ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Sucralose is the active compound of the most commonly sold sweetener in the United States. Different than aspartame, sucralose is not considered to be a migraine trigger. Herein we report a patient with attacks of migraine consistently triggered by sucralose. She also suffers from menstrually related migraine that had been well-controlled for several months since she switched her contraceptive from fixed estrogen to triphasic contraceptive pills. Some attacks triggered by sucralose were preceded by aura, and she had never experienced migraine with aura before. Withdrawal of the compound was associated with complete resolution of the attacks. Single-blind exposure (vs. sugar) triggered the attacks, after an attack-free period.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Headache ISSN 0017-8748
2006 by American Headache Society doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00386.x
Published by Blackwell Publishing
Correspondence and Clinical Notes
Clinical Notes
Migraine Triggered by Sucralose—A Case Report
Marcelo E. Bigal, MD, PhD; Abouch V. Krymchantowski, MD, PhD
Sucralose is the active compound of the most commonly sold sweetener in the United States. Different than
aspartame, sucralose is not considered to be a migraine trigger. Herein we report a patient with attacks of migraine
consistently triggered by sucralose. She also suffers from menstrually related migraine that had been well-controlled
for several months since she switched her contraceptive from fixed estrogen to triphasic contraceptive pills. Some
attacks triggered by sucralose were preceded by aura, and she had never experienced migraine with aura before.
Withdrawal of the compound was associated with complete resolution of the attacks. Single-blind exposure (vs.
sugar) triggered the attacks, after an attack-free period.
Key words: migraine, triggers, sucralose, migraine-induced
(Headache 2006;46:515-527)
Migraine attacks may be triggered by external or in-
ternal precipitants in many individuals.1A prospective
case–control matched survey, conducted in France, con-
trasted headache triggers in migraineurs and in those with
tension-type headache. The information was collected using
headache calendars over a 3-month period.2Fatigue, sleep
problems, stress, specific food and/or drinks, menstruation,
and hot or cold weather were identified as migraine trig-
gers. Other studies show that potential migraine triggers
include dietary components (monosodium glutamate, red
wine),3,4other exogenous factors (flickering lights, weather
changes),5,6as well as endogenous factors (stress, menstrua-
From the Department of Neurology, The Albert Einstein Col-
lege of Medicine, Bronx, NY; The New England Center for
Headache, Stamford, CT; and The Montefiore Headache Unit,
Bronx, NY (Dr. Bigal); Headache Center of Rio, Rio de Janeiro,
RJ, Brazil (Dr. Krymchantowski); and Department of Neu-
rology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, RJ,
Brazil (Dr. Krymchantowski).
Address all correspondence to Dr. Marcelo E. Bigal, Depart-
ment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1165
Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461.
Accepted for publication November 10, 2005.
Aspartame, commonly used as an artificial sweetener,
is a trigger for some migraineurs. In a survey of 190 consec-
utive patients seen in a headache unit, 8.2% of them iden-
tified aspartame as their most important trigger,9although
a negative relation between aspartame and headaches has
also been reported.10 More recently, two migraineurs with
attacks probably triggered by a triptan formulation contain-
ing aspartame were reported.11
Sucralose, another low-calorie sweetener, is the sweet-
ening ingredient used worldwide in more than 4,000 food,
beverage, and nutritional products (and is the sweetening
ingredient in SPLENDABrand Sweetener).12 Sucralose is
considered safe, and is not associated with side effects in
usual doses.12 Different from aspartame, sucralose was never
reported as a migraine trigger.
Herein we report the case of a migraineur with attacks
consistently triggered by a sweetener containing sucralose.
The trigger was identified using headache calendars and
trigger questionnaires, and confirmed by prospective single-
blinded challenge.
The subject is a 30-year-old woman, who suffers from
migraine without aura since menarche. The subject is
516 March 2006
married to one of the authors of this study. Until recently,
around 90% of her migraine attacks were related to men-
struation. She had no more than one nonmenstrually related
attack per month. Around 6 months ago, her contraceptive
pill was changed to a triphasic oral contraceptive, and the
80%. However, around 4 months ago, she reported an impor-
tant increase in the frequency of her nonmenstrual attacks,
for more than 10 days per month. Attacks were also more
severe and disabling. She could not identify changes in her
lifestyle or in other medications.
She was given a headache calendar and daily trigger
questionnaires, asking about known migraine triggers. The
trigger questionnaires had also blank spaces for substances
not included on it. She was oriented to use the questionnaire
every day, even without a headache. Sucralose is not listed
in this questionnaire, but aspartame is.
1 month. Migraine without aura was the diagnosis in 6 of
them, probable migraine happened in other three, and mi-
graine with typical visual aura (never experienced before)
in 1.
Analysis of the trigger questionnaire revealed that in
all but one attack (90% of the attacks), she had used sweet-
eners containing sucralose from 30 minutes to 3 hours be-
fore the headache (this was specifically written in the blank
space of the trigger questionnaire). The use of sucralose on
a non-headache day happened just once. All other triggers
(sleep changes, red wine, etc) were present on no more than
2 headache days, and happened no more frequently than
on non-headache days. When specifically asked she realized
that she had changed the sweetener (from aspartame to su-
cralose) by the time her headaches started to increase.
The subject discontinued sucralose use and started mag-
nesium (400 mg of the salt bid) and pyridoxine (200 mg bid).
She remained pain-free for 1 month. However, since we
were still not convinced that sucralose was the trigger, we
proposed to her to let us sweet her beverage with sugar or
sweetener, and use it for 6 consecutive times.She was blinded
to the product (orange juice with sucralose vs. sugar). On the
first 3 days we used sugar and she did not have a headache.
However, she developed a headache in the first two episodes
of sucralose use, and stopped participation. Immediately af-
ter drinking the juice, we asked her to tell us, according to
the taste, if the juice had been sweetened with sucralose or
sugar. From the 5 exposures, she correctly identified sugar
in one, sucralose in another, and was wrong or unsure in the
other three attacks. She just had one nonmenstrually related
migraine attack since she discontinued the use of sucralose.
We are convinced that one of the compounds of the
sweetener was the trigger in the case reported herein. Since
sucralose is the active component, we postulate that it was
the trigger. However, inactive compounds present in the
sweetener, maltodextrin and dextrose, could also be the trig-
ger. Since these inactive compounds are present in a number
of processed foods, and the patient reported a clear onset of
her headaches associated with the use of the sweetener, we
suggest that sucralose was the trigger. Additionally it is pos-
sible that the magnesium and pyridoxine, known migraine
preventives, are responsible for the improvement. Although
this is plausible, we think it is not probable, since posterior
trigger exposition caused attacks of migraine with aura.
Sucraloseisa noncaloric sweetener.IntheUnitedStates
it is known by the trade name Splenda. In the European
Union it is also known under the E number (additive code)
E955. It is 500 to 600 times sweeter than sucrose, making it
roughly four times as sweet as aspartame. It is manufactured
by the selective chlorination of sucrose, by which three of su-
crose’s hydroxyl groups are substituted with chlorine atoms
to produce 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructo-furanosyl
4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside (Figure 1).13,14
Fig 1.—Chemical structure of sucralose.
Headache 517
The literature on sucralose is scarce. At the time of
this writing, a pubmed search using the single keyword “su-
cralose” revealed just 79 papers, most dealing with ani-
mal models,13 the pharmacological properties of the com-
pound,14 or reviewing the overall use of sweeteners in low
caloric diets.15 No reports dealt with side effects of su-
cralose in humans, or with headache induced by sucralose.
Meanwhile, the sales of products containing sucralose are
dramatically increasing worldwide, while the consumption
of aspartame is gradually decreasing.16
Aspartame is a known migraine trigger in a sizeable pro-
portionoftheindividuals.9Hereinwe identified a migraineur
with attacks most probably triggered by sucralose. This re-
lation was identified with the use of prospective question-
naires, headache calendars, and was further confirmed by
single-blind challenge. Since many migraineurs are exposed
to sucralose, and that triggers overall may render a headache
refractory, we suggest that providers consider sucralose as a
potential (although very likely infrequent) migraine trigger.
1. Martin VT, Behbehani MM. Toward a rational under-
standing of migraine trigger factors. Med Clin North Am.
2. Chabriat H, Danchot J, Michel P, Joire JE, Henry P. Precipi-
tating factors of headache. A prospective study in a national
control-matched survey in migraineurs and nonmigraineurs.
Headache. 1999;39(5):335-338.
3. Sauber WJ. What is Chinese restaurant syndrome? Lancet.
4. Peatfield RC. Relationships between food, wine, and
beer-precipitated migrainous headaches. Headache.
5. Kowacs PA, Piovesan EJ, Werneck LC, Fameli H, Pereira
da Silva H. Headache related to a specific screen flickering
frequency band. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(5):408-410.
6. Prince PB, Rapoport AM, Sheftell FD, Tepper SJ, Bi-
gal ME. The effect of weather on headache. Headache.
7. Rains JC, Penzien DB, McCrory DC, Gray RN. Behavioral
headache treatment: History, review of the empirical litera-
ture, and methodological critique. Headache. 2005;45(suppl
8. MacGregor EA. Female sex hormones and migraine. Rev
Neurol (Paris). 2005;161(6-7):677-678.
9. Lipton RB, Newman LC, Cohen JS, Solomon S. Aspartame
as a dietary trigger of headache. Headache. 1989;29(2):90-
10. Koehler SM, Glaros A. The effect of aspartame on migraine
headache. Headache. 1988;28(1):10-14.
11. Newman LC, Lipton RB. Migraine MLT-down: An un-
usual presentation of migraine in patients with aspartame-
triggered headaches. Headache. 2001;41(9):899-901.
12. The facts about sucralose. Available at Accessed 10/05/2005.
13. Sclafani A, Clare RA. Female rats show a bimodal prefer-
ence response to the artificial sweetener sucralose. Chem
Senses. 2004;29(6):523-528.
14. McCourt J, Stroka J, Anklam E. Experimental design-based
development and single laboratory validation of a capillary
zone electrophoresis method for the determination of the
artificial sweetener sucralose in food matrices. Anal Bioanal
Chem. 2005;382(5):1269-1278.
15. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American
Dietetic Association: Use of nutritive and nonnutritive
sweeteners. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(2):255-275.
16. Johnson and Johnson. SPLENDA(sucralose) No Calo-
rie Sweetener Earns #1 Spot In U.S. Retail Sales. Ava-
ilable at news/20030611 1651
21.htm. Accessed 10/08/2005.
Thunderclap Headache From Complicated Sinusitis
Brian E. McGeeney, MD, MPH; Glenn Barest MD; Gregory Grillone, MD
We report a case of complicated pansinusitis presenting with thunderclap headache. The patient quickly devel-
oped left ophthalmoplegia and imaging demonstrated extension of inflammation from the sphenoid sinus into the
sellar region. Thunderclap headache is well known to occur from a variety of intracranial events, but complicated
sinusitis presenting this way is seldom described. The patient recovered completely with appropriate treatment.
Key words: thunderclap, headache, sinusitis
518 March 2006
Thunderclap headache often heralds an intracranial
vascular catastrophe such as hemorrhage from an intracra-
nial aneurysm and may also be a manifestation of primary
thrombosis, intracranial hypotension, pituitary apoplexy,
and carotid artery dissection. Sinusitis is well known to cause
headache and facial pain, especially the acute variety, but a
thunderclap presentation is very unusual and may be the
presentation of sinusitis-related intracranial complications.
Intracranial complications are particularly associated with
sphenoid involvement and the case presentation involves
extension of inflammation beyond the limits of the sphe-
noid and into the sella turcica with involvement of adjacent
cranial nerves also.3
A 34-year-old Hispanic man developed a sudden se-
vere headache with immediate peak intensity, at about 2 a.m.
one night while preparing for bed after playing video games.
The pain was predominantly located in both temples and a
sense of flowing or movement of the pain was described.
Headache was followed by nausea and vomiting. The next
morning he presented to the Emergency Department. He
was well prior to the headache although there were symp-
toms of a viral upper respiratoryinfection 1 to 2 weeks be-
forehand. His background medical history is notable for re-
current sinus infections for years including recent months.
On examination he was afebrile and there were no signs of
meningeal irritation. Cranial computed tomography (CT)
of the brain was remarkable only for pansinusitis (Figure 1).
Laboratory testing included a white blood count of 17,500
nation was clear to inspection with 27 red blood cells per high
power field and 22 white blood cells per high power field of
which 94% were lymphocytes and 6% mononuclear histio-
cytes.CSF protein level was elevated at 69 mg/dL and glucose
level was 77 mg/dL. A diagnosis of sinusitis was made and he
was discharged home on amoxicillin/clavulanate, ibuprofen,
From the Department of Neurology, Boston University School
of Medicine, Boston, MA (Dr. McGeeney); Department of Ra-
diology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
(Dr. Barest); and Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Uni-
versity School of Medicine, Boston, MA (Dr. Grillone).
Address all correspondence to Dr. Brian E. McGeeney, 715
Albany Street, Dept of Neurology, Boston University School
of Medicine, C329, Boston, MA 02118.
Accepted for publication November 16, 2005.
Fig 1.—CT brain on initial presentation. Opacified right sphe-
noid sinus (arrow). Fluid-filled ethmoid sinuses are also seen.
oxycodone, and pseudoephedrine.The next day diplopia and
left ptosis developed. The patient continued to feel unwell
and presented again in the Emergency Department 2 days af-
ter initial evaluation. By this time the headache was bifrontal
and worst in the left periorbital region. A white blood count
was 18,800 per mm3, 69% neutrophils. He was febrile (103F)
and without meningismus, but a left ptosis and partial ocu-
lomotor and abducent palsies were present. Pupils were re-
active and visual acuity was 20/20 bilaterally. Therapy was
instituted with intravenous ceftriaxone and vancomycin, and
later metronidazole was added. Streptococcus mitis was cul-
tured from the CSF, which was of uncertain pathological
significance. Over next 24 hours he developed complete left
ophthalmoplegia, with retention of visual acuity. Magnetic
resonance imaging of the brain revealed abnormalities of the
sphenoid sinus, sella, and cavernous sinuses with enhance-
ment. Pituitary signal was abnormal (Figure 2). A CT of the
sinuses noted dehiscence of the sellar floor/roof of sphenoid
sinus (Figure 3). Although consistent with sinusitis, the dif-
ferential included other inflammatory processes and tumor.
Therewasnocavernoussinusthrombosis. Laboratory results
suggested pituitary insufficiency.
The headache improved markedly within a few days and
the ophthalmoplegia began to resolve. Maxillary washouts
and endoscopic sphenoidotomies were performed and
Headache 519
Fig 2.—MR brain. Sagittal T1 pre- and postgadolinium images 2 days after initial presentation. Note similar signal intensity of
material filling sphenoid sinus and sella (long arrow). Pituitary gland not well discriminated with abnormal pattern of enhancement.
Abnormal enhancement of subfrontal dura and hypothalamus (short arrows). Abnormality of cavernous sinuses was demonstrated
on coronal images (not shown).
cultures grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus of
unclear significance. There was no evidence of tumor. Two
weeks after initial presentation the left ophthalmoplegia was
practically gone and eventually the patient returned to nor-
mal. A repeat MRI of brain demonstrated that the pitu-
itary contour returned to normal although mucosal thicken-
Fig 3.—CT sinuses. Thin-section sagittal (left) and coronal (right) reconstructions show dehiscence of floor of sella/roof of sphenoid
ing and inflammatory changes of the sphenoid sinus remain
(Figure 4).
This case highlights a rare headache presentation of
complicated sinusitis, namely thunderclap headache. The
520 March 2006
Fig 4.—MR Brain 6 weeks later. Sagittal T1 pre- and postgadolinium images. Pituitary contour has returned to normal (long arrow),
but still shows heterogeneous pattern of enhancement. Pituitary stalk and hypothalamus are now normal (short arrow).
patient had involvement of the sphenoid (in addition to other
sinuses) which is known to result in major complications.4
The sphenoid walls can be very thin, bounded by the sella
and pituitary above, and laterally from cranial nerves and
vascular contents of the cavernous sinus region. It is pos-
sible that (continued) extension of the inflammatory mate-
rial outside the confines of the sphenoid sinuses resulted in
thunderclap headache. The patient had an aseptic menin-
gitis picture of the CSF suggesting that the parameningeal
infection was contained, as has been described before.5Bac-
terial meningitis may ensue.6Thrombosis of the cavernous
sinus which did not occur here can also present with thunder-
clap headache in the setting of sphenoid sinusitis.7Pain from
sphenoid infection and its complications has a varied loca-
tion and has been associated with occipital, vertex, frontal,
and bitemporal pain.3Periorbital pain is common. Sinusi-
tis should be considered when evaluating new onset severe
headache, and thunderclap headache is a rare presentation
of complicated sinusitis with sphenoidal involvement. Physi-
cians should ensure that CT brain scans performed for the
indication of thunderclap headache include adequate sinus
views, especially of the sphenoid sinuses.
1. Dodick DW. Thunderclap headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy-
chiatry. 2002;72:6-11.
2. Cumurciuc R, Crassard I, Sarov M, Valade D, Bousser MG.
Headache as the only neurological sign of cerebral venous
thrombosis: A series of 17 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychi-
atry. 2005;76:1084-1087.
3. Silberstein SD. Headaches due to nasal and paranasal sinus
disease. Neurol Clin. 2004;22(1):1-19, v. Review.
4. Ruoppi P, Seppa J, Pukkila M, Ruoppi P, Seppa J, Pukkila M,
Nuutinen J. Isolated sphenoid sinus diseases. Arch Otolaryn-
gol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:777-781.
5. Brook I, Overturf GD, Steinberg EA, Brook I, Over-
turf GD, Steinberg EA, Hawkins DB. Acute sphenoid si-
nusitis presenting as aseptic meningitis: A pachymenin-
gitis syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1982;4:77-
6. Lew D, Southwick FS, Montgomery WW, Weber AL, Baker
AS. Sphenoid sinusitis. A review of 30 cases. N Engl J Med.
7. Kibblewhite DJ, Cleland J, Mintz DR. Acute sphenoid sinusi-
tis: Management strategies. J Otolaryngol. 1998;17(4):159-
Thunderclap Stroke: Embolic Cerebellar Infarcts Presenting
as Thunderclap Headache
Todd J. Schwedt, MD; David W. Dodick, MD
Thunderclap headache is known to be a presenting feature of subarachnoid hemorrhage,unrupturedintracranial
aneurysm, cerebral venous thrombosis, cervical artery dissection, spontaneous intracranial hypotension, pituitary
Headache 521
apoplexy, retroclival hematoma, and hypertensive reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. We describe a case
of thunderclap headache in the absence of focal, long-tract, or lateralizing neurological findings, as the primary
clinical feature of embolic cerebellar infarcts. This case expands the differential diagnosis of thunderclap headache
and reinforces the need for magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of such patients, even when neurologic
examination, brain computed tomography, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis are normal.
Key words: headache disorders, cerebrovascular accident, vascular headaches, intracranial aneurysm, subarachnoid
A 66-year-old right-handed woman presented after
acute onset of a sudden and severe headache. That morn-
ing, while at work, she stood up from a chair and suddenly
experienced an explosive headache in the occipital region.
This was accompanied by binocular visual disturbance de-
scribed as “waves of water” traveling from her peripheral
to central vision. With eyes closed, she saw vertical white
beams of light with superimposed colored dots. Additional
symptoms included transient lightheadedness and nausea.
She took 325 mg of aspirin and presented to our institu-
tion. At the time of arrival to our institution, her symp-
toms had resolved except for a mild frontal and occipital
The patient’s past medical history was significant for hy-
pertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity. There was no his-
tory of headache, transient ischemic attack or stroke,tobacco
use, atrial fibrillation, or ischemic heart disease. Her medi-
cations at admission included aspirin, lisinopril, pravastatin,
and estrogen.
Vital signs and physical examination were normal.
Neurological examination disclosed no focal, long-tract,
or lateralizing neurological findings. Laboratory testing of
blood counts, basic chemistries, prothrombin time, par-
tial thromboplastin time, homocysteine, sedimentation rate,
anti-nuclear antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies, and car-
diac enzymes was normal. Electrocardiogram showed nor-
mal sinus rhythm with normal axis and a rate of 76 beats
per minute. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the head
without contrast was normal. Magnetic resonance imaging
From the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale,
Address all correspondence to Dr. Todd J. Schwedt, MD, De-
partment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd.,
Scottsdale, AZ 85259.
Accepted for publication January 11, 2005.
(MRI) of the brain revealed two small areas of restricted
diffusion in the inferior right cerebellar hemisphere and a
punctate area of restricted diffusion in the left side of the
cerebellar vermis (Figure). Magnetic resonance angiography
of the circle of Willis was normal. Transesophageal echocar-
diography and duplex ultrasound of the lower extremities
were normal.
Thunderclap headache refers to a sudden and se-
vere headache that comes unexpectedly, reminding one
of a “clap of thunder.” The initial description of this
headache type was related to an unruptured intracra-
nial aneurysm.1Since that time, there have been an ex-
panding number of conditions associated with thunderclap
headache. These include cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,
cervical artery dissection, spontaneous intracranial hypoten-
sion, pituitary apoplexy, retroclival hematoma, and hyper-
tensive reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy.2-4In ad-
dition, the International Headache Society has recognized
primary thunderclap headache as an idiopathic headache
disorder that may occur in the absence of intracranial
Although headaches occurring in the context of an is-
chemic stroke are not uncommon, this is the first report
of a thunderclap headache as the presenting and primary
clinical feature, in the absence of neurological findings. Ap-
proximately 25% of patients with stroke develop an asso-
ciated headache, but is often overshadowed by the abrupt
neurological deficits.5Headaches may resemble a patient’s
usual headache, or may be a new headache that is most com-
monly throbbing, and if unilateral, ipsilateral to the side of
the stroke. Pain in the frontal region of the head is more com-
mon with anterior circulation strokes while diffuse or occip-
ital pain is more common with posterior circulation strokes.6
Headaches more frequently occur with strokes that are large,
522 March 2006
Figure.—MRI Brain: Right cerebellar and left vermian areas of restricted diffusion correlating with apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC) changes. These findings are consistent with acute ischemic infarction.
a primary headache disorder.6
The underlying pathophysiology for headache with
stroke is multifactorial. Likely, there is direct activation of
sensory afferents that innervate the intracranial vasculature.
Headaches are twice as common with strokes in the pos-
terior circulation, which is more densely innervated by no-
ciceptive sensory afferents from upper cervical ganglia and
superior vagal ganglia. In addition, a pattern of neurogenic
inflammation is created during ischemic stroke with release
of vasoactive neuropeptides from sensory afferents, inflam-
matory cytokines, nitrogen oxide from damaged tissue, and
bradykinins.7This reaction results in increased nociceptive
input into the nervous system and head pain.
The addition of ischemic stroke expands the differential
diagnosis of thunderclap headache and reinforces the need
for MR imaging, even when the initial neurological examina-
tion, brain CT, and cerebrospinal fluid exam are unrevealing.
In some cases, imaging of the cranial and cervical arteries and
intracranial venous system is also necessary.
1. Day JW, Raskin NH. Thunderclap headache: A symp-
tom of unruptured cerebral aneurysm. Lancet. 1986;2:1247-
2. Dodick DW. Thunderclap headache. Curr Pain Headache
Rep. 2002;6:226-232.
3. Dodick DW, Eross EJ, Drazkowski JF, et al. Thun-
derclap headache associated with reversible vasospasm
and posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Cephalalgia.
4. de Bruijn SFTM, Stam J, Kappelle LJ, for the CVST
Study Group. Thunderclap headache as first symptom of
cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Lancet. 1996;348:1623-
5. Vestergaard K, Andersen G, Nielsen MI, et al. Headache in
stroke. Stroke. 1993;24:1621-1624.
6. Kumral E, Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, et al. Headache
at stroke onset: The Lausanne Stroke Registry. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:490-492.
7. Dray A. Inflammatory mediators of pain. Br Anaesth.
Headache 523
Chronic Long-Standing Headache due to Neurocysticercosis
Josef Finsterer, MD, PhD; Mei Li, MD; Kartrin Rasmkogeler, MD; Herbert Auer, PhD
A 35-year-old Chinese woman presented with a 26-year history of persistent headache, relieved only by diuret-
ics. Characteristic CT findings, peripheral eosinophilia, lymphocytic CSF pleocytosis, elevated CSF IgG, positive
oligoclonal bands, antibody-positive ELISA, and Western blot results with Taenia solium antigen, and a favorable
response to albendazole led to the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis.
Key words: parasitological infection, parasitosis, aseptic meningitis, chronic headache, eosinophilia, Taenia solium
Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is the most frequent parasitic
infection of the central nervous system and is protean in its
clinical presentations (Table).1,2Cysts are predominantly lo-
cated in the parenchyma (91%), but also occur in the ven-
tricles, subarachnoidal space, and spinal cord.2We present
an unusual case of NCC manifesting as recurrent headache
over a period of 26 years.
A 35-year-old Chinese woman reported episodes of
holocranial headache since age 9. She described her
headaches as pulsatile, originating in the neck and extend-
ing over the entire head. Her headache often was accom-
panied by blurred or double vision, vertigo, and fever; for
the previous 5 years, she also reported nausea and emesis.
At times, the pain reached such intensity that she would hy-
perventilate, exhibit tetany, and lose consciousness. At age
9, a diagnostic work-up (including a lumbar puncture CCP
and cerebral angiography) reportedly was normal. During
a severe attack at age 17, she was treated with mannitol,
four times daily for 3 days and experienced a significant
reduction in headaches. At age 21, a CSF analysis report-
edly demonstrated granulocytic pleocytosis of 770/3 with
slight eosinophilia. Tuberculous meningitis was suspected,
and treatment with antibiotics was initiated. Noting no im-
provement, the patient stopped all medications after 10
weeks. At age 22, she experienced a possible seizure. Mul-
tiple EEGs were normal, and no anti-epileptic medication
FromtheKrankenanstaltRudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria(Drs.
Finsterer and Rasmkogeler); Otolaryngological Department,
Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria (Dr. Li); and
InstituteofHygiene,UniversityofVienna, Vienna, Austria(Dr.
Address all correspondence to Dr. J. Finsterer, Postach 20, 1180
Vienna, Austria.
Accepted for publication November 8, 2005.
was begun. Diagnostic work-up at age 31 disclosed a pseudo-
tumor cerebri and a cystic chiasmatic lesion. She refused a
spinal tap after her headache promptly improved following
a treatment with acetazolamide. Her relatives subsequently
observed her to exhibit slowly progressive cognitive decline
over the ensuing years.
At age 35, she again sought medical evaluation be-
cause of intensifying headache. Her examination revealed
only lymphadenopathy-reduced Achilles tendon reflexes,
and specifically the ophthalmologic exam was normal. Blood
studies revealed eosinophilia (6%; normal: 1% to 5%). Brain
CT demonstrated several calcified cysts in the Sylvian fis-
suresbilaterally. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis demonstrateda
lymphocytic pleocytosis (359/mm3), peripheral eosinophilia,
and the presence of oligoclonal bands; the lumbar puncture’s
opening pressure was normal. ELISA and Western blot tests
were positive for Taenia solium in the serum and CSF.
Albendazole, 800 mg daily, was administered for
3 weeks. After 2 days on albendazole therapy, the patient
reported increased headache along with vertigo, nausea,
and vomiting. The CSF white cell pleocytosis had increased
to 638/mm3; her headache improved significantly following
treatment with corticosteroids. Three months following dis-
continuation of albendazole, her headache had not recurred.
Though headache is a common clinical feature of NCC,
it has not been described as a dominant symptom persist-
ing for years.2-5Patients with NCC most often present with
seizures (66%), symptomatic hydrocephalus (16%), menin-
gitis or encephalitis (12%), focal neurological deficits (11%),
or altered mental state (6%); headache occurs in about
15%.2In children with NCC, headache with associated vom-
iting reportedly is more common, occurring in one-third.5
The chronic headache reported by our patient presum-
ably reflected chronic meningitis or meningoencephalitis.
Except for the chiasmatic lesion noted when she was 31,
524 March 2006
Table.—CNS Manifestations of NCC
Pseudotumor cerebri
Bilateral disc edema
Intracranial hypertension
Sinus thrombosis
Parkinson syndrome
Inflammatory aneurysm
Subarachnoid scarring
Cerebral edema
Cysternal cysts
Global mental deterioration
Extrapyramidal signs
Third cranial nerve palsy
no intracranial cysts were evident on repeated MRIs. That
her NCC was so clinically indolent over a period of years, is
consistent with previous reports.2That NCC was diagnosed
in a Chinese woman living in Europe emphasizes both that
NCC has become more widely distributed due to immigra-
tion also in the Western world and the fact that NCC is one
of the major causes of neurological disease in China.6
Though there is no direct proof for a causal relation-
ship between the patient’s chronic headache and NCC, her
headache at last did resolve following treatment with alben-
dazole; and the CSF eosinophilia present at age 21 suggests
that she already was infected at that time. Her prognosis is
likely to be favorable as only a few calcified cysts were de-
tected via brain imaging, and death is rare in patients with
low cyst burden.7
This case confirms that NCC assumes an indolent course
over a period of years and may manifest only as chronic
headache. Such a relatively mild course may delay correct
diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
1. Aditya GS, Mahadevan A, Santosh V, Chickabasaviah YT,
Ashwathnarayanarao CB, Krishna SS. Cysticercal chronic
basal arachnoiditis with infarcts, mimicking tuberculous pat-
hology in endemic areas. Neuropathology. 2004;24:320-325.
2. Wallin MT, Kurtzke JF. Neurocysticercosis in the United
States: Review of an important emerging infection. Neurol-
ogy. 2004;63:1559-1564.
3. Llompart Pou JA, Gene A, Ayestaran JI, Saus C. Neurocys-
ticercosis presenting as sudden death. Acta Neurochir (Wien).
4. Mahajan SK, Machhan PC, Sood BR, Kumar S, Sharma DD,
Mokta J, et al. Neurocysticercosis presenting with psychosis.
Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:663-665.
5. SinghiP,SinghiS.Neurocysticercosisinchildren.J Child Neu-
rol. 2004;19:482-492.
6. Ikejima T, Piao ZX, Sako Y, Sato MO, Bao S, Si R, et al.
Evaluation of clinical and serological data from Taenia solium
cysticercosis patients in eastern Inner Mongolia Autonomous
Region, China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005;99:625-630.
7. DeGiorgio CM, Houston I, Oviedo S, Sorvillo F. Deaths as-
sociated with cysticercosis. Report of three cases and review
of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;12:e2.
Hemicrania Continua: A Case in Which A Patient Experienced
Complete Relief on Melatonin
Roderick C. Spears, MD
This paper reports a case of hemicrania continua in which attacks were successfully eliminated while taking
melatonin 7 mg at bedtime after the patient was no longer able to tolerate indomethacin due to gastrointestinal
side effects.
Key words: hemicrania continua, melatonin
Headache 525
Hemicrania continua (HC) is an uncommon primary
headache disorder characterized by a continuous, mild-to-
moderate intensity, unilateral headache.1-4
Most patients will experience superimposed exacerba-
tions of more severe pain, often associated with ipsilateral
autonomic symptoms. Response to indomethacin is a neces-
sary criterion mandated by the International Headache So-
ciety guidelines.2,3,5Treatment with indomethacin, in doses
ranging from 25 to 300 mg per day, successfully eliminates
attacks. Some patients are unable to tolerate indomethacin
due to moderate-to-severe gastrointestinal (GI) side effects.
I now report a case of HC in which attacks were suc-
cessfully eliminated while taking melatonin 7 mg at bedtime
after the patient was no longer able to tolerate indomethacin.
This is the second such case in the literature.
A 42-year-old, left-handed, Caucasian man initially
presented with a 12-year history of unilateral headaches
diagnosed as migraine and a 4-month history of unilat-
eral headache on the ipsilateral side that acutely became
a chronic daily headache. The patient reported prior to
4 months ago, he would have 1 headache attack per month as-
sociated with photophobia, phonophobia, osmophobia, and
nausea. He described the pain as throbbing and pressure-
like pain and rated it as 6 to 8 out of 10 in severity. He
reported this headache would last for 24 to 36 hours and
then resolve completely. The patient also reported that the
above described headaches could be triggered by weather
Within the 4 months prior to presentation to this author,
the patient reported acute onset of unilateral headache on
the left side, the same side as his previous headaches, which
had not resolved. He described a mild-to-moderate steady
ache,2to4outof10ontheseverity scale,affectingtheipsilat-
eral eye and radiating into the ipsilateral hemicranium. Su-
perimposed exacerbations of severe pain, described as “pok-
ing in my left eye,” would occur at varying intervals lasting
several minutes to hours. He reported ptosis, erythema, and
lacrimation involving the ipsilateral eye. The patient also re-
ported a “foreign body” sensation in the ipsilateral eye. He
FromtheUniversityofRochester/Rochester General Hospital,
Neurology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Address all correspondence to Dr. Roderick C. Spears, Uni-
versity of Rochester/Rochester General Hospital, Neurology,
Rochester, NY, USA.
Accepted for publication September 23, 2005.
reports that he is never pain free on the left side and that the
severe pain is associated with photophobia and nausea.
Past medical history was significant for migraine, ir-
ritable bowel syndrome, asthma, mitral valve prolaspe,
and gastric enteritis. The patient was taking escitalo-
pram oxalate, protriptyline, eletriptan, naratriptan, mon-
telukast, esomeprazole, mometasone, prochlorperazine, and
hydrocodone. The patient reports no relief from his new
headache when taking eletriptan, naratriptan, and hy-
drocodone. He also reported no relief taking prednisone.
and son. The general medical examination was normal. The
neurological examination was remarkable for decreased sen-
sation to vibration and temperature on the left side in his arm
and leg and decreased deep tendon reflexes at the patellar
and Achilles on the right side, it was otherwise normal. A
magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal.
The patient was treated with indomethacin 25 mg TID
and reported being headache free 36 hours later. The patient
remained headache free for 1 week but had to discontinue
the indomethacin due to GI irritation, and his headache re-
turned to pretreatment levels. The patient was started on
melatonin 5 mg QHS and had improvement in headache
pain. He became completely headache free on melatonin 7
mg QHS. The patient has been followed for 5 months and
has remained headache free on melatonin 7 mg QHS. At-
tempts to lower the dosage of melatonin have resulted in a
return of the headache within 24 hours.
HC was first described in 1981 and officially named by
Sjaastad and Spierings in 1984.6,7There are now more than
100 reports of HC in the literature. HC was originally be-
lieved to be a rare primary headache disorder but more
recent evidence may suggest that HC is not rare, just un-
derrecognized.2In the clinical setting, HC is characterized
by a unilateral headache that is continuous and of mild-
to-moderate severity. The pain is usually reported as dull,
aching, or pressure-like pain without associated symptoms.
Exacerbations of more severe pain, lasting anywhere from
20 minutes to several days, are experienced in the major-
ity of those with HC, and when present are associated with
1 or more autonomic symptoms on the ipsilateral side. Mi-
grainous features, such as photophobia, phonophobia, nau-
sea, and vomiting commonly occur during exacerbations of
pain. Many patients will experience a sensation of a foreign
body in their eye similar to sand or an eyelash on the affected
526 March 2006
HC presents as 2 temporal profiles: an episodic form
with distinct headache phases separated by periods of pain-
free remissions, and a chronic form in which the headache
persists without remission for years.3HC is chronic from
onset in 53% of patients; the disorder began in the episodic
form and evolved into the chronic form in 35%, and it begins
and remains episodic in 12% of patients.2
HC may be incorrectly diagnosed as cluster headache.
This can occur by focusing exclusively on the ipsilateral au-
tonomic features that accompany the painful exacerbations
of HC. Similarly, focusing on the associated photophobia,
phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting that may occur during
exacerbations of HC may lead to misdiagnosing HC as mi-
graine. Autonomic features on the ipsilateral side, which are
present during exacerbations of HC, are at times also present
during acute attacks of migraine. HC is distinguished from
cluster headache and migraine by the presence of a contin-
uous baseline headache that is usually unilateral and mild
to moderate in severity. The associated features of photo-
phobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting, as well as the
ipsilateral autonomic features of cluster are absent with the
continuous baseline pain of HC.
My patient suffers from the chronic form of HC
and therefore requires continuous therapy, typically in-
domethacin, for headache relief. Some patients are unable
to tolerate indomethacin due to GI distress, renal disease, or
concurrent anticoagulation therapy, and alternative types of
therapy must be considered. Peres and Silbertstein demon-
strated in a study using cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-
2), efficacy of celecoxib and rofecoxib. They found 60% of
patients who received celecoxib and 33% who received ro-
fecoxib experienced a complete response.8There is also one
case in the literature similar to HC that did not respond to
indomethacin, and many other standard headache agents,
but was responsive to 1200 mg of gabapentin per day. That
patient had complete pain relief after 17 years of continu-
ous headache.9The most recent case report in the literature
involves a patient who initially responded to indomethacin.
When that no longer worked for her, she responded to ve-
rapamil with some relief at 40 mg, but complete relief at
120 mg per day.10 Finally, Rozen reported 3 cases of idio-
pathic stabbing headache, also an indomethacin responsive
headache that responded to melatonin, and 1 case of HC that
responded to melatonin.11,12 My patient was unable to tol-
erate indomethacin due to GI distress, but his headache has
been effectively controlled with melatonin through 5 months
of follow-up.
Melatonin may play a role in headache pathophysiology
via several mechanisms. It directly scavenges toxic-free rad-
icals, and inhibits the activity of nitric oxide synthase. Mela-
tonin has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory effects.
Its action in membrane stabilization, inhibition of dopamine
release, modulation of the GABAergic system, neuroprotec-
tion from glutamate induced toxicity, potentiation of opiod
analgesia, all suggest melatonin may play an important pro-
tective role in headache occurrence.13,14 Melatonin has also
been found to modulate serotonin. It is believed that mela-
tonin may interfere in cortical spreading depression, com-
monly found in the migraine spectrum, via its effect on the
nitric oxide, GABAergic, and glutamatergic systems. It is
also known that depression and migraine may be linked to
the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems.15 I propose
that melatonin is a good alternative for patients with HC
who are not able to tolerate indomethacin. This becomes
more important in patients suffering from the chronic form
of HC.
1. Bordini C, Antonaci F, Stover LJ, Schrader H, Sjaastad
O. ”Hemicrania continua”: A clinical review. Headache.
2. Peres MFP, Silberstein SD, Nahmias S, Shechter AL, Rozen
TD, Young WB. Hemicrania continua is not that rare. Neu-
rology. 2001;57:948-951.
3. Newman LC, Lipton RB, Solomon S. Hemicrania continua:
Ten new cases and a review of the literature. Neurology.
4. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB. A review of paroxysmal hemicra-
nias, SUNCT syndrome and other short-lasting headaches
with autonomic features, including new cases. Brain.
5. Headache Classification Committee of the International
Headache Society. The international classification of
headache disorders, 2nd ed. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):
6. Medina JL, Diamond S. Cluster headache variant: Spectrum
of a new headache syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1981;38:705-709.
7. Sjaastad O, Spierings EL. Hemicrania continua: Another
headache absolutely responsive to indomethacin. Cephalal-
gia. 1984;4:65-70.
8. Peres MF, Silberstein SD. Hemicrania continua responds to
cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Headache. 2002;42:530-531.
9. Mariano da Silva H, Alcantara MC, Bordini CA, Speciali
JG. Strictly unilateral headache reminiscent of hemicra-
nia continua resistant to indomethacin but responsive to
gabapentin. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:409-410.
10. Rajabally YA, Jacob S. Hemicrania continua responsive to
verapamil. Headache. 2005;45:1082.
11. Rozen TD. Melatonin as treatment of idiopathic stabbing
headache. Neurology. 2003;61:865-866.
Headache 527
12. Rozen TD. Melatonin as treatment of indomethacin respon-
sive headache syndromes. Cephalalgia. 2003;23:734-735.
13. Peres MFP, Stiles MA, Oshinsky M, et al.. Remitting form
of hemicrania continua with a seasonal pattern. Headache.
14. Peres MFP, Zukerman E, Porto PP, Brandt RA. Headaches
and pineal cyst: A (more than) coincidental relationship?
Headache. 2004;44:929-930.
15. Peres MF. Melatonin, the pineal gland and their implications
for headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:403-411.
... 3. Saccharine, Aspartame Sucralose, Neotame Acesulfame K Food sweetener Carcinogenic, hepatotoxic chromosomal abnormality, diarrhea, migraine, genotoxic Mukhopadhyay et al. (2000); Weihrauch and Diehl (2004);Roberts (2007); Soffritti et al. (2007); Bigal and Krymchantowski (2006 (2003) 13. X-rays, gamma rays (ionizing radiation) Radioactive elements in the earth, cosmic rays, radon gas, man-made artificial dose dependent radiations Cardiovascular toxicity, carcinogenic, organ failure, hematopoietic syndrome Menon et al. (2016) 14. ...
Full-text available
Mutagens present in the environment manifest toxic effects and are considered as serious threat for human health and healthcare. Recent reports reveal that medicinal plant resources are being explored for identifying potent antimutagenic as well as cancer preventing agents. There is mounting evidence that cancer and other mutation-related diseases can be prevented with the use of medicinal pant resources including crude extracts, active fractions, phytochemicals, and pure phytomolecules. These medicinal plant resources possessing antimutagenic potentials have been shown to target molecular mechanisms underlying the mutagenic impacts. Technological advents and high-throughput screening/activity methods have revolutionized this field, though several potent plants and their active principles have been reported as effective antimutagens. The translational success rate needs to be improved, but the trends are encouraging. In this review, we present the current understandings and updates on various mutagens in the environment, toxicities related/attributed to them, the resultant mutations (and cancer), and how medicinal plants come to the rescue. A perspective review has been presented on whether and how medicinal plant resources can be an effective approach for addressing mutagens in the environment. An account of medicinal plant resources used as antimutagenic agents has been given along with the underlying mechanism of action and their therapeutic potential in various models of cancer. Recent success stories, current challenges, and future prospects are discussed.
... However, proper assessment of the records and specific immunotoxicity studies evidently cleared the misconception proving that the involution process of the thymus gland was mainly due to nutritional deficit 17 . Migraine attacks were reported upon increased incidence of sucralose ingestion 18 . The tolerance studies along withextensive animal safety database indicate that it does not have absence of adverse effects on human health due to long-term or frequent intake of sucralose at the maximum amount of ingestion estimated 19 . ...
Full-text available
Background: Sugar is an inevitable part of our diet. Since ages, sweeteners have been used to enhance the flavour and appearance of food products. Sweeteners may be natural or synthetically produced. Those that are synthetic, as a whole, are referred to as artificial sweeteners. This review aims at highlighting the characteristics and health implications of artificial sweeteners. Methodology: In this review, the physical and chemical characteristics of artificial sweeteners are highlighted. Also, the impact of artificial sweeteners on human health is discussed in detail. The data has been collected using standard search engines like PubMed, Google scholar and websites of publishing houses like Elsevier and Springer. Results and Discussion: Today, due to high calorie content, natural sweeteners are getting replaced by artificial ones. The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has approved utilization of five artificial sweeteners namely, saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, neotame and cyclamate. However, artificial sweeteners should be consumed carefully and in limited quantities. This is because the consumption of artificial sweeteners is controversial owing to their effects on health ranging from mild headache to dreadful cancer risks. Conclusion: Hence, long term study of these sweeteners for further safety evaluation on health risks is essential.
... As a result, consumption increase for these products were led to appearance many questions about safety of these sweeteners for human in general, although, it have possible health benefits during use in weight control [3] and diabetes [4], but possible health concerns began to appear through the potential effect to occurrence of cancer [5], migraine [6], preterm delivery [7] and thrombocytopenia [8]. ...
... Cases studies have been reported on sucralose consumption and the increased incidence of deleterious effects. Bigal and Krymchantowski (2006) discuss migraines triggered by sucralose. Multiple blinded posttests were provided for this client once she was migraine free to determine if sucralose was the trigger for her migraines. ...
Since their discovery, the safety of artificial sweeteners has been controversial. Artificial sweeteners provide the sweetness of sugar without the calories. As public health attention has turned to reversing the obesity epidemic in the United States, more individuals of all ages are choosing to use these products. These choices may be beneficial for those who cannot tolerate sugar in their diets (e.g., diabetics). However, scientists disagree about the relationships between sweeteners and lymphomas, leukemias, cancers of the bladder and brain, chronic fatigue syndrome, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, autism, and systemic lupus. Recently these substances have received increased attention due to their effects on glucose regulation. Occupational health nurses need accurate and timely information to counsel individuals regarding the use of these substances. This article provides an overview of types of artificial sweeteners, sweetener history, chemical structure, biological fate, physiological effects, published animal and human studies, and current standards and regulations.
... El efecto más leve de la sucralosa es como desencadenante de migrañas; existen casos clínicos en los que el consumo de sucralosa ha provocado episodios agudos de migraña en consumidores después de haber ingerido bebidas endulzadas o en alimentos preparados con el edulcorante. En estos casos clínicos se describe al edulcorante como "disparador" de la cefalea, al consumir bebidas light, pero sin especificar las concentraciones en el producto (18,(45)(46)(47). ...
Full-text available
Antecedentes: la función principal de los edulcorantes no nutritivos es proveer al consumidor un producto dulce sin la carga calórica del azúcar. El consumo de edulcorantes no nutritivos se relaciona con alteraciones en el ADN, con apoptosis y con la síntesis de precursores de cáncer. Además, su consumo también se relaciona recientemente con un incremento de tejido adiposo. Objetivo: analizar el efecto de los edulcorantes no nutritivos a largo plazo, evaluando el riesgo de estos compuestos. Materiales y métodos: búsqueda en bases de datos, PubMed, SciELO y Redalyc, y análisis de bibliografía relacionada con efectos tóxicos y metabólicos del consumo de edulcorantes no nutritivos. Resultados: el consumo de estos edulcorantes presentó efectos citotóxicos en diferentes modelos de estudio. Parece existir una relación con el incremento en la síntesis de tejido adiposo, que provoca obesidad y enfermedades derivadas. Los edulcorantes sintéticos fueron los que presentaron más alteraciones citotóxicas, mientras que edulcorantes naturales, a excepción de los esteviósidos, no presentaron efectos adversos. Múltiples investigaciones explican el efecto del consumo de estos edulcorantes en el metabolismo y los efectos citotóxicos. Conclusiones: el tema de edulcorantes es controversial, por ello la información recopilada en esta revisión busca proporcionar un panorama que ayude a comprender la respuesta a nivel celular y metabólico sobre su consumo.
... As a result, consumption increase for these products were led to appearance many questions about safety of these sweeteners for human in general, although, it have possible health benefits during use in weight control [3] and diabetes [4], but possible health concerns began to appear through the potential effect to occurrence of cancer [5], migraine [6], preterm delivery [7] and thrombocytopenia [8]. ...
Full-text available
Twelve male rats, Albino Sprague Dawley rats, approximately age 42 day were used for this study that divided into 3 groups, Group A: treated orally with 20mg aspartame that dissolved in 1.5ml of sterile distilled water, Group B: treated orally with 20mg saccharin that dissolved in 1.5ml of sterile distilled water, Group C: control received equivalent quantity sterile distilled water for the same period. The results for test of blood as Triglyceride, Cholesterol, HDL, LDL and VLDL parameters measured showed 75±3.83, 70±2.90, 50±1, 12±0.9 and 20±1 (mg/dL) respectively at 0mg concentration of sweeteners, while it was 55.7±1.91, 71±2.81, 60±1.5, 11.5±0.5 and 21±0.5 (mg/dL) respectively at 20mg concentration of aspartame and it was 80±2.70, 73±2.95, 55±2, 12.2±0.6 and 20±0.7 (mg/dL) respectively at 20mg concentration of saccharine. All of Glucose, Total protein, Albumin, Globulin, Ind bilirubin, D bilirubin, T bilirubin, Blood urea, Uric acid and Creatinine parameter were measured in this test showed 132.0±5, 6.3±0.8, 2.5±0.1, 4±0.07, 0.10±0.1, 0.04±0.01, 0.14±0.02, 51.9±2.18, 3.6±0.05 and 0.50±0.03 (mg/dL) respectively at 0mg concentration of sweeteners, while it was 131.5±6, 6.6±0.5, 2.6±0.1, 4.4±0.1, 0.9±0.01, 0.04±0.02, 0.09±0.01, 47.2±1.67, 2.6±0.06 and 0.25±0.03 (mg/dL) respectively at 20mg concentration of aspartame and it was 133.1±5.2, 6.7±0.3, 2.55±0.1, 4.2±0.2, 0.11±0.01, 0.04±0.02, 0.09±0.02, 40.1±1.47, 2.9±0.05 and 0.21±0.02 (mg/dL) respectively at 20mg concentration of saccharine. Histological test results showed different change in liver, kidney and spleen tissues after treated with aspartame and saccharine.
... Three case reports have appeared in the literature that suggested sucralose may be associated with the onset of migraine headaches in female adults (Patel et al. 2006;Bigal & Krymchantowski 2006;Hirsch 2007), each involving only one individual. These observations have not been followed up with a hypothesis-based, properly controlled clinical trial. ...
Full-text available
Sucralose is a non-caloric high intensity sweetener that is approved globally for use in foods and beverages. This review provides an updated summary of the literature addressing the safety of use of sucralose. Studies reviewed include chemical characterization and stability, toxicokinetics in animals and humans, assessment of genotoxicity, and animal and human feeding studies. Endpoints evaluated include effects on growth, development, reproduction, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, carcinogenicity and overall health status. Human clinical studies investigated potential effects of repeated consumption in individuals with diabetes. Recent studies on the safety of sucralose focused on carcinogenic potential and the effect of sucralose on the gut microflora are reviewed. Following the discovery of sweet taste receptors in the gut and studies investigating the activation of these receptors by sucralose lead to numerous human clinical studies assessing the effect of sucralose on overall glycemic control. Estimated daily intakes of sucralose in different population subgroups, including recent studies on children with special dietary needs, consistently find that the intakes of sucralose in all members of the population remain well below the acceptable daily intake. Collectively, critical review of the extensive database of research demonstrates that sucralose is safe for its intended use as a non-caloric sugar alternative.
Introduction: In order to strengthen metabolic study designs on non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), sensory characteristics of NNS with a variety of carriers should be better understood. The objective of this investigation was to determine the appropriate carrier (water or applesauce) for a high dose of specific-types of NNS (aspartame, sucralose, or stevia) in order to inform future metabolic and controlled feeding study designs. Methods: Adult participants (n=67) sampled six carrier-sweetener combinations in total (water and applesauce containing high concentrations of aspartame [30 g/oz], sucralose [8.25 g/oz, and stevia [6.75 g/oz]). Participants completed a Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) emotional terminology questionnaire for each sample, a five-point affective attribute questionnaire, and paired preference questionnaire for a comparison of the water and applesauce carriers for each sweetener. Results: Applesauce waspreferred as a carrier (sucralose = 83.6%; aspartame = 79.1%; stevia = 74.6%) significantly more than water for all sweetener types (p<XXX). For all NNS types, mean acceptability scores were significantly?? higher for applesauce samples compared to water samples. With the exception of the term “disgusted”, all other frequently selected terms were positive, such as “happy”, or neutral, such as “mild”. Cochran's Q test determined a strong significance among the emotional terms (χ2[43] = 203.1, p<0.001). Conclusion: Participants in this investigation preferred high NNS concentrations delivered in applesauce rather than water. Applesauce is likely a more appropriate and tolerable carrier for high-dose NNS in research studies. Using an acceptable carrier for delivery of high-doses of NNS to research participants may contribute to designing effective intervention studies, with greater participant compliance. This is of great importance when examining how NNS consumption impacts health outcomes.
Background: The role of diet in the management of the headache patient is a controversial topic in the headache field. Objectives: To review the evidence supporting the hypothesis that specific foods or ingredients within foods and beverages trigger attacks of headache and/or migraine and to discuss the use of elimination diets in the prevention of headache disorders METHODS: This represents part 1 of a narrative review of the role of diet in the prevention of migraine and other headache disorders. A PubMed search was performed with the following search terms: "monosodium glutamate," "caffeine," "aspartame," "sucralose," "histamine intolerance syndrome," "tyramine," "alcohol," "chocolate," "nitrites," "IgG elimination diets," and "gluten." Each of these search terms was then cross-referenced with "headache" and "migraine" to identify relevant studies. Only studies that were written in English were included in this review. Results: Caffeine withdrawal and administration of MSG (dissolved in liquid) has the strongest evidence for triggering attacks of headache as evidenced by multiple positive provocation studies. Aspartame has conflicting evidence with two positive and two negative provocation studies. Observational studies provide modest evidence that gluten- and histamine-containing foods as well as alcohol may precipitate headaches in subgroups of patients. Two of three randomized controlled trials reported that an elimination diet of IgG positive foods significantly decreased frequency of headache/migraine during the treatment as compared to baseline time period. Conclusions: Certain foods, beverages, and ingredients within foods may trigger attacks of headache and/or migraine in susceptible individuals. Elimination diets can prevent headaches in subgroups of persons with headache disorders.
Full-text available
Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a common cause of seizures and neurologic disease. Although there may be variable presentations depending on the stage and location of cysts in the nervous system, most children (> 80%) present with seizures particularly partial seizures. About a third of cases have headache and vomiting. Diagnosis is made by either CT or MRI. Single enhancing lesions are the commonest visualization of a scolex confirms the diagnosis. Some cases have multiple cysts with a characteristic starry-sky appearance. Management involves use of anticonvulsants for seizures and steroids for cerebral edema. The use of cysticidal therapy continues to be debated. Controlled studies have shown that cysticidal therapy helps in increased and faster resolution of CT lesions. Improvement in long-term seizure control has not yet been proven. Children with single lesions have a good outcome and seizure recurrence rate is low. Children with multiple lesions have recurrent seizures. Extraparenchymal NCC has a guarded prognosis but it is rare in children. In endemic areas NCC must be considered in the differential diagnosis of seizures and various other neurological disorders.
Aspartame, an artificial sweetener added to many foods and beverages, may trigger headaches in susceptible individuals. We report two patients with aspartame-triggered attacks in whom the use of an aspartame-containing acute medication (Maxalt-MLT) worsened an ongoing attack of migraine.
Objective: To review published clinical studies on neurocysticercosis (NCC) in the United States over the past two decades and comment on epidemiologic trends and treatment. Methods: This review is based on a search of the literature citing NCC cases diagnosed in the United States utilizing PUBMED for the years 1980 through early 2004. Case series, case reports, epidemiologic studies, and treatment of NCC were evaluated. Results: A total of 1,494 patients with NCC were reported in the United States among large case series (n > 20) between 1980 and early 2004. Common onset symptoms for these patients included seizures (66%), hydrocephalus (16%), and headaches (15%). The majority presented with parenchymal NCC (91%), with the remainder having ventricular cysts (6%), subarachnoid cysts (2%), and spinal cysts (0.2%). A total of 76 cases of NCC were likely acquired within the United States during the period of this review. A higher risk for acquiring NCC has been documented in patients who have traveled to endemic regions, are of Hispanic ethnicity, and have contact with Taenia solium tapeworm carriers. Conclusions: An increasing number of NCC cases have been reported in the US literature over the past 50 years, suggesting that the prevalence of this disease may be on the rise. Because neurologists are often involved with the diagnosis and management of NCC in the United States, it is important that they become familiar with this disorder, as they will play an important role in efforts to control the disease.
The aim is to review the background underlying the debate related to the alternative nomenclatures for and the most appropriate diagnostic evaluation of patients with thunderclap headache. The clinical profile and differential diagnosis of thunderclap headache is described, and a nosological framework and diagnostic approach to this group of patients is proposed.
Objective To detail the underlying pathological conditions, symptoms, signs, and outcomes of patients with isolated sphenoid sinus involvement. Design A retrospective survey. Setting An academic referral center of a university hospital. Patients All 39 patients, aged 7 to 85 years, treated in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland, from 1988 through 1997 for isolated sphenoid sinus disease. Results Sinusitis was characterized as acute in 26 patients, subacute in 5 (including 1 pyocele), and chronic in 8 (including 2 fungal infections). No tumors were found. Isolated sinus cysts were excluded from the study. Headache, the main symptom in 32 patients (82%), was localized most commonly on the vertex. Other common complaints were rhinitis, dizziness, eye symptoms, and fever. In 2 patients, the finding was occult. Eight patients (21%) presented with cranial nerve deficits, and 1 patient had an intracranial complication. Sinus irrigation was performed in 16 patients (41%) and sphenoidotomy was performed in 10 (26%). Fifteen patients (38%) were treated with antibiotic drugs alone. Within 3 months, 31 (84%) of 37 patients had recovered from the illness; 5 still experienced headaches despite having normalized radiographic findings; and 1 had permanent unilateral visual loss. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusions Sphenoid sinus opacity is mostly inflammatory in origin. Despite the benign nature of the disease, there is a risk of complications with high morbidity and mortality. Early and, if necessary, aggressive therapy to guarantee drainage of the sinus is recommended.
Prospective studies of precipitating factors in migraine are rare. Mig Access is a national control-matched survey conducted to evaluate the access of migraineurs to health care in France. This study allowed us to screen prospectively some precipitating factors of headache in migraineurs and in nonmigraineurs. Three hundred eighty-five migraineurs (group 1) and 313 nonmigraineurs (group 2) kept a diary for a 3-month period (a total of 35 805 days in group 1 and 29 109 days in group 2). Precipitating factors were reported for each headache period. Headache intensity was self-assessed during each headache period using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100. Headache was reported on 4274 days (12%) in group 1 and on 602 days (2%) in group 2. Headache intensity was greater in group 1 (39 ± 20 versus 32 ± 19, P<.05). The most frequent precipitating factors (reported at least once by more than 10% of subjects [range 18% to 80%] in both groups) were fatigue and/or sleep, stress, food and/or drinks, menstruation, heat/cold/weather, and infections in both groups. All these factors except infections were reported to cause headache more frequently in migraineurs than in nonmigraineurs. Mean intensity of headache related to fatigue and/or sleep, stress, food and/or drinks, hot/cold weather, and menstruation varied from 37 to 43 in migraineurs and from 29 to 35 in nonmigraineurs. Headache with the highest mean intensity was due to infections in the two groups (47 ± 20 in group 1,45 ± 23 in group 2). Our results support that endogenous factors are the most frequent triggers of headache in migraineurs. The most frequent precipitating factors of headache appear identical in migraineurs and in nonmigraineurs. Our results suggest that similar triggers could precipitate headache of different type in these two populations.
SYNOPSISMany dietary factors have been implicated as possible precipitants of headache. There have been recent differences of opinion with regard to the effect of the artificial sweetener aspartame as a precipitant of headache. To assess the importance of aspartame as a dietary factor in headache, 190 consecutive patients of the Montefiore Medical Center Headache Unit were questioned about the effect of alcohol, carbohydrates and aspartame in triggering their headaches. Of the 171 patients who fully completed the survey, 49.7 percent reported alcohol as a precipitating factor, compared to 8.2 percent reporting aspartame and 2.3 percent reporting carbohydrates.Patients with migraine were significantly more likely to report alcohol as a triggering factor and also reported aspartame as a precipitant three times more often than those having other types of headache. The conflicting results of two recent placebo-control studies of aspartame and headache are discussed.We conclude that aspartame may be an important dietary trigger of headache in some people.
Hemicrania continua is a primary headache syndrome characterized by a continuous, unilateral headache that is completely responsive to indomethacin. Hemicrania continua exists in continuous and remitting forms. Ten cases of the remitting form have been reported, none of which have had a seasonal pattern. We report a patient with remitting hemicrania continua with a clear seasonal predilection.