Article

Ma Y, Pagoto SL, Olendzki BC, et al. Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass

Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Obesity Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.75). 09/2006; 16(9):1227-31. DOI: 10.1381/096089206778392284
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies and depends on many factors, such as time elapsed since surgery, baseline weight, and co-morbidities.
We analyzed weight data from 494 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) by one surgeon at an academic institution between June 1999 and December 2004. Linear regression was used to identify factors in predicting % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year.
Mean patient age at time of surgery was 44 +/- 9.6 (SD), and the majority were female (83.8%). The baseline prevalence of co-morbidities included 24% for diabetes, 42% for hypertension, and 15% for hypercholesterolemia. Baseline BMI was 51.5 +/- 8.5 kg/m(2). Mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 +/- 4.6 days. Mortality rate was 0.6%. Follow-up weight data were available for 90% of patients at 6 months after RYGBP, 90% at 1 year, and 51% at 2 years. Mean %EWL at 1 year was 65 +/- 15.2%. The success rate (> or = 50 %EWL) at 1 year was 85%. Younger age and lower baseline weight predicted greater weight loss. Males lost more weight than females. Diabetes was associated with a lower %EWL. Depression did not significantly predict %EWL.
The study demonstrated a 65 %EWL and 85% success rate at 1 year in our bariatric surgery program. Our finding that most pre-surgery co-morbidities and depression did not predict weight loss may have implications for pre-surgery screening.

0 Followers
 · 
5 Reads
  • Source
    • "In our study, the multivariate analysis identified advanced age (p = 0.02), hypertension (p < 0.01), and preoperative BMI (p < 0.01) as the main predictors of primary suboptimal WL. These results are consistent with the current published literature[29]. The limitations of this project are mainly related to its retrospective nature and incomplete follow-up rate. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Currently, there is no agreement on the best method to describe weight loss (WL) after bariatric surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term outcomes using percent of total body weight loss (%TWL). Methods A single-institution retrospective study of 2420 patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was performed. Suboptimal WL was defined as %TWL < 20 % at 12 months. Results Mean preoperative BMI was 46.8 ± 7.8 kg/m2. One year after surgery, patients lost an average 14.1 kg/m2 units of body mass index (BMI), 30.0 ± 8.5 %TWL, and 68.5 ± 22.9 %EWL. At 6 and 12 months after RYGB, mean BMI and percent excess WL (%EWL) significantly improved for all baseline BMI groups (p < 0.01, BMI; p = 0.01, %EWL), whereas mean %TWL was not significantly different among baseline BMI groups (p = 0.9). The regression analysis between each metric outcome and preoperative BMI demonstrated that preoperative BMI did not significantly correlate with %TWL at 1 year (r = 0.04, p = 0.3). On the contrary, preoperative BMI was strongly but negatively associated with the %EWL (r = −0.52, p < 0.01) and positively associated with the BMI units lost at 1 year (r = 0.56, p < 0.01). In total, 11.3 % of subjects achieved <20 %TWL at 12 months and were considered as suboptimal WL patients. Conclusion The results of our study confirm that %TWL should be the metric of choice when reporting WL because it is less influenced by preoperative BMI. Eleven percent of patients failed to achieve successful WL during the in the first year after RYGB based on our definition.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Obesity Surgery
  • Source
    • "RYGB, comparable to findings by other investigators [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (RYGB), some surgeons elect to perform a vagotomy to reduce symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER). Routine vagotomy during RYGB may independently affect weight loss and metabolic outcomes following bariatric surgery. We aimed to determine whether vagotomy augments percent excess weight loss in obese patients after RYGB. We examined the effect of vagotomy in 1278 patients undergoing RYGB at our institution from 2003 to 2009. Weight and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) were modelled at three months and annually up to five years using a longitudinal linear mixed model controlling for differences in age, gender, initial body mass index (BMI), ideal body weight, and presence of vagotomy. Vagotomy was performed on 40.3% of our cohort. Vagotomy patients had significantly lower initial BMI (46.4±6.2 vs. 48.3±7.7kg/m(2), p<0.001), but there were no other significant differences at baseline. The strongest predictor of %EWL over time was initial BMI, with lower BMI patients exhibiting greater %EWL (p<0.001). Age and gender effects were also significant, with younger patients (p<0.04) and males (p<0.002) attaining greater %EWL. Vagotomy had no effect on %EWL in either simple or multiple regression models. Our series suggest that vagotomy does not augment %EWL when performed with RYGB. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A method is presented for imaging the detailed structure of surface-breaking tight cracks from the surface opposite to the cracks. The technique combines laser-ultrasonics and data processing with an improved version of the Fourier-domain Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique (F-SAFT). The key point of this study is to use laser-generated shear waves, which interact very effectively with the crack roots. Ultrasonic images of the stress corrosion cracks, having depths of typically 0.5 mm. and widths of less than 0.05 mm, are successfully reconstructed and compared with results from liquid penetrant testing.
    No preview · Conference Paper · Nov 2002
Show more