Article

Does Social Support Affect the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Depression? A Longitudinal Study from Adolescence to Adulthood

Department of Dental Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.38). 07/2007; 100(1-3):55-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The aim of this prospective longitudinal study of adolescents was to investigate socioeconomic differences in adult depression and in the domain of social support from adolescence to adulthood. We also studied the modifying effect of social support on the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and depression.
All 16-year-old ninth-grade school pupils of one Finnish city completed questionnaires at school (n=2194). Subjects were followed up using postal questionnaires when aged 22 and 32 years.
At 32 years of age there was a social gradient in depression, with a substantially higher prevalence among subjects with lower SES. Low parental SES during adolescence did not affect the risk of depression at 32 years of age, but the person's lower level of education at 22 years did. Lower level of support among subjects with lower SES was found particularly in females. Some evidence indicated that low level of social support had a greater impact on depression among lower SES group subjects. However, this relationship varied depending on the domain of social support, life stage and gender. On the other hand, the results did not support the hypothesis that social support would substantially account for the variation in depression across SES groups.
The assessments and classifications of social support were rather brief and crude, particularly in adolescence and early adulthood.
It is important to pay attention to social support resources in preventive programs and also in the treatment settings, with a special focus on lower SES group persons.

0 Followers
 · 
7 Reads
    • "This difference may be partly related to differential migration rates in rural and urban areasdurban residents may be more likely to live farther away from their families than rural residents (Amato, 1993), which favors the social selection hypothesis. Previous studies have shown that residents living in neighborhoods with high SES report more social support than those living in neighborhoods with low SES (Huurre et al., 2007; Mickelson and Kubzansky, 2003; Ziersch et al., 2009). In the present study, we only observed the association with social support from friends but not from family members. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While many associations between neighborhood characteristics and individual well-being have been reported, there is a lack of longitudinal studies that could provide evidence for or against causal interpretations of neighborhood effects. This study examined whether neighborhood urbanicity and socioeconomic status were associated with within-individual variation in depression, mistrust and social support when individuals were living in different neighborhoods with different levels of urbanicity and socioeconomic status. Participants were from the Young Finns prospective cohort study (N = 3074) with five repeated measurement times in 1992, 1997, 2001, 2007, and 2011. Neighborhood urbanicity and socioeconomic status were measured at the level of municipalities and zip-code areas. Within-individual variation over time was examined with multilevel regression, which adjusted the models for all stable individual differences that might confound associations between neighborhood characteristics and individual well-being. Social support from friends was higher in urban areas and in areas with higher socioeconomic status, whereas social support from the family was higher in rural areas. These associations were observed also in the within-individual analyses, and they were partly accounted for by employment and socioeconomic status of the participants. There were no associations between neighborhood characteristics and depression or mistrust. These findings suggest that people receive less support from their families and more support from their friends when living in urban compared to rural regions of Finland. These differences are partly explained by people's changing socioeconomic and employment statuses. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    No preview · Article · May 2015 · Social Science [?] Medicine
  • Source
    • "to poor emotional support from relatives and friends ( Laitinen , Ek , and Sovio 2002 ) ; sibling or maternal ties attenuate the harmful effects of stressful life events on teen depression ( Gass et al . 2007 ; Ge et al . 2009 ; Waite et al . 2011 ) ; and among low - SES teens , low social support from parents increases risk for adult depression ( Huurre et al . 2007 ) . We submit that , for disadvantaged and geographically isolated rural teenagers , family ties may be especially crucial due to relative food insecurity , scarce employment opportunities , and limited child - care options , which can increase parental strain , sibling caregiving , and early adult role transitions for rural teens ( Bro"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In adolescence, vital sources of support come from family relationships; however, research that considers the health-related impact of ties to both parents and siblings is sparse, and the utility of such ties among at-risk teens is not well understood. Here we use two waves of panel data from the population of 8th and 12th grade students in a geographically isolated, rural, northeastern U.S. county to assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) moderates the effects of parental and sibling attachments on three indicators of adolescent health: obesity, depression, and problem substance use. Our findings indicate that, net of stressful life events, prior health, and sociodemographic controls, increases in parental and sibling attachment correspond with reduced odds of obesity for low-SES adolescents, reduced odds of depression for high-SES adolescents, and reduced odds of problem substance use for low-SES adolescents. Results suggest also that sibling and maternal ties are more influential than paternal ties, at least with regard to the outcomes considered. Overall, the findings highlight the value of strong family ties for the physical, psychological, and behavioral health of socioeconomically strained rural teens, and reveal the explanatory potential of both sibling and parental ties for adolescent health.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · Rural Sociology
  • Source
    • "Common explanations for socioeconomic inequalities in anxiety and depression are that SES stratifies life stressors and coping resources [36, 37]. Adverse life events, poorer coping styles and weaker social support are examples of factors that are associated with disadvantaged SES and account for some of the socioeconomic variation in depression [37–39]. Although the incidence and persistence of symptoms were both stratified by SES in this study, it may not be the same resources and stressors that are responsible for these effects. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Socioeconomic inequalities in anxiety and depression widen with increasing age. This may be due to differences in the incidence or persistence of symptoms. This paper investigates the widening of inequalities in anxiety and depression over the lifecourse. Methods Data were from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study, constituting three cohorts aged approximately 16, 36 and 56 years at baseline and re-visited at 5-yearly intervals for 20 years. Symptoms were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Adjusting for age and sex, multilevel models with pairs of interviews (n = 6,878) nested within individuals (n = 3,165) were used for each cohort to estimate associations between current symptoms and education or household social class for both those with and without earlier symptoms, approximating socioeconomic differences in incidence and persistence. Results Inequalities in current symptom levels were present for both those with and without earlier symptoms. In the youngest cohort, those with less education were more likely to experience persistent depression and to progress from anxiety to depression. At older ages there were educational and social class differences in both the persistence and incidence of symptoms, though there was more evidence of differential persistence than incidence in the middle cohort and more evidence of differential incidence than persistence in the oldest cohort. Conclusions Differential persistence and symptom progression indicate that intervening to prevent or treat symptoms earlier in life is likely to reduce socioeconomic inequalities later, but attention also needs to be given to late adulthood where differential incidence emerges more strongly than differential persistence.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · Social Psychiatry
Show more