A Review and Analysis of Placebo Treatments, Placebo Effects, and Placebo Controls in Trials of Medical Procedures When Sham Is Not Inert

Stichting (Foundation) for the Study of Traditional East Asian Medicine (STEAM), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.59). 05/2006; 12(3):303-10. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.303
Source: PubMed


Researchers examining the efficacy of medical procedures make assumptions about the nature of placebo. From these assumptions they select the sham interventions to be used in their trials. However, placebo is not well defined. A number of definitions are contradictory and sometimes misleading. This leads to problems in sham-controlled studies of medical procedures and difficulties interpreting their results. The author explores some of the contradictory definitions of placebo and assumptions and consequences of these. Principal among these is the assumption that the placebo is inert when it is not, which introduces bias against the tested medical procedures and devices. To illustrate the problem, the author examines the use of sham procedures in clinical trials of the medical procedures surgery and acupuncture in which the sham was assumed to be inert but was not. Trials of surgery and acupuncture should be re-examined in light of this.

Download full-text


Available from: Stephen Birch, Oct 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "Numerous acupuncture researches had focused on the placebo effect of acupuncture [15–18] and used minimal or sham acupuncture as control to real acupuncture [19–23]. Studies had questioned the accuracy of the definition of placebo [24]. Others also questioned whether minimal, superficial, or sham acupuncture procedures are acceptable as inert placebo controls [25, 26]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The research on acupuncture has increased steadily over the years and regular review and revision of the direction of future acupuncture research are necessary. This paper aims to review and explore the significance of acupuncture depth in modern acupuncture research. Searches conducted in Science Direct and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases reflected a lack of focus on depth of acupuncture. We propose that the research trends of acupuncture should progress to the depth of insertion. It is suggested that future acupuncture research, especially randomized controlled trials (RCTs), should take into consideration the depth of insertion. Comparison between databases using different language of medium suggests the need for international collaboration of researchers from the same field. It is also crucial to inherit and innovate traditional medicine (TM) through modern technology. The use of bibliometric method is also suitable for development of TM research trends. Acupuncture and depth should be considered as one of the future directions of acupuncture research.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Source
    • "Ideally, an RCT should be blinded, but there is a problem with placebo controls in acupuncture research, since they possibly have similar physiological effects as acupuncture in the activation of the endogenous opioid system [22,23]. We therefore decided not to use a placebo control group and hence blinding was impossible. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with standard care in reducing labour pain. Our hypothesis was that both acupuncture stimulation techniques were more effective than standard care, and that electro-acupuncture was most effective. A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The recruitment of participants took place at the admission to the labour ward between November 2008 and October 2011 at two Swedish hospitals . 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 minutes of manual acupuncture (MA), electro-acupuncture (EA), or standard care without acupuncture (SC). Primary outcome: labour pain, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: relaxation, use of obstetric pain relief during labour and post-partum assessments of labour pain. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome and a difference of 15 mm on VAS was regarded as clinically relevant, this gave 101 in each group, including a total of 303 women. Mean estimated pain scores on VAS (SC: 69.0, MA: 66.4 and EA: 68.5), adjusted for: treatment, age, education, and time from baseline, with no interactions did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7-6.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 0.6 [95% CI] -3.6-4.8). Fewer number of women in the EA group used epidural analgesia (46%) than women in the MA group (61%) and SC group (70%) (EA vs SC: odds ratio [OR] 0.35; [95% CI] 0.19-0.67). Acupuncture does not reduce women’s experience of labour pain, neither with manual stimulation nor with combined manual and electrical stimulation. However, fewer women in the EA group used epidural analgesia thus indicating that the effect of acupuncture with electrical stimulation may be underestimated. These findings were obtained in a context with free access to other forms of pain relief. Trial registration NCT01197950.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Source
    • "Firstly, from the biomedical point of view the needle applies pressure to the skin and as such produces a physiological response [5]. The pressure applied by the Streitberger needle can on occasions cause the needle to pierce the skin [9]. Secondly, from traditional practice point of view it is not true to say the penetration of the skin is always thought to be essential, for example in some forms of Japanese acupuncture non-penetrating techniques are used [28]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Clinical guidelines depend on the analysis of randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews. How to interpret the results of acupuncture vs. sham-placebo procedures is a controversial aspect of the evidence base for acupuncture. Two inferences can be drawn from the acupuncture vs. sham-placebo randomised controlled trials. The first is whether acupuncture has a physiological basis. The second is whether there is any validity in traditional concepts of acupuncture practice. The degree to which sham acupuncture controls can physiologically be considered placebo controls has been challenged. However, whether these procedures should be considered ‘inert’ in terms of Chinese medicine theory has yet to be fully examined. Therefore this review aims to evaluate the extent to which sham-placebo procedures used in randomised controlled trials should be considered inert, with particular reference to traditional Chinese medicine theories. It also considers sham-placebo controls from a biomedical perspective. Methods Sham-placebo procedures were identified through reviews examining acupuncture controls. Results Four main types of sham-placebo control were identified. The procedures are heterogeneous and should not necessarily be considered as equivalent within systematic reviews. Conclusion These procedures cannot be considered as inert controls from either a Chinese medicine or biomedical perspective. There is a need to develop appropriate Acupuncture Control Assessment Guidelines to assess the risk of bias from sham-placebo controls when undertaking systematic reviews. The terminology used to describe control procedures needs to be developed and standardised.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Show more