Over-expression of parathyroid hormone Type 1 receptor confers an aggressive phenotype in osteosarcoma

Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.09). 09/2007; 121(5):943-54. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22749
Source: PubMed


Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and is associated with rapid bone growth. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) signaling via parathyroid hormone Type 1 receptor (PTHR1) is important for skeletal development and is involved in bone metastases in other tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of PTHrP/PTHR1 and its possible role in osteosarcoma. In a preliminary screening, a higher level of PTHR1 mRNA, but not PTHrP, was found in 4 osteosarcoma xenografts as compared with 4 standard cell lines, or 5 patient derived cell lines (p < 0.05) using quantitative RT-PCR. It was therefore extended to 55 patient specimens, in which a significantly higher level of PTHR1 mRNA was detected in metastatic or relapsed samples than those from primary sites (p < 0.01). Cell behavior caused by PTHR1 overexpression was further studied in vitro using PTHR1 transfected HOS cell line as a model. Over-expression of PHTR1 resulted in increased proliferation, motility and Matrigel invasion without addition of exogenous PTHrP suggesting an autocrine effect. Importantly, the aggressiveness in PTHR1-expressing cells was completely reversed by RNAi mediated gene knockdown. In addition, PTHR1 over-expression led to delayed osteoblastic differentiation and upregulation of genes involved in extracellular matrix production, such as TGF-beta1 and connective tissue growth factor. When cocultured with bone marrow derived monocytes, PTHR1 transfected HOS cells induced a greater number of osteoclasts. This study suggests that PTHR1 over-expression may promote osteosarcoma progression by conferring a more aggressive phenotype, and forming a more favorable microenvironment.

Download full-text


Available from: Rui Yang, Jan 07, 2016
  • Source
    • "Some dogs develop metastases within 4 months regardless of the therapy modality, while others survive for longer periods of time [17]. One of the key factors contributing to intensified proliferative activity of the tumor in dogs leading to poor outcome is the deregulation of cellular signals, including growth factors and hormones [18,19]. This poor prognosis feature is comparable to human OS, where there is still ample room for new therapeutics development, primarily to eradicate micrometastases and improve survival. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene expression profiling of spontaneous tumors in the dog offers a unique translational opportunity to identify prognostic biomarkers and signaling pathways that are common to both canine and human. Osteosarcoma (OS) accounts for approximately 80% of all malignant bone tumors in the dog. Canine OS are highly comparable with their human counterpart with respect to histology, high metastatic rate and poor long-term survival. This study investigates the prognostic gene profile among thirty-two primary canine OS using canine specific cDNA microarrays representing 20,313 genes to identify genes and cellular signaling pathways associated with survival. This, the first report of its kind in dogs with OS, also demonstrates the advantages of cross-species comparison with human OS. The 32 tumors were classified into two prognostic groups based on survival time (ST). They were defined as short survivors (dogs with poor prognosis: surviving fewer than 6 months) and long survivors (dogs with better prognosis: surviving 6 months or longer). Fifty-one transcripts were found to be differentially expressed, with common upregulation of these genes in the short survivors. The overexpressed genes in short survivors are associated with possible roles in proliferation, drug resistance or metastasis. Several deregulated pathways identified in the present study, including Wnt signaling, Integrin signaling and Chemokine/cytokine signaling are comparable to the pathway analysis conducted on human OS gene profiles, emphasizing the value of the dog as an excellent model for humans. A molecular-based method for discrimination of outcome for short and long survivors is useful for future prognostic stratification at initial diagnosis, where genes and pathways associated with cell cycle/proliferation, drug resistance and metastasis could be potential targets for diagnosis and therapy. The similarities between human and canine OS makes the dog a suitable pre-clinical model for future 'novel' therapeutic approaches where the current research has provided new insights on prognostic genes, molecular pathways and mechanisms involved in OS pathogenesis and disease progression.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2009 · Molecular Cancer
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional prognostic determinants in osteosarcoma have included demographics (age, sex), tumour size, site, stage, and the response to chemotherapy. Many of these are determined using varying techniques and units of measurement, which can make comparison between studies difficult. The absence of survival difference between limb sparing surgery and amputation has been repeatedly demonstrated in primary disease, and even in the setting of pathological fracture. On the other hand, there is still some controversy over the existence of increased local recurrence for limb-sparing surgery, and the implications of this. Commonly used prognostic determinants such as metastases, and response to chemotherapy enable a high degree of prognostic accuracy but usually at a late stage in the course of disease. Leading on from this, there is a need to uncover molecular pathways with specific influence over osteosarcoma progression to facilitate earlier treatment changes. Some important pathways are already being defined, for example the association of CXCR4 with metastases on presentation, the likelihood of doxorubicin resistance with positive P-glycoprotein, and the reduced survival prediction of over expressed survivin. It is anticipated that the future of osteosarcoma treatment will involve treatment tailored to the molecular profile of tumours at diagnosis, adjuvant therapy directed towards dysfunctional molecular pathways rather than the use of cytotoxics, and a more standardised approach to the measurement of clinical prognostic factors.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2008 · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An understanding of differential gene expression in highly metastatic osteosarcoma could provide gene targets for treatment of metastases. We compared gene expression profiles of high- (LM7) and low- (LM2) metastatic SaOS2-derived cell lines in an in vitro tissue culture model and examined several differentially regulated genes in vivo in a murine orthotopic xenograft model. We hypothesized an orthotopic inoculation of LM2 and LM7 cells would establish a primary lesion and the gene expression profile of cells grafted in this fashion would resemble the gene expression profile observed in an in vitro model. Thirty-five days after inoculation, animals were euthanized and both tibiae were harvested and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Human-specific GAPDH mRNA was present in two of four tibias inoculated with LM2 cells and three of four tibias inoculated with LM7 cells. Tibiae displaying the presence of human cells were assayed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. We observed poor correspondence of in vitro to in vivo gene expression for either cell line. Accordingly, in vitro osteosarcoma gene expression data must be interpreted with caution until confirmed in vivo. Our orthotopic injection model allowed in vivo study of differential gene expression between these two cell lines but did not show radiographic evidence of an established primary lesion.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2008 · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Show more