Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: An evidence-based literature review
The influence of psychosocial factors on clinical outcomes after surgery has been investigated in several studies. This review is limited to surgical outcomes studies published between 1990 and 2004 that include (1) psychosocial variables (eg, depression, social support) as predictors of outcome and that focus on (2) clinical outcomes (eg, postoperative pain, functional recovery) using (3) specific multivariate analytic techniques with (4) relevant clinical variables (eg, presurgical health status) included as covariates. Twenty-nine studies met these criteria. Results indicate that psychosocial factors play a significant role in recovery and are predictive of surgical outcome, even after accounting for known clinical factors. Attitudinal and mood factors were strongly predictive; personality factors were least predictive. The results suggest that preoperative consideration of attitudinal and mood factors will assist the surgeon in estimating both the speed and extent of postoperative recovery.
Available from: Mujgan Caliskan
- "Extensive research has shown the effectiveness of integrative medical strategies to improve the outcomes of surgery. As one example, a lower level of stress and anxiety is associated with improved outcomes of surgery , including fewer complications and a faster recovery . Some 'mind–body' techniques have been shown to decrease stress and anxiety, reduce pain, lessen the amounts of medication required, and even reduce blood loss during surgery, all of which might result in a shorter hospital stay . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
The holistic approach in medicine is a framework that considers and treats all aspects of a patient’s needs, as it relates to their health. The goal of such an approach is to prevent illness, and to maximise the well-being of individuals and families. Holistic medicine is also referred to as integrative, which has been interpreted by some professionals as the combination of evidence-based medicine and complementary medicine.
The speciality of Family Medicine (FM) is often referred to as General Practice (GP), a terminology which emphasises the holistic nature of that discipline. Furthermore, GP/FM professional bodies in some countries have incorporated the holistic and integrative approach into curricula and guidelines for doctors in training, which reflects its acceptance as a component of medical training. However, despite this validation, and despite research showing the effectiveness of such strategies in enhancing the outcomes of surgery, a holistic framework or integrative approach has not been equally integrated into speciality training for would-be surgeons.
We argue that it would be advisable to include holistic approaches into surgical training and help surgeons to recognise their role in the continuum of care.
Available from: PubMed Central
- "A recent study has reported psychological variables (e.g., mood, cognition, and coping strategies) as contributing factors when explaining such variance in functional independence.7 A further study found a relationship among mood, coping style, and functional outcome, while positive coping and getting on with life were significantly related to functional outcome in 228 of the patient participants.22 "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the severity of depression, degree of life satisfaction, level of stress, and resilience among patients in the first 6 months after a spinal cord injury (SCI).
36 patients with SCI were asked to fill out questionnaires concerning Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire-BREF, Stress Response Inventory, and Connor-Davidson resilience scale. All patients had experienced an SCI within the last 6 months before the commencement of this study.
In our study, the patients who experienced the SCI within the last six months had a higher rate of depression (63.9%) and a higher overall level of depression (13.8 points). The unmarried group had a significantly higher quality of life (QOL; p<0.05) when compared with the married group. In the motor complete group, severity of depression and level of stress were higher, whereas QOL was lower than the motor incomplete group (p<0.05). The mean American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Motor Score (AMS) was much higher in the non-depressive group (p<0.05) when compared with the depressive group.
We found the patients within six months after SCI injury had higher rate of depression and higher overall level of depression. Also, patients with motor complete injury had affected significantly on depression, QOL and stress. We found the married patients had poorer QOL and depressive group had lower AMS score of lower extremity. Therefore, there should be emphasis of psychological care who have motor complete injury and are married during the early stage.
Available from: link.springer.com
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Understanding chronic pain requires an understanding of psychological factors related to the pain experience. This paradigm is the standard foundation for pain medicine as well as physical medicine and rehabilitation diagnosis and treatment. Pain patients with spine disease frequently present with a multifaceted array of physical and psychological aspects including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, cognitive dysfunction, a potential for substance abuse, and regressed social functioning. An evolving standard of care mandates that prior to invasive pain therapies for spinal pain psychological suitability be determined. Spine pain disorders in the context of ongoing litigation present complex clinical situations which cannot be managed by medical treatments alone. The litigation will add stress and disruption to the medical diagnosis and treatment. The biopsychosocial model with inclusion of clinical psychologists as members of the treatment team is essential. This review will consider the important factors essential for a best practice approach to management of the spine pain patient with coexisting litigation.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.