Introduction. In low- and middle-income countries, gestational diabetes mellitus is increasing globally; it is also a double burden of illness for both mothers and children. While gestational diabetes mellitus is recognized in Ethiopia, according to recent diagnostic criteria, information regarding it remains scarce. Objective. To assess the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and associated factors among women attending antenatal care in Hadiya Zone public Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia. Methods. An institution-based cross-sectional research on a total of 470 pregnant mothers was conducted in the Hadiya Region from August 2019 to December 2020. Finally, via the systematic random sampling process, the study subjects were chosen. A two-hour oral glucose tolerance test of 75 g was used to conduct the universal one-step screening and diagnostic technique. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Results. Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was 26.2% (95% CI, 21.8, 30.5). Urban residents (AOR: 2.181; 95% CI: 1.274, 3.733), primary education (AOR:2.286; 95% CI: 1.396, 3.745), without previous history of abortion (AOR: 0.097; 95% CI: 0.048, 0.196), with history of late gestational age in weeks (29-32) (AOR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.213, 0.723), with no history of coffee drinking (AOR: 2.704; 95% CI: 1.044, 7.006), and adequate dietary diversity (AOR: 2.740; 95% CI: 1.585, 4.739) were significantly associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Conclusion. In Hadiya Zone public Hospitals, the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women attending antenatal treatment was higher compared to other studies conducted. The urban residents, primary schooling, no prior history of abortion, late gestational age, no history of coffee drinking, and sufficient dietary diversity were significantly linked with gestational diabetes mellitus. To enhance maternal and child health, reinforcing screening, treatment, and prevention strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus is essential.
1. Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is generally characterized as glucose intolerance that changes the degree of severity that begins or is first detected during pregnancy, usually after the 24th week of gestation [1–4]. It is also known as intolerance to carbohydrates resulting in variable severity hyperglycemia with onset or first recognition during pregnancy [5].
Diabetes diagnosed in the second or third trimester of pregnancy has been ruled out because of overt diabetes early in pregnancy and is not preexisting type 1 or type 2 diabetes [6, 7]. Gestational diabetes mellitus occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the insulin it produces cannot be used efficiently by the body. Insulin is a blood sugar-regulating hormone [8]. Symptoms include blurred vision; fatigue; regular infections like bladder, vagina, and skin; increased vision like thirst, appetite, and urination; nausea and vomiting; and loss of weight [9].
The global effect of gestational diabetes is growing and both mothers and infants are doubly burdened by the disease. The prevalence in the general population compares with the pregnancy rate [10, 11]. It affects up to 1 out of 7/10 pregnancies worldwide and, in combination with other noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), accounts for 70% of all deaths worldwide [1, 7, 12].
The global prevalence of all births can range from 2.4 to 21% [12, 13]. The prevalence was approximately 16.9 percent among women in the reproductive age group [1, 2]. This varies greatly depending on the studied population and the diagnostic test used [12].
The burden is rising in low- and middle-income countries, with some 90% of cases occurring in developed countries. The estimated total prevalence in Africa was 5% [1, 7, 12]. It also makes about 4% of all pregnancies difficult and women with it have an estimated 7-fold chance of developing type 2 diabetes in the future, as well as their children and subsequent generations [10, 14].
While diabetes mellitus is recognized as one of the major chronic diseases in Ethiopia, the prevalence ranges from 4 to 13% for NCDs [1]. Increased risk of preeclampsia in mothers and increased risk of macrosomia, hypoglycemia, jaundice, respiratory failure, polycythemia, and hypocalcemia in newborn babies. There is postpartum progression if no treatment is needed [10, 11, 15].
Because of postpartum development, women with GDM are advised to be screened for type 2 diabetes 4-12 weeks postpartum and referred for follow-up if diabetes is identified [16]. Therefore, early diagnosis of GDM is important for prevention [6].
In our country, the prevalence of GDM among pregnant mothers and factors associated with it have not been well researched. There is no research on gestational diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors, especially in the field of study up to the investigator’s knowledge. Because of all these causes, the consciousness of the community about the conditions is low.
It will be necessary to recognize the prevalence of the problem and common risk factors to mitigate the problem on a timely basis and to promote health policy and enhancement of the program. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and associated risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant mothers in the Hadiya region of southern Ethiopia; besides, the findings will be used as a guideline for those interested in researching the same subjects.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Study Setting
The study was conducted in Hadiya Zone public hospitals among a cohort of pregnant mothers recruited from the general population attending antenatal care in public hospitals of the Zone. The Zone was found in Southern Nation Nationality People Regional State (SNNPR). The Zone is located in South West of Ethiopia, 230 km far away from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, and 194 km from the regional capital city, Hawassa.
Administratively, the Hadiya Zone was organized by 4 administrative towns, 13 districts, 305 rural Kebeles, and 30 urban Kebeles, and estimated population size of 1,727,920 with male 856,357 (49.56%) and female 871,563 (50.44%). Estimated number of reproductive age mothers in the Zone, which was about 402,605 (23.3%), which comprises an estimated 23,155 (3.46%), pregnant mothers, from age 18 to 49 years on study area based on 2007 census conversion factor projection and have a population density of 92 inhabitants per km² [17, 18].
In the Zone, there were a total of 376 health institutions from this; there is 1 general hospital, 3 primary hospitals, 3 primary hospitals (under construction), 61 health center, 311 health posts, and 81 private clinics (1 higher, 16 medium, and 64 lower) and 39 private pharmacies (2 pharmacies, 17 drug stores, and 20 rural drug vendors), which would deliver routine health services to the community. Health coverage was not yet satisfied, and all health facilities were not currently providing blood glucose level tests for GDM patients [17–19].
2.2. Study Design and Period
From August 2019 to December 2020, an institution-based cross-sectional study design was carried out in public hospitals of the Hadiya Region among a cohort of pregnant mothers recruited from the general population attending antenatal care in public hospitals of the Zone.
2.3. Source Population
The source population was all pregnant mothers aged 18-49 years living in the Zone.
2.4. Study Population
The research population of all selected pregnant mothers with 24-32 weeks of gestational age living in the Zone.
2.4.1. Sample Size Determination
The sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula, considering the following assumptions and taking the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus 12.8% which was a study conducted in Northwest Ethiopia [20]. where is the desired sample size, is the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (12.8%) (which was taken from a study conducted at Gondar town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019), is the critical value at 95% confidence level (1.96), is the margin of error (5%), . For possible none response during the study, the final sample size was increased by10% to of 172 which is 17.2, by adding; then, the total sample size was 189.
2.5. The Sample Size for Second Objectives
Since the sample size calculated for the second objectives was larger than the sample size calculated for the first objectives, so the sample size of 470 was a sample size of the study, where is the percent of outcome in unexposed groups ratio, unexposed to exposed OR (odds ratio), odds of exposed to unexposed and power, and the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false (see Table 1).
Variables
Assumption
Sample size
Previous cesarean section
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
50 [1]
Family history of type II diabetes
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
62 [1]
Previous history of spontaneous abortion
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
114 [1]
Dietary diversity status
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
470 [20]
MUAC
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
438 [20]
Level of physical activity
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
104 [20]
Family history of DM
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
128 [20]
Antenatal depression
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
124 [20]
Previous GDM
, , ratio 1 : 1, ,
76 [20]