Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: A new challenge for supportive care

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center & School of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
The Cancer Journal (Impact Factor: 4.24). 09/2006; 12(5):432-43.
Source: PubMed


The growing population of cancer survivors represents a clear challenge to clinicians and researchers to look beyond the search for a cure and to address the multifaceted needs of those living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis. Common sequelae that disrupt the psychosocial aspects of life for adult cancer survivors after primary treatment include: fatigue; cognitive changes; body image; sexual health and functioning; infertility; fear of recurrence; PTSD and stress syndromes; family/caregiver distress; socioeconomic issues; and distress, anxiety, and depression. Psychosocial interventions, particularly group-based interventions and physical activity programs, have shown great promise in improving these outcomes. Future research will identify even better targeted, more efficacious, and more cost effective programs and disseminate them into cancer care settings. Healthcare providers must realize that they serve as vital gatekeepers to services that will help optimize cancer survivors' psychosocial as well as physical outcomes. Addressing these issues in the post-treatment period represents the new challenge to supportive care.

Download full-text


Available from: Julia Rowland
  • Source
    • "In life domains such as productivity, leisure and self-care, rehabilitation focuses on assisting patients to maintain and/or restore participation in self-care, leisure and productivity including work (Alfano and Rowland 2006). In these life domains occupational therapists (OTs) assist their patients to regain functionality by supporting them in activity and participation as proposed in the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF) (Haglund and Henriksson 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An increasing number of patients are confronted with breast cancer (BC) and functional limitations after treatment. Occupational therapy (OT) is successful in return to work (RTW), but not yet available for BC patients. This paper explores experts' opinions on OT interventions for RTW in BC patients in the Belgian context. Primary data were topic-interviews with all heads of OT departments in Flemish University Hospitals (n = 5). Secondary data were four focus group interviews with care professionals in oncological rehabilitation (n = 41). All data were transcribed and thematic analysis was used. Integrated in multidisciplinary teamwork, OT interventions should have a holistic and client-centred approach, start early in the rehabilitation process, include workplace visits and contacts with relevant stakeholders, and use goal setting to start up tailor made rehabilitation, linking assessment of abilities and work. Occupational therapists are regarded as professionals who can effectively answer BC patients unmet needs regarding RTW due to their skill to bridge between care and workplace. According to the experts, OT interventions supporting RTW in BC patients are useful when integrated in regular healthcare. They agree on the components but organisational barriers should be removed, for example not providing reimbursement for including this type of support trough healthcare insurance.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · European Journal of Cancer Care
  • Source
    • "Increasing breast cancer survival rates have left greater numbers of survivors and their spouses to cope with the transition back to normal life. Such transitions often induce psychosocial stress relating to the fear of recurrence, the resumption of a sexual and intimate relationship and the uncertainty of life's meaning (Alfano & Rowland, 2006; Ganz et al., 2002; Hodgkinson et al., 2007). Patients with breast cancer and their spouses appear to have higher psychological distress when both of them hold a negative cognitive appraisal of stress (Bigatti et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore whether stress from individual's and partner's depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, insecure attachment, and meaning in life, were predictors of diurnal cortisol patterns in breast cancer survivors and their spouses. Thirty-four couple dyads participated in this 8-month follow-up study. The breast cancer survivors and their spouses completed the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) scale, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale, and the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), and they collected salivary cortisol at home at time of awakening, 30 and 45 minutes after waking, 1200 hours, 1700 hours, and 2100 hours. Diurnal cortisol slopes of survivors and spouses are positively correlated. But the factors associated with diurnal cortisol patterns are different between survivors and spouses. For survivors, neither survivor individuals' nor spouses' psychosocial factors were the predictors of survivors' diurnal cortisol patterns. For spouses, the survivors' higher anxious attachment style was the main predictor of spouses' flatter diurnal cortisol patterns. In conclusion, for spouses, psychophysiological stress responses are mainly influenced by breast cancer survivors' insecure attachment. Future couple supportive care interventions can address survivors' attachment styles in close relationships in order to improve neuroendocrine functions for both breast cancer survivors and their spouses.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
  • Source
    • "Nearly half of North American men will receive a cancer diagnosis in their lifetime (Canadian Cancer Society's Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics 2012; Jemal et al. 2008). Most will access medical care to treat their disease, but far fewer will obtain psychosocial resources important to coping with their illness (Alfano and Rowland 2006; McDowell et al. 2011). This pattern is not explained by a lack of need. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As researchers consider the “problem” of men’s health-related help-seeking, more limited attention has been devoted to gender dynamics in how men with cancer work with lay and professional supports during illness. This article helps address that gap by presenting a substantive theory of men’s help-seeking in the context of cancer. Developed using a grounded theory methodology engaging thirty men, results indicate that as men experienced cancer as a “biographical disruption” they used help-seeking to both resist and adapt to illness-related identity threats. “Help-seeking with a strong back” allowed men to build resources important to resisting shifts. In contrast, “help-seeking with a soft front” enabled men to obtain help to acknowledge and adapt to disruptions. Although both forms of help-seeking had value, most men experienced help-seeking with a strong back as unproblematic and consistent with masculine ideals, while help-seeking with a soft front was less anticipated, less welcomed, and less comfortable amid gendered norms discouraging expressions of vulnerability.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Men and Masculinities
Show more