Article

Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-risk patients: A test of the relationship at the weekly level

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 11/2006; 74(5):967-79. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.967
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Given the availability of violence risk assessment tools, clinicians are now better able to identify high-risk patients. Once these patients have been identified, clinicians must monitor risk state and intervene when necessary to prevent harm. Clinical practice is dominated by the assumption that increases in psychiatric symptoms elevate risk of imminent violence. This intensive study of patients (N = 132) at high risk for community violence is the first to evaluate prospectively the temporal relation between symptoms and violence. Symptoms were assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory and threat/control override (TCO) scales. Results indicate that a high-risk patient with increased anger in 1 week is significantly more likely to be involved in serious violence in the following week. This was not true of other symptom constellations (anxiety, depression, TCO) or general psychological distress. The authors found no evidence that increases in the latter symptoms during 1 week provide an independent foundation for expecting violence during the following week.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Edward Patrick Mulvey
    • "In prior research by the Correctional Service of Canada (Stewart, Wilton, & Malek, 2011), the BSI was found to have a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 65% compared with a mental health clinician's recommendation of whether mental health services were required, and a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 55% using a diagnosis of severe mental illness based on file information as the outcome measure. However, the factor structure of the subscales has not been consistently replicated (Skeem et al., 2006;Warren et al., 2002). As the only prior study to consider the factor structure of the BSI in correctional populations suggested that a single factor (i.e., the GSI) fits the data best, and in light of the high correlations "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inmates who experienced childhood trauma have higher rates of institutional violence. However, the potential intermediate roles of co-occurring mental health and substance use needs and early justice involvement have not previously been considered. The current study examined the relationships between trauma, mental health, substance abuse, youth criminal charges, and institutional violence during the first 180 days of incarceration. As secondary aims, we explored whether these associations differed by sex or differed for inmates of Aboriginal ethnicity. Secondary data from prison records for all 5,154 inmates admitted to a federal prison during 2011 were collected. Path analysis was used to estimate the direct and indirect associations between trauma and institutional violence. Approximately 45% of inmates reported childhood trauma, which was associated with a higher prevalence of co-occurring mental health and substance abuse needs, and youth criminal charges. Although mental health, substance abuse, and youth criminal charges interacted with one another in predicting violence, their associations were similar for those with and without histories of trauma. A direct association between trauma and institutional incidents remained (Relative Risk [RR] = 1.38, 95% CI [1.07, 1.78]) after accounting for indirect associations through these co-occurring risk factors. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that these associations differed between men and women or between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal inmates. Given the high co-occurrence of multiple health and behavioral risk factors for inmates with traumatic histories, clarifying which factors are causally associated and reversible is needed to inform effective trauma informed care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Law and Human Behavior
  • Source
    • "Anger dysregulation is part of a broad range of clinical disorders (DiGiuseppe & Tafrate, 2007; Novaco, 2010), and its relevance for clinical and forensic populations centrally concerns it being a dynamic risk factor for violence. Studies with multiple control variables show anger to be related to the violent behavior of psychiatric patients before, during, and after hospitalization (Doyle & Dolan, 2006a, 2006b; McNiel, Eisner, & Binder, 2003; Monahan et al., 2001; Novaco & Taylor, 2004; Skeem et al., 2006; Swogger et al., 2012) and to physical aggression within institutions by incarcerated adults (Wang & Diamond, 1999). Anger is not only an important clinical need, it also bears on the therapeutic milieu and on the well-being of clinical and custodial staff. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anger has high prevalence in clinical and forensic settings, and it is associated with aggressive behavior and ward atmosphere on psychiatric units. Dysregulated anger is a clinical problem in Danish mental health care systems, but no anger assessment instruments have been validated in Danish. Because the Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory (NAS-PI) has been extensively validated with different clinical populations and lends itself to clinical case formulation, it was selected for translation and evaluation in the present multistudy project. Psychometric properties of the NAS-PI were investigated with samples of 477 nonclinical, 250 clinical, 167 male prisoner, and 64 male forensic participants. Anger prevalence and its relationship with other anger measures, anxiety/depression, and aggression were examined. NAS-PI was found to have high reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity, and its scores discriminated the samples. High scores in the offender group demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining self-report assessments of anger with this population. Retrospective and prospective validity of the NAS were tested with the forensic patient sample regarding physically aggressive behavior in hospital. Regression analyses showed that higher scores on NAS increase the risk of having acted aggressively in the past and of acting aggressively in the future. © The Author(s) 2015.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Assessment
  • Source
    • "Anger has long been associated with aggression and violence from both a theoretical perspective and as demonstrated through empirical evidence (Craig, 1982; Novaco, 2003; Novaco & Jarvis, 2002). Recent studies have shown anger to be related to physical aggression in inpatient settings (Doyle & Dolan, 2006a; McDermott, Quanbeck, Busse, Yastro, & Scott, 2008) as well as in the community (Doyle, Carter, Shaw, & Dolan, 2012; Doyle & Dolan, 2006b; Monahan et al., 2001; Skeem et al., 2006). As a result, the assessment of anger has increased in forensic psychiatric and correctional settings, and treatment programs targeting anger have been developed in hopes of reducing violence (see e.g., Haddock et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used archival data to examine the predictive validity of a prerelease violence risk assessment battery over 6 years at a forensic hospital (N = 230, 100% male, 63.0% African American, 34.3% Caucasian). Examining “real-world” forensic decision making is important for illuminating potential areas for improvement. The battery included the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Schedule of Imagined Violence, and Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory. Three outcome “recidivism” variables included contact violence, contact and threatened violence, and any reason for hospital return. Results indicated measures of general violence risk and psychopathy were highly correlated but weakly associated with reports of imagined violence and a measure of anger. Measures of imagined violence and anger were correlated with one another. Unexpectedly, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses revealed that none of the scales or subscales predicted recidivism better than chance. Multiple regression indicated the battery failed to account for recidivism outcomes. We conclude by discussing three possible explanations, including timing of assessments, controlled versus field studies, and recidivism base rates.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · Criminal Justice and Behavior
Show more