Article

On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 05/2006; 90(4):597-612. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

This research examines the multiple effects of racial diversity on group decision making. Participants deliberated on the trial of a Black defendant as members of racially homogeneous or heterogeneous mock juries. Half of the groups were exposed to pretrial jury selection questions about racism and half were not. Deliberation analyses supported the prediction that diverse groups would exchange a wider range of information than all-White groups. This finding was not wholly attributable to the performance of Black participants, as Whites cited more case facts, made fewer errors, and were more amenable to discussion of racism when in diverse versus all-White groups. Even before discussion, Whites in diverse groups were more lenient toward the Black defendant, demonstrating that the effects of diversity do not occur solely through information exchange. The influence of jury selection questions extended previous findings that blatant racial issues at trial increase leniency toward a Black defendant.

Full-text preview

Available from: tufts.edu
    • "For example, information coming from out-group members (i.e., minorities) is often considered with greater interest than information from in-group members (i.e., majorities) (e.g. Antonio et al., 2004; Kane, 2010; Kane, Argote, & Levine, 2005; Phillips, Northcraft, & Neale, 2006; Sommers, 2006). In addition, group members engage in more perspective taking and divergent thinking in the presence of others who hold a different opinion (Gruenfeld, Thomas-Hunt, & Kim, 1998; Nemeth, 1992). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the impact of secret conversation opportunities during virtual team discussions on majority opinion holders’ motivation to attend to minority opinion holders. Studies 1a and b showed that majorities were more motivated to process others’ arguments when secret conversation opportunities were available (vs. not), provided these arguments contained unique (vs. shared) information and this information was offered by the minority (vs. majority). Study 2 demonstrated that this effect occurs because secret opportunities made majorities feel less powerful after being exposed to unique information from the minority (Study 2a), especially when majority members expected others to use these channels (Study 2b). Study 3 used an interactive group decision-making task and demonstrated that the increased majority motivation triggered by secret opportunities increased group decision quality. Study 3 also examined whether secret opportunities influence the minority and whether the effect is robust across different communication settings.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2016 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
    • "Finally, scholars should expand work on potential interventions to reduce the influence of race and ethnicity on judgments of defendants and to promote the full participation of jurors from all backgrounds. Research discussed in this review provides insights into possible interventions ; for example, increasing jury diversity (Sommers 2006) and the salience of racial bias (Sommers & Ellsworth 2001) should lead to more fair trial outcomes. In addition, social psychological research offers strategies for reducing bias that may be applied to legal contexts, such as exposing jurors to positive, counterstereotypical examples of racial and ethnic minorities (Kang et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews a growing body of social science research indicating that race, ethnicity, and culture can influence the judgments and behaviors of juries. The first section addresses research on jury bias, which shows that jurors often make harsher judgments of defendants from other racial and ethnic groups and are more likely to give death sentences in cases involving Black or Latino defendants and White victims. However, these effects are moderated by several factors related to the trial parties, context, and crime. Further, juror bias often involves subtle or implicit psychological processes that can be difficult to recognize and correct. The second section discusses research conceptualizing jurors as agentic forces whose judgments and behaviors may reflect their racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds. This work shows that jurors’ backgrounds may influence their reactions to defendants, trial judgments, and deliberation behaviors. The final section offers recommendations for future research in these areas.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  • Source
    • "Second, both majority and minority individuals in diverse groups consider more information and process that information more deeply and accurately (Apfelbaum, Phillips, & Richeson, 2014; Crisp & Turner, 2011; Phillips & Loyd, 2006). For instance, experimental evidence shows that ethnically diverse juries consider more perspectives and make fewer inaccurate statements than homogeneous juries (Sommers, 2006). In addition, people who anticipate joining ethnically or politically diverse groups process the information that will be discussed in the group more thoroughly (Loyd, Wang, Phillips, & Lount, 2013; Sommers, Warp, & Mahoney, 2008) and write more cognitively complex postdiscussion summaries (Antonio et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Empirical evidence reveals that diversity-heterogeneity in race, culture, gender, etc.-has material benefits for organizations, communities, and nations. However, because diversity can also incite detrimental forms of conflict and resentment, its benefits are not always realized. Drawing on research from multiple disciplines, this article offers recommendations for how best to harness the benefits of diversity. First, we highlight how two forms of diversity-the diversity present in groups, communities, and nations, and the diversity acquired by individuals through their personal experiences (e.g., living abroad)-enable effective decision making, innovation, and economic growth by promoting deeper information processing and complex thinking. Second, we identify methods to remove barriers that limit the amount of diversity and opportunity in organizations. Third, we describe practices, including inclusive multiculturalism and perspective taking, that can help manage diversity without engendering resistance. Finally, we propose a number of policies that can maximize the gains and minimize the pains of diversity.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
Show more