Article

Hospital food service: A comparative analysis of systems and introducing the 'Steamplicity' concept

Centre for Foodservice Research, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset, UK.
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (Impact Factor: 1.99). 01/2007; 19(6):421-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2006.00730.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Patient meals are an integral part of treatment hence the provision and consumption of a balanced diet, essential to aid recovery. A number of food service systems are used to provide meals and the Steamplicity concept has recently been introduced. This seeks, through the application of a static, extended choice menu, revised patient ordering procedures, new cooking processes and individual patient food heated/cooked at ward level, to address some of the current hospital food service concerns. The aim of this small-scale study, therefore, was to compare a cook-chill food service operation against Steamplicity. Specifically, the goals were to measure food intake and wastage at ward level; 'stakeholders' (i.e. patients, staff, etc.) satisfaction with both systems; and patients' acceptability of the food provided.
The study used both quantitative (self-completed patient questionnaires, n = 52) and qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews, n = 16) with appropriate stakeholders including medical and food service staff, patients and their visitors.
Patients preferred the Steamplicity system overall and in particular in terms of food choice, ordering, delivery and food quality. Wastage was considerably less with the Steamplicity system, although care must be taken to ensure that poor operating procedures do not negate this advantage. When the total weight of food consumed in the ward at each meal is divided by the number of main courses served, at lunch, the mean intake with the cook-chill system was 202 g whilst that for the Steamplicity system was 282 g and for the evening meal, 226 g compared with 310 g.
The results of this small study suggest that Steamplicity is more acceptable to patients and encourages the consumption of larger portions. Further evaluation of the Steamplicity system is warranted.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Heather Hartwell, Apr 27, 2015
  • Source
    • "Although this new production system improved food safety and contained costs, it was also detrimental to sensory characteristics (i.e. appearance, flavor and texture), which commonly cause patient dissatisfaction and complaints (Edwards and Hartwell, 2006). Similarly, the deteriorating trend in patients' roomcomfort perception likely reflects inconvenience caused by major renovation and large scale refurbishment after tall-building security regulations were enforced. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate trends in patient hospital quality perceptions between 1999 and 2010. Design/methodology/approach – Original data from 11 cross-sectional surveys carried out in a French single university hospital were analyzed. Based on responses to a 29-item survey instrument, overall and subscale perception scores (range 0-10) were computed covering six key hospital care quality dimensions. Findings – Of 16,516 surveyed patients, 10,704 (64.8 percent) participated in the study. The median overall patient perception score decreased from 7.86 (25th-75th percentiles, 6.67-8.85) in 1999 to 7.82 (25th-75th percentiles, 6.67-8.74) in 2010 (p for trend <0.001). A decreasing trend was observed for the living arrangement subscale score (from 7.78 in 1999 to 7.50 in 2010, p for trend <0.001). Food service and room comfort perceptions deteriorated over the study period while patients increasingly reported better explanations before being examined. Practical implications – Patient perception scores may disguise divergent judgments on different care aspect while individual items highlight specific areas with room for improvement. Originality/value – Despite growing pressure on healthcare expenditure, this single-center study showed only modest reduction in patients’ hospital-care perceptions in the 2000s.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
  • Source
    • "Nell'81 % degli ospedali statunitensi viene utilizzato il sistema a vassoio, nel Regno Unito il 37 % degli ospedali utilizza il sistema a carrello in base a raccomandazioni della British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in quanto maggiormente aderente alle preferenze del paziente rispetto al modello " a vassoio " . Secondo la letteratura[19]la distribuzione a carrello è ritenuta migliore dal punto di vista qualitativo in quanto risponde alle necessità dei pazienti, ne rispetta maggiormente le preferenze e consente le modifiche della dieta legate a variazioni delle condizioni cliniche[6,20]. Nella distribuzione a carrello la quantità di alimenti è operatore-dipendente e l'apporto nutrizionale potrebbe essere difficilmente misurabile ; nel modello a vassoio la standardizzazione della porzionatura permetterebbe di superare tale problematica. La standardizzazione della dieta assicurata con il sistema a vassoio limita eventuali integrazioni/variazioni ma consente una personalizzazione del menu che risulta bilanciato nelle componenti nutrizionali[21]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Inappropriate feeding is a risk factor in many pathological conditions and causes direct and indirect costs. A number of inpatients are malnourished, resulting in complications and hospital stay prolongation. Objectives To compare, with HTA methodology, food distribution systems, i.e. “trolley service” versus “plate”. Materials and methods A review of the literature, analysis of organizational efficiency, a customer satisfaction survey and comparisons between systems were carried out. Results The “plate service” system requires less resources and a spare of time in delivering food to the patients but there remain some organizational activities and caring to patients who need help feeding. The “trolley” system is more economic (cost of a meal €6,650 versus €6,910). In the ethical-social analysis it has been shown a higher working-time availability with the “plate” system, that could be used to assist patients with their meals. Caregiving support must also be considered as a social cost. In the safety analysis, missed nursing care increased the risk of negative outcomes. The “tray” method qualitatively is considered to be better (it meets patient needs, respects patient preferences, allows variations related to changes in clinical conditions). The “cart” system allows portioning standardization, balanced meals, measuring real food intake and limiting any additions or changes. Conclusions There is no clear evidence indicating which system is better.
    Preview · Article · Jul 2013
  • Source
    • "In North America, cook to order or room service has become the predominant trend in hospital foodservice (McLymont et al. 2003). Other foodservice models, such as 'Steamplicity' whereby meals are plated in a central production unit prior to distribution to hospitals, then microwaved at short notice prior to meal times, have been implemented with success in the UK (Edwards & Hartwell 2006). The principal foodservice models in Australia are cook-chill and cook-freeze systems where food is preprepared and then rethermalised at required times (Greathouse et al. 1989; McLelland & Williams 2003; Nettles & Gregoire 2006) and the traditional cook-fresh model. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Decline in nutritional status during hospitalisation highlights the importance of achieving high-quality foodservice. This research aimed to explore patient satisfaction with hospital foodservices from on-site and off-site cook-chill production systems. Two cross-sectional surveys of hospital inpatients were conducted in an acute medical and a subacute rehabilitation ward before and after a change to off-site cook-chill production. The survey used a validated instrument (Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire). Sixty-six patients in 2006 and 51 patients in 2007 recorded unchanged results across factors of food quality, staffing service quality, meal service quality and physical environment quality. Satisfaction with foodservice was rated ‘good’ or ‘very good’ by the majority of patients in both surveys. The research instrument was able to deconstruct various issues relating to patients' satisfaction and six individual items correlated with overall satisfaction with foodservice. To maximise patient satisfaction, further research into these, and additional dimensions of foodservice quality is needed to determine how improvements may be achieved.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2009
Show more