Sharing of Virulent Escherichia coli Clones among Household Members of a Woman with Acute Cystitis

Mucosal and Vaccine Research Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Clinical Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 8.89). 12/2006; 43(10):e101-8. DOI: 10.1086/508541
Source: PubMed


Within-household transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) may contribute to the pathogenesis of urinary tract infection (UTI), but this is poorly understood.
A woman with acute UTI, 4 human household members who cohabited with her, and the family's pet dog underwent prospective longitudinal surveillance for colonizing E. coli for 7-9 weeks after the woman's UTI episode. Unique clones were resolved by random amplified polymorphic DNA and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Virulence genes, phylogenetic group, and O types were defined by PCR. Comparisons with reference strains were made using random amplified polymorphic DNA profiling.
Serial fecal and urine samples from the 6 household members yielded 7 unique E. coli clones (4 of which were ExPEC and 3 of which were non-ExPEC). For 3 clones, extensive among-host sharing was evident in patterns suggesting host-to-host transmission. The mother's UTI clone, which represented E. coli O1:K1:H7, was the clone that was most extensively shared (in 5 hosts, including the dog) and most frequently recovered (in 45% of samples and at all 3 time points). The other 3 ExPEC clones corresponded with E. coli O6:K2:H1, O1:K1:H7, and O2:F10,F48.
E. coli clones, including ExPEC, can be extensively shared among human and animal household members in the absence of sexual contact and in patterns suggesting host-to-host transmission.

Full-text preview

Available from:
    • "Canine faeces is a potential reservoir for pathogenic Escherichia coli and can cause infections in humans (Johnson et al. 2001). Several studies have documented the sharing of E. coli clones between companion animals and human beings within a household, supporting potential cross-species bacterial transmission (Caugant et al. 1984; Murray et al. 2004; Johnson and Clabots 2006; Stenske et al. 2009; Harada et al. 2012). Cross-species bacterial transmission is a serious public health concern. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims: To determine the prevalence of cross-species sharing of Escherichia coli between healthy dogs and humans living in the same household. Methods and results: Two fecal E. coli isolates from 25 healthy dog-owner pairs and 16 healthy control humans were tested using three fingerprinting methods. The prevalence of within-household sharing of E. coli was 4%, 8% and 8% using PFGE, RAPD and ERIC-PCR analyses, respectively. Within-household bacterial sharing was more prevalent than across-household sharing (P< 0.05). According to questionnaire analyses avoiding the dog-owner behaviors such as allowing a dog to kiss or lick the owner's face, sharing people food with dog and feeding it raw meat may decrease the chance of cross-species E. coli sharing. Conclusions: Direct contact between humans and dogs and environmental reservoirs may be important routes for cross-species sharing of bacteria. Good personal hygiene and appropriate veterinary care for pets can minimize this risk. Significance and impact of study: Due to the importance of canine pathogenic E. coli reservoir hypothesis, close contacts between humans and dogs raises public health concerns. Determining the rate of cross-species bacterial sharing and confirm its accuracy by different fingerprinting techniques will help to find ways for reducing the economic impact of E. coli infections. This study support claims that public health concerns regarding the cross-species sharing of E. coli are warranted but this risk is minimal. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of Applied Microbiology
  • Source
    • "Inappropriate empirical treatment and wide spread use of antimicrobials in these animals leads to antimicrobial resistance which complicates therapy in dogs. Public health significance of these infections cannot be overlooked as cats and dogs being companion animals remain in close physical contact with human beings in modern society and represent potential sources of spread of antimicrobial resistance to human beings (Low et al., 1988; Kurazono et al., 2003; Guardabassi et al., 2004; Johnson and Clabots, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study was carried out on 96 swabs of uterine discharge of bitches with a history of infertility and repeat breeding irrespective of their age or breed, received in College Central Laboratory. On bacteriological examination, 92 (95.83%) were found positive for bacterial growth yielding 120 isolates. Of these positive samples, 65 (70.65%) yielded single bacterial species, 26 (28.26%) yielded two species, and the remaining 1 (1.08%) yielded 3 different bacterial species. Of 120 isolates, Streptococcus pyogenes was the predominant organism accounting for 55 (45.83%) infections followed by Staphylococcus aureus 23 (19.16%), Escherichia coli 20 (16.66%), Corynebacterium pyogenes 19 (15.83%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2 (1.67%) and Klebseilla pneumoniae 1(0.83%). Most common mixed infection was of S. aureus + S. pyogenes (11) and S. pyogenes + C. pyogenes (7) followed by other combinations S. pyogenes + E. coli (3), C. pyogenes+ E. coli (2), S. aureus + S. pyogenes + C. pyogenes (1), P. aeruginosa + S. pyogenes (1), E. coli + K. pneumoniae (1), S. aureus + C. pyogenes (1). Overall antimicrobial sensitivity pattern revealed that majority of the isolates were highly sensitive (80.20 to 89.58%) for azithromycin, norfloxacin, ceftriaxone, cephaperazone and clindamycin. Whereas 77.08 to 79.16% bacterial isolates were moderately sensitive towards oxytetracycline, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, amoxycillin, carbenicillin. Least sensitivity (44.79 to 72.91%) towards isolates were shown by penicillin, streptomycin, ampicillin, neomycin, cloxacillin, enrofloxacin, amoxyclav, co-trimaxole, cephalexin. Therefore, for rational use of antibiotics, prior testing of antibiotic sensitivity is suggested.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014
  • Source
    • "Em 75% dos casos, entretanto, as infecções tem como etiologia as Gram negativas (Esche-­ richia coli, Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp. e Enterobacter spp.), (Seguin et al. 2003, Barsanti 2006), sen-­‐ do a Escherichia coli, isoladamente, o principal agente etio-­‐ lógico desta infecção nos animais e no homem (Low et al. 1988, Blanco & Bartges 2001, Ling et al. 2001, Johnson et -­‐ cias de que pode haver a transmissão cruzada desta bacté-­‐ al. 2001, Johnson & Clabots 2006), situação epidemiológica complexa, uma vez que a E. coli é um dos principais partí-­‐ cipes da disseminação de resistência aos antimicrobianos (Pitout 2012). Dados nacionais e internacionais dão conta que na úl-­‐ tima década, o controle e tratamento das ITU, sobretudo aquelas de origem humana, tem se complicado devido à emergência de resistência por parte das bactérias (Andra-­‐ de et al. 2006, Pitout 2012). "

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira
Show more