Content uploaded by David Haslam
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by David Haslam on Feb 02, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7569.640
2006;333;640-642 BMJ
David Haslam, Naveed Sattar and Mike Lean
Obesity—time to wake up
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7569/640
Updated information and services can be found at:
These include:
References
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7569/640#otherarticles
1 online articles that cite this article can be accessed at:
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7569/640#BIBL
This article cites 7 articles, 3 of which can be accessed free at:
Rapid responses
http://bmj.com/cgi/eletter-submit/333/7569/640
You can respond to this article at:
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7569/640#responses
free at:
4 rapid responses have been posted to this article, which you can access for
service
Email alerting
box at the top right corner of the article
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the
Topic collections
(252 articles) Obesity
Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections
Notes
http://www.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprintform
To order reprints of this article go to:
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/subscriptions/subscribe.shtml
go to: BMJTo subscribe to
on 24 October 2006 bmj.comDownloaded from
ABC of obesity
Obesity—time to wake up
David Haslam, Naveed Sattar, Mike Lean
The obesity epidemic in the United Kingdom is out of control,
and none of the measures being undertaken show signs of
halting the problem, let alone reversing the trend. The United
States is about 10 years ahead in terms of its obesity problem,
and it has an epidemic of type 2 diabetes with obesity levels that
are rocketing. Obesity is a global problem
—
levels are rising all
over the world. Moreover, cer tain ethnic groups seem to be
more sensitive than others to the adverse metabolic effects of
obesity. For example, high levels of diabetes and related diseases
are found in South Asian and Arab populations. Although most
of the medical complications and costs of obesity are found in
adults, obesity levels are also rising in children in the UK and
elsewhere.
Limited time to act
Obesity can be dealt with using three expensive options:
x Treat an almost exponential rise in secondary clinical
consequences of obesity
x Treat the underlying obesity in a soaring number of people
to prevent secondary clinical complications
x Reverse the societal and commercial changes of the past 200
years, which have conspired with our genes to make overweight
or obesity more normal.
Sheaves of evidence based guidelines give advice on the
treatment of all the medical consequences of obesity, and an
evidence base for identifying and treating obesity is
accumulating. Although the principles of achieving energy
balance are known, an evidence base of effective measures for
preventing obesity does not exist. The methods of randomised
clinical trials are inappropriate, and so some form of
continuous improvement methodology is needed.
In the United Kingdom, even if preventive measures against
obesity were successful immediately (so that not one more
person became obese) and people who are obese do not gain
weight, there would still be an epidemic of diabetes and its
complications within 10-20 years. This is because so many
young people are already in the clinically “latent” phase of
obesity, before the clinical complications present. Treatment of
obesity must be prioritised alongside prevention. It will take an
unprecedented degree of cooperation between government
departments; schools; food, retail, and advertising industries;
architects and town planners; and other groups to improve our
“toxic” environment. Meanwhile, in their clinics, doctors have to
deal with the obesity epidemic one person at a time
—
a daunting
role.
This is the first article in the series
Proportion obese (%)
0
20
30
Men
10
North America and Cuba
Western Europe
Latin America and the Caribbean
Central and eastern Europe
Middle East
China and Vietnam
South East Asia
Japan, Australia, Pacific Islands
Africa
Age (years)
Proportion obese (%)
5-14 15-29 30-44 45-59 60-69 70-79 ≥80
0
20
30
40
Women
10
Prevalence of obesity worldwide. Adapted from Haslam D, James WP. Lancet
2005;366:1197-209
Year
Prevalence (%)
1995
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
Girls aged 6-10 years
5
1996 1997 1998 1999/2000 2001 2002
Prevalence (%)
0
10
15
20
25
Boys aged 6-10 years
5
Obese Overweight
Results from Health Survey for England 2002. The most recent Health Survey
for England (2004) states that “Between 1995 and 2001, mean BMI increased
among boys (from 17.6 to 18.1) and girls (from 18.0 to 18.4) aged 2-15”
Definition of obesity
x Obesity is excess body fat accumulation with multiple
organ-specific pathological consequences
x Obesity is categorised by body mass index (BMI), which is
calculated by weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in metres)
squared. A BMI > 30 indicates obesity and it is reflected by an
increased waist circumference
x Waist circumference is a better assessor of metabolic risk than BMI
because it is more directly proportional to total body fat and the
amount of metabolically active visceral fat
Practice
640 BMJ VOLUME 333 23 SEPTEMBER 2006 bmj.com
on 24 October 2006 bmj.comDownloaded from
Health consequences
It has been known for centuries that obesity is the cause of
serious chronic disease. Only relatively recently has the full
spectrum of disease linked to obesity become apparent
—
for
example, recognition that most hypertension, previously
considered “essential,” is secondary to obesity. Among
preventable causes of disease and premature death, obesity is
overtaking smoking.
Economic costs
Every year obesity costs the UK economy £3.5bn (€5.1bn,
$6.4bn), and results in 30 000 deaths;18 million days of work
taken off for sickness each year. Strategies for primary care that
encourage primary prevention of chronic disease, including
obesity management, would achieve considerable financial
rewards. The Counterweight study on obesity reduction and
maintenance showed that obese people take up a greater
proportion of time in general practice than non-obese people.
Obese patients also need more referral, and are prescribed
more drugs across all the categories of the British National
Formulary than people of normal weight. Resources are being
spent mainly treating the secondary consequences of obesity.
Preventing obesity is not encouraged. The Counterweight study
also showed that obesity can be managed in a population
without a major increase in resources.
Benefits of managing obesity
Uniquely among chronic diseases, obesity does not need a
scientific breakthrough to be treated successfully. Enough is
known about the causes of obesity and that diet, exercise,
behaviour therapy, drugs, and even laparoscopic surgery can be
effective. The barriers to successful management of obesity are
political and organisational ones, along with a lack of resources.
In the long term, the cheapest and most effective strategy to
improve the health of the population may be to prioritise and
provide incentives for the management of obesity.
The metabolic and vascular benefits of even modest reductions
in weight are well described. Weight loss also enhances fertility
in women, improves respiratory function and mental wellbeing,
reduces risk of cancers and joint disease, and improves quality
of life. Major benefits for individuals from dramatic
interventions, like obesity surgery, have been shown. Optimal
medical treatment can also produce major weight loss for many
patients (outside the constraints of randomised controlled
trials). The most striking benefits, however, in proportional
terms, are from modest weight loss (5-10%), when fat is
particularly lost from intra-abdominal sites. For example, this
amount of weight loss increases life expectancy 3-4 years for
overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, which is impressive.
Obesity management includes priority treatment of risk
factors for cardiovascular disease. The benefits of treatment are
greater for overweight and obese people because their risks are
higher. Primary prevention of obesity and overweight would
prevent much secondary disease. Many people do stay at
normal weight, but there is no proven effective intervention.
Beyond BMI
The most clinically telling physical sign of serious underlying
disease is increased waist circumference, which is linked to
insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, a
proinflammatory state, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart
Costs attributable to obesity in Scotland in 2003*
Illness
GP contacts Prescribing costs (£)
No Cost (£) Per person Total
Obesity 58 346 758 503 3 2 818 025
Hypertension 988 493 12 850 406 179 43 650 190
Type 2 diabetes 65 777 855 098 409 18 901 220
Angina pectoris 93 178 1 211 309 720 20 348 921
Myocardial
infarction
33 372 433 838 720 14 598 139
Osteoarthritis 37 003 481 045 112 2 240 485
Stroke 5829 75 777 35 106 333
Gallstones 1575 20 470 67 57 448
Colon cancer 2631 34 207 0 0
Ovarian cancer 382 4967 91 6970
Gout 17 321 225 170 25 244 155
Prostate cancer 0 0 2949 162 609
Endometrial
cancer
0 0 168 14 362
Rectal cancer 0 0 1114 12 812
Total 1 303 907 16 950 791 103 161 670
£1 = €1.40 or US$1.8
* Adapted from Walker A. The cost of doing nothing—the economics of obesity in
Scotland. University of Glasgow, 2003 (www.cybermedicalcollege.com/Assets/
Acrobat/Obesitycosts.pdf)
Health consequences of obesity
Greatly increased risk (relative risk >3)
x Diabetes
x Hypertension
x Dyslipidaemia
x Breathlessness
x Sleep apnoea
x Gall bladder disease
Moderately increased risk (relative risk about 2-3)
x Coronary heart disease or heart failure
x Osteoarthritis (knees)
x Hyperuricaemia and gout
x Complications of pregnancy
—
for example, pre-eclampsia
Increased risk (relative r isk about 1-2)
x Cancer (many cancers in men and women)
x Impaired fertility/polycystic ovar y syndrome
x Low back pain
x Increased risk during anaesthesia
x Fetal defects arising from maternal obesity
Estimated metabolic and vascular benefits of 10% weight loss
Blood pressure
x Fall of about 10 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in
hypertensive patients
Diabetes
x Fall of up to 50% in fasting glucose for newly diagnosed patients
People at risk for diabetes, such as those with impaired glucose
tolerance
x > 30% fall in fasting or two hour insulins
x > 30% increase in insulin sensitivity
x 40-60% fall in incidence of diabetes
Lipids
x Fall of 10% in total cholesterol
x Fall of 15% in low density lipoprotein cholesterol
x Fall of 30% in triglycerides
x Rise of 8% in high density lipoprotein cholesterol
Mortality
x > 20% fall in all cause mortality
x > 30% fall in deaths related to diabetes
x > 40% fall in deaths related to obesity
Practice
641BMJ VOLUME 333 23 SEPTEMBER 2006 bmj.com
on 24 October 2006 bmj.comDownloaded from
disease. More than 250 years ago, Giovanni Battista Morgagni
used surgical dissection to show visceral fat. He linked its
presence to hyper tension, hyperuricaemia, and atherosclerosis.
Jean Vague (in the 1940s and ’50s) and Per Bjorntorp (in the
1980s) led the interest in gender specific body types of android
and gynoid fat distribution. Pear shaped women tend to carry
metabolically less active fat on their hips and thighs. Men
generally have more central fat distribution, giving them an
apple shape when they become obese, although obese women
can have a similar shape.
Cross-sectional studies show that waist to hip ratio is a
strong correlate of other diseases. Prospective studies, however,
show a large waist as the strongest anthropometric predictor of
vascular events and diabetes because it predicts risk
independently of BMI, hip circumference, and other risk factors.
Management of obesity in the UK
Clinical practice in the UK focuses on secondary prevention for
chronic diseases. Obesity is often neglected in evidence based
approaches to managing its consequences. One problem is in
recording the diagnosis.
Computerised medical records and better linking of datasets
will help monitor efforts to reduce obesity locally and
nationally. The UK Counterweight audit showed that height and
weight are measured in about 70% of primary care patients
only. The diagnosis of obesity is rarely recorded in reports from
hospital admissions or outpatient attendance. A survey of
secondary prevention of coronary heart disease shows that,
despite the importance of obesity as a coronary heart disease
risk factor, it is still poorly managed, even in high risk patients.
Although patients with type 2 diabetes are often overweight,
most are managed in primary care and few regularly see a
dietician.
The first revision of the general medical services contract
gives practices eight points for creating registers of obese adults,
but this is only a start in readiness for a more emphatic second
revision of the contract. BMI is seldom measured in people of
normal weight so their progression to becoming overweight is
missed, and with it the opportunity to prevent more than half of
the burden of diabetes in the UK.
Producing a register of obese individuals is futile unless
something is done with the list. Weight management and
measurement of fasting lipid profile, glucose, and blood
pressure should be encouraged. This could be used to identify
people at high risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes
through risk factors related to obesity, which individually might
fall below treatment thresholds. Without these steps the
contract creates more work with no clinical benefit. The
arguments are strong for awarding points for assessing obese
individuals and offering weight management programmes. The
clinical and economic benefit will be extended if effective
obesity prevention strategies can be developed. These are not
alternative strategies: strategies are needed for both prevention
and treatment with ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
Conclusion
Obesity affects almost every aspect of life and medical practice.
The rise in obesity and its complications threatens to bankr upt
the healthcare system. Early treatment and prevention offer
multiple long term health benefits, and they are the only way
towards a sustainable health service. Doctors in all medical and
surgical specialties can contribute.
Further reading
x Haslam D, James WP. Obesity. Lancet 2005;366:1197-209.
x Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjostrom L. XENical in the
prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a
randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for
the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care
2004;27:155-61.
x James WP, Astrup A, Finer N, Hilsted J, Kopelman P, Rossner S, et
al. Effect of sibutramine on weight maintenance after weight loss: a
randomized trial. STORM Study Group. Sibutramine Trial of
Obesity Reduction and Maintenance. Lancet 2000;356:2119-25.
x McQuigg M, Brown J, Broom J, Laws RA, Reckless JP, Noble PA, et
al. Counterweight Project Team. Empowering primary care to
tackle the obesity epidemic: the Counterweight Programme. Eur J
Clin Nutr 2005;59:93-100.
x De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Cokkinos D, Keil U, Montaye M, Ostor
E, et al. Overweight and obesity in patients with established
coronary heart disease: are we meeting the challenge? Eur Heart J
2004;25:121-8.
x Scottish Intercollegiate guidelines (www.sign.ac.uk)
x National Institute of Health guidelines (www.nhlbi.nih.gov/
guidelines/obesity/ob_gdlns.htm)
Stereotypical apple (metabolically harmful, more common in men) and pear
(metabolically protective and more common in women) shapes. Making
obesity an object of humour has impeded the understanding of its medical
consequences. Obesity can contribute to musculoskeletal and psychological
problems and have profound effects on quality of life
The figure showing obesity in English girls and boys aged 6-10 uses data
from Health Survey for England 2002 (using criteria of the International
Obesity Task Force for overweight and obesity), and is adapted from
British Medical Association Board of Science. Preventing childhood obesity,
2005 (www.bma.org). The box showing health consequences of obesity is
adapted from International Obesity Taskforce (www.iotf.org/.../slides/
IOTF-slides/sld016.htm). The box showing metabolic and vascular
benefits of 10% weight loss is adapted from Jung RT. Obesity as a disease.
Br Med Bull 1997;53:307-21.
David Haslam is a general practitioner and clinical director of the
National Obesity Forum.
The ABC of obesity is edited by Naveed Sattar
(nsattar@clinmed.gla.ac.uk), professor of metabolic medicine, and
Mike Lean, professor of nutrition, University of Glasgow.
The series will be published as a book by Blackwell Publishing early in
2007.
Competing interests: DH has received honorariums for presentations and
advisory board attendance from Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, Roche and
GlaxoSmithKline. NS has received fees for consulting and speaking from
Sanofi-Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck, and from several companies
in the field of lipid lowering therapy. ML has received personal and
departmental funding from most major pharmaceutical companies
involved in obesity research, and from several food companies. A full list
can be seen on www.food.gov.uk/science/ouradvisors/ACR/
BMJ 2006;333:640–2
Practice
642 BMJ VOLUME 333 23 SEPTEMBER 2006 bmj.com
on 24 October 2006 bmj.comDownloaded from