Content uploaded by Michael K Dame
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Michael K Dame on Dec 02, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cell Injury, Repair, Aging and Apoptosis
Decreased Collagen Production in Chronologically
Aged Skin
Roles of Age-Dependent Alteration in Fibroblast Function and
Defective Mechanical Stimulation
James Varani,* Michael K. Dame,* Laure Rittie,
†
Suzanne E.G. Fligiel,* Sewon Kang,
†
Gary J. Fisher,
†
and John J. Voorhees
†
From the Departments of Pathology *and Dermatology,
†
The
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Reduced synthesis of collagen types I and III is char-
acteristic of chronologically aged skin. The present
report provides evidence that both cellular fibroblast
aging and defective mechanical stimulation in the
aged tissue contribute to reduced collagen synthesis.
The reduction in collagen synthesis due to fibroblast
aging was demonstrated by a lower in vitro produc-
tion of type I procollagen by dermal fibroblasts iso-
lated from skin of young (18 to 29 years) versus old
(80ⴙyears) individuals (82 ⴞ16 versus 56 ⴞ8 ng/ml;
P<0.05). A reduction in mechanical stimulation in
chronologically aged skin was inferred from morpho-
logical, ultrastructural, and fluorescence microscopic
studies. These studies, comparing dermal sections
from young and old individuals, demonstrated a
greater percentage of the cell surface attached to col-
lagen fibers (78 ⴞ6 versus 58 ⴞ8%; P<0.01) and
more extensive cell spreading (1.0 ⴞ0.3 vs. 0.5 ⴞ0.3;
P<0.05) in young skin compared with old skin.
These features are consistent with a lower level of
mechanical stimulation on the cells in old versus
young skin. Based on the findings presented here, we
conclude that reduced collagen synthesis in chrono-
logically aged skin reflects at least two different un-
derlying mechanisms: cellular fibroblast aging and a
lower level of mechanical stimulation. (Am J Pathol
2006, 168:1861–1868; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051302)
Reduction of fibrillar (types I and III) collagen is a char-
acteristic feature of chronologically aged skin and is en-
hanced in photodamage. This has been well described
using histological and ultrastructural approaches in the
past,
1–5
and our own recent studies have documented
this biochemically in both chronological aging
6
and pho-
toaging.
7
Collagen-degrading matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs) are up-regulated in skin by UV radiation.
8,9
Re-
peated induction of these enzymes by exposure to solar
radiation over years or decades is likely responsible for
producing collagen fragmentation in sun-damaged skin.
During natural or chronological aging of the skin, the
same MMPs that are up-regulated acutely in response to
UV radiation are gradually increased. This has been ob-
served in monolayer culture with cells obtained from old
versus young subjects,
10–14
and our own studies have
shown gradual up-regulation of MMPs in intact (old ver-
sus young) skin.
15
Although destruction of existing collagen is, undoubt-
edly, central to the deleterious changes observed in
aged/photoaged skin, failure to replace damaged colla-
gen with newly synthesized material is also critical to the
overall pathophysiology. There is a sustained down-reg-
ulation in collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin rela-
tive to what occurs in healthy sun-protected skin
16
and in
chronologically aged, sun-protected skin compared with
what is seen in young skin.
15
Mechanisms underlying the loss of collagen synthesis
in photodamaged skin and chronologically aged skin
have not been fully delineated. In a recent series of
studies, we demonstrated that in severely photodam-
aged skin, the presence of fragmented collagen in the
dermis inhibited collagen synthesis. Based on results
from a variety of in vitro and in vivo approaches, we
Supported in part by United States Public Health Service grants DK59169
and AG013964.
Accepted for publication March 13, 2006.
Address reprint requests to James Varani, Ph.D., Department of Pa-
thology, The University of Michigan, 1301 Catherine Rd./Box 0602, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109 USA. E-mail: varani@umich.edu.
American Journal of Pathology, Vol. 168, No. 6, June 2006
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051302
1861
concluded that damaged collagen did not support a level
of mechanical tension on resident fibroblasts necessary
for efficient collagen synthesis.
6,7,17,18
Whether a similar
mechanism contributes to decreased collagen produc-
tion in chronologically aged skin, and if so, to what extent
it is responsible for the overall collagen reduction ob-
served in aged skin, is not known. These issues are
addressed in the present study.
Materials and Methods
Skin Biopsies
For this study, individuals between the ages of 18 and 29
years (young cohort) and individuals 80 years or older
(old cohort) were recruited. Replicate 2- and/or 4-mm
punch biopsies of sun-protected hip skin were obtained
from each individual. The 4-mm punches were used for
fluorescence microscopic and ultrastructural analysis
and for assessment of type I procollagen levels. On ar-
rival in the laboratory, one of the 4-mm biopsies was
immediately frozen in optimal cutting temperature me-
dium (OCT), and the other piece was fixed in glutaralde-
hyde. The 2-mm punch biopsies were used for routine
histology at the light microscopic level and as a tissue
source for the isolation of dermal fibroblasts. For routine
histology, the biopsies were fixed in 10% buffered forma-
lin. Fibroblast isolation was accomplished as indicated
below. All procedures involving human subjects were
approved by the Institutional Review Board, and biopsies
were obtained after receiving informed consent.
Human Dermal Fibroblasts in Monolayer Culture
Fibroblasts were isolated from skin biopsies as described
previously.
15
Briefly, the biopsy was minced with a scis-
sors and forceps, and tissue fragments were transferred
to individual wells of a 24-well dish. Dulbecco’s modified
minimal essential medium supplemented with nonessen-
tial amino acids and 10% fetal bovine serum (DMEM-
FBS) was used as culture medium. Only a minimal
amount of medium was included so that tissue pieces
would adhere to the plastic surface. The dishes were
maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5%
CO
2
. Eventually, fibroblast proliferation around the edge
of some of the tissue fragments was observed. When
cells in sufficient number were available, they were har-
vested with trypsin/ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
(EDTA) and grown in monolayer culture using DMEM-
FBS. Cells were subcultured by exposure to trypsin/EDTA
one or two times and then used in experiments.
Type I Procollagen
Serial frozen sections were prepared from OCT-embed-
ded skin biopsies as follows: 7, 200, and 7
m. After
hematoxylin and eosin staining, the areas of the sections
from both ends of the 200-
m sample were measured
using Image ProPlus software to calculate the volume of
the 200-
m sample. Soluble protein extracts were pre-
pared from the 200-
m samples, which were homoge-
nized in ice-cold extraction buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease
inhibitors [Complete Mini, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Nutley,
NJ]), and vortexed in the presence of glass beads (Bio-
spec, Bartlesville, OK). After centrifugation for 10 minutes
at 10,000 ⫻gand 4°C, supernatants were assayed for
procollagen I using a commercial enzyme-linked immu-
nosorbent assay kit (Panvera, Madison, WI) as described
previously.
15
The procollagen assay uses an antibody to
the C-terminal propeptide region that is part of the colla-
gen molecule as it is synthesized and secreted (before
being proteolytically cleaved). As such, this assay is a
measure of newly synthesized collagen. Type I procolla-
gen concentrations were normalized to the volume of
tissue used for the preparation of each sample.
Type I procollagen production was also assessed in
dermal fibroblasts in monolayer culture. Fibroblasts were
seeded at 4 ⫻10
4
cells per well in 24-well plates using
DMEM-FBS as culture medium. The cells were allowed to
attach overnight. The next day, they were washed and
then incubated in keratinocyte growth medium (Cambrex
Bioscience, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 1.4
mmol/L Ca
2⫹
. Keratinocyte growth medium is a serum-
free, low-Ca
2⫹
modification of MCDB-153 medium sup-
plemented with epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin,
hydrocortisone, and pituitary extract. Cell numbers were
determined 2 days later by releasing the cells with tryp-
sin/EDTA and enumerating them using a particle counter
(Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL). At the time of harvest,
the serum-free culture fluids were collected and as-
sessed for type I procollagen using the same enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay procedure and then normal-
ized to cell number.
Immunostaining and Confocal Microscopy
A mouse monoclonal antibody to vinculin was obtained
from Chemicon (Temicula, CA). The primary antibody
was visualized with rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibody
bound to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and
further amplified with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit
IgG. Alexa Fluor 546-phalloidin (Invitrogen) was used as
a probe for actin. Nuclei were counterstained with the
nuclear dye 4⬘,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochlo-
ride (DAPI) (Prolong Gold; Invitrogen). (Note that Alexa
Fluor 488 is spectrally similar to fluorescein, whereas
Alexa Fluor 546 is spectrally similar to rhodamine.)
OCT-embedded frozen skin biopsies from young
and old individuals were used for staining. Briefly, the
frozen tissue sections were fixed with 4% formalde-
hyde for 20 minutes. After fixation, the tissue sections
were washed twice with wash buffer (0.05% Tween 20
in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline), followed by
permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes.
Tissue sections were again washed and then exposed
to a blocking solution consisting of 1% bovine serum
albumin in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline for
30 minutes. Next, the sections were treated with anti-
vinculin antibody in blocking solution for 1 hour. After
1862 Varani et al
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
three subsequent washing steps (5 minutes each),
each sample was treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conju-
gated secondary antibody in blocking solution and
incubated for 45 minutes. Sections were simulta-
neously stained for actin expression using Alexa Fluor
546-phalloidin along with the secondary antibody. Af-
ter three additional washing steps (5 minutes each),
tissue sections were treated for 30 minutes with the
amplification antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit
IgG). This was followed by two additional washing
steps and treatment with DAPI (nuclei counterstain) for
3 minutes. After three final washing steps, tissue sec-
tions were rinsed once with water. Coverslips were
mounted onto the microscope slides with Prolong Anti-
Fade (Invitrogen). Stained tissue sections were exam-
ined by fluorescence microscopy. Microscopy was
performed on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope
using a 63⫻(C-Apochr) water immersion objective
lens (numerical aperture (NA) ⫽1.2). Laser excitation
wavelengths included 364, 488, and 543 nm scanned
in sequence by the line method.
Light Microscopic and Transmission Electron
Microscopic Studies
Skin biopsies were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde
in 0.1 mmol/L cacodylate buffer (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at
pH 7.4. Glutaraldehyde-fixed specimens were treated
with 2% osmium tetroxide buffered in 0.1 mmol/L caco-
dylate buffer. Specimens were dehydrated with graded
ethanol to 2 ⫻100% ethanol and 2⫻propylene oxide
(EM Sciences). The samples were embedded in pure
epon resin. One-micrometer tissue sections were cut,
stained with toluidine blue, and examined at the light
microscopic level. Surface area occupied by individual
cells was assessed quantitatively using NIH Image soft-
ware on 1-
m sections obtained from glutaraldehyde-
fixed, plastic-embedded tissue.
The same tissue sections used for quantification of
surface area at the light microscopic level were also used
to identify areas of interest for transmission electron mi-
croscopy. Ultrathin sections were cut from areas of inter-
est, stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate (both
from EM Sciences), and observed using a Phillips 400
transmission electron microscope. Photographs were
made from several areas of each specimen. Using the
high-resolution photographs, interstitial cells were quan-
titatively evaluated for percentage of the cell boundary in
contact with individual collagen fibrils or collagen fibril
bundles. Although it is difficult to identify interstitial fibro-
blasts with 100% accuracy, obvious contaminants (mast
cells, cells in vascular structures, glandular epithelial
cells, and red blood cells) were not evaluated.
Statistical Analysis
Proliferation, type I procollagen production, two-dimen-
sional surface area measurements and collagen-attach-
ment data were compared between young and old skin.
The data were analyzed using Student’s two-sample t-
test (Microsoft Excel and SAS analytic software). Sum-
mary data are expressed as means ⫾SEM. All Pvalues
are two-tailed.
Results
Type I Procollagen Synthesis in Skin from
Young and Old Individuals
In the first series of experiments, type I procollagen con-
tent was measured in skin from young and old individu-
als. Type I procollagen content, a marker of ongoing
collagen synthesis, was decreased by 68% in old skin
versus young skin (Figure 1).
Type I Procollagen Synthesis by Fibroblast
Isolates from Young and Old Skin
Next, conditioned medium from cultures of young and old
fibroblasts was assessed for type I procollagen produc-
tion. Isolates from the cohort of young individuals synthe-
sized more type I procollagen than did the fibroblast
isolates from the cohort of old individuals (Figure 2). Cells
isolated from young skin also proliferated to a greater
extent (Figure 2).
Collagen Structure, Fibroblast-Collagen
Interactions, and Cell Shape in Vivo:
Comparison of Young and Old Skin
A series of related histological, ultrastructural, and fluo-
rescence microscopic analyses were performed to de-
termine the relationship between collagen structure, cell
shape and adhesion site protein distribution. Differences
in fiber bundle content were observed between young
and old skin. Fiber bundles were thicker and there was
Figure 1. Type I procollagen production in young and old skin. Values
shown are averages ⫾SEM, based on six young and six old individuals.
Statistical significance of the differences between young and old skin was
determined using Student’s t-test. *Significance at the P⬍0.05 level.
Collagen in Aged Skin 1863
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
less open space within and between bundles in the pap-
illary dermis of the 18- to 29-year-old individuals than in
the corresponding tissue from the 80⫹-year-old subjects
(Figure 3). In sections of young skin, interstitial cells could
be seen oriented in the plane of the collagen polymer
(Figure 3, inset). In old skin, the papillary dermis was
characterized by the presence of open space inter-
spersed with criss-crossing, tangled, thin fibers. There
was little evidence of fiber bundle orientation. Open
space around interstitial cells was apparent (Figure 3B,
arrows), and there was little evidence of cell orientation
(Figure 3, inset).
Cell shape (two-dimensional cross-sectional area of
cells in 1-
m-thick sections from plastic embedded tis-
sue) was quantitatively examined. Cells from young indi-
viduals were more spread than the corresponding cells
from old individuals (Figure 4). The quantitative data
shown in Figure 4 were obtained from sections of super-
ficial (papillary) dermis. When the same analyses were
done in the deeper layers of the (reticular) dermis, results
were similar (not shown).
Ultrastructural features of the matrix were compared in
sections from young and old skin. Overall, there were no
major differences in the appearance of the collagen poly-
mers that could be used to distinguish young and old
skin. There were, however, areas in sections of old skin
where the density of collagen was reduced. Such areas
were primarily (though not always) confined to the pap-
illary dermis. Occasional unstriated fibers were present in
some of the sections from the old skin samples, but we
never detected the elastotic material characteristic of
badly sun-damaged skin.
2,3,5
As part of the analysis, the interaction between inter-
stitial cells and the surrounding collagen was examined.
For these studies, we avoided mast cells, epithelial cells
in glandular structures, cells associated with the micro-
vasculature and any inflammatory cell that might be
present. Thus, a majority of the cells characterized were
interstitial fibroblasts. Figure 5 demonstrates and quanti-
fies the interaction of these cells with the surrounding
collagen in sections from young and old individuals. In
skin sections from the 18- to 29-year-old cohort, cells
were in contact with intact collagen fibrils over a greater
proportion of their surface (two-dimensional image) than
were cells in sections from old skin.
Adhesion Site Protein Expression: Comparison
of Cells in Young and Old Skin
In a final set of experiments, anti-vinculin antibody was
used to identify focal adhesion sites by fluorescence
microscopy (Figure 6). In cells from both young and old
skin, anti-vinculin staining was evident. Staining in skin
sections from young individuals was associated with fiber
bundles, which were evident by their dull orange appear-
ance in the stained sections. In sections of old skin, there
were fewer focal adhesions, and much of the staining
was closely associated with nuclei (blue color). The dif-
ferential pattern of adhesion site protein expression
shown in Figure 6 correlated with differences in cell
spreading, as observed at the light microscopic level
(Figure 4), and with cell-collagen interactions, as ob-
served at the transmission electron microscopic level
(Figure 5). Alternatively, nuclear-associated fluorescence
could indicate an intracellular (presumably, functionally
inactive) pool of vinculin.
Discussion
There is a large body of literature demonstrating a rela-
tionship between mechanical tension on cells in vitro and
biological responses of cells to stress.
19–23
When there is
a sufficient level of mechanical tension on fibroblasts,
production of collagen and other components of the ex-
Figure 2. Cellular proliferation and type I procollagen production in mono-
layer culture. Proliferation (A) and type I procollagen production (B)by
fibroblasts isolated from young and old skin. Values shown are averages ⫾
SEM, based on 26 fibroblast isolates from eight young individuals and 37
isolates from eight old individuals. Statistical significance of the differences
between isolates from young and old skin was determined using Student’s
t-test. *Significance at the P⬍0.05 level.
1864 Varani et al
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
tracellular matrix is high. When tension is reduced, matrix
production falls, and elaboration of matrix-degrading en-
zymes is concomitantly stimulated.
24–30
Lapiere and col-
leagues
31
directly measured mechanical forces gener-
ated by fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen lattices.
In a series of studies, they demonstrated that the reduc-
tion in collagen synthesis occurring as a consequence of
reduced mechanical tension reflected decreased tran-
scription of genes for interstitial collagens, effects on
enzymes involved in the posttranslational processing of
procollagen peptides, and increased elaboration of col-
lagen-degrading MMPs. It was shown, furthermore, that
multiple signaling pathways were responsible for altered
gene transcription.
32,33
Of interest, changes in MMP pro-
duction resulting from a loss of mechanical tension could
be clearly separated from changes resulting from inter-
leukin-1 stimulation.
34
Consistent with these past observations, studies from
our laboratory demonstrated that when human dermal
fibroblasts were maintained on native three-dimensional
collagen lattices, these cells produced type I procolla-
gen. When the collagen in the lattice was fragmented by
exposure to MMP-1 (interstitial collagenase) or to en-
zymes elaborated by UV-exposed skin (primarily MMP-
1), a fall-off in collagen production occurred. Concomi-
tant with the decrease in collagen production on the
fragmented collagen lattices was a reduction in mechan-
ical tension as evidenced by reduced cell spreading,
decreased focal adhesions, and dissolution of actin
stress fibers.
6,7,17,18
Parallel studies showed that in se-
verely photodamaged skin (with its extensive collagen
degradation), resident fibroblasts were characterized by
similar morphological, ultrastructural, and fluorescence
microscopic findings as observed in vitro on fragmented
collagen.
18
Our interpretation of these findings is that
degradation of collagen in severe photodamage pro-
duces an environment that is unable to support a level of
mechanical tension required for efficient collagen-syn-
thetic activity.
Collagen fragmentation, a reduction in total collagen,
and decreased cell-collagen fiber interactions also char-
acterize chronologically aged skin.
1–3,5
The enzymes re-
sponsible for collagen degradation increase gradually
over time in the skin.
15
Collagen synthesis may also de-
cline gradually, but the fall-off in new collagen production
is most evident when skin damage is clinically evident.
15
The present study was undertaken to determine what
factors contribute to the loss of collagen-synthetic activity
in chronological aging. Based on the results presented
here, we suggest at least two mechanisms. In vitro stud-
ies indicate that reduced collagen synthesis in old skin
reflects, at least in part, an age-related reduction in col-
lagen-synthetic activity in the resident population of fibro-
blasts. Fibroblasts obtained from sun-protected skin of
young adults (18 to 29 years of age) synthesized an
average of 82 ng of type I procollagen per 5 ⫻10
4
cells,
whereas cells from old individuals (80⫹years of age)
synthesized 56 ng per 5 ⫻10
4
cells under identical in
vitro conditions. Coupled with this is the fact that there are
fewer interstitial fibroblasts in aged skin compared with
young skin,
15
contributing to reduced growth capacity
(Figure 2). Thus, even when all environmental factors that
may contribute to differences in vivo are removed, there is
still an age-dependent difference in collagen-synthetic
capacity that explains at least part of the previously doc-
umented reduction in collagen content of aged skin.
6
If a decrease in collagen synthetic capacity occurs as
a function of fibroblast (cellular) aging, then what role
does a reduction in mechanical tension play? Although it
may be difficult to precisely estimate the percentage of
the overall decrease in collagen production (in old skin
relative to young skin) accounted for by decreased me-
chanical tension, the following analysis serves as a basis
for comparison. Our past studies
15
indicate that collagen
Figure 3. Histological features of sun-protected skin from young and old individuals as observed in 5-
m hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from
formalin-fixed tissue (main frames) and in 1-
m toluidine blue-stained sections from glutaraldehyde-fixed, plastic-embedded tissue (insets). Thick fiber bundles
are present throughout the upper dermis of sun-protected young skin. Inset: Some fibroblasts can be seen oriented in the plane of the fiber bundles. In the old
skin sample, the bundles have been replaced with thin, disorganized fibers. There is more open space in the dermis. Interstitial cells are round or oblong, and
some are surrounded by open space (arrows). Inset: Fibroblast orientation (arrow) is not evident. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, ⫻490; toluidine
blue-stained sections (insets)⫻980.
Collagen in Aged Skin 1865
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
production in sun-protected skin of old (80⫹years) indi-
viduals is decreased by approximately 75% relative to
production in corresponding skin of young (18 to 29
years) adults. Both Western blotting of skin extracts and
immunostaining for type I procollagen are consistent in
this regard. These past findings are also consistent with
the direct measurements of type I procollagen in young
and old skin presented here (ie, 68% reduction in old
versus young skin; Figure 1). If the number of fibroblasts
in skin from 80⫹-year-old individuals is reduced by ap-
proximately 35% relative to the number in skin of 18- to
29-year-old individuals as indicated by morphometric
analysis
15
and if type I procollagen synthesis is reduced
by an average of 30% in fibroblasts from old skin as
indicated in Figure 2 of the present study, then it is
reasonable to suggest that age-dependent differences in
fibroblast biosynthetic activity account for approximately
45% of the total decrease. Other factors (including loss of
mechanical tension) account for the remaining 30%. This
separation is shown schematically in Figure 7. How ulti-
mate accuracy of the 45%/30% split is less important
than the fact that while a loss of mechanical tension
appears to be the major factor underlying decreased
collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin,
18
in chrono-
logically aged skin, it is one of the two contributing
mechanisms.
Of interest, age-dependent alterations in fibroblast bio-
synthetic activity and the reduction in external mechani-
cal tension on cells in the dermis of aged skin may not be
independent. The same reduction in mechanical tension
that lowers collagen production by resident fibroblasts
may also indirectly contribute to permanent alterations in
fibroblast function. It is generally accepted that pheno-
typic changes seen in aged fibroblasts are largely medi-
ated by oxygen radical damage.
35
This is potentially
related to the issue at hand, because among the alter-
ations that occur under conditions of reduced mechani-
cal tension is increased oxidant stress as evidenced by
Figure 4. Shape of fibroblasts in the papillary dermis of sun-protected hip
skin from young and old individuals (1-
m toluidine blue-stained sections
from glutaraldehyde-fixed, plastic-embedded tissue). Top panel: Cells in
young skin are flattened, and cytoplasm and nucleus are visible (arrow).
Cells are embedded in matrix. Cells in old skin appear round, and only the
nucleus and a small amount of cytoplasm are visible (arrows). Bottom
panel: Surface area measurements were made quantitatively as described in
Materials and Methods. Values represent mean cross-sectional surface area ⫾
SEM, based on 160 cells in sun-protected skin from six young individuals and
57 cells in sun-protected skin from six old individuals. Statistical significance
was determined using Student’s t-test (two-tailed). *P⬍0.01 (magnification,
⫻240).
Figure 5. Ultrastructural appearance of dermal fibroblasts in healthy sun-
protected hip skin from young and old individuals. Aand B: The cell from the
section of young skin (A) is flattened and well spread. The cell is in contact
with collagen fibers over a high percentage of its surface. The cell in the old
skin sample (B) is round and is in contact with collagen polymer over a
smaller portion of its surface. There is more open space surrounding the cell.
(The computer-generated coloring of the cells was done to aid in the
demarcation of cells from extracellular material [magnification ⫻2050]). C: A
high magnification (⫻3500) of old skin showing the striations in the fibers
(typical of collagen). D: Quantification of contact between cells and collagen
fibers. Values represent the percentage of the cell boundary in contact with
collagen fibers ⫾SEM (P⫽0.01; two-tailed Student’s t-test). Measurements
are based on 33 cells in sections of healthy skin from six young individuals
and 38 cells in sections from six old individuals.
1866 Varani et al
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
increased levels of reactive oxygen species and altered
expression of anti-oxidant enzymes (G.J. Fisher, unpub-
lished observations). It might be inferred from this that
environmental damage causally precedes changes in
fibroblast function that are observed in the aged or se-
nescent state.
The age-related decrease in collagen-synthetic activity
may be, at least in part, reversible. It has been demon-
strated that agents such as all-trans retinoic acid can
stimulate collagen production in aged skin.
16,36–38
Not
surprisingly, topical retinoid use brings about an im-
provement in the appearance of aged skin
39
and photo-
damaged skin.
40
In summary, collagen synthetic capacity is low in aged
(sun-protected) skin relative to that in healthy young sun-
protected skin. Based on the findings presented here
and by analogy with in vitro models and the findings of
photoaging studies, we hypothesize that old fibroblasts
have an age-dependent reduction in the capacity for
collagen synthesis and simultaneously experience a loss
of mechanical stimulation resulting from decreased intact
collagen fibers.
Acknowledgments
We thank Suzan Rehbine for help with recruitment of
volunteers, Robin Kunkel and Lisa Riggs for help with
electron microscopy, Ted Hamilton for help with statisti-
cal analysis, Bruce Donohoe for help with fluorescence
microscopy, and Laura Vangoor for help with the prepa-
ration of graphic materials.
Figure 6. Adhesion-site protein expression in sections of healthy sun-pro-
tected hip skin from young and old individuals. Tissue sections (OCT-
embedded frozen) were stained using antibody to vinculin and concomi-
tantly with phalloidin (actin stain) and DAPI (nuclear stain) as described in
Materials and Methods. After staining, cells were examined by confocal
fluorescence microscopy. Cells are identified by their blue (DAPI)-stained
nuclei. Bright green punctate fluorescence identifies vinculin. In the 18- to
29-year-old skin samples, vinculin can be seen at a distance from the nucleus,
and in many areas, the vinculin appears to be in close apposition to collagen
fibers. In the 80⫹-year-old skin, blue-stained nuclei are apparent, but there
is less vinculin than in the young skin samples. Where intense focal staining
is evident, it is surrounding the nucleus (arrows). Away from the nucleus,
staining is more diffuse than seen in cells from young skin. The sections
presented are representative of young and old sun-protected skin from six
individuals, respectively. In both young and old skin, collagen fibers are
apparent by their dull orange fluorescence (magnification, ⫻1200).
Figure 7. Schematic representation of mechanisms underlying reduced col-
lagen synthesis in aged skin.
Collagen in Aged Skin 1867
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6
References
1. Smith JG, Davidson EA, Clark WM: Alterations in human dermal
connective tissue with age and chronic sun damage. J Invest Der-
matol 1962, 39:347–356
2. Lavker RM: Structural alterations in exposed and unexposed aged
skin. J Invest Dermatol 1979, 73:559 –566
3. Pieraggi MT, Julian M, Bouissou H: Fibroblast changes in cutaneous
aging. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1984, 402:275–287
4. Marks R. Sun-Damaged Skin. London, Martin Dunitz, 1992
5. Lavker RM. Cutaneous aging: chronologic versus photoaging. Pho-
toaging. Edited by BA Gilchrest. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Science,
1995, pp 123–135
6. Fligiel SEG, Varani J, Datta SH, Kang S, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ:
Collagen degradation in aged/photoaged skin in vivo and after ex-
posure to MMP-1 in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2003, 120:842– 848
7. Varani J, Spearman D, Perone P, Fligiel SEG, Datta SC, Wang ZQ,
Shao Y, Kang S, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ: Inhibition of type I procol-
lagen synthesis by damaged collagen in photoaged skin and by
collagenase-degraded collagen in vitro. Am J Pathol 2001,
158:931–942
8. Fisher GJ, Datta SC, Talwar HS, Wang, ZQ Varani J, Kang S, Voo-
rhees JJ: The molecular basis of sun-induced premature skin ageing
and retinoid antagonism. Nature (London) 1996, 379:335–338
9. Fisher GJ, Wang Z-Q, Datta SC, Varani J, Kang S, Voorhees JJ:
Pathophysiology of premature skin aging induced by ultraviolet light.
New Eng J Med 1997, 337:1419 –1428
10. Millis AJ, Sottile J, Hoyle M, Mann DM, Diemer V: Collagenase pro-
duction by early and late passage cultures of human fibroblasts. Exp
Gerontol 1989, 24:559 –575
11. Millis AJ, Hoyle M, MCue HM, Martini H: Differential expression of
metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase genes in
aged human fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 1992, 201:373–379
12. Burke EM, Horton WE, Pearson JD, Crow MT, Martin GR: Altered
transcriptional regulation of human interstitial collagenase in cultured
skin fibroblasts from older donors. Exp Gerontol 1994, 29:37–53
13. Bizot-Foulon V, Bouchard B, Hornebeck W, Dubertret L, Bertaux B:
Uncoordinate expressions of type I and III collagens, collagenase
and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 along in vitro prolif-
erative life span of human skin fibroblasts: regulation by all-trans
retinoic acid. Cell Biol Int 1995, 19:129 –135
14. Ricciarelli R. Mini P, Ozer N, Zingg JM, Azzi A: Age-dependent
increase of collagenase expression can be reduced by alpha-toco-
pherol via protein kinase c inhibition. Free Radic Biol Med 1999,
27:729 –737
15. Varani J, Warner RL, Gharaee-Kermani M, Phan SH, Kang S, Chung
JH, Wang ZQ, Datta SC, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ: Vitamin a antago-
nizes decreased cell growth and elevated collagen-degrading matrix
metalloproteinases and stimulates collagen accumulation in naturally
aged human skin. J Invest Dermatol 2000, 114:480 –486
16. Griffiths CE, Russman AN, Majmudar G, Singer RS, Hamilton TA,
Voorhees JJ: Restoration of collagen formation in photodamaged
human skin by tretinoin (retinoic acid). N Engl J Med 1993,
329:530 –535
17. Varani J, Perone P, Fligiel SEG, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ: Inhibition of
type I procollagen production in photodamage: correlation between
presence of high molecular weight collagen fragments and reduced
procollagen synthesis. J Invest Dermatol 2002, 119:122–129
18. Varani J, Schuger L, Dame MK, Leonard C, Fligiel SEG, Kang S,
Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ: Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact
collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in pho-
todamaged skin. J Invest Dermatol 2004, 122:1471–1479
19. Grinnell F: Fibroblast-collagen matrix contraction: growth factor sig-
nalling and mechanical loading. Trends Cell Biol 2000, 10:362–365
20. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA: Myofi-
broblasts and mechanoregulation of connective tissue remodeling.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:349 –363
21. Grinnell F: Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices.
Trends Cell Biol 2003, 13:264 –269
22. Silver FH, Siperko LM, Seehra GP: Mechanobiology of force trans-
duction in dermal tissue. Skin Res Technol 2003, 9:3–23
23. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankow R, Yamada KM: Transmembrane:
extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2001, 2:793–805
24. Lambert CA, Soudant EP, Nusgens BV, Lapiere CM: Pretranslational
regulation of extracellular matrix macromolecules and collagenase
expression in fibroblasts by mechanical forces. Lab Invest 1992,
66:444 – 451
25. Geesin J, Brown LJ, Gordon JS, Berg RA: Regulation of collagen
synthesis in human dermal fibroblasts in contracted collagen gels by
ascorbic acid, growth factors and inhibitors of lipid peroxidation. Exp
Cell Res 1993, 206:283–290
26. Clark RAF, Nielsen LD, Welch MP, McPherson JM: Collagen matrices
attenuate the collagen-synthetic response of cultured fibroblasts to
TGF-

. J Cell Sci 1995, 108:1251–1261
27. Chiquet M: Regulation of extracellular gene expression by mechani-
cal stress. Matrix Biol 1999, 18:417– 426
28. Tamariz E, Grinnell F: Modulation of fibroblast morphology and ad-
hesion during collagen matrix remodeling. Mol Biol Cell 2002,
13:3915–3929
29. Le J, Rattner A, Chepda T, Frey J, Chamson A: Production of matrix
metalloproteinase 2 in fibroblast reaction to mechanical stress in a
collagen gel. Arch Derm Res 2002, 294:405– 410
30. Fluck M, Giraud M-N, Tunc V, Chiquet M: Tensile stress-dependent
collagen XII and fibronectin production by fibroblasts requires sepa-
rate pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003, 1593:239 –248
31. Delvoye P, Wiliquet P, Leveque J-L, Nusgens BV, Lapiere CM: Mea-
surement of mechanical forces generated by skin fibroblasts embed-
ded in a three-dimensional collagen gel. J Invest Dermatol 1991,
97:898 –902
32. Lambert CA, Colige AC, Lapiere CM, Nusgens BV: Coordinated
regulation of procollagens I and III and their post-translational en-
zymes by dissipation of mechanical tension in human dermal fibro-
blasts. Euro J Cell Biol 2001, 80:479 –485
33. Lambert CA, Colige AC, Munaut C, Lapeiere CM, Nusgens BV:
Distinct pathways in the over-expression of matrix metalloproteinases
in human fibroblasts by relaxation of mechanical tension. Matrix Biol
2001, 20:397–408
34. Lambert CA, Lapiere CM, Nusgens BV: An interleukin-1 loop I in-
duced in human skin fibroblasts upon stress relaxation in a three-
dimensional collagen gel but is not involved in the up-regulation of
matrix metalloproteinase 1. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:23143–23149
35. Jenkins G: Molecular mechanisms of skin aging. Mech Aging De-
velop 2002, 123:801– 810
36. Kligman LH, Duo CH, Kligman AM: Topical retinoic acid enhances
the repair of ultraviolet damaged dermal connective tissue. Connect
Tissue Res 1984, 12:139 –150
37. Kligman LH: Effects of all-trans-retinoic acid on the dermis of hairless
mice. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986, 15:779 –785; 884–847
38. Kligman AM, Dogadkina D, Lavker RM: Effects of topical tretinoin on
non-sun-exposed protected skin of the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol
1993, 29:25–33
39. Kligman AM, Grove GL, Hirose R, Leyden JJ: Topical tretinoin for
photoaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986, 15:836 –859
40. Weiss JS, Ellis CN, Headington JT, Tincoff T, Hamilton TA, Voorhees
JJ: Topical tretinoin improves photoaged skin: a double-blind vehicle-
controlled study. JAMA 1988, 259:527–532
1868 Varani et al
AJP June 2006, Vol. 168, No. 6