Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 17.81). 04/2007; 146(5):317-25. DOI: 10.7326/003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
Source: PubMed


Anxiety, although as common as depression, has received less attention and is often undetected and undertreated.
To determine the current prevalence, impairment, and comorbidity of anxiety disorders in primary care and to evaluate a brief measure for detecting these disorders.
Criterion-standard study performed between November 2004 and June 2005.
15 U.S. primary care clinics.
965 randomly sampled patients from consecutive clinic patients who completed a self-report questionnaire and agreed to a follow-up telephone interview.
7-item anxiety measure (Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-7 scale) in the clinic, followed by a telephone-administered, structured psychiatric interview by a mental health professional who was blinded to the GAD-7 results. Functional status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20), depressive and somatic symptoms, and self-reported disability days and physician visits were also assessed.
Of the 965 patients, 19.5% (95% CI, 17.0% to 22.1%) had at least 1 anxiety disorder, 8.6% (CI, 6.9% to 10.6%) had posttraumatic stress disorder, 7.6% (CI, 5.9% to 9.4%) had a generalized anxiety disorder, 6.8% (CI, 5.3% to 8.6%) had a panic disorder, and 6.2% (CI, 4.7% to 7.9%) had a social anxiety disorder. Each disorder was associated with substantial impairment that increased significantly (P < 0.001) as the number of anxiety disorders increased. Many patients (41%) with an anxiety disorder reported no current treatment. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both the GAD-7 scale and its 2 core items (GAD-2) performed well (area under the curve, 0.80 to 0.91) as screening tools for all 4 anxiety disorders.
The study included a nonrandom sample of selected primary care practices.
Anxiety disorders are prevalent, disabling, and often untreated in primary care. A 2-item screening test may enhance detection.

Download full-text


Available from: Bernd Löwe, May 23, 2014
  • Source
    • "It is possible that the genetic liability to DP due to depressive or anxiety diagnoses might be explained by genetic factors contributing to medical conditions that are comorbid with the disorder underlying DP. One of such conditions may be CF, which has previously been reported to frequently co-occur with depressive and anxiety disorders (Fischler et al., 1997; Hickie et al., 1990; Kroenke et al., 2007) as well as to predict DP or work disability (Knudsen et al., 2011; Leone et al., 2006; Markkula et al., 2011; van Amelsvoort et al., 2002). The co-occurrence of depression , anxiety, and CF has partly a common genetic influence (Kato et al., 2009) as well as unique genetic and environmental influences on CF (Hickie et al., 1999). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Previous research indicates that liability to disability pension (DP) due to mental diagnoses is moderately influenced by genetic factors. This study investigates whether genetic contributions to the liability to DP due to mood and neurotic diagnoses overlap with the genetic influences on major depression (MD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or chronic fatigue (CF). Method: A prospective cohort study including 9,985 female twins born in Sweden 1933-1958. The presence of MD, GAD, and CF was assessed by computer-assisted telephone interviews conducted in 1998-2002. Data on DP due to mood and neurotic diagnoses were obtained from nationwide registers for the years 1998-2010. Common genetic and environmental influences on the phenotypes were estimated by applying structural equation modeling. Results: The prevalence of MD/GAD was 30%, CF 8%, and DP due to mood and neurotic diagnoses 3% in 2010. Genetic effects on MD/GAD explained 31% of the total genetic variation in DP, whereas genetic contributions in common with CF were small and not significant. The majority of the total non-shared environmental variance in DP (85%) was explained by the factors that were unique to DP. Conclusions: Large proportions of genetic and non-shared environmental influences in DP due to mood and neurotic diagnoses were not explained by the contributions from MD/GAD or CF. The results suggest that the process leading to DP is complex and influenced by factors other than those related to the disorder underlying DP.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Source
    • "Affective and somatic symptoms are common and debilitating categories of psychological health concerns in the United States, representing key causes of distress and impaired functioning across the lifespan. Somatic symptoms frequently cooccur with affective difficulties including anxiety, trauma-related, and depressive symptoms [1] [2] [3]. Of these comorbidities, cooccurring depressive and somatic symptoms may be of particular clinical and research concern. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite high comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms, cognitive mechanisms that transmit vulnerability between symptom clusters are largely unknown. Dampening, positive rumination, and brooding are three cognitive predictors of depression, with rumination theoretically indicated as a transdiagnostic vulnerability through amplifying and diminishing affect in response to events. Specifically, the excess negative affect and lack of positive affect characteristic of depressive symptoms and underlying somatic symptoms may cause and be caused by cognitive responses to events. Therefore, the current study examined whether comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms may be explained by the cognitive mechanisms of dampening and positive rumination in response to positive events and brooding in response to negative events among adults ( N = 321 ) across eight weeks of assessment. We hypothesized that greater dampening and brooding would reciprocally predict greater depressive and somatic symptoms, while greater positive rumination would reciprocally predict fewer depressive and somatic symptoms. Mediation analyses in AMOS 22 indicated that dampening and brooding mediated reciprocal pathways between depressive and somatic symptoms, but positive rumination did not . Findings propose dampening and brooding as mechanisms of the reciprocal relationship between depressive and somatic symptoms through diminishing positive affect and amplifying negative affect in response to positive and negative events.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Depression research and treatment
  • Source
    • "WHO data for 14 countries show a 1-year prevalence of any psychiatric disorder of between 6% and 27% (Kessler et al., 2009). Mental disorders are even more prevalent in primary care (Jackson et al., 2007) (Linden et al., 2004; Kroenke et al., 2007), among the oldest old (Stek et al., 2007), and among elderly receiving home care (Bruce et al., 2002; Davitt and Gellis, 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Even though the prevalence of mental disorders and social problems is high among elderly patients, it is difficult to detect these in a primary (home) care setting. Goal was the development and preliminary validation of a short observation list to detect six problem areas: anxiety, depression, cognition, suspicion, loneliness, and somatisation. Methods: A draft list of indicators identified from a short review of the literature and the opinions of 22 experts was evaluated by general practitioners (GPs) and home care organisations for feasibility. It was then used by GPs and home care personnel to observe patients, who also completed validated tests for psychological disorders (General Health Questionnaire 12 item version (GHQ-12)), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version (GDS-15)), anxiety and suspicion (Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90)), loneliness (University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)), somatisation (Illness Attitude Scale (IAS)), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)). Results: GPs and home care personnel observed 180 patients (mean age 78.4 years; 66% female) and evaluated the draft list during a regular visit. Cronbach's α was 0.87 for the draft list and ≥0.80 for the draft problem areas (loneliness and suspicion excepted). Principal component analysis identified six components (cognition, depression + loneliness, somatisation, anxiety + suspicion, depression (other signs), and an ambiguous component). Convergent validity was shown for the indicators list as a whole (using the GHQ-12), and the subscales of depression, anxiety, loneliness, cognition, and somatisation. Using pre-set agreed criteria, the list was reduced to 14 final indicators divided over five problem areas. Conclusion: The Observation List for mental disorders and social Problems (OLP) proved to be preliminarily valid, reliable, and feasible for use in primary and home care settings. Copyright © John Wliey & Sons, Ltd.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Show more