... Since the research of Inman et al. (Inman et al., 1952) in 1952, a plethora of studiesutilizing a variety of modeling methods-have related surface electromyogram (EMG) activity to force/torque generated about a joint (Buchanan et al., 2004, Staudenmann et al., 2010. Various strategies have emerged to improve the fidelity of the EMG-force relationship, including: techniques to reduce the variability of the processed EMG (Clancy and Hogan, 1994, 1995, Hashemi et al., 2015, Hogan and Mann, 1980a, b, Parker et al., 2006, Potvin and Brown, 2004, Sanger, 2007, modeling agonist and antagonist muscles about a joint , Clancy and Hogan, 1997, Messier et al., 1971, Solo mo now et al., 1986, applying system identification methods that adapt to each subject , Hasan and Enoka, 1985, Hashemi et al., 2012, Thelen et al., 1994, incorporating dynamic changes in force (Gottlieb and Agarwal, 1971, Hashemi, Morin, 2015, Hashemi, Morin, 2012, and considering variations in joint angle (Doheny et al., 2008, Hashemi et al., 2013, Hof and Van den Berg, 1981, Liu et al., 2013b. These models have been utilized in numerous application areas, such as ergonomics assessment (Hagg et al., 2004, Kumar andMital, 1996), clinical bio mechanics (Disselhorst-Klug et al., 2009, Doorenbosch andHarlaar, 2003) and motor control research (Ostry and Feldman, 2003). ...