Developmental Disabilities Modification of the Children’s Global Assessment Scale

National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.26). 03/2007; 61(4):504-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.001
Source: PubMed


Interventions for pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) aim to alleviate symptoms and improve functioning. To measure global functioning in treatment studies, the Children's Global Assessment Scale was modified and psychometric properties of the revised version (DD-CGAS) were assessed in children with PDD.
Developmental disabilities-relevant descriptors were developed for the DD-CGAS, and administration procedures were established to enhance rater consistency. Ratings of clinical case vignettes were used to assess inter-rater reliability and temporal stability. Validity was assessed by correlating the DD-CGAS with measures of functioning and symptoms in 83 youngsters with PDD. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing change from baseline to post-treatment with change on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement subscale scores in a subset of 14 children.
Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .79) and temporal stability (average ICC = .86) were excellent. The DD-CGAS scores correlated with measures of functioning and symptoms with moderate to large effect sizes. Changes on the DD-CGAS correlated with changes on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-I (r = -.71) and Global Impressions Scale-I (r = -.52). The pre-post DD-CGAS change had an effect size of .72.
The DD-CGAS is a reliable instrument with apparent convergent validity for measuring global functioning of children with PDD in treatment studies.

Download full-text


Available from: Benedetto Vitiello
    • "Global rating scales for young children are clinically meaningful (De Kruif & McWilliam, 1999; Wagner et al., 2007) and have been reported to be sensitive to change following behavioural intervention programmes (Endicott, Spitzer, Fleiss & Cohen, 1976; Lehmann, 1984). Some argue that global ratings provide a more comprehensive view of child behaviour as compared to scores based on specifi c subtask analysis or scores based on the opinion of a single informant (Wagner et al., 2007). Research demonstrates that rating scales can have considerable levels of short-and long-term predictive validity throughout later school years and even into adulthood (Epstein, Schweinhart, DeBruin-Parecki & Robin, 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study investigates the validity of a 4-point rating scale used to measure the level of preschool children's orientation to literacy during shared book reading. Validity was explored by (a) comparing the children's level of literacy orientation as measured with the Children's Orientation to Book Reading Rating Scale (COB) with a teacher's rating of a child's level of attention and effortful control on the Children's Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ), and (b) computing the predictive validity of a child's COB rating with overall levels of emergent literacy at the end of the preschool school year. This study involved 46 preschool children from low-income backgrounds; children's literacy orientation was rated during a group teacher-led book reading. Children's ratings of literacy orientation during shared book reading using the global 4-point COB scale were significantly correlated with teacher ratings of a child's attention and effortful control as measured on the CBQ. Hierarchical regression results indicated children's literacy orientation significantly predicted children's end-of-year alphabet knowledge and overall emergent reading skills above and beyond the variance contributed by children's language skills and family income. The validity of a global rating for indexing children's level of literacy orientation was supported. Educational implications and recommendations for the COB as a component of early literacy assessment are discussed.
    No preview · Article · May 2014 · Journal of Research in Reading
  • Source
    • "In the trial, a treatment responder was defined as a rating of 1 (''very much improved'') or 2 (''much improved''), and all other endpoint ratings were considered non-responders. Developmental Disability–Child Global Assessment Scale (DD-CGAS; Wagner et al. 2007). The DD-CGAS is a reliable and valid (test–retest, r = .86; "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comorbid anxiety is common among children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and parents of children with ASD are more likely to have anxiety disorders. This study investigated the relationship between parents' state and trait anxiety and parent-reported internalizing and externalizing symptoms among adolescents (n = 30) with ASD, as well as the relationship of parents' anxiety symptoms and adolescent treatment response in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Parental state anxiety correlated with severity of adolescent anxiety, and trait anxiety in parents correlated with parent-reported adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Also, parents of adolescent treatment responders experienced a decrease in their own trait anxiety. Findings highlight the importance of considering parental anxiety when targeting anxiety among youth with ASD.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2012 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Source
    • "Possible explanations of why these associations were not detected in the regression analysis could be that the sample size in our study was too small and that 23% of the sample in this study had an IQ below 70. The CGAS has been criticized for not covering all relevant domains of functioning in children with developmental disabilities (Wagner et al., 2007). It could be that the part of the sample in this study with an IQ under 70 primarily has difficulties related to problems that are common among children with developmental disabilities, and that impairment related to psychiatric symptoms are not the most prominent problem. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies indicate that low IQ is a substantial risk factor for developing mental health problems. Based on these results, we hypothesized that IQ may predict some of the variance in clinician-rated severity of children's mental health problems measured with the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). The other aims of this study were to examine if there was any difference in the predictive ability of the different IQ scores of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third edition (WISC-III) and to examine if parent-rated measure of child mental health problems could predict the scores on CGAS and HoNOSCA after controlling for IQ, age, and gender. In this study, 132 patients at three outpatient clinics in North Norway were assessed with the parent version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), HoNOSCA, CGAS, and with the WISC-III. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted with HoNOSCA and CGAS as dependent variables. Demographics, WISC-III IQ scores, and SDQ were entered as independent variables. The model with HoNOSCA as the dependent variable predicted 25% of the total variance. The WISC-III full-scale IQ predicted an additional 6% of the variance. The analyses with CGAS as the dependent variable gave no significant results. When a patient has a high HoNOSCA score, an intelligence test in addition to an evaluation of symptoms on mental health should be considered. Future research ought to examine whether HoNOSCA's ability to detect change might be affected by patients IQ.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2012 · British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Show more