Availability of Physical Activity–Related Facilities and Neighborhood Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics: A National Study

Department of Economics and the Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois, Chicago 60608, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 10/2006; 96(9):1676-80. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.065573
Source: PubMed


We examined associations between neighborhood demographic characteristics and the availability of commercial physical activity-related outlets by zip code across the United States.
Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the availability of 4 types of outlets: (1) physical fitness facilities, (2) membership sports and recreation clubs, (3) dance facilities, and (4) public golf courses. Commercial outlet data were linked by zip code to US Census Bureau population and socioeconomic data.
Results showed that commercial physical activity-related facilities were less likely to be present in lower-income neighborhoods and in neighborhoods with higher proportions of African American residents, residents with His-panic ethnicity, and residents of other racial minority backgrounds. In addition, these neighborhoods had fewer such facilities available.
Lack of availability of facilities that enable and promote physical activity may, in part, underpin the lower levels of activity observed among populations of low socioeconomic status and minority backgrounds.

Download full-text


Available from: Sandy J Slater, Jun 10, 2014
  • Source
    • "Obesity prevalence in Canadian youth has doubled since 1980 (Tremblay and Willms, 2000). In addition to biologic factors, sociodemographic and environmental factors are associated with obesity; lower socioeconomic status (SES) (Wang and Beydoun, 2007), living in neighborhoods with poor walkability, and poor access to fresh fruits and vegetables increase the risk for obesity (Powell et al., 2006; Nilsen et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parents play a critical role in their children's lifestyle habits. The objective was to assess the effect of parenting style on the risk of childhood obesity, and to determine whether poverty was a moderator of the association. Participants were from the 1994-2008 cross-sectional samples of the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY), a nationally representative survey of Canadian youth. Factor and cluster analysis identified four parenting styles consistent with Baumrind's parenting style prototypes. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the risk of obesity based on parenting style after adjusting for covariates. Analyses were stratified by age (preschool: 2-5 years of age, n=19,026; school-age: 6-11 years of age, n=18,551) and the moderating effect of poverty (household income < low income cut-offs adjusted for household size and geographic region) was assessed. Analyses used sampling and bootstrap weights. In multivariable analyses, compared to authoritative parenting, preschool- and school-age children with authoritarian parents were 35% (95% CI: 1.2-1.5) and 41% (CI: 1.1-1.8) more likely to be obese, respectively. In preschool children, poverty moderated this association: authoritarian and negligent parenting was associated with 44% (CI: 1.3-1.7) and 26% (CI: 1.1-1.4) increased likelihood of obesity, respectively, but only among the children not living in poverty. In school-age children, poverty was not a moderator. Parenting style is associated with childhood obesity, but may be moderated by poverty. Successful strategies to combat childhood obesity should reflect the independent and interactive associations of sociodemographic and social-familial influences on health especially in early childhood. Copyright © 2015 American Health Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · Preventive Medicine
  • Source
    • "Five-year (2005–2009) estimates for median household income and percent minority residents (defined as all non-White and Hispanic White residents) for all tracts were downloaded from the American Community Survey (ACS) website (American Community Survey [ACS], 2010). Once the weighted income and percent minority values were created for each park, these values were used to categorize each park neighborhood as low, medium, or high income and low, medium, or high percent minority by dividing the full set of parks into three even tertiles (Abercrombie et al., 2008; Estabrooks et al., 2003; Powell, Slater, Chaloupka, & Harper, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parks are important resources for facilitating community health. Using an environmental justice framework, this study in Kansas City, Missouri examined disparities by income and race/ethnicity for bordering land uses, densities of incivilities (e.g., vandalism, litter), unhealthy retail establishments in neighborhoods surrounding parks. Low and medium income and high minority park neighborhoods were more likely to be surrounded by higher densities of incivilities and to have a moderate density of FF restaurants. Low-income park neighborhoods were five times more likely to have a moderate density of other unhealthy establishments compared to parks in high-income areas. Future research and environmental justice efforts should explore policies that reduce unhealthy characteristics of park neighborhoods to encourage increased usage of these important community settings.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · Journal of Leisure Research
  • Source
    • "Increasing access to safe and accessible opportunities for PA is especially important for disadvantaged populations (Powell et al., 2006). Prior research has shown that families who live in low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods and communities with a higher percentage of Black and/or Hispanic families are less likely to have access to recreation facilities and amenities (Powell et al., 2006) and less likely to be physically active (Babey et al., 2007). Concerns about environmental safety has also been identified as a barrier to PA in low SES neighborhoods (Wilson et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To determine the status and common characteristics of shared use in public schools in North Carolina. Method All public school principals (N = 2,359) in North Carolina were invited to participate in an online survey (February – May, 2013) designed to provide baseline information about the extent and nature of shared use of school facilities. Results Responses (n = 1182, 50.1%) indicated that most schools share their facilities (88.9%). Formal agreements were more common when schools shared gyms and outdoor athletic fields. Informal agreements were most common with playgrounds and track facilities. Schools with more low income or Black students were less likely to share facilities. For schools that did not share use of their facilities the most frequent reason was no outside groups had ever asked. Conclusion Schools may be more accommodating to shared use partnerships. Community organizations seeking to use indoor school facilities or athletic fields should be prepared to complete a formal written agreement. Preconceived notions that schools are unwilling to share their facilities may be preventing community organizations from initiating shared use inquiries. Schools located in the middle tier of economic distress and schools with a greater concentration of Black students were less likely to share their facilities.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Preventive Medicine
Show more