Article

Effects of chronic Triclosan exposure upon the antimicrobial susceptibility of 40 ex-situ environmental and human isolates

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Journal of Applied Microbiology (Impact Factor: 2.48). 06/2006; 100(5):1132-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02811.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Triclosan (TCS) exposure of Escherichia coli selects for tolerant clones, mutated in their enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI). It has been inferred that this phenomenon is widespread amongst bacterial genera and might be associated with resistance to third party agents.
Ex-situ, low passage isolates of enteric, human axilla, human oral origin and bacteria isolated from a domestic drain, together with selected type cultures were exposed to escalating concentrations of TCS over 10 passages using a gradient plate technique. One fresh faecal isolate of E. coli was included as a positive control. TCS susceptibility was determined for all strains before and after exposure, whilst enteric isolates were additionally assessed for susceptibility towards chlorhexidine, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, and the oral isolates towards chlorhexidine, tetracycline and metronidazole.
Triclosan exposure of E. coli markedly decreased TCS susceptibility. TCS susceptibility also decreased for Klebsiella oxytoca, Aranicola proteolyticus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Susceptibility of the remaining 35 strains to TCS and the other test agents remained unchanged.
These data suggest that selection for high level resistance by TCS exposure is not widespread and appears to be confined to certain enteric bacteria, especially E. coli. Change in TCS susceptibility did not affect susceptibility towards chemically unrelated antimicrobials. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT: Acquired high-level TCS resistance is not a widespread phenomenon.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Andrew McBain, Oct 01, 2014
  • Source
    • "For these studies, we reported only the results regarding the isolates from humans. Importantly , the results were similar regardless of isolate source [33, 43]. In addition, our search did not include studies that were published in languages other than English. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much has been written recently about the potential hazards versus benefits of antibacterial (biocide)-containing soaps. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to assess the studies that have examined the efficacy of products containing triclosan, compared with that of plain soap, in the community setting, as well as to evaluate findings that address potential hazards of this use--namely, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The PubMed database was searched for English-language articles, using relevant keyword combinations for articles published between 1980 and 2006. Twenty-seven studies were eventually identified as being relevant to the review. Soaps containing triclosan within the range of concentrations commonly used in the community setting (0.1%-0.45% wt/vol) were no more effective than plain soap at preventing infectious illness symptoms and reducing bacterial levels on the hands. Several laboratory studies demonstrated evidence of triclosan-adapted cross-resistance to antibiotics among different species of bacteria. The lack of an additional health benefit associated with the use of triclosan-containing consumer soaps over regular soap, coupled with laboratory data demonstrating a potential risk of selecting for drug resistance, warrants further evaluation by governmental regulators regarding antibacterial product claims and advertising. Further studies of this issue are encouraged.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2007 · Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 RUNNING HEAD: Cationic biocides and bacterial susceptibility 16
    Full-text · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Les campylobacters sont des bactéries zoonotiques responsables d’entérites chez l’homme. La viande de volaille est considérée comme une source importante de contamination. Il a été suggéré que les désinfectants et les stress subis par les bactéries au cours des procédures de nettoyage et désinfection et des procédés d’abattage des volailles puissent favoriser la sélection de gènes de résistance aux antibiotiques. Afin d’explorer cette hypothèse, des prélèvements dans 4 abattoirs de volailles ont été réalisés au cours de 9 visites. Les niveaux de résistance des campylobacters isolés ont été déterminés par la méthode de dilution en milieu gélosé pour 6 antibiotiques et 2 substances actives entrant dans la composition de désinfectants. Des souches isolées dans l’environnement des abattoirs après nettoyage et désinfection et sur les carcasses de volailles avant l’entrée en salle de ressuage, ont été génotypées avec la technique de PCR-RFLP des gènes pfla/gyrA et flaA. Nos résultats montrent d’une part que les campylobacters sont capables de survivre aux opérations de nettoyage et de désinfection dans les abattoirs de volailles, et que ces souches sont susceptibles de contaminer les carcasses de volailles. D’autre part, nos résultats indiquent que les opérations d’abattage et les procédures de nettoyage et désinfection dans les abattoirs de volailles ne semblent pas favoriser la sélection de souches de campylobacter résistantes aux antibiotiques.
    Preview · Article ·
Show more