The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: An Assessment of Its Domain Structure Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis

Centre for Eye Research Australia, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Impact Factor: 3.4). 03/2007; 48(3):1001-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0361
Source: PubMed


To assess and validate the subscale structure of the 28-item Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) Scale by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis for use as an outcome measure.
Three hundred nineteen participants completed the IVI questionnaire, and the responses then were subjected to Rasch analysis by RUMM2020 software. With the person estimates for each item, CFA was used to assess two hypothesized structures: three-and four-factor models. The subscales of the model with the best fit were then further validated by Rasch analysis.
CFA supported a three-factor model that included items from the emotional well-being, reading and accessing information, and mobility and independence subscales. Almost all the selected goodness-of-fit statistics for the three-factor model were better than the recommended values. The factor loadings of the items on their respective domains were all statistically significant (P < 0.001) and ranged between 0.54 and 0.81. The three subscales individually fitted the Rasch model according to the item-trait interaction test (mobility and independence chi(2) [df] = 45.9 [44], P = 0.39; emotional well-being = 28.4 [32], P = 0.65; and reading and accessing information = 43.5 [36], P = 0.18). The item-fit residuals values of the three subscales were <2.5 and showed mean and standard deviations approximating 0 and 1, respectively. The internal consistency reliability of the subscales (alpha) was substantial, ranging between 0.89 and 0.91.
An examination of the IVI dimension confirmed a three-subscale structure that displays interval measurement characteristics likely to provide a valid and reliable assessment of restriction of participation. The findings provide an opportunity for a more detailed measurement of the effects of different types of low-vision rehabilitation programs.

Download full-text


Available from: Jill E Keeffe, Jun 16, 2014
  • Source
    • "ge when using the questionnaire at an individual level ( Fox & Jones , 1998 ; Wright & Stone , 1979 ) . A large number of other researchers have used the Rasch model to construct instruments that measure latent traits ( e . g . , Manz , Gernhart , Bracaliello , Pressimone , & Eisenberg , 2014 ; Peoples , O ' Dwyer , Wang , Brown , & Rosca , 2014 ; Lamoureuxe et al . , 2007 ; Maulana , Helms - Lorenz , & van de Grift , 2015a ; Maulana , Helms - Lorenz , & van de Grift , 2015b ) . A member of the family of item response theory ( IRT ) , the Rasch model ( Rasch , 1960 ) has more stringent assumptions to be met than classical test theory ( CTT ) . The usefulness of IRT models depends on the extent to which th"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents findings of Phase 2 of a larger three phase study examining culturally responsive pedagogies and their influence on Indigenous student outcomes. Characteristics of culturally responsive pedagogies obtained through interviews with Australian Indigenous1 parents and students generated characteristics and themes which were distilled into survey items. The resulting instrument was applied to practicing teachers for validation.The survey was piloted on a sample of 141 elementary and secondary teachers from diverse schools. Analyses using Item Response Theory, employing the Rasch model, confirmed that the instrument measured a unidimensional latent trait, culturally responsive pedagogy. Seven subscales, initially qualitatively determined, were statistically confirmed. The instrument proved suitable to measure nuances in pedagogy and to detect significant differences between elementary and secondary teachers.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · International Journal of Educational Research
  • Source
    • "Measures 2.3.1. Primary outcome measures The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire (IVI) [19] [3] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effectiveness of a low vision self-management program (LVSMP) in older adults.Methods Participants(n = 153) were existing clients of a national low vision rehabilitation organisation randomly allocated to usual services (n = 60) or usual services plus LVSMP (n = 93). The LVSMP was an eight-week group program facilitated by low vision counsellors. The primary outcome was vision-specific quality of life (QoL) measured using the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes emotional well-being, self-efficacy and adaptation to vision loss were measured using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and Short Form Adaptation to Age-Related Vision Loss scale (AVL12).ResultsAt one and six month follow-up assessments, no significant between-group differences were found for vision-specific QoL, emotional well-being, adaptation to vision loss or self-efficacy (p > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no impact of the intervention on outcome measures.Conclusions In contrast to previous work, our study found limited benefit of a LVSM program on QoL for older adults accessing low vision services.Practice ImplicationsWhen implementing self-management programs in low vision rehabilitation settings, issues of client interest, divergence of need, program accessibility and fidelity of intervention delivery need to be addressed.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2014 · Patient Education and Counseling
  • Source
    • "This measure is used to indicate if different groups (stratified by age, sex, or educational level) have systematically different responses despite having equal levels of trait being measured. A DIF value >1.0 logits is considered significant, and thus the interpretation of the results should be stratified by groups [25]–[28]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To develop and validate a Chinese version of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a cataract population. Methods The Catquest-9SF Questionnaire was translated and back translated into Chinese. Preoperative patients were recruited at a tertiary eye hospital and their demographic information and visual acuity were documented. Psychometric properties of the Catquest-9SF, including ordered thresholds, the ability to distinguish between different strata of person ability, absence of misfitting items, unidimentionality, differential item functioning (DIF) and construct validity were tested, using Rasch analysis. Results A total of 102 patients (100% response rate) were enrolled. The participants'mean age was 70.2 year (SD = 12.1) and 46.9% were female. Rasch analysis showed that this version of the questionnaire had ordered response thresholds and was free of DIF. The items fit a single overall construct and unidimensional by principal components analysis of the residuals. Patients with visual impairment had significantly poorer Rasch scores on the Catquest-9SF (mean change, -2.5, p = 0.035, compared with non-visually impaired patients). Conclusion The Chinese version of Catquest-9SF is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing the visual disability outcomes of Chinese patients with cataract, and it may be recommended for routine clinical use.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · PLoS ONE
Show more