ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity with Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple Sclerosis

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Dirty electricity is a ubiquitous pollutant. It flows along wires and radiates from them and involves both extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and radio frequency radiation. Until recently, dirty electricity has been largely ignored by the scientific community. Recent inventions of metering and filter equipment provide scientists with the tools to measure and reduce dirty electricity on electrical wires. Several case studies and anecdotal reports are presented. Graham/Stetzer (GS) filters have been installed in schools with sick building syndrome and both staff and students reported improved health and more energy. The number of students needing inhalers for asthma was reduced in one school and student behavior associated with ADD/ADHD improved in another school. Blood sugar levels for some diabetics respond to the amount of dirty electricity in their environment. Type 1 diabetics require less insulin and Type 2 diabetics have lower blood sugar levels in an electromagnetically clean environment. Individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis have better balance and fewer tremors. Those requiring a cane walked unassisted within a few days to weeks after GS filters were installed in their home. Several disorders, including asthma, ADD/ADHD, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, are increasing at an alarming rate, as is electromagnetic pollution in the form of dirty electricity, ground current, and radio frequency radiation from wireless devices. The connection between electromagnetic pollution and these disorders needs to be investigated and the percentage of people sensitive to this form of energy needs to be determined.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25: 259–268, 2006
Copyright © Informa Healthcare
ISSN 1536-8378 print
DOI: 10.1080/15368370601044192
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects
of Dirty Electricity with Emphasis on Diabetes
and Multiple Sclerosis
MAGDA HAVAS
Environmental and Resource Studies, Trent University, Peterborough,
Ontario, Canada
Dirty electricity is a ubiquitous pollutant. It flows along wires and radiates from
them and involves both extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and radio
frequency radiation. Until recently, dirty electricity has been largely ignored by
the scientific community. Recent inventions of metering and filter equipment provide
scientists with the tools to measure and reduce dirty electricity on electrical wires.
Several case studies and anecdotal reports are presented. Graham/Stetzer (GS)
filters have been installed in schools with sick building syndrome and both staff
and students reported improved health and more energy. The number of students
needing inhalers for asthma was reduced in one school and student behavior
associated with ADD/ADHD improved in another school. Blood sugar levels for
some diabetics respond to the amount of dirty electricity in their environment.
Type 1 diabetics require less insulin and Type 2 diabetics have lower blood sugar
levels in an electromagnetically clean environment. Individuals diagnosed with
multiple sclerosis have better balance and fewer tremors. Those requiring a cane
walked unassisted within a few days to weeks after GS filters were installed in
their home. Several disorders, including asthma, ADD/ADHD, diabetes, multiple
sclerosis, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, are increasing at an alarming rate, as is
electromagnetic pollution in the form of dirty electricity, ground current, and radio
frequency radiation from wireless devices. The connection between electromagnetic
pollution and these disorders needs to be investigated and the percentage of people
sensitive to this form of energy needs to be determined.
Keywords Diabetes; Dirty electricity; Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Multiple
sclerosis; Power quality; Radio frequency.
Introduction
Most of the research on the biological effects of nonionizing radiation is done at one
of two frequency ranges: extremely low frequency (ELF) associated with electricity
(50/60 Hz) and radio frequency (RF) associated with wireless telecommunication
Address correspondence to Magda Havas, Environmental and Resource Studies,
Trent University, 1600 West Band Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada; E-mail:
mhavas@trentu.ca
259
260 Havas
devices (800 MHz to 2.5 GHz range). An intermediate frequency range, at the low
end of the RF spectrum (kHz), flows along and radiates from wires (dirty electricity)
and thus has characteristics of the two major types of electromagnetic pollution
mentioned above. Scientists doing research on the biological effects of power line
frequencies seldom measure this frequency range and thus ignore the effects it might
have on health.
Recent advances in filtering technology (Graham/Stetzer or GS filters) and
measuring equipment (microsurge meter) enable scientists to test for dirty electricity
and to reduce it on indoor wires. In this article, case studies are presented of
individuals who have benefited after the dirty electricity in their environment was
reduced. This technology provides scientists with the tools to monitor, reduce, and
experiment with a frequency range that, until now, has been largely ignored and
it may help those who suffer from symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity
(EHS).
Dirty Electricity
Poor power quality, also known as dirty electricity, has been a concern for the
electric utility for decades. Dirty electricity refers to electromagnetic energy that
flows along a conductor and deviates from a pure 60-Hz sine wave (Figure 1). It has
both harmonic and non harmonic (transient) components and emerged as a problem
in the late 1970s with the increasing use of electronic devices that produce nonlinear
loads. Karl Stahlkopf, a vice president of the Electric Power Research Institute
(EPRI), estimates that dirty power costs U.S. industry between $4 and $6 billion a
year, and that it is likely to get worse before it can be mitigated. EPRI expects that
70% of all electricity produced within the U.S. will flow through electronic devices
by 2002, compared with 30% in 1999 (Fortune, 1999).
Dirty electricity is ubiquitous. It is generated by electronic equipment such
as computers, plasma televisions, energy efficient appliances, dimmer switches, as
Figure 1. Visual display of dirty electricity (kHz range) and 60 Hz power frequency without
(left) and with (right) Graham/Stetzer filters. A 2-channel Fluke 199 Scopemeter was
attached to a ubiquitous filter to separate the 60 Hz frequency from the dirty electricity
(Graham, 2000). The improved power quality has fewer spikes and smaller amplitude for
the high frequency transients. The GS filters have no effect on the 60 Hz sine wave.
Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity 261
Figure 2. Sources of dirty electricity include electronic equipment and appliances, arcing on
wires, and unfiltered cell phone and broadcast frequencies from nearby antennas.
well as arcing on electrical conductors caused by loose wires or contact with trees
(Figure 2). Dirty electricity is thus produced within buildings but can also enter
buildings from neighbors who share the same transformer. Mobile or broadcast
antennas, if not properly filtered, can also contribute to high frequencies on
electrical wires in nearby buildings.
The IEEE 519-1992 recommends installing filters to control harmonic
distortions on power lines. With 5 kV and higher voltage distribution lines the
IEEE identifies voltage notching, which produces both harmonic and nonharmonic
frequencies in the radio frequency (RF) range and, as such, can introduce harmful
effects associated with spurious RF. Industry uses large capacitors to protect
sensitive equipment from power surges, especially in production line work, where
malfunctions and down time are costly. Until now filters have not been available
for in home use.
Professor Martin Graham from UC Berkeley and power quality expert, Dave
Stetzer, President of Stetzer Electric in Wisconsin, have designed a filter that can
be used inside buildings to clean the power that enters the building as well as the
dirty electricity generated within the building. The Graham/Stetzer (GS) filter is a
compact unit that plugs into an electrical outlet (Figure 3). It contains an electrical
capacitor that shorts-out the high frequency transients on the circuit and is most
effective when placed close to the appliance generating the dirty electricity. The GS
filter has optimum filtering capacity between 4 and 100 kHz (Graham, 2000, 2002).
In Russia, the safety guidelines for electric and magnetic field exposure are
frequency specific. For frequencies between 5 Hz and 2 kHz, the guideline is 25 V/m
for electric fields and 0.25 T (2.5 mG) for magnetic fields. For frequencies between 2
and 400 kHz, the guidelines are lower by a factor of 10. Since energy is proportional
to frequency, the energy is 1,000 times higher at 60 kHz than it is at 60 Hz.
262 Havas
Figure 3. Equipment used to reduce and monitor dirty electricity inside buildings: the
Graham/Stetzer filter and the microsurge meter.
The microsurge meter (Figure 3), also designed by Graham and Stetzer,
measures the energy associated with dirty electricity in GS units with a range from
1 to 1999 and an accuracy of ±5% (Graham, 2003). The Health Department of
the Republic of Kazakhstan (2003) has stated that any reading on the microsurge
meter exceeding 50 is unacceptable and steps must be taken to lower such readings.
Experience with this meter suggests that values below 30 GS units are undesirable
and that extremely sensitive individuals may not see any benefits until the values are
at or below 20 GS units. In some extremely dirty environments it is not possible to
achieve such low values.
In the following, a number of case studies are presented.
Case Studies
GS filters have been placed in homes, offices, and schools. People report
having better sleep, more energy, and less pain. They document cognitive
improvements in memory and concentration. Symptoms of radio wave sickness or
electrical hypersensitivity (Table 1) are often reduced or eliminated in the filtered
environment.
GS filters placed in one Wisconsin school that had sick building syndrome,
significantly improved power quality. Shortly after the filters were installed, the
health and energy level of staff and students began to improve. According to the
District Nurse, of the 37 students in the school who used inhalers on a daily basis,
only 3 required inhalers and only for exercise-induced asthma after the filters were
in place (Sbraggia, 2002).
GS filters were placed in a Toronto school and approximately 50% of the
teachers documented improvements in energy, performance, mood, and/or health
in a single blind study (Havas et al., 2004). Student behavior, especially at the
elementary level, also improved. The symptoms that changed were ones we associate
Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity 263
Table 1
Symptoms of radio wave sickness first documented among radar workers
during the Second World War resemble those now associated with
electromagnetic hypersensitivity
Symptoms of radio wave sickness
(Firstenberg, 2001)
Neurological: Headaches, dizziness, nausea, difficulty concentrating, memory loss,
irritability, depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, weakness, tremors, muscle
spasms, numbness, tingling, altered reflexes, muscle and joint paint, leg/foot pain,
“flu-like” symptoms, fever. More severe reactions can include seizures, paralysis,
psychosis, and stroke.
Cardiac: Palpitations, arrhythmias, pain or pressure in the chest, low or high blood
pressure, slow or fast heart rate, shortness of breath.
Respiratory: Sinusitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, asthma.
Dermatological: Skin rash, itching, burning, facial flushing.
Ophthalmologic: Pain or burning in the eyes, pressure in/behind the eyes,
deteriorating vision, floaters, cataracts.
Others: Digestive problems, abdominal pain, enlarged thyroid,
testicular/ovarian pain, dryness of lips, tongue, mouth, eyes, great thirst,
dehydration, nosebleeds, internal bleeding, altered sugar metabolism, immune
abnormalities, redistribution of metals within the body, hair loss, pain in the teeth,
deteriorating fillings, impaired sense of smell, ringing in the ears.
Note: These symptoms resemble symptoms associated with electrical hypersensitivity.
with attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD). This begs the question, “How much of the increase in ADD/ADHD
among young people is due to electromagnetic pollution and poor electromagnetic
hygiene?”
People with situational tinnitus (ringing in the ears that is present only in certain
environments, often where RF is present) have documented improvements as well
after the filters were installed in their home, as have those individuals who are
otherwise healthy (Havas and Stetzer, 2004). Two diseases we seldom associate
with electromagnetic hypersensitivity are diabetes and multiple sclerosis (MS). What
follows are case studies that document the response to dirty electricity of diabetics
and those with MS.
Diabetes
Two case studies are presented. (1) A 51-year old male with Type 2 diabetes who
does not take medication and (2) an 80-year old female with Type 1 diabetes who
takes insulin twice a day. A 51-year old male with Type 2 diabetes monitored
dirty electricity in his environment and his blood sugar levels randomly throughout
the day for approximately one month in 2003. The microsurge meter was not yet
available to measure dirty electricity so he used a Protek 506 Digital Multimeter and
measured the peak-to-peak voltage. His blood sugar levels were positively correlated
with the amount of dirty electricity in his environment (Figure 4). One day he was
264 Havas
Figure 4. Fifty-one year old male with Type 2 diabetes. His plasma glucose levels correlate
with the dirty electricity in his environment. Insert shows exposure on one day to a very
high level of dirty electricity and this is reflected in elevated blood sugar.
exposed to very high levels of dirty electricity and this was reflected in exceptionally
high levels of blood sugar. He noticed that his blood sugar levels remained low
when he was in his truck away from power lines and antennas and when he was
in a wilderness setting. In an electromagnetically dirty environment his blood sugar
levels would increase within minutes.
An 80-year old female with Type 1 diabetes, who monitors her blood sugar
twice daily—once in the morning upon awakening (fasting plasma glucose) and once
in the evening before supper—had her home in Arizona filtered by an electrician. He
was able to reduce the dirty electricity in her home from an average of 800 GS units
to 13 GS units. As soon as the dirty electricity in her home was reduced, her blood
sugar began to drop. Her average fasting plasma glucose levels without the filters
was 171mg/dL and this dropped to an average of 119 with the filters (Figure 5).
During this period her insulin injections were reduced from a daily average of 36
units to 9 units.
Her evening plasma glucose did not change after the filters were installed in
her home but they did change on days she spent away from home. Levels were
particularly high after spending time in a casino. Casinos are likely to have high
levels of dirty electricity but stress may also have contributed to higher levels of
blood sugar (Hinkle and Wolf, 1950).
Multiple Sclerosis
One teacher in the Wisconsin school that was filtered had been diagnosed with
multiple sclerosis (MS). She was extremely tired, had double vision, had cognitive
Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity 265
Figure 5. Eighty-year old female with Type 1 diabetes, who takes insulin twice daily.
Fasting plasma glucose levels and insulin injections with and without Graham/Stetzer filters
are shown.
difficulties and could not remember the names of the students in her 4th grade
class. Her health would improve during the summer but her symptoms returned
in September. She assumed her problems were mold-related but her symptoms did
not improve after the mold was removed from the school. Once the school was
filtered her symptoms disappeared. Similar stories prompted studies with people
who had MS.
Havas began to work with people diagnosed with MS, who had difficulty
walking and who used canes or walkers. The first person she worked with noticed
improvements within 24 h. At that stage Havas assumed this was a powerful placebo
effect but the subject’s symptoms continued to improve weekly and regressed only
during wet weather, which had always been a problem for this subject. Several other
people with MS were able to walk unassisted after a few days to weeks with the GS
filters and Havas began to videotape those who gave her permission to do so.
One of those individuals is a 27-year old male who had been diagnosed with
primary progressive MS two years earlier. He walked with a cane or did “wall
walking” at home (holding onto the wall or furniture for balance). He had tremors,
was exceptionally tired, and was beginning to have difficulty swallowing. Three days
after 16 GS filters were placed in his home his symptoms began to disappear. The
dirty electricity in his home was reduced from 135–410 GS units to 32–38 GS units.
He assumed his body was recovering spontaneously but he had been diagnosed
with progressive MS and not relapsing/remitting MS, so spontaneous recovery was
unlikely in his case.
A week after the filters were installed in his home he had enough energy to go
shopping with his father. He did not take his cane because he had not needed it, but
266 Havas
Figure 6. Video-clip of 27-year old male with primary progressive multiple sclerosis,
diagnosed two years earlier. In the video on left (without Graham/Stetzer filters), he walks
slowly and is hesitant. In the video on the right (two weeks after Graham/Stetzer filters were
installed in his home), he walks with confidence and is well coordinated.
Figure 7. Symptoms of 27-year old male with primary progressive multiple sclerosis with
and without Graham/Stetzer filters in his home.
Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity 267
after a couple of hours in the store his symptoms reappeared and he had difficulty
walking to the car. His tremors began to subside three hours after arriving home.
This experience has been repeated on several occasions and he now knows that if
he goes into an environment with dirty electricity his MS symptoms reappear.
Figure 6 is taken from a video before the filters were installed in his home and
two weeks later. Prior to the filters his walk was stilted and slow. He staggered
and resembled the gait of someone who was intoxicated. Two weeks after the filters
were installed his walk was normal with no signs of MS. During this period he
began to put on weight, was sleeping better, and had fewer tremors and more energy
(Figure 7).
Some other observations that are notable is that his mother had been suffering
from hot flashes at night associated with menopause and these came to an end after
the filters were installed and his father experienced several episodes of vertigo weekly
and these became less frequent.
Conclusions
These case studies and anecdotal reports suggest that dirty electricity is biologically
active. Once dirty electricity is reduced, people’s health improves. For some it is
reflected in more normal blood sugar levels, for others symptoms of MS are reduced,
and for still others tinnitus disappears and behavior resembling ADD/ADHD
improves. Since dirty electricity is becoming ubiquitous large fractions of the
population are being exposed to this pollutant and some are being adversely
affected.
Diabetes, multiple sclerosis, ADD/ADHD, asthma chronic fatigue, and
fibromyalgia are all increasing in the population and the reasons for this increase
are poorly understood. Dirty electricity may be one of the contributors to these
illnesses.
According to Philips and Philips (2006) 3% of the population has
electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and 35% have symptoms of EHS. If these
percentages apply to diabetics then as many as 5–60 million diabetics worldwide
may be responding to the poor power quality in their environment (Wild et al.,
2004). Evidence from laboratory studies documents that insulin release and insulin-
binding capacity to receptors cells is reduced by electromagnetic fields (Li et al.,
2005; Sakurai et al., 2004). It is further known that stress increases blood sugar
levels in diabetics and that exposure to electromagnetic energy induces stress
proteins at various frequencies (Blank and Goodman, 2004; Hinkle and Wolf,
1950).
Dirty electricity can now be monitored with meters and reduced with filters,
providing scientists with the tools needed for research. What is presented here is
a handful of studies, many preliminary, with dramatic results. This area warrants
further investigation to determine the mechanisms involved and the percentage of
the population affected.
Conflict of Interest
Please note that the author has no vested interest, financial or otherwise, in the
commercial devices discussed in this article.
268 Havas
References
Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2004). Comment: a biological guide for electromagnetic safety:
the stress response. Bioelectromagnetics 25(8):642–646.
Bylinsky, G. (1999). Hot new technologies for American factories. Fortune Mag. July 5, 1999,
p. 4.
Firstenberg, A. (2001). No Place to Hide. Volume 3 (1): April 2001. Special Issue on Russian
and Ukrainian Research, Cellular Phone Taskforce, Mendocino, CA.
Graham, M. (2000). A ubiquitous pollutant. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M00/55. 28 October
2000, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley.
Graham, M. (2002). Mitigation of electrical pollution in the home. Memorandum No.
UCB/ERL M02/18. 19 April 2002, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of
Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
Graham, M. (2003). A microsurge meter for electrical pollution research. Memorandum
No. UCB/ERL M03/3, 19 February 2003, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of
Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
Havas, M., Stetzer, D. (2004). Dirty electricity and electrical hypersensitivity: five case
studies. World Health Organization Workshop on Electrical Hypersensitivity 25–26
October 2004, Prague, Czech Republic.
Havas, M., Illiatovitch, M., Proctor, C. (2004). Teacher and student response to the removal
of dirty electricity by the Graham/Stetzer filter at Willow Wood School in Toronto,
Canada. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on the Biological Effects of
Electromagnetic Fields, 4–8 October 2004, Kos, Greece.
Hinkle, L. E., Wolf, S. (1950). Studies in diabetes mellitus: changes in glucose, ketone
and water metabolism during stress. Life Stress and Bodily Disease. Baltimore, MD:
Williams and Wilkins.
IEEE 519-1992. (1992). Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control
in Electrical Power Systems. Sponsors: Transmission and Distribution Committee of
the IEEE Power Engineering Society and Static Power Converter Committee of the
IEEE Industry Applications Society, Approved June 18, 1992 IEEE Standards Board,
Approved January 4, 1993 American National Standards Institute.
Kazakhstan Health Department. (2003). Permissible levels of high-frequency electromagnetic
pollutions voltage in wires of industrial frequency alternating current. Confirmed: The
Order of the Head State Sanitary Physician of the Republic of Kazakhstan. November
28, 2003, No. 69.
Li, L., Dai, Y., Xia, R., Chen, S., Qiao, D. (2005). Pulsed electric field exposure of insulin
induces anti-proliferative effects on human hepatocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 26(8):
639–647.
Philips, A., Philips, J. (2006). The Power Watch Handbook. London: Piatkus Books Ltd.,
294 pp.
Sakurai, T., Satake, A., Sumi, S., Inoue, K., Miyakoshi, J. (2004). An extremely low
frequency magnetic field attenuates insulin secretion from the insulinoma cell line,
RIN-m. Bioelectromagnetics 25:160–166.
Sbraggia, C. (2002). Letter from school nurse. www.electricalpollution.com.
Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes.
Diabetes Care 27:1047–1053.
... 5 A pattern consistent with these diagnostic criteria is also reported for sensitivities to electromagnetic phenomena. [6][7][8] ...
... 83,84 Children are healthier and learn better when indoor environmental quality is improved in schools. 8,[85][86][87] Summary Sensitivities may be initiated by a range of environmental factors and once the condition is initiated, reactions may be triggered by a broadening array of incitants. Environmental sensitivities may affect every system in the body, so multiple symptoms are possible, with variation among individuals. ...
... Using these filters to create an electromagnetically "cleaner" environment, improvements are reported for several health outcomes, including multiple sclerosis, behavioural problems and asthma in children in schools, and diabetes. 8 Canadian standards for electrical equipment do not require testing for or limits on "dirty power." The CSA requires most products to be assessed only for shock and fire hazard. ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
Report for the 2007 Canadian Human Rights Commission on the topic of Environmental Illness. I provided information for inclusion in Chapter VII Building code, regulations and guidelines, and Chapter VIII Accommodating and preventing environmental Illness. Dr. Margaret E. Sears initiated this study and was the editor of this report. http://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/content/medical-perspective-environmental-sensitivities
... melanoma 597 prostate 598 testicular 599 cardiovasc. disease 600 601 602 603 child growth retardation 604 dementia 605 606 depression and suicide 607 608 609 610 611 612 hypothyroidism, obesity 613 leukaemia 614 615 616 lipoatrophia semicircularis 617 lymphoma 618 male infertility 619 miscarriage 620 621 motor neuron disease 622 623 Parkinson's disease 624 625 626 breast cancer 627 628 cancers (possible): multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, prostate, testicular 629 630 cardiovascular diseases 631 632 childhood leukaemia 633 634 635 636 637 glycaemia, diabetics 638 639 640 leukaemia 641 642 643 644 645 malignant melanoma 646 647 648 649 MS impairment 650 thyroid and uterine cancer 651 ADHD 652 behaviourial problems 653 brain tumours 654 655 656 657 658 659 cancer, testicular 660 661 cardiovascular diseases 662 663 664 665 666 cataracts 667 668 669 670 671 672 dyslipidemia, obesity 673 impaired cognition 674 675 676 677 impaired memory 678 679 leukaemia, NH lymphoma 680 681 682 male infertility 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 miscarriage 690 691 ophthalmic effects 692 parotid gland malignancy 1061 uveal melanoma 693 Maternal and paternal exposure and teratogenic diseases or outcomes in offspring childhood brain tumours 694 childhood leukaemia 695 696 reduced male births 697 other adverse effects 698 699 ...
Book
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity is categorised as a multisymptomatic 'el-allergy' in the Nordic classification of 2000 (R.68.8). Its symptoms are 'certainly real' and it can be a 'disabling condition' (W.H.O., 2005). It was first recorded in the mid 20th century as an occupational illness, but it has now spread into the general population through environmental exposure from increasing levels of electromagnetic fields and radiation. This Summary covers current research on this syndrome, covering EM Sensitivity and EM Hypersensitivity. It includes tables of symptoms, EMF sources and exposure guidelines, along with references to scientific studies. This New Edition adds updates, international doctors' protocols, aspects of quantum biology, evidence for sensitivity in animals and plants, case studies, disability issues and human rights.
... Skin and other superficial tissues usually absorb the non-thermal radiations emitted by smart mobile phones; this causes an insignificant increase in the temperature of the brain and other body organs [4]. Non-thermal mechanisms are not directly related to temperature change, alternatively it is slightly related to some other changes in tissues in association with the quantity of absorbed energy [1,5,6]. A significant part of several studies concerning EMF has investigated the non-thermal effects of RF on biological tissues [1,7,8]. ...
... Skin and other superficial tissues usually absorb the non-thermal radiations emitted by smart mobile phones; this causes an insignificant increase in the temperature of the brain and other body organs [4]. Non-thermal mechanisms are not directly related to temperature change, alternatively it is slightly related to some other changes in tissues in association with the quantity of absorbed energy [1,5,6]. A significant part of several studies concerning EMF has investigated the non-thermal effects of RF on biological tissues [1,7,8]. ...
... Skin and other superficial tissues usually absorb the non-thermal radiations emitted by smart mobile phones; this causes an insignificant increase in the temperature of the brain and other body organs [4]. Non-thermal mechanisms are not directly related to temperature change, alternatively it is slightly related to some other changes in tissues in association with the quantity of absorbed energy [1,5,6]. A significant part of several studies concerning EMF has investigated the non-thermal effects of RF on biological tissues [1,7,8]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Bu çalışmada kentsel bölgelere konuşlandırılmış antenlerden oluşan elektromanyetik ışıma dağılımlarının kentin sokak ve caddelerindeki değerlerinin nümerik olarak hesaplanması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla örnek bir kentsel bölgenin bilgisayar destekli tasarım modeli oluşturulmuş, sonrasında bu modelin içine yerleştirilen antenlerden oluşan elektromanyetik ışıma CADFEKO© yazılımı kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen benzetim sonuçları iki boyutlu elektrik ve manyetik alan grafikleri kullanılarak paylaşılmış ve anten kapsama alanı ile ilgili yorumlar yapılmıştır.
Article
Full-text available
In 21 st century almost every person uses cell phone throughout the world. However, the exposures of radiation emitted by the cell phone are not known to the individuals. Enormous exposure of unwanted electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phone in human life is increasing and expected to be in peak coming days due to the technological innovation such as 5G may have serious health hazards. There are numerous reports stated that radiation emitted by cell phone may be responsible biological as well as environmental hazards. However, due to the lack of awareness and knowledge of radiation emitted from cell phone, we expose our self in unnecessary radiation. Therefore, our main aim of the review article is to collect data from different studies and bring it up about the affect of cell phone radiation in human as well as in environment. The review also will focus on its exposure standards and its health and environmental implications, precautionary measure to avoid effect of cell phone radiation.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Il comune in cui uno dei due autori risiede ha emanato una ordinanza di divieto di installazione di impianti con tecnologia 5G, così come altri 500 comuni italiani. Questo libro nasce con l’obiettivo di cercare la risposta ad una semplice domanda: perché? Il materiale di partenza è il testo dell’ordinanza comunale, di cui vengono analizzati criticamente i vari “visto che”, “ricordato che”, “preso atto che”, cioè tutte le parti che di solito si saltano a pie’ pari. Il metodo seguito è a ventaglio: da ogni singolo punto gli autori allargano lo sguardo ai riferimenti bibliografici citati, addentrandosi nella normativa di riferimento, nei documenti e lavori scientifici e nelle sentenze. Le affermazioni generiche dell’ordinanza non recanti alcun riferimento, sono analizzate in base alle evidenze scientifiche pubblicate su riviste autorevoli o provenienti da fonti istituzionali. L’analisi si allarga naturalmente al problema degli effetti dei campi elettromagnetici sulla salute, soffermandosi sui documenti ufficiali emanati da enti sovranazionali direttamente interessati all’argomento: Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, Organizzazione Internazionale per la protezione dalle radiazioni non ionizzanti (ICNIRP), Agenzia Internazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IARC) e Commissione Europea. Al di là di ciò che è riportato nell’ordinanza, viene considerato anche quanto pubblicato in proposito da enti italiani (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ARPA e Politecnico di Milano) e verificato come si muovono altre realtà locali italiane ed altri paesi Europei e non. Non viene tralasciato quanto scritto nei siti che si oppongono genericamente alle “onde elettromagnetiche” o specificamente al 5G, materiale che viene qui sottoposto a controllo ed analisi critica basata sulle evidenze scientifiche. Una parte importante occupa la verifica di cosa si intenda per principio di precauzione e di come esso venga applicato nel caso specifico italiano. La conclusione degli autori è che il limite di esposizione fissato da ICNIRP per l’intensità dei segnali 5G e adottato in quasi tutto il mondo si basa sulle evidenze scientifiche accreditate e aggiornate al settembre 2019, applicando il principio di precauzione in maniera precisa e molto conservativa. Il limite fissato dal legislatore italiano (10 volte inferiore per il campo elettrico e 100 volte per la densità di potenza), costituisce già un ulteriore e forse eccessivo livello di precauzione. I comuni italiani che si oppongono alla installazione del 5G aggiungono un terzo livello di precauzione. Un comportamento che, oltre a non trovare giustificazione scientifica o logica, vari TAR regionali e il Consiglio di Stato hanno a più riprese ritenuto illegittimo. Edizione 2.0 - Agosto 2020: Nel tentativo di mettere un freno alle ordinanze stop-5G e permettere il dispiego della rete senza ulteriori ritardi, il Governo ha recentemente emanato il DL “Semplificazioni”, che chiarisce, o tenta di farlo, che la responsabilità di fissare i limiti per le emissioni elettromagnetiche spetta solo allo Stato. I Comuni possono al più definire aree “sensibili”, che vogliono lasciare libere da antenne, ma non possono più vietarle in modo generalizzato in tutto il territorio comunale. A seguito di ciò la principale associazione promotrice della campagna di ordinanze comunali, l’Alleanza italiana Stop 5G (AIS5G), ha inviato qualche giorno fa a tutti i Comuni italiani una lettera di “chiamata alle armi”, nella quale si invitano i sindaci ad aderire ad ulteriori forme di lotta. In questa nuova edizione, in un'appendice dedicata, passeremo in rassegna e verificheremo tutti i punti menzionati nella lettera con particolare attenzione per le nuove ricerche scientifiche.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to test the effect of the Graham/Stetzer microsurge filters on the wellbeing of teachers and on the behavior of their students in a private school (grades 1 to 12) in Toronto, Canada. GS filters remove electromagnetic frequencies from 4 to 100 kHz on indoor wiring and they were installed in this school because one of the students is electrically sensitive. Teachers were asked in a single blind study to complete a questionnaire daily between January and March 2003 for a 6-week period (3 weeks with and 3 weeks without filters). Eighteen teachers out of 49 completed the questionnaire enough times to enable statistical analysis. Symptoms improved for 55% of the teachers and got worse for 11% of the teachers while the filters were installed. Three teachers (16%) had no response to the filters and another three (16%) had mixed reactions (some symptoms improved and some got worse). Overall teacher wellbeing improved while the filters were in place. Teachers were less frustrated, less tired, less irritable. They were better able to focus and had better health, improved mood, and greater sense of accomplishment. Student response appeared to be age-specific with younger students responding more favorably than older students. This preliminary study needs to be repeated in other schools. If the Graham/Stetzer filters are as effective as they appear to be, then the dirty electricity in schools, homes, and offices can be reduced until other methods are in place to minimize the production and distribution of this form of electrical pollution.
Article
Full-text available
Deteriorating power quality is becoming increasingly common in developed countries. Poor power quality, also known as dirty electricity, refers to a combination of harmonics and transients generated primarily by electronic devices and by non-linear loads. We have assumed, until recently, that this form of energy is not biologically active. However, when Graham/Stetzer™ filters were installed in homes and schools, symptoms associated with electrical hypersensitivity (such as chronic fatigue, depression, headaches, body aches and pains, ringing in the ears, dizziness, impaired sleep, memory loss, and confusion) were reduced. Five case studies are presented that include one healthy individual; one person with electrical hypersensitivity; another with diabetes; and a person with multiple sclerosis. Results for 18 teachers and their classes at a school in Toronto are also presented. These individuals experienced major to moderate improvements in their health and wellbeing after Graham/Stetzer filters improved power quality in their home or work environment. The results suggest that poor power quality may be contributing to electrical hypersensitivity and that as much as 50% of the population may be hypersensitive; children may be more sensitive than adults and dirty electricity in schools may be interfering with education and possibly contributing to disruptive behavior associated with attention deficit disorder (ADD); dirty electricity may elevate plasma glucose levels among diabetics, and exacerbate symptoms for those with multiple sclerosis and tinnitus. Graham/Stetzer filters and meters enable individuals to monitor and improve power quality in buildings and they provide scientists with a tool for studying the effects of dirty electricity. For the first time we can progress from simply documenting electrical hypersensitivity to alleviating some of the symptoms. These results are dramatic and warrant further investigation. If they are representative of what is happening worldwide, then dirty electricity is adversely affecting the lives of millions of people.
Article
Full-text available
The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of diabetes and the number of people of all ages with diabetes for years 2000 and 2030. Data on diabetes prevalence by age and sex from a limited number of countries were extrapolated to all 191 World Health Organization member states and applied to United Nations' population estimates for 2000 and 2030. Urban and rural populations were considered separately for developing countries. The prevalence of diabetes for all age-groups worldwide was estimated to be 2.8% in 2000 and 4.4% in 2030. The total number of people with diabetes is projected to rise from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030. The prevalence of diabetes is higher in men than women, but there are more women with diabetes than men. The urban population in developing countries is projected to double between 2000 and 2030. The most important demographic change to diabetes prevalence across the world appears to be the increase in the proportion of people >65 years of age. These findings indicate that the "diabetes epidemic" will continue even if levels of obesity remain constant. Given the increasing prevalence of obesity, it is likely that these figures provide an underestimate of future diabetes prevalence.
Article
How they're helping companies cope.
Article
High frequency voltages present on the electrical power wires in homes, offices, schools and factories should be considered a potential pollutant. An inexpensive and simple to use instrument is described for measuring these voltages.
Article
In this study, we investigated the effects of exposure to an extremely low frequency magnetic field (ELFMF) on hormone secretion from an islet derived insulinoma cell line, RIN-m. We stimulated RIN-m cells to secrete insulin under exposure to an ELFMF, using our established system for the exposure of cultured cells to an ELFMF at 5 mT and 60 Hz, or under sham exposure conditions for 1 h and observed the effects. In the presence of a depolarizing concentration of potassium (45 mM KCl), exposure to ELFMF significantly attenuated insulin release from RIN-m cells, compared to sham exposed cells. Treatment with nifedipine reduced the difference in insulin secretion between cells exposed to an ELFMF and sham exposed cells. The expression of mRNA encoding synaptosomal associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) and synaptotagmin 1, which play a role in exocytosis in hormone secretion and influx of calcium ions, decreased with exposure to an ELFMF in the presence of 45 mM KCl. These results suggest that exposure to ELFMF attenuates insulin secretion from RIN-m cells by affecting calcium influx through calcium channels.
Article
Questions of safety of electromagnetic (EM) fields should be based on relevant biological properties, i.e., specific cellular reactions to potentially harmful stimuli. The stress response is a well documented protective reaction of plant and animal cells to a variety of environmental threats, and it is stimulated by both extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) EM fields. It involves activation of DNA to initiate synthesis of stress proteins. Thermal and non-thermal stimuli affect different segments of DNA and utilize different biochemical pathways. However, both ELF and RF stimulate the same non-thermal pathway. Since the same biochemical reactions are stimulated in different frequency ranges with very different specific absorption rates (SARs), SAR level is not a valid basis for safety standards. Studies of EM field interactions with DNA and with model systems provide insight into a plausible mechanism that can be effective in ELF and RF ranges.
Article
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects and the mechanism of a pulsed electric field (PEF) on insulin and its subsequent mediation of proliferative changes in human hepatocytes in vitro. The PEF, the electric field intensity coupled into the culture medium, was about 0.7 V/m with a repeating frequency of 50 Hz. Insulin solution was exposed to PEF for 20 min and added to the culture medium of human hepatocytes. Combining fluorescence spectroscopy, immunocytochemistry, microarrays, RT-PCR and MTT, several important events of the insulin signaling pathways were investigated, including ligand-receptor binding capacity, intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation level, gene transcription, and cell proliferation. PEF produced a conformational change of insulin molecule. The binding capacity of insulin to its receptors was reduced to 87% of the control level after PEF treatment, and the average intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation level decreased by 11%. The expression of 55 of 12,000 genes examined was modified, including an increase in the expression of human tyrosine phosphatase and the small GTP-binding protein. Based on these results, a mechanism is proposed to explain the bio-effects of PEF on hepatic cell proliferation through the insulin signaling pathway.