Content uploaded by Hector D. Douglas III
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hector D. Douglas III on Jun 27, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
AUTHOR'S PROOF
Metadata of the article that will be visualized in OnlineFirst
1
Article Title
Measurement of Chemical Emissions in Crested Auklets (
Aethia
cristatella
)
2
Journal Name
Journal of Chemical Ecology
3
Corresponding
Author
Family Name
Douglas
4
Particle
5
Given Name
Hector D.
6
Suffix
III
7
Organization
University of Alaska Fairbanks
8
Division
Institute of Marine Science
9
Address
Fairbanks 9970, Alaska, USA
10
e-mail
hddouglas@gmail.com
11
Schedule
Received
27 March 2006
12
Revised
2 June 2006
13
Accepted
21 June 2006
14
Abstract
This report presents the first quantitative estimates of emission rates for
chemical signals in a bird—the crested auklet (Aethia cristatella). Volatile
emissions from live birds were captured in a purified airstream onto polymer
traps. Traps were eluted with methanol and analyzed with gas chromatography-
mass spectrometry. The volatile collection chamber was field-calibrated with an
in-line bubbler and synthetic octanal, the dominant constituent of the crested
auklet’s citruslike odor. The result is an index of volatile chemical emissions
within a small population of wild crested auklets at Big Koniuji Island, AK, USA.
The average emission rate for octanal was 5.7 µl/50 min. Males and females
did not differ in their emission rates (t
(0.05)two-tailed
= 0.44, P = 0.66). There was
a sevenfold difference between minimum and maximum emission rates.
Prevalence of tick infection (2.1%) was low despite the high abundance of ticks
in the colony. The crested auklet with the lowest chemical emission rate had 14
ticks attached to the face, whereas nearly all other crested auklets had no ticks.
15
Keywords
separated by ' - '
Crested auklet - Chemical emissions - Chemical signal - Octanal -
Ectoparasites - Repellents - Chemical defense
16
Foot note
information
Page
1
of
1
Testsite
9/17/2006
file://D:\Programs\Metadata\temp\jec69164.htm
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
1
2
4
Measurement of Chemical Emissions in Crested Auklets
5(Aethia cristatella)
6Hector D. Douglas III
7Received: 27 March 2006 / Revised: 2 June 2006 / Accepted: 21 June 2006
8
#
Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006
11Abstract This report presents the first quantitative estimates of emission rates for chemical
12signals in a bird—the crested auklet (Aethia cristatella). Volatile emissions from live birds were
13captured in a purified airstream onto polymer traps. Traps were eluted with methanol and
14analyzed with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The volatile collection chamber was
15field-calibrated with an in-line bubbler and synthetic octanal, the dominant constituent of the
16crested auklet’s citruslike odor. The result is an index of volatile chemical emissions within a
17small population of wild crested auklets at Big Koniuji Island, AK, USA. The average emission
18rate for octanal was 5.7 μl/50 min. Males and females did not differ in their emission rates
19(t
(0.05)two-tailed
=0.44,P = 0.66). There was a sevenfold difference between minimum and
20maximum emission rates. Prevalence of tick infection (2.1%) was low despite the high
21abundance of ticks in the colony. The crested auklet with the lowest chemical emission rate
22had 14 ticks attached to the face, whereas nearly all other crested auklets had no ticks.
23Keywords Crested auklet
.
chemical emissions
.
chemical signal
.
octanal
.
ectoparasites
.
24repellents
.
chemical defense
26Introduction
27Chemical signals in vertebrates can provide information about the parasite resistance of
28prospective mates, and such signals may be amenable to sexual selection (Penn and Potts,
291998). Many species of birds emit odors (Weldon and Rappole, 1997), but the functional
30significance of avian odors has received relatively little attention. Weldon and Rappole
31(1997) suggested that avian odors may be indicative of chemical defense or unpalatability.
32Few endogenous chemical defenses have been documented, but exogenous defenses,
33applied to plumage and nests, may be widespread (Simmons, 1966; Clark and Mason,
341985, 1988; Ehrlich et al., 1986; Clayton and Vernon, 1993; Gwinner et al., 2000; Lafuma
J Chem Ecol
DOI 10.1007/s10886-006-9164-2
H. D. Douglas III (*)
Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks,
Fairbanks, Alaska 9970, USA
e-mail: hddouglas@gmail.com
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
35et al., 2001; Parkes et al., 2003; Weldon, 2004). The best known examples of endogenous
36chemical defense among birds are the Pitohuis and Ifrita kowaldi of New Guinea
37(Dumbacher et al., 1992, 2000). These species apparently sequester batrachotoxins, a potent
38class of neurotoxins, from dietary sources such as Choresine beetles (Family Melyridae;
39Dumbacher et al., 2005). The concentrations can be sufficient in skin and plumage to act as
40a deterrent against parasites and predators (Dumbacher et al., 1992, 2000;Dumbacher,1999).
41However, chemical characteristics of these neurotoxins vary widely within and among
42species, consistent with evidence that they are acquired from an environmental source
43(Dumbacher et al., 2000). Two species of pitohuis (“hooded” Polyporous dichrous and
44“variable” P. kirhocephalus) emit a sour odor that is hypothesized to serve as an olfactory
45warning of the birds’ poisonous characteristics (Dumbacher et al., 1992). The chemical odors
46of pitohuis have not yet been characterized qualitatively or quantitatively.
47Crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) produce a citruslike odorant dominated by even-
48numbered aldehydes (6–12 carbons) that may function as an ectoparasite repellent and
49signal of mate quality (Douglas et al., 2001, 2004; Hagelin et al., 2003). Two of the primary
50constituents are potent invertebrate repellents, and synthetic analogues of the crested auklet
51odorant repel, paralyze, and kill ectoparasites in a dose-dependent fashion (Douglas et al.,
522001, 2004, 2005b). The efficacy of synthetic analogues is comparable to that of com-
53mercial arthropod repellents (Douglas et al., 2005b). Brief exposure of auklet lice to in situ
54concentrations of the odorant in tissues caused paralysis and mortality; however, suspension
55of pigeon lice above crested auklet feathers had no effect on survivorship compared to
56controls (Douglas et al., 2005a).
57This report presents a method for comparison of odor production in live crested auklets
58that can also be applied to other vertebrates. Wild birds were captured and confined in a
59purified and regulated airstream, whereas chemical emissions were captured onto polymer
60traps. Portable industrial instruments designed for detection of volatile organics are not
61sufficiently specific or accurate to provide comparative measurements. In crested auklets,
62chemical concentrations vary considerably within an individual bird’s plumage (Douglas,
63unpublished data). A large sample of feathers is required to obtain an accurate mean
64measurement for each body region. The removal of a large sample of feathers would
65compromise the thermal insulation of the birds. Therefore, accurate quantitative compar-
66isons of individual chemical potency would probably require that birds be sacrificed if
67feather extractions were the basis for comparison. The method described here provides a
68quantitative comparison of chemical emissions in live birds that does not compromise their
69fitness in any way. It also provides a means to isolate measurements of chemical volatiles
70from environmental contaminants, and a means to calibrate those measurements.
71Methods and Materials
72Field Methods Research on the chemical odor of crested auklets was conducted at a colony
73on Big Koniuji Island, Alaska, from June 4 to July 16, 2002. In terms of phenology, this
74period corresponded with the onset of egg-laying to early chick rearing. The colony is
75situated in an ancient glacial cirque at 243 m elevation on a mountain overlooking Yukon
76Harbor. The crested auklet nests in rock talus, high on the steep slopes of this cirque. It is the
77only seabird species that nests in the cirque. Breeding adults synchronized visitations each
78morning during the incubation period, gathering in a large flock in Yukon Harbor prior to
79visiting the colony. Birds arrived on the colony surface in a large flock and were captured in
80noose carpets strung over landing rocks. Each bird was measured, banded with a USFWS
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
81metal band, color bands, sampled, sexed by bill characteristics (according to Jones, 1993a),
82and inspected for ectoparasites.
83Each bird was then placed into a glass reaction kettle, and volatile emissions were
84collected in a purified airstream. The flow rate of 1.0 l/min delivered oxygen at a rate of
850.2 l/min (dry atmospheric air = 20.95% oxygen; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1997), which was more
86than sufficient to supply the oxygen consumption needs of a 300-g nonpasserine bird
87(0.25 l/h at rest; Lasiewski and Dawson, 1967). Air temperature during volatile collections
88was 6–10°C. Duration of sampling was measured with a stopwatch. Volatile emissions were
89collected for 50 min on all except six birds. The period of collection for those six was
90reduced to 30 min. Gas chromatography (GC) peak areas for octanal were adjusted to
91account for the difference in collection times. The adjusted values for those six individuals
92lay within the range of other values in the sample. After GC-mass spectrometry (MS)
93analysis, peak values for all samples were normalized to a 50-min collection time (CT) with
94the following equation: 50 min
=
CT peak area ¼ adjusted peak area. Collection traps
95were eluted with 2.0 ml of methanol, and the elution was collected in borosilicate glass
96vials (3/8 oz; Fisher Scientific), sealed with Teflon-lined caps and a vapor seal (DuraSeal
97stretch film). The chambers were scrubbed with baking soda, rinsed with freshwater, and
98dried with a clean cotton towel between each sampling.
99Design of Volatile Collection System The design of this system benefited from the study of
100similar methods used to study plant volatiles (e.g., Turlings et al., 1991). The collection
Fig. 1 Volatile collection system for measuring chemical emissions. Regulated and purified air is pulled by
battery-operated vacuum pump into glass reaction kettle containing live crested auklet. Volatile emissions are
captured onto polymer traps that are placed in the exiting air stream.
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
101chamber (Figure 1) consisted of a 4000-ml Pyrex reaction kettle (Corning # 6947-4 L) and
102kettle lid (VWR 36393-051) clamped securely with a kettle clamp (VWR Cat. No. 36393-
103051). All tubing and fittings were glass or Teflon. The incoming airstream was filtered
104through a glass dispersion tube (Lab Glass UA-71801-11950, extra coarse porosity 170–
105220) and then an in-line charcoal filter (Whatman Carbon Cap). This purified airstream
106entered the chamber through a 24/40 glass elbow (LabGlass LG-1980-100). The outgoing
107airstream was split, exiting through two 24/40 glass elbows into two glass collection traps.
108The collection traps were custom manufactured by Lab Glass (Vineland, NJ, USA) and
109adapted from a design described in Turlings et al. (1991). Each trap was 6 cm long by 9 mm
110outer diam (6 mm ID). The tube was fitted with a 325-mesh stainless steel frit sealed across
111the diameter of the tube, 20 mm from the downstream end. Glass collection traps were
112packed with Super Q (80–100 mesh; Alltech, Deerfield, IL, USA) or Tenax (35/60 mesh;
113Alltech). These traps were conditioned under vacuum in a Bullet Dryer at 225°C for 14 hr
114prior to shipping to the field site. The polymer (50.0 mg) was placed on top of the frit and
115held in place with a small plug of glass wool. Air exiting from these collection tubes was
116passed through Gilmont flow meters hooked up to a battery operated vacuum source (Cole
117Parmer Model # 7530-25). Flow rate was regulated at 500 ml/min through each trap. Flow
118meters were factory calibrated prior to the field season, and calibration of the flow meters
119was checked again after fieldwork. This calibration was performed with Sierra 820 Mass
120Flowmeter, and SE was ±0.41 ml/min. The volatile collection system was calibrated in the
121field by passing 3.0 ml of synthetic octanal through a bubbler, placed in line (Ace Midget
122Bubbler with 145–175 μm filter; Ace Glass Inc., Vineland, NJ, USA). This calibration was
123run exactly as performed with crested auklets, with the volatile collection system operating
124for 50 min. The calibration was performed once at the end of the field season to avoid
125contamination of equipment and samples with standards.
126Chemical Analysis GC-MS was carried out in the SIM mode (selective ion monitoring)
127with an HP5890 Series II Gas Chromatograph equipped with a 20 m×0.25 mm, 5% phenyl
128siloxane column (Alltech), and an HP5972 Series Mass Selective Detector. The injector and
129detector temperatures were maintained at 250°C throughout, and the column flow was
1301.0 ml/min. The instrument was programmed from 60°C to 250°C in two stages. The first
131stage increased at a rate of 4°C/min to a final temperature of 120°C, and remained at that
132temperature for 4 min. The second stage increased at a rate of 8°C/min to a final
133temperature of 250°C, and remained at that temperature for 2 min. Octanal was selected as
134an index of chemical potency because it is consistently the most abundant constituent in the
135crested auklet odorant (40%; Douglas et al., 2001), and it is also strongly repellent to ticks
136(Douglas et al., 2004). Retention time and ion abundances were obtained in EI mode from
137standard (99% Octanal, ACROS Organics, C.A.S. 124-13-0), and results were consistent
138across five replicates at different concentrations. The most abundant ions were chosen for
139monitoring, and dwell times (ms) were set for each ion according to its relative abundance
140(ion/dwell time: 43.0/100, 41.0/80, 44.0/70, 57.0/30, 84.1/30). Subsequent analyses of
141standards in SIM mode showed that these parameters consistently discriminated octanal
142from background and obtained well-defined peaks.
143Quality control was assured by the inclusion of blanks, duplicates, internal standards,
144augmented standards, and calibration standards run at intervals in sequences at the
145frequency of 5–10% of total samples. Standards were made by serial dilutions in methanol
146(ACROS Organics HPLC grade). Undecenal (97% Undecyclenic Aldehyde, ACROS
147Organics, C.A.S. 112-45-8) was used as an internal standard, and was added to all samples.
148Blanks with the internal standard were also included in the sequence. Precise quantities of
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
149standards were measured with an Eppendorf Pipette (Model 4710). Accuracy and precision
150of the pipette were determined by replicate weighing of 10-μl samples of distilled water
151with a Mettler AE163 analytical balance (x = 9.94×10
−3
g; SE = ±8.38×10
−5
; SD = 3.25×
15210
−4
).
153GC-MS variability was addressed by calibrating response factors of the target analyte
154and the internal standard. A series of calibrations was conducted at four concentrations of
155octanal and undecenal (3.8×10
−3
, 4.8×10
−3
, 6.0×10
−3
, and 9.0×10
−3
μl/ml) to obtain the
156regression of relative response (R
2
= 0.96, P < 0.001, N = 22). The following regression
157equation was obtained:
Octanal Peak Area ¼ 7:58 Undecenal Peak AreaðÞþ14135
159For each sample, the difference between the obtained and expected GC peak areas of the
160internal standard was calculated. This difference in undecenal peak area was applied in the
161regression equation above, and the value was added to the obtained value for octanal.
162Duplicate samples were collected for all birds. However, the Big Koniuji colony is
163located in a rugged spot, and some samples were lost due to damage to the sample vials.
164Some samples were expended in the testing and calibration of analytical methods. I
165analyzed 103 samples from 57 individuals—46 individuals with duplicate split samples and
16611 individuals with single split samples. Results obtained for Tenax and Super-Q volatile
167traps in the 46 duplicate split samples were similar. Standard error of splits, expressed as a
168percentage of peak area, was 8%. In the case of duplicate split samples, average octanal
169peak area was used as a relative index for chemical potency. In the cases where only single
170splits were available, the obtained value for octanal peak area ( ±8%) was used as the
171relative index. Quantitative measurements, obtained from field calibration with synthetic
172octanal and bubbler, were used to calculate emission rates for the birds.
173Evaluating Ectoparasite Abundance A visual inspection method, similar to that described
174in Clayton and Walther (1997), was used as a relative measure of ectoparasite prevalence
175and abundance. A subsample of crested auklets (N = 12) was fumigated with carbon
176dioxide (as described in Visnak and Dumbacher, 1999), and dusted with pyrethrum (as
177described in Clayton and Walther, 1997) to evaluate the accuracy of the inspection method.
178Ticks were identified as Ixodes uriae by Lance Durden and were deposited in the U.S.
179National Tick Collection (curated at Georgia Southern University) under accession number
180RML 123386. Lice were i dentified by Dale Clayton as belonging to the genera
181Austromenopon, Quadraceps, and Saemundssonia, and deposited into the frozen col-
182lections of the Price Institute for Phthirapteran Research at University of Utah.
184Results
185Chemical emission rates differed among individuals, but not between the sexes. Measure-
186ments from the field calibration obtained a mean peak area of 277,424,557 (SE = ±4,586,885)
187from 3.0 ml octanal passed into the volatile collection system. Applying this calibration, the
188average chemical emission for crested auklets was 5.7 μl octanal/50 min ±0.42 (peak area =
189529,800; SE = ±38,800 or 7% sample mean). There was a sevenfold difference between
190the highest and lowest chemical emissions. A male had the highest chemical emission at
19119.9 μl/50 min (PA = 1,842,816), and the lowest chemical emission was also a male at 2.8 μl/
19250 min (PA = 262,271). Male and female auklets did not differ in chemical emission rates,
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
t
(0.05)two-tailed
= 0.44, P = 0.66. The mean value for male auklets was 5.6 μl/50 min ±0.52
194(PA = 518,900; SE = ±48,500, N = 41) vs. 6.0 μl/50 min ±0.68 (PA = 557,900; SE =
195±62,600, N = 16) for females. Measurements were also obtained for one subadult male and
196female with well developed ornaments. The male emitted 4.4 μl/50 min (PA = 405,974),
197and the female emitted 8.8 μl/50 min (PA = 813,506).
198Most birds had no ticks, despite a high abundance of I. uriae ticks on the colony surface.
199The individual with lowest octanal emission had 14 ticks attached between the rictal plate
200and eye on the left side of the face. All ticks were in the process of obtaining blood meals.
201Prevalence of tick parasitism was low. Only 2 out of 96 auklets examined by visual ins-
202pection methods had ticks. The only other auklet that we saw parasitized by ticks had 2
203attached to its face. This was just 2.1% of the population. Results for the visual inspection
204method were similar to results for the combined methods of fumigation and dust ruffling.
205Only one tick was found on 12 crested auklets by the combined methods of fumigation and
206dust ruffling, and this individual had not necessarily been successful at parasitizing its host.
207The low abundance of ticks on auklets was remarkable considering our own encounter rate
208with ticks in the colony. We noted 5–10 ticks on our pant legs per hour while sitting in the
209colony. We counted as many as 20 ticks questing (host-seeking behavior) within small areas
210(0.37– 0.91 m
2
) on the surface of large landing rocks where auklets alighted.
211Visual inspection suggested that the prevalence and abundance of lice were low. Lice
212were found on 4 of the 96 birds inspected, an infection rate of 4.2%. Comparison of the
213visual inspection method with fumigation and pyrethrum dusting was in agreement with
214results from visual inspection. Only one louse was found by fumigation, and only one louse
215was found by dust ruffling on 12 crested auklets. No more than four lice were found on any
216bird, including specimens that were collected for dissection.
217Discussion
218Differences in octanal emission rates may be related to the ability to produce odor. Higher
219emission rates probably represent a higher expenditure of lipid reserves since the aldehydes
220appear to be products of fatty acid synthesis (Douglas 2006). The male with the highest
221chemical “potency” in this study would have expended a minimum of 0.57 ml lipid per
22224 h in order to consistently maintain the same level of emissions, and the male with the
223lowest chemical potency would have expended approximately seven times less. Differences
224in emission rates might also be related to hormone levels and behaviors that help to perfuse
225odorants in plumage.
226The prevalence of tick parasitism on adult crested auklets in this study (2.1%) was
227unexpectedly low considering the high abundance of ticks in the colony. It was also much
228lower than what has been found in other subpolar seabirds where I. uriae ticks have been
229studied. Infestations in subarctic colonial seabirds have been documented in as high as 70%
230of the adult population (Barton et al., 1996), and intensity of I. uriae infestations in some
231subantarctic seabird colonies may be sufficient to cause mortality in adult king penguins
232(Aptenodytes patagonicus;Gauthier-Clercetal.,1998). Two species of Pitohui birds (New
233Guinea), also known for chemical defense, exhibited a lower than expected infection rate from
234ticks (3.1%, N = 32) compared to other genera of passerines (Mouritsen and Madsen, 1994).
235Higher rates of octanal emission in crested auklets may be associated with lower
236incidence of tick parasitism. Aldehydes could interfere with four stages of Ixodes tick
237parasitism—engagement, exploration, penetration, and attachment (described in Kebede,
193
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
2382004). Crested auklets thrust their bills and faces into the scented nape feathers of
239conspecifics (“ruff-sniff” behavior) during courtship and social behavior (Jones, 1993b;
240Hunter and Jones, 1999; Hagelin et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2004). This behavior may
241provide an opportunity to evaluate chemical potency of prospective mates (Douglas et al.
2422001, 2004), and it may also serve to distribute the odorant in plumage. Anointment of
243facial skin and plumage around the head and neck could help to deter ticks and interfere
244with the intraspecific chemical signaling that ticks use to locate attachment sites on the host
245(Sonenshine, 1985). In fact, aldehyde concentrations in crested auklet plumage are
246sufficient to reduce tick locomotion (Douglas, unpublished data). Below some threshold
247of chemical defense, crested auklets are likely to be more vulnerable to tick parasitism. In
248this study, the crested auklet with the lowest chemical emission rate (half the population
249mean) was parasitized by 14 ticks clustered together between the eye and rictal plate. Ticks
250often attach around the eyes of birds because the skin is thin, and the area cannot be
251preened by the host (Reed et al., 2003). Chemical potency and associated repellence of
252ectoparasites may be a basis for mutual sexual selection in crested auklets (Douglas et al.
2532001, 2004).
254The louse infection rate among crested auklets at Big Koniuji Island, as best could be
255determined, was 4.2%. Similarly, there was a very low infection rate at another mono-
256specific colony of crested auklets. No lice were found on 80 adults at Talan Island (see
257Douglas et al., 2004 for details). By contrast, the prevalence and abundance of lice were
258much higher in a mixed-species colony that included both crested auklets and least auklets
259(A. pusilla) at St. Lawrence Island, Alaska (Douglas et al., 2005a). Among these crested
260auklets, there was a 100% infection rate (N = 21), and the intensity of infection (adult +
261juvenile lice) ranged from 8 to 91 lice per bird (Douglas, unpublished data). Numerical
262results are not directly comparable because data for Douglas et al. (2005a) were obtained by
263body washing, which is a more accurate method than visual inspection (Clayton and
264Drown, 2001). Nevertheless, a qualitative difference can be inferred. To the extent that it
265has been evaluated, the prevalence of louse infections in crested auklets is higher at mixed-
266species colonies.
267This study reports on a novel research application for estimating chemical emission rates
268in crested auklets. The method has several advantages. Accurate quantitative estimates of
269chemical production and emissions can be obtained for live vertebrates without harvesting
270tissues that might jeopardize the animal’s fitness. The live specimen is isolated in a leak
271proof chamber supplied with a purified airstream. This eliminates the possibility of con-
272tamination from plant volatiles, insects, and naturally occurring materials. Flow rate is
273regulated, and this is critical for determining rates. The quantitative measurements can be
274calibrated to known standards. The methods reported here could be applied to other
275vertebrates to study the relationship of chemical emissions to a range of studies including
276hormones, mate selection, reproductive behavior, or parasitism.
277Acknowledgments Laboratory analyses were made possible by the support of the Dept. of Chemistry and
278Biochemistry, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks. Professors R. Stolzberg and T. Clausen offered suggestions and
279assistance. Research was supported with grants from the Eppley Foundation for Research, Inc., and the
280Angus Gavin Memorial Bird Research Fund, Univ. of Alaska Foundation. Logistical support was also
281provided in part by a grant from the Center for Global Change and Arctic System Research sponsored by the
282Alaska Sea Grant College Program. A. Springer helped support this research. A. Kelly and A. Maccormack
283assisted with fieldwork. J. Galvin and the Rita B F/V provided logistical support. The Alaska Maritime Natl.
284Wild. Refuge and the Aleut Corp. granted research permits. T. Jones, W. Conner, and W. Simpson offered
285suggestions on design of the volatile collection system. Ø. Tøien checked the calibration of flowmeters.
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
286References
287BARTON, T. R., HARRIS, M. P., WANLESS, S., and ELSTON, D. A. 1996. The activity periods and life-cycle of
288the tick Ixodes uriae (Acari: Ixodidae) in relation to host breeding strategies. Parasitology 112:571–580.
289CLARK, L. and MASON, J. R. 1985. Use of nest material as insecticidal and anti-pathogenic agents by the
290European starling. Oecologia 67:169–176.
291CLARK, L. and MASON, J. R. 1988. Effect of biologically active plants used as nest material and the derived
292benefit to starling nests. Oecologia 77:174–180.
293CLAYTON, D. H. and VERNON, J. G. 1993. Common grackle anting with lime fruit and its effects on
294ectoparasites. Auk 110:951–952.
295CLAYTON, D. H. and WALTHER, B. A. 1997. Collection and quantification of arthropod parasites of birds,
296pp. 419–440, in D. H. CLAYTON and J. MOORE (eds.). Host–Parasite Evolution: General Principles and
297Avian Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
298CLAYTON, D. H. and DROWN, D. M. 2001. Critical evaluation of five methods for quantifying chewing lice
299(Insecta: Phthiraptera). J. Parasitol. 87:1291–1300.
300DOUGLAS, H. D. III, 2006. Odors and ornaments in crested auklets (Aethia cristatella): Signals of mate
301quality? Ph.D. thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, pp. 217.
302DOUGLAS, H. D. III, CO, J. E., JONES, T. H., and CONNER, W. E. 2001. Heteropteran chemical repellents
303identified in the citrus odor of a seabird (Crested Auklet: Aethia cristatella). Naturwissenschaften
30488:330–332.
305DOUGLAS, H. D. III, CO, J. E., JONES, T. H., and CONNER, W. E. 2004. Interspecific differences in Aethia
306spp. auklet odorants and evidence for chemical defense against ectoparasites. J. Chem. Ecol. 30:1921–
3071935.
308DOUGLAS, H. D. III, MALENKE, J. R., and CLAYTON, D.H. 2005a. Is the citrus-like plumage odorant of
309crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) a defense against lice? J. Ornithol. 146:111–115.
310DOUGLAS, H. D. III, CO, J. E., JONES, T.H., CONNER, W. E., and DAY, J. F. 2005b. Chemical odorant of
311colonial seabird repels mosquitoes. J. Med. Entomol. 42:647–651.
312DUMBACHER, J. P. 1999. Evolution of toxicity in Pitohuis I: Effects of homobatrachotoxin on chewing lice.
313Auk 116:957–963.
314DUMBACHER, J. P., BEEHLER, B. M., SPANDE,T.F.,GARRAFFO, H. M., and DALY, J. W. 1992.
315Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: Chemical defense in birds? Science 258:799–801.
316DUMBACHER, J. P., SPANDE, T. F., and DALY, J. W. 2000. Batrachotoxin alkaloids from passerine birds: A
317second toxic bird genus (Ifrita kowaldi) from New Guinea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:12970–12975.
318DUMBACHER, J. P., WAKO, A., DERRICKSON, S. R., SAMUELSON, A., SPANDE, T. F., and DALY, J. W. 2005.
319Melyrid beetles (Choresine): A putative source for the batrachotoxin alkaloids found in poison-dart frogs
320and toxic passerine birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:15857–15860.
321EHRLICH, P. R., DOBKIN, S., and WHEYE, D. 1986. The adaptive significance of anting. Auk 103:835.
322GAUTHIER-CLERC, M., CLERQUIN, Y., and HANDRICH, Y. 1998. Hyperinfestation by ticks Ixodes uriae:A
323possible cause of death in adult King Penguins, a long-lived seabird. Colon. Waterbirds 21:229–233.
324GWINNER, H., OLTROGGE, M., TROST, L., and NIENABER, U. 2000. Green plants in starling nests: Effects on
325nestlings. Anim. Behav. 59:301–309.
326HAGELIN, J. C., JONES, I. L., and RASMUSSEN, L. E. L. 2003. A tangerine-scented social odour in a
327monogamous bird. Proc. R. Soc. B 270:1323–1329.
328HUNTER,F.M.andJONES, I. L. 1999. The frequency and function of aquatic courtship and copulation in
329least, crested, whiskered, and parakeet auklets. Condor 101:518–528.
330Jones, I. L. 1993a. Sexual differences in bill shape and external measurements of Crested Auklets. Wilson
331Bull. 105:525–529.
332JONES, I. L. 1993b. Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella), in A. POOLE and F. GILL (eds.). The Birds of North
333America, No. 70. Acad. of Nat. Sci. and Am. Ornithol. Union, Philadephia, PA.
334JONES, I. L., HAGELIN, J. C., MAJOR, H. L., and RASMUSSEN, L. E. L. 2004. An experimental field study of
335the function of crested auklet feather odor. Condor 106:71–78.
336KEBEDE, A. G. 2004. Seasonal dynamics of ticks (Amblyomma cohaerens and Boophilus decoloratus) and
337development of a management plan for tick and tick born diseases control on cattle in Jimma zone,
338Southwestern Ethiopia. PhD dissertation, Georg-August-University, Göttingen.
339LAFUMA, L., LAMBRECHTS, M. M., and RAYMOND, M. 2001. Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection
340against blood-sucking flying insects? Behav. Process. 56:113–120.
341LASIEWSKI, R. C. and DAWSON, W. R. 1967. A reexamination of the relation between standard metabolic rate
342and body weight in birds. Condor 69:13–23.
343MOURITSEN, K. N. and MADSEN, J. 1994. Toxic birds: Defence against parasites? Oikos 69:357–358.
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROOF
344PARKES, K. C., WELDON, P. J., and HOFFMAN, R. L. 2003. Polydesmidan millipede used in self-anointing by
345a strong-billed woodcreeper (Xiphocolaptes promeropirhynchus) from Belize. Ornitol. Neotrop. 14:285–
346286.
347PENN, D. and POTTS, W. 1998. Chemical signals and parasite-mediated sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol.
34813:391–396.
349REED, K. D., MEECE, J. K., HENKEL, J. S., and SHUKLA, S. K. 2003. Birds, migration, and emerging
350zoonoses: West Nile virus, Lyme disease, influenza A and enteropathogens. Clin. Med. Res. 1:5–12.
351SCHMIDT-NIELSEN, K. 1997. Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment. Cambridge University Press,
352Cambridge, United Kingdom.
353SIMMONS, K. E. L. 1966. Anting and the problem of self-stimulation. J. Zool. (Lond.) 149:145–162.
354SONENSHINE, D. E. 1985. Pheromones and other semiochemicals of the Acari. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30:1–28.
355TURLINGS,T.C.J.,TUMLINSON, J. H., HEATH, R. R., PROVEAUX, A. T., and DOOLITTLE, R. E. 1991.
356Isolation and identification of allelochemicals that attract the larval parasitoid, Cotesia marginiventris,
357(Cresson), to the microhabitat of one of its hosts. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:2235–2251.
358VISNAK, R. M. and DUMBACHER, J. P. 1999. Comparison of four fumigants for removing avian lice. J. Field
359Ornithol. 70:42–48.
360WELDON, P. J. 2004. Defensive anointing: Extende d chemical phenotype and unorthodox ecology.
361Chemoecology 14:1–4.
362WELDON, P. J. and RAPPOLE, J. H. 1997. A survey of birds odorous or unpalatable to humans: Possible
363indications of chemical defense. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2609–2633.
J Chem Ecol
JrnlID 10886_ArtID 9164_Proof# 1 - 17/09/2006
AUTHOR'S PROOF
UNCORRECTED PROO
F
AUTHOR QUERY
AUTHOR PLEASE ANSWER QUERY.
No Query.