Article

Validity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder

Bipolar Disorders Program & Molecular Psychiatry Laboratory, Hospital Clinic of Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 90035-003, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 06/2007; 3(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/1745-0179-3-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have documented high rates of functional impairment among bipolar disorder (BD) patients, even during phases of remission. However, the majority of the available instruments used to assess functioning have focused on global measures of functional recovery rather than specific domains of psychosocial functioning. In this context, the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) is a brief instrument designed to assess the main functioning problems experienced by psychiatric patients, particularly bipolar patients. It comprises 24 items that assess impairment or disability in six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
101 patients with DSM-IV TR bipolar disorder and 61 healthy controls were assessed in the Bipolar Disorder Program, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The psychometric properties of FAST (feasibility, internal consistency, concurrent validity, discriminant validity (euthymic vs acute patients), factorial analyses, and test-retest reliability) were analysed.
The internal consistency obtained was very high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.909. A highly significant negative correlation with GAF was obtained (r = -0.903; p < 0.001) pointing to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity. Test-retest reliability analysis showed a strong correlation between the two measures carried out one week apart (ICC = 0.98; p < 0.001). The total FAST scores were lower in euthymic (18.55 +/- 13.19; F = 35.43; p < 0.001) patients, as compared with manic (40.44 +/- 9.15) and depressive patients (43.21 +/- 13.34).
The FAST showed strong psychometrics properties and was able to detect differences between euthymic and acute BD patients. In addition, it is a short (6 minutes) simple interview-administered instrument, which is easy to apply and requires only a short period of time for its application.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jose Sánchez-Moreno
  • Source
    • "Measures of affective symptoms and socio-occupational function Depressive symptoms were rated with the HDRS-17 and sociooccupational function was assessed with the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST; Rosa et al., 2007), a 24-item intervieweradministered instrument with good validity and reliability in BD (Rosa et al., 2007) and psychotic disorders (González-Ortega et al., 2010). 2.3.2. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity. Method: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively. Results: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05). Limitations: A modest sample size. Conclusions: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Source
    • "It was composed of six domains: (1) estimated IQ, which was evaluated with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – III (WAIS-III) vocabulary subtest (Wechsler, 1997a); (2) the processing speed index, which consists of two subtests of the WAIS-III, the digit–symbol coding and symbol search (Wechsler, 1997a); (3) executive function, which was tested by set shifting, verbal fluency, planning, and response inhibition using the Computerized Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Heaton, 1981), the Stroop Color– Word Interference Test (Golden, 1978), the phonemic (F-A-S) and categorical (animal naming) components of the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (Benton & Hamsher, 1976), the Trail Making Test, part B (Reitan, 1958), and the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure (Rey, 1997); (4) visual memory and verbal learning/memory, which were assessed with the Rey– Osterrieth Complex Figure for visual memory and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) (Delis et al. 1987) and the Logical Memory Scale (Wechsler Memory Scale-III; WMS-III) (Wechsler, 1997b) for learning/memory; (5) the working memory index, which was tested with three subtests of the WAIS-III (Wechsler, 1997a): arithmetic, digits forward and backward, and letter–number sequencing; and (6) attention , which was tested with the Trail Making Test, part A (Reitan, 1958), administered together with the Continuous Performance Test-II, version 5 (Conners, 2000), to measure sustained attention. Finally, psychosocial functioning was assessed by means of the FAST scale (Rosa et al. 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Functional remediation is a novel intervention with demonstrated efficacy at improving functional outcome in euthymic bipolar patients. However, in a previous trial no significant changes in neurocognitive measures were detected. The objective of the present analysis was to test the efficacy of this therapy in the enhancement of neuropsychological functions in a subgroup of neurocognitively impaired bipolar patients. Method: A total of 188 out of 239 DSM-IV euthymic bipolar patients performing below two standard deviations from the mean of normative data in any neurocognitive test were included in this subanalysis. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to assess the impact of the treatment arms [functional remediation, psychoeducation, or treatment as usual (TAU)] on participants' neurocognitive and functional outcomes in the subgroup of neurocognitively impaired patients. Results: Patients receiving functional remediation (n = 56) showed an improvement on delayed free recall when compared with the TAU (n = 63) and psychoeducation (n = 69) groups as shown by the group × time interaction at 6-month follow-up [F 2,158 = 3.37, degrees of freedom (df) = 2, p = 0.037]. However, Tukey post-hoc analyses revealed that functional remediation was only superior when compared with TAU (p = 0.04), but not with psychoeducation (p = 0.10). Finally, the patients in the functional remediation group also benefited from the treatment in terms of functional outcome (F 2,158 = 4.26, df = 2, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Functional remediation is effective at improving verbal memory and psychosocial functioning in a sample of neurocognitively impaired bipolar patients at 6-month follow-up. Neurocognitive enhancement may be one of the active ingredients of this novel intervention, and, specifically, verbal memory appears to be the most sensitive function that improves with functional remediation.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · Psychological Medicine
  • Source
    • "The subjects with bipolar disorder and substance abuse/dependence were considered in the group BD þSAD, and the subjects with bipolar disorder and without substance abuse/ dependence were classified in the BD group. Functioning was assessed using the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) (Cacilhas et al., 2009; Rosa et al., 2007). FAST includes 24 items that evaluate six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning , cognitive functions, financial issues, interpersonal relationships , and leisure time. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the functional impairment of young adults with bipolar disorder with substance abuse/dependence comorbidity. Cross-sectional study within a community sample. Bipolar Disorder was assessed by qualified psychologists using The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview - PLUS (MINI-PLUS). Substance abuse and dependence was assessed using the "Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test" (ASSIST). Functional impairment was assessed using the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST). The sample included 1259 young adults. The prevalence of Bipolar Disorder (BD) without Substance Abuse/Dependence (SAD) comorbidity was 5.9% (n=74), and the prevalence of bipolar disorder with substance abuse/dependence comorbidity was 1.4% (n=17). Both groups showed higher impairment in overall functioning, interpersonal relationship, and leisure time as compared to controls. In addition, BD+SAD showed higher impairment in the cognitive functioning domain of FAST. A battery of neuropsychological tests was not performed. Functional impairment is associated with BD, independently of substance abuse or dependence. In addition, BD+SAD present a more severe impairment in the cognitive domain of FAST as compared to controls. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · Journal of Affective Disorders
Show more