Article

Decline in FEV 1 in Relation to Incident Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Cohort with Respiratory Symptoms

The OLIN Studies, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, Luleå, Sweden.
COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Impact Factor: 2.67). 04/2007; 4(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1080/15412550601168358
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Data on the relationship between decline in lung function and development of COPD are sparse. We assessed the decline in FEV1 during 10 years among subjects with respiratory symptoms by two different methods and evaluated risk factors for decline and its relation to incident Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD. A cross-sectional postal questionnaire was in 1986 sent to 6610 subjects of three age strata. All subjects reporting respiratory symptoms were invited to a structured interview and spirometry. A follow-up survey was performed 10 years later, and totally 1109 subjects performed spirometry in both 1986 and 1996. COPD was defined according to the ATS/ERS standards (FEV1/FVC < or =0.70). The decline in FEV1 was 39 ml/year in men vs. 28 ml/year in women, p = < 0.001 (-1.53 vs. -0.12 change in percent of predicted normal value over 10 years (pp), p = 0.023), among smokers 39 vs. non-smokers 28 ml/year, p < 0.001 (-3.30 vs. 0.69 pp, p < 0.001), in subjects with chronic productive cough 36 vs. not 32 ml/year, p = 0.044 (-2.00 vs. -0.02 pp, p = 0.002). Incident cases of moderate COPD (n = 83) had a decline of 62 ml/year (-12.6 pp) and 22.9% of them had a decline > 90 ml/year (-27.8 pp over 10 years). Gender-specific analysis revealed that smoking was a stronger risk factor in women than in men, while higher age was a significant risk factor in men only. In conclusion, decline in FEV1 was associated with age, smoking, and chronic productive cough, but the risk factor pattern was gender-dependent. Among incident cases of COPD the decline was steeper and close to a quarter had a rapid decline.

0 Followers
 · 
36 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The monitoring of health conditions in workers exposed to asbestos for prolonged periods is a problematic issue. The Occupational Health physician being required to carry out his activity of prevention of the medical consequences and protection of the workers can use various instruments among which there is the evaluation of lung function. We have performed a meta-analysis on the scientific evidence on this matter in order to identify significant alterations of the lung function parameters in subjects professionally exposed to asbestos compared with controls. By the means of a bibliographic search and the application of selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 21 articles presenting data from controlled studies. Our results show that the number of controlled trials is very small compared to the totality of studies performed on this matter (1 to 70 ratio) and that the number of the subjects included in the majority of the analyzed studies is oddly divided in the experimental and control group. For this and other reasons the analyzed studies are very heterogeneous. Despite these difficulties, the meta- analysis evidences that some parameters of respiratory functioning are more likely to be influenced by asbestos exposure taking into account the smoking habit and that other parameters are sinergically influenced by both asbestos exposure and smoking. Our meta-analysis points out the necessity to define a common methodology about the technical and operatives procedures in the evaluation of the effects on lung function measures determined by an occupational exposure to asbestos and a thorough examination of the intensity of abnormality levels that could allow using the values obtained from the above mentioned measures in a discriminating diagnostic way.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2008
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epidemiologische Daten zu Prävalenz, Inzidenz und Verlauf von Krankheiten sind gesundheitspolitisch von großer Wichtigkeit. Daten hierzu liegen aber für Deutschland zumeist nicht ausreichend und/oder methodisch nicht verlässlich vor. Ziel des Beitrages ist es, eine Systematik von Verzerrungen und damit Nicht-Repräsentativität darzustellen und herauszuarbeiten, mit welchem Design einer Studie und an welchem Ort der Forschung am besten repräsentative Daten zu erheben sind. Probleme und Fallstricke werden anhand von ausgewählten Studien erläutert. Wesentliche Verzerrungen der Ergebnisse kommen zu Stande über: 1. Vorgaben zur Krankheitsdefinition und zu Grenzwerten, 2. Untersuchungsinstrumente und 3. Selektion der untersuchten Population über a) Form der primären Gewinnung der Teilnehmer (z.B. Selbstselektion, Selektion durch Institution, an der die Datenerhebung erfolgt) und b) Teilnahmequoten bei der eigentlichen Untersuchung. Sekundärstatistische Auswertungen auf Basis von Daten, die an sich häufig eher repräsentativ sind, haben dafür immer das Problem von under- oder over-reporting — je nach Interessenlage derjenigen, die dokumentiert haben. Hochgerechnete Daten auf die Gesamtbevölkerung stimmen in der Regel nicht, weil die untersuchten Populationen in der Regel nicht repräsentativ für die Gesamtpopulation sind. Die Interessenlage derjenigen, die epidemiologische Daten präsentieren, ist aufgrund der Möglichkeit manipulativ eingesetzter Forschungsdesigns und -methodik immer zu beachten. Zumeist stellt die Selektion das Hauptproblem in Bezug auf die Repräsentativität dar. Die geläufige Annahme, dass Gemeindestudien am ehesten diese Probleme umgehen, erweist sich als in der Regel falsch. Da Menschen zur Mitarbeit gewonnen werden müssen, gelingt dies immer nur mit Selbstselektion. Studien in der Hausarztpraxis hingegen basieren gerade auf der erlebten Verpfl ichtung des Patienten seinem Arzt gegenüber und erlauben so, eine hohe, in der Zusammensetzung kaum verzerrte Teilnehmerrate zu gewinnen.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2008
  • Source

    Preview · Article · Jan 2007 · Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
Show more