Article

The theory of facilitated variation

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 06/2007; 104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):8582-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701035104
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

This theory concerns the means by which animals generate phenotypic variation from genetic change. Most anatomical and physiological traits that have evolved since the Cambrian are, we propose, the result of regulatory changes in the usage of various members of a large set of conserved core components that function in development and physiology. Genetic change of the DNA sequences for regulatory elements of DNA, RNAs, and proteins leads to heritable regulatory change, which specifies new combinations of core components, operating in new amounts and states at new times and places in the animal. These new configurations of components comprise new traits. The number and kinds of regulatory changes needed for viable phenotypic variation are determined by the properties of the developmental and physiological processes in which core components serve, in particular by the processes' modularity, robustness, adaptability, capacity to engage in weak regulatory linkage, and exploratory behavior. These properties reduce the number of regulatory changes needed to generate viable selectable phenotypic variation, increase the variety of regulatory targets, reduce the lethality of genetic change, and increase the amount of genetic variation retained by a population. By such reductions and increases, the conserved core processes facilitate the generation of phenotypic variation, which selection thereafter converts to evolutionary and genetic change in the population. Thus, we call it a theory of facilitated phenotypic variation.

Full-text preview

Available from: pnas.org
  • Source
    • "The evolution of developmental biases and constraints, accumulated over past selection, might improve the distribution of phenotypes explored in the future[7,38,47,48]. But the core issue in the evolution of evolvability [7,38,47,49,86–88] is that selection cannot favour traits for benefits that have not yet been realised[9,50]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The theory of evolution links random variation and selection to incremental adaptation. In a different intellectual domain, learning theory links incremental adaptation (e.g., from positive and/or negative reinforcement) to intelligent behaviour. Specifically, learning theory explains how incremental adaptation can acquire knowledge from past experience and use it to direct future behaviours toward favourable outcomes. Until recently such cognitive learning seemed irrelevant to the 'uninformed' process of evolution. In our opinion, however, new results formally linking evolutionary processes to the principles of learning might provide solutions to several evolutionary puzzles - the evolution of evolvability, the evolution of ecological organisation, and evolutionary transitions in individuality. If so, the ability for evolution to learn might explain how it produces such apparently intelligent designs.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015
  • Source
    • "Regulation of the level of expression of specific proteins is a key element of flexibility of biological systems. It is argued in evolutionary developmental biology that the flexible architecture together with conservation of core mechanisms is crucial for the observed rate of biological evolution [16] [22]. It is suggested that morphology evolves largely by altering the expression of functionally conserved proteins [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We consider two classes of computations which admit taking linear combinations of execution runs: probabilistic sampling and generalized animation. We argue that the task of program learning should be more tractable for these architectures than for conventional deterministic programs. We look at the recent advances in the "sampling the samplers" paradigm in higher-order probabilistic programming. We also discuss connections between partial inconsistency, non-monotonic inference, and vector semantics.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Oct 2015
  • Source
    • "Key developmental genes arose more than 1.1 billion years ago, before the emergence of complex animal body plans during the Cambrian period [1]. An evolutionarily refined set of these transcriptional/developmental genes, termed the " basic genetic toolbox, " allowed the emergence of the immense variation in animal forms observed in this and later geological periods [2] [3]. In this context, two fundamental types of homologous genetic relationships are found: paralogous and orthologous genes, which evolve through duplication/deletion and speciation, respectively [4] [5] [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paired box (PAX) family of transcription/developmental genes plays a key role in numerous stages of embryonic development, as well as in adult organogenesis. There is evidence linking the acquisition of a paired-like DNA binding domain (PD) to domestication of a Tc1/mariner transposon. Further duplication/deletion processes led to at least five paralogous metazoan protein groups, which can be classified into two supergroups, PAXB-like or PAXD-like, using ancestral defining structures; the PD plus an octapeptide motif (OP) and a paired-type homeobox DNA binding domain (PTHD), producing the PD-OP-PTHD structure characteristic of the PAXB-like group, whereas an additional domain, the paired-type homeodomain tail (PHT), is present in the PAXD-like group, producing a PD-OP-PTHD-PHT structure. We examined their patterns of distribution in various species, using both available data and new bioinformatic analyses, including vertebrate PAX genes and their shared and specific functions, as well as inter- and intraspecific variability of PAX in primates. These analyses revealed a relatively conserved PAX network, accompanied by specific changes that led to adaptive novelties. Therefore, both stability and evolvability shaped the molecular evolution of this key transcriptional network. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
Show more