Content uploaded by Preena Bhalla
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Preena Bhalla
Content may be subject to copyright.
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among women in Delhi, India
P. Bhalla, Rohit Chawla, S. Garg*, M.M. Singh*, U. Raina**, Ruchira Bhalla & Pushpa Sodhani†
Departments of Microbiology, *Community Medicine, **Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Maulana Azad Medical College & associated LN Hospital, New Delhi &
†Institute of Cytology & Preventive Oncology, Noida, India
Received March 3, 2005
Background & objectives: Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of vaginal discharge among
women in reproductive age. Surveillance studies on bacterial vaginosis are mostly based on specialist
clinic settings. As few population-based prevalence surveys of bacterial vaginosis have been
conducted, we studied the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the urban and rural communities in
Delhi, and to associate the presence of bacterial vaginosis with demoraphic profile, risk factors
and presence of other reproductive tract infections (RTIs)/ sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
Methods: Vaginal specimens for Gram-stain evaluation of vaginal flora for diagnosis of bacterial
vaginosis and culture of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida spp, blood samples for HIV and syphilis
serology, and urine for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis were collected
from women (15-49 yr) from rural and urban areas. Information on demographic characteristics,
risk factors and clinical symptoms was obtained.
Results: Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 70 (32.8%) subjects. A high percentage though
asymptomatic (31.2%) were found to have bacterial vaginosis. Highest prevalence was seen in urban
slum (38.6%) followed by rural (28.8%) and urban middle class community (25.4%). All women
with vaginal trichomoniasis were found to have bacterial vaginosis while 50 per cent of subjects
having syphilis also had bacterial vaginosis.
Interpretation & conclusion: The study showed high prevalence of bacterial vaginosis. The
asymptomatic women having bacterial vaginosis are less likely to seek treatment for the morbidity
and thus are more likely to acquire other STIs. Women attending various healthcare facilities
should be screened and treated for bacterial vaginosis to reduce the risk of acquisition of other
STIs.
Key words Bacterial vaginosis - community based study - prevalence
167
Indian J Med Res 125, February 2007, pp 167-172
Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause
of vaginal discharge among women in reproductive
age1. It is characterized by an increased vaginal pH
and the replacement of vaginal lactobacilli
(particularly those that produce hydrogen peroxide)
with Gardnerella vaginalis and anaerobic Gram-
negative rods2. Bacterial vaginosis has been
consistently associated with preterm delivery, but
its role in upper genital tract infection (pelvic
inflammatory disease), tubal damage and infertility
is less certain3. Surveillance studies on bacterial
vaginosis are mostly based on specialist clinic
settings, such as genitourinary medicine clinics4,
gynaecology and antenatal clinics5, which
underestimate the true burden of disease in the
community given the high proportion of
asymptomatic cases. Very few population based
prevalence surveys of bacterial vaginosis have been
conducted. Most of these have been carried out in
rural Africa6,7, the findings of which may be hard to
apply in other settings.
Lactobacilli dominated vaginal ecology may be
an important defense against pathogen acquisition
as various studies have shown that women with
bacterial vaginosis are more likely than women with
normal vaginal flora to acquire infection due to
herpes simplex virus type-21 (HSV-2), Trichomonas
vaginalis8, Neisseria gonorrhoeae8 and HIV6,8.
Therefore, the present study was carried out to
determine the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in
the urban and rural communities in Delhi, India, and
to associate the presence of bacterial vaginosis with
demographic profile, risk factors and presence of
other reproductive tract infections (RTIs)/sexually
transmitted infections (STIs).
Material & Methods
This study was conducted under the aegis of
National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), and
Delhi State AIDS Control Society (DSACS), Delhi,
after approval by the ethics committee of Maulana
Azad Medical College, New Delhi. The
communities studied were randomly selected and
included two urban slums (Census enumeration
block: Sanjay Amar Colony, Charge No.: 19 and
Census enumeration block: Lal Bag, Charge No.:
77), one urban middle class colony (Census
enumeration block: Tilak Vihar, Charge No.: 49)
and one rural area (Block Name: Khanjawala,
Village name: Bajidpur Thakran). Initial house-to-
house survey was carried out in 100 households in
each area; these households were selected by
systematic random sampling method. The survey
was carried out during September and December
2002 and information regarding socio-
demographic profile of the household; knowledge,
attitude and practices regarding STIs; and health
seeking behaviour was collected. The number of
eligible women (15-49 yr of age) enumerated was,
143 in Sanjay Amar Colony, 137 in Lal Bag, 132
in Tilak Vihar and 125 in Bajidpur Thakran. The
minimum number of women to be studied was 50
in each area but 65 women were selected from the
eligible women enumerated in each area by
systematic random sampling. The sample size was
decided on the basis of the findings of the previous
study9. Camps were held in the health centres
located in these areas. During the camps
demographic, risk factor and clinical data were
collected using a structured questionnaire.
Relevant specimens (vaginal specimens, blood and
urine) were collected for laboratory diagnosis of
various RTIs/ STIs after obtaining informed
consent from all participants. Women who were
menstruating, pregnant or had received antibiotics
in the past four weeks, were excluded from the
study.
Two vaginal swabs were collected from each
women, one used for preparation of saline and KOH
wet mount and smear for Gram staining. The second
swab was used for inoculation in Kupferberg
medium (for culture of T. vaginalis) and Sabouraud
dextrose agar (SDA, for culture of Candida spp.).
This was done to minimize the number of swabs to
be collected from each women. Culture for
T. vaginalis was incubated at 37°C and wet mounts
168 INDIAN J MED RES, FEBRUARY 2007
were prepared and examined after 2,4 and 7 days of
incubation10. SDA was incubated at 37°C and
examined for growth after 72 h of incubation.
Diagnosis of trichomoniasis and candidiasis was
made on the basis of positivity in direct microscopy
and/or culture. First-void urine specimen was
collected for diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae and
Chlamydia trachomatis infection using a
commercially available multiplex polymerase chain
reaction kit (Amplicor CT/NG test, Roche
Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). The urine
specimen was transported, stored and tested as per
manufacturer’s instructions. Venous blood sample
(5 ml) was collected for HIV and syphilis serology.
For syphilis serology all serum samples were
screened by VDRL test (Serologist to the
Government of India, Kolkata) and positive results
were confirmed by treponema pallidum
haemagglutination test (TPHA) (Immunotrep
TPHA, Omega Diagnostics Limited, Scotland,
U.K.). For serodiagnosis of HIV infection, serum
samples were screened by ELISA (HIVASE 1+2,
General Biologicals Corporation, Taiwan) and
positive results were confirmed by a second rapid
and simple test (Capillus HIV1/ HIV2, Trinity Biotech
PLC, Ireland). For diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
Gram stained vaginal smear was examined under oil
immersion objective (1000x magnification) and
graded as per standardized, quantitative,
morphological classification developed by Nugent et
al11. Composite score was categorized into three
categories, scores 0-3 being normal, 4-6 intermediate
and 7-10 as definite bacterial vaginosis.
Statistical analysis: Data was statistically analysed
for correlation of bacterial vaginosis with
demographic profile, risk factors and presence of
other laboratory confirmed RTIs/STIs using
Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test.
Results & Discussion
Of the total of 260 women invited to participate,
237 (91.1%) were enrolled for the study. Of these,
122 (51.4%) belonged to urban slum, while 60
(25.3%) and 55 (23.25%) subjects belonged to urban
Table I. Association between bacterial vaginosis and presence of other laboratory confirmed sexually transmitted or reproductive
tract infections
Characteristic n Vaginal flora morphology
(%) BV (%) I (%) N (%)
Trichomoniasis* Positive 6 (2.8) 6 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Negative 207 (97.1) 64 (30.9) 36 (17.3) 107 (51.6)
Candidiasis Positive 36 (16.9) 9 (25) 6 (16.6) 21 (58.3)
Negative 177 (83.0) 61 (34.4) 30 (16.9) 86 (48.5)
HIV infection†Positive 2 (0.95) 0 (0) 1 (50) 1 (50)
Negative 208 (99.0) 70 (33.6) 34 (16.3) 104 (50)
Syphilis†Positive 10 (4.76) 5 (50) 1 (10) 4 (40)
Negative 200 (95.2) 65 (32.5) 34 (17) 101 (50.5)
Gonorrhea Positive 2 (0.93) 0 (0) 1 (50) 1 (50)
Negative 211 (99.0) 70 (33.1) 35 (16.5) 106 (50.2)
BV, bacterial vaginosis: score of 7-10; I, intermediate: score of 4-6; N, normal: score of 0-3; †Blood samples for serology could not
be collected from three subjects.
*P<0.001 BV vs. I+N
BHALLA et al: PREVALENCE OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS 169
Table II. Correlation between bacterial vaginosis and various socio-demographic and risk factors
Characteristic n Vaginal flora morphology
BV (%) I (%) N (%)
Age (yr) 15-24 38 13 (34.2) 6 (15.7) 19 (50)
25-49 175 57 (32.5) 30 (17.1) 88 (50.2)
Income (Rs) <520 4 2 (50) 0 (0) 2 (50)
520-1299 35 15 (42.8) 7 (20) 13 (37.1)
1300-2599 130 37 (28.4) 24 (18.4) 69 (53)
2600-4159 34 13 (38.2) 4 (11.7) 17 (50)
³ 4160 10 3 (30) 1 (10) 6 (60)
Religion Hindu/Sikh 176 56 (31.8) 30 (17) 90 (51.1)
Muslim 37 14 (37.8) 6 (16.2) 17 (45.9)
Literacy Illiterate 114 38 (33.3) 23 (20.1) 53 (46.4)
Just literate 27 9 (33.3) 4 (14.8) 14 (51.8)
Primary 36 12 (33.3) 5 (13.8) 19 (52.7)
Secondary 28 10 (35.7) 2 (7.1) 16 (57.1)
Higher 5 0 (0) 2 (40) 3 (60)
secondary
Graduate 3 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 2 (66.6)
Location Urban slum 106 41 (38.6) 19 (17.9) 46 (43.3)
Urban middle 55 14 (25.4) 11 (20) 30 (54.5)
class
Rural 52 15 (28.8) 6 (11.53) 31 (59.6)
Marital status Married 203 69 (33.9) 34 (16.7) 100 (49.2)
Unmarried 10 1 (10) 2 (20) 7 (70)
History of Yes 26 9 (34.6) 4 (15.38) 13 (50)
abortion No 187 61 (32.6) 32 (17.1) 94 (50.2)
Smoking Yes 15 4 (26.6) 3 (20) 8 (53.3)
No 198 66 (33.3) 33 (16.6) 99 (50)
Past history Yes 100 36 (36) 16 (16) 48 (48)
suggestive of No 113 34 (30) 20 (17.6) 59 (52.2)
RTIs/STIs
Complaint of Yes 88 31 (35.2) 14 (15.9) 43 (48.8)
vaginal discharge No 125 39 (31.2) 22 (17.6) 64 (51.2)
Complaint of Yes 41 10 (24.3) 8 (19.5) 23 (56)
lower abdominal No 172 60 (34.8) 28 (16.2) 84 (48.8)
pain
BV, bacterial vaginosis: score of 7-10; I, intermediate: score of 4-6; N, normal: score of 0-3
170 INDIAN J MED RES, FEBRUARY 2007
middle class and rural communities, respectively.
The majority of the women in this investigation were
>30 yr of age (143, 63.3%), were married (226,
95.3%), and were not working (208, 87.7%). Most
of them were Hindus (177, 74.6%), illiterate (131,
55.2%), and non smokers (198, 93%).
Of the 237 women enrolled in the study, vaginal
swabs and urine specimens could be obtained from
213 and blood samples from 210 subjects. Prevalence
of laboratory confirmed STIs/ RTIs with 95 per cent
CI was as follows: bacterial vaginosis 32.8 per cent
(26.38, 39.22), trichomoniasis 2.8 per cent (0.54,
5.06), candidiasis 16.9 per cent (11.78, 22.02),
syphilis 4.7 per cent (1.84, 7.68), HIV infection 0.95
per cent (0, 2.27), gonorrhoea 0.93 per cent (0, 2.23)
and C. trachomatis infection 0 per cent.
Table I shows the association between bacterial
vaginosis and other laboratory confirmed STIs/ RTIs.
All women with vaginal trichomoniasis were found
to have bacterial vaginosis (P<0.001) while 50 per cent
of subjects having syphilis also had bacterial vaginosis.
Table II shows the association between socio-
demographic profile of the study population and
prevalence of bacterial vaginosis. The highest
prevalence was seen in urban slum (38.6%) followed
by rural community (28.8%) and urban middle class
community (25.4%). In a study conducted by Garg
et al9 in ever-married women belonging to an urban
slum in Delhi, prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was
41 per cent. Higher prevalence reported in this study
could be because of more than one method used for
the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. In a study
conducted in married rural women in Karnataka,
India, prevalence of bacterial vaginosis using
Nugent’s criteria was reported to be 20.5 per cent12.
In another study from Haryana, India, bacterial
vaginosis was diagnosed in a high percentage
(48.5%) of rural women13. This shows that
prevalence of bacterial vaginosis varies widely
among different areas and communities within the
country. The contrasting prevalence figures may be
because of various reasons such as differences in
economic status and educational background, study
population and method used for diagnosis of
bacterial vaginosis.
In the present study we found no association
between prevalence of bacterial vaginosis with age,
as almost equal prevalence was seen in women
between 15 to 24 yr of age and those who were
>25 yr. However, other studies showed a strong
association between the presence of bacterial
vaginosis age >25 yr4,6. Smoking has also been
reported to be associated with bacterial vaginosis14.
However, no such association was found in the
present study as number of smokers was very few.
Bacterial vaginosis (score >7) was found in 32.8
per cent of women while a shift from normal flora
(score 4-6) was observed in another 16.9 per cent of
women. Sewankambo et al6 reported bacterial
vaginosis in 50.8 per cent and intermediate flora in
31.7 per cent women. An intermediate score between
4-6 may be found among women who are either
recovering from bacterial vaginosis or who may
develop bacterial vaginosis subsequently. Such
women therefore should be followed up to confirm
the same as these alterations in vaginal microflora
may increase the risk of acquisition of other STIs
including HIV infection.
39/125 (31.2%) women not complaining of
vaginal discharge also had bacterial vaginosis. These
asymptomatic women are less likely to seek treatment
for the morbidity and thus are more likely to acquire
other serious STIs. In view of this it is suggested
that women attending various health care facilities
including antenatal clinic, gynaecology clinic,
genitourinary medicine clinic or family planning
clinic should be screened and treated for bacterial
vaginosis to reduce the risk of acquisition of other
more serious STIs.
Acknowledgment
Authors thank Shrimati Sujatha Grover and
Seema Malhotra for technical support.
BHALLA et al: PREVALENCE OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS 171
References
1. Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG,
Hillier SL. Association between acquisition of Herpes
simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis.
Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 : 319-25.
2. Hillier SL. Diagnostic microbiology of bacterial vaginosis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169 : 455-9.
3. Morris M, Nicoll A, Simms I, Wilson J, Catchpole M.
Bacterial vaginosis: a public health review. BJOG 2001;
108 : 439-50.
4. Moi H. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and its association
with genital infection, inflammation and contraceptive
methods in women attending sexually transmitted disease
and primary health clinics. Int J STD AIDS 1990; 1 : 86-
94.
5. Purwar M, Ughade S, Bhagat B, Agarwal V, Kulkarni H.
Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and adverse
pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001; 27 :
175-81.
6. Sewankambo N, Gray RH, Wawe MJ, Paxton L, McNairn
D, Wabwire-Mangen F, et al. HIV-1 infection associated
with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial
vaginosis. Lancet 1997; 350 : 546-50.
7. Walraven G, Scherf C, West B, Expo G, Paine K, Coleman
R, et al. The burden of reproductive-organ disease in rural
women in the Gambia, West Africa. Lancet 2001; 357 :
1161-7.
8. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, Lavreys L, Hillier
SL, Chohan B, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora,
and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and
sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999;
180 : 1863-8.
9. Garg S, Sharma N, Bhalla P, Sahay R, Saha R, Raina U, et
al. Reproductive morbidity in an Indian urban slum: need
for health action. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78 : 68-9.
10. Thomason JL, Gelbart SM, Sobun JF, Schulien MB,
Hamilton PR. Comparison of four methods to
detect Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26 :
1869-70.
11. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of
diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standard
method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol
1991; 29 : 297-301.
12. Rao PS, Devi S, Shriyan A, Rajaram M, Jagdishchandra
K. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in the rural setup:
comparison of clinical algorithm, smear scoring and culture
by semiquantitative technique. Indian J Med Microbiol
2004; 22 : 47-50.
13. Aggarwal AK, Kumar R, Gupta V, Sharma M. Community
based study of reproductive tract infections among ever
married women of reproductive age in rural area of
Haryana, India. J Commun Dis 1999; 31 : 223-8.
14. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison
C, Pearson J. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital
tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage.
BMJ 1994; 308 : 295-8.
Reprint requests: Dr Rohit Chawla, 4A/ 55, First Floor, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi 110060, India
e-mail: rohitchawla_75@hotmail.com
172 INDIAN J MED RES, FEBRUARY 2007