... The negative impact of increased choice beyond an optimal intermediate level is variously referred to in the literature as the "the problem of too much choice" (Fasolo, McClelland, & Todd, 2007), the "choice overload hypothesis" (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000;Mogilner, Rudnick, & Iyengar, 2008), the "overchoice effect" (Gourville & Soman, 2005), the "tyranny of choice" (Schwartz, 2000), the "toomuch-choice effect" (Lenton, Fasolo, & Todd, 2008;Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, & Todd, 2009), or the "excess-choice effect" (Arunachalam, Henneberry, Lusk, & Norwood, 2009;Hafner et al., 2016). However, the current research presents a novel term that encompasses Shah and Wolford's (2007; see also Reutskaja & Hogarth, 2009) observation that a moderate level of choice is still better than too little choice. ...