modificaciones a instaurar en todos los pacientes durante reuniones clínicas 1,6 . El primer paciente tratado con este método fue una niña de doce años llamada Vivi Ebert (figura 1) la cual evolucionaba con una gravísima falla respiratoria y en quien se probó el beneficio de este nuevo enfoque terapéutico sugerido, demostrando además el limitado valor del uso de la presión negativa en estos pacientes (27 de agosto de 1952) [5][6][7][8][9] . Luego de una semana, este método de ventilación manual se utilizó en cada uno de los pacientes con falla respiratoria por poliomielitis en el Blegdamhospital 10 . ...
... En 1952, un ventilador regulado por volumen diseñado por Carl Gunnar Engström (1912-1987) fue adecuado para lograr ventilar a las víctimas de la polio y entregaba ventilación controlada por volumen tanto para adultos como niños. El paso siguiente fue la creación de dispositivos de presión positiva en Estados Unidos de Norteamérica (lugar donde seguía la epidemia de poliomielitis en su peak) 9 . Por de pronto, en Europa los respiradores a presión negativa rápidamente quedaron obsoletos. ...
... Se pueden reconocer en la historia reciente, diversos eventos y figuras claves asociados con el origen de las unidades de cuidados intensivos [5][6][7]9 , no obstante, es posible identificar hitos pretéritos trascendentes. Durante la campaña napoleónica en Egipto (1798-1801) se desarrollaron los primeros esbozos de lo que sería, a futuro, la medicina de cuidados intensivos. ...
Full-text available
El nacimiento de los cuidados intensivos fue un proceso que tuvo lugar en Copenhague, Dinamarca, durante y después de la epidemia de poliomielitis de 1952-1953. El hecho que marca su comienzo fue que se le pidiera ayuda al anestesiólogo Björn Ibsen y “saliera del quirófano”, no sin alguna controversia. Ibsen propuso y defendió el uso de traqueostomía, aspiración y ventilación. Dada la falta de ventiladores de presión positiva, esta tarea se llevó a cabo por estudiantes que contribuyeron con 165.000 horas de ventilación manual. Pocos años después, en Gotemburgo, Suecia, el anestesista Göran Haglund motivado por el caso de un niño de cuatro años con una apendicitis complicada, creó la primera unidad multidisciplinaria de cuidados intensivos pediátricos del mundo (1955). En Chile, durante la década de 1950, se comenzó a desarrollar el concepto de cuidados intensivos infantiles bajo la dirección de médicos con una sólida visión de futuro. Dado que en el planeta se vive una pandemia, parece un momento adecuado para revisar el rol de la epidemia de poliomielitis en el desarrollo de la ventilación con presión positiva, el nacimiento de la medicina intensiva y las unidades de cuidados intensivos, a modo de valorizar el papel de las diversas tareas e innovaciones efectuadas.
... (4) Historically, medical students have been involved in various capacities during natural disasters, such as the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic and 1952 Copenhagen polio epidemic. (5,6) Due to COVID-19 safe-distancing measures, recruitment was conducted by email delivered through the school mailing list. Participants were shown the NUS-IRB compliant Participant Information Sheet and were informed that consent is implied if they completed the survey. ...
Full-text available
Physiotherapy is the simplest way of treatment used in all world to be applied in cardiopulmonary patients. The techniques involved to give to the patients’ better conditions of life and to avoid the implications of these ills, to meliorate the physical conditions and the quality of life. This work pretends to present the utilization of physiotherapist methods and its consequences in develop better conditions through the patients. Presenting this revision guide to give a north to all physiotherapist and their patients.
Death has traditionally been determined on the basis of the cessation of heartbeat and breathing. The last few decades witnessed the emergence of the neurological determination of death. This chapter traces its origin to the wider use of mechanical ventilation in modern intensive care units, and explores the manner in which its development was connected to the field of organ transplantation. The chapter ends by highlighting the public unease which can be discerned from the legal developments in some jurisdictions.KeywordsMechanical ventilationComa dépasséHarvard criteriaIntensive care unitsOrgan transplantationDiagnosis of death using neurological criteria
Full-text available
Resumen Las pandemias y otras catástrofes de alto impacto sanitario azotan periódicamente a la humanidad, aumentando desproporcionadamente la demanda por atención en servicios de urgencia, unidades de cuidados intensivos y medios de soporte vital avanzado. Este desequilibrio obliga a una compleja toma de decisiones en que se deben asignar recursos proporcionalmente escasos en relación a una gran demanda. Así, los equipos clínicos asistenciales necesitan actuar bajo criterios consensuados, que orienten sus decisiones y alivien la pesada carga moral de seleccionar pacientes para terapias, en detrimento de otros. El triaje es una estrategia que permite establecer, bajo racionalidades propias a cada escenario, objetivos y criterios que faciliten la toma de decisiones complejas para el logro del mejor resultado. Estas estrategias deben considerar el marco de valores intangibles que apreciamos y que nos identifican cultural y socialmente, como son el respeto a la vida, la igualdad, la justicia y la libertad. Sin embargo, en escenarios excepcionales como el de la actual pandemia COVID-19, en que el sistema sanitario puede no dar abasto, deberán establecerse objetivos prioritarios, como salvar la mayor cantidad de vida, del modo más humano, justo y eficiente posible. A la vez, deberán redefinirse jerarquías en los valores y principios clásicos de la práctica clínica cotidiana, adecuadas a la catástrofe sanitaria, bajo una ética propia de la salud pública, el mayor bien para la mayoría y el mejor cuidado de los que no pueden ser curados.
Full-text available
Jayanti Pant,1 Mahendra Kumar Pant,2 Manisha Naithani3 1Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India; 2Department of Anatomy, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand, India; 3Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, IndiaCorrespondence: Manisha Naithani Department of BiochemistryAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, Uttarakhand, IndiaEmail naithanimanisha@gmail.comAbstract: COVID 19 has brought several challenges for each individual, changing the world’s perception of health-care professionals. People are hailing health-care professionals as heroes, worthy of praise and gratitude. However, the pandemic has overburdened the health-care system. In this situation, the undergraduate medical students are being used as a crucial part of the health-care team in various ways. Involvement of medical undergraduates in situations of natural disaster is not new. In fact, a review of history of previous natural disasters reveals that this has been normal every time health systems have been overburdened. In the present situation of COVID 19, these students have a crucial role to play in helping frontline workers combat the crisis. Though the students would like to render their services, they are in a state of dilemma, as their roles are not defined clearly and their training to combat the pandemic is inadequate, as it was in previous outbreaks. This highlights a need to introduce module-based training for medical graduates to contribute effectively in combating future outbreaks.Keywords: pandemic, outbreaks, medical students, services, undergraduate
Most historians believe that Bjorn Ibsen's response to the 1952 polio epidemic in Copenhagen led to intensive care medicine (ICM) and intensive care units (ICUs). The epidemic involved thousands of patients, many dying from respiratory failure. Ibsen convinced his skeptical colleagues to concentrate all patients with respiratory failure in one area and institute tracheostomy and manual positive pressure ventilation in these patients. Attempts to understand the pathophysiology of respiratory failure and monitor its treatment accelerated the development of blood gas analysis by Poul Astrup.
Paralytic poliomyelitis, Reye syndrome, Hemophilus Influenzae type B epiglottitis, bacterial meningitis, and meningococcal septic shock are catastrophic illnesses that in the last 60 years have shaped the development of pediatric intensive care. Neurocritical care has been at the forefront of our thinking and, more latterly, as a specialty we have had the technology and means to develop this focus, educate the next generation and show that outcomes can be improved—first in adult critical care and now the task is to translate these benefits to critically ill children. In our future we will need to advance interventions in patient care with clinical trials. MeSH terms: Neurocritical care; child; traumatic brain injury; status epilepticus; cerebrovascular
Thesis (doctoral)--Uppsala universitet, 1963.
Substantial progress in the acquisition of scientific knowledge concerning blood gas transport, which began in the 17th century, led to the discovery of oxygen in air and carbon dioxide in smoke, the presence of these gases in the bloodstream and the role of the lungs in getting them in and out of the body, and finally, how to measure them in blood. These basic research achievements were clinically applied in dramatic and successful fashion in 1952 during the polio epidemic that ravaged Copenhagen, Denmark. An inspired anesthetist, Bjorn Ibsen, after making the right deductions from scanty information, introduced a radical type of therapy that incorporated several novel features: a team approach by experts, a separate facility for trained personnel and special equipment, and a clinical laboratory for essential monitoring. This radical and effective way of treating seriously ill patients launched the proliferation of intensive care units and led to the inauguration of the now flourishing specialty of critical care medicine, where science and clinical medicine continue their powerful partnership.