Article

Fgf10 regulates hepatopancreatic ductal system patterning and differentiation

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
Nature Genetics (Impact Factor: 29.35). 04/2007; 39(3):397-402. DOI: 10.1038/ng1961
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

During organogenesis, the foregut endoderm gives rise to the many different cell types that comprise the hepatopancreatic system, including hepatic, pancreatic and gallbladder cells, as well as the epithelial cells of the hepatopancreatic ductal system that connects these organs together and with the intestine. However, the mechanisms responsible for demarcating ducts versus organs are poorly understood. Here, we show that Fgf10 signaling from the adjacent mesenchyme is responsible for refining the boundaries between the hepatopancreatic duct and organs. In zebrafish fgf10 mutants, the hepatopancreatic ductal epithelium is severely dysmorphic, and cells of the hepatopancreatic ductal system and adjacent intestine misdifferentiate toward hepatic and pancreatic fates. Furthermore, Fgf10 also functions to prevent the differentiation of the proximal pancreas and liver into hepatic and pancreatic cells, respectively. These data shed light onto how the multipotent cells of the foregut endoderm, and subsequently those of the hepatopancreatic duct, are directed toward different organ fates.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Zhiyuan Gong
  • Source
    • "We also used the following probes: hhex (Ho et al., 1999), prox1 (Glasgow and Tomarev, 1998), fabp10a (Her et al., 2003), sepp1b (Kudoh et al., 2001), cp (Korzh et al., 2001), and cdx1b (Flores et al., 2008). Whole-mount immunostaining was performed as previously described (Dong et al., 2007), using the following antibodies: chicken polyclonal anti-GFP (1:100; Aves Labs, Tigard, OR, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-Prox1 (1:1000; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-Anxa4 (also named as 2 F11; 1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, MA USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-dsRed (1:200; Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-Histone H3 (1:100; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and conjugated secondary antibodies, including Alexa Fluor 405, 488, 568, and 647 (1:300; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Hoechst 33342 (2.5 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for DNA staining. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During development, inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) proteins, a subclass of the helix-loop-helix family of proteins, regulate cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in various organs. However, a functional role of Id2a in liver development has not yet been reported. Here, using zebrafish as a model organism, we provide in vivo evidence that Id2a regulates hepatoblast proliferation and cell death during liver development. Initially, in the liver, id2a is expressed in hepatoblasts and after their differentiation, id2a expression is restricted to biliary epithelial cells. id2a knockdown in zebrafish embryos had no effect on hepatoblast specification or hepatocyte differentiation. However, liver size was greatly reduced in id2a morpholino-injected embryos, indicative of a hepatic outgrowth defect attributable to the significant decrease in proliferating hepatoblasts concomitant with the significant increase in hepatoblast cell death. Altogether, these data support the role of Id2a as an important regulator of hepatic outgrowth via modulation of hepatoblast proliferation and survival during liver development in zebrafish. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Mechanisms of Development
  • Source
    • "Euthanized zebrafish were fixed overnight at 4 • C with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), rinsed with PBS, and bleached with 0.9% H 2 O 2 and 1% KOH, protected from light with foil, and placed on a rocking table for about 1.25 h, or until clear and rinsed five times for five minutes with PBS. Fixed samples were immunostained as described previously (Dong et al., 2007; Plavicki et al., 2013). Samples were blocked overnight at 4 • C with PBS containing 0.3% Triton (PT, X-100, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 4% bovine serum albumin (PBT). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) disrupts craniofacial development in zebrafish larvae. However, the cellular changes responsible for the decreased jaw size remain poorly understood. We show that smaller jaw size is due to a decrease in both the size and number of chondrocytes in the developing craniofacial cartilages. TCDD was found to decrease ossification of osteoblasts in the perichondrium of craniofacial cartilages. We also discovered that TCDD caused clefting of the parasphenoid, an effect with similarity to TCDD-induced cleft palate in mice. Thus, dermal and perichondrial bone development of the craniofacial skeleton are clearly disrupted by TCDD exposure in the zebrafish larvae. This dysmorphic response of the zebrafish craniofacial skeleton after exposure to TCDD is consistent with findings demonstrating disruption of axial bone development in medaka and repression of sox9b in zebrafish. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
  • Source
    • "Dnmt1 s904 mutants (Anderson et al., 2009) were obtained from M. Goll (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA). Tg(fabp10:dsRed) fish (Dong et al., 2007) were obtained from D. Stainier. Embryos from at least three clutches were individually genotyped at stages before mutants could be distinguished based on morphological phenotype (24-48 hpf ). "

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · Development
Show more