Deaf women's experiences and satisfaction with prenatal care: A comparative study

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 1.17). 01/2006; 38(10):712-6.
Source: PubMed


The quality of communication between physician and patient is a major contributor to patient satisfaction and treatment adherence. Deaf patients who use American Sign Language experience significant communication barriers in most medical settings. This study investigated factors impacting deaf patients' satisfaction with prenatal care and prenatal care disparities between deaf and hearing women.
Questionnaires modified from Omar and Schiffman's prenatal satisfaction measure were administered to 23 deaf and 32 hearing women.
Deaf women were less satisfied than hearing women with physician communication and less satisfied with overall care. Deaf women's expectations about provision of interpreter services being met or exceeded was significantly associated with overall satisfaction. Hearing women had more prenatal care appointments and reported receiving more information from their doctors.
Maximizing communication effectiveness with deaf patients results in better prenatal care and improved patient satisfaction. Good communication includes conveying concern and making efforts to ensure that whatever communication methods used are effective.

Download full-text


Available from: Amanda O’Hearn, Apr 01, 2015

  • No preview · Article · Jan 2010 · The practising midwife
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deafness concerns about 7% of the French population. In this context, the clinic of obstetrics and gynecology of Grenoble teaching hospital established two adaptation actions in the pregnant signing-deaf patient's management: a partnership with French Sign Language interpreters from the deaf patient reception and care unit, and sign language training for nine professionals. The aim of this study is to evaluate this patient management and to propose some potential improvements. This descriptive study is made through information from both numeric and paper files of 22 deaf pregnant patients. A significant adaptation of patient management during scheduled consultations and hospitalisation in the clinic is observed, whereas adaptation rate is weak for emergency situations. The patient management adaptation turns out to be perfectible, through the anticipation of the entire pregnancy consultation schedule. In emergency situations, the creation of a sign language interpreter on-call duty would greatly improve the health care access of these patients.
    No preview · Article · May 2012 · Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires health care facilities to provide equal access to patents with disabilities. Yet, people with disabilities experience many access barriers. To develop a valid, reliable, and user-friendly tool that measures the physical and environmental features of outpatient health care facilities. Instead of addressing full compliance with the ADA, the tool measures the essential features of an outpatient health care facility. The project included an online survey of people with disabilities (reported elsewhere), work groups of people with disabilities prioritizing ADA administrative guidelines (ADAAG), ADA expert review, measure development, pilot testing and re-testing. ADA experts' ratings were summarized as Content Validity Ratios (CVR). Retained ADAAG items were organized into a survey instrument and tested by raters at outpatient health clinics. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient and Gwet's AC1 statistic. Refinement and re-testing of the instrument was conducted. The work groups narrowed the ADAG items from over 400 to 154 items. CVR ratings from ADA subject-matter experts reduced the items to 129. Inter-rater reliability for the pilot version was 0.61 (Kappa) and 0.88 (AC1). After refinement, inter-rater reliability was 0.77 (Kappa) and 0.90 (AC1). The items with the lowest reliability scores were re-examined, revised, and re-tested. Inter-rater reliability for the final version of the OHCUP was 0.89 (Kappa) and 0.97 (AC1). The OHCUP is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the usability of health care facilities.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2012 · Disability and Health Journal
Show more