A meta-analysis of P50 studies in patients with schizophrenia and relatives

Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 3.92). 01/2008; 97(1-3):137-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.04.028
Source: PubMed


To determine whether patients with schizophrenia as well as their relatives show deficits in sensory gating reflected by an abnormal P50 ratio and to quantify the differences from controls.
A systematic search on articles published between 1982 and 2006 was conducted. 28 patient studies that were suitable for analysis including 891 patients and 686 controls were retrieved. Six studies on P50 of relatives of schizophrenic patients were identified, including 317 relatives and 294 controls.
In the patient studies we found an P50 effect size of 1.28 (SD=0.72). We confirmed high variability in outcomes across studies. Almost half of the studies included where published by one laboratory of the University of Colorado and these results differed significantly from the results found in studies performed in other laboratories. We found correlations between effect size outcome and sound intensity, filter settings and subjects' position which could be explained by differences between the Colorado laboratory and the other groups. In the relative studies we found a mean P50 effect size of 0.85 (+/-0.42).
The differences in methodology and lack of reported demographics and methodology including raters blinding in some studies makes it hard to compare results across studies and to evaluate the validity and reliability of P50 as a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia. There are large differences in outcomes from Colorado studies and non-Colorado studies. In contrast to the Colorado studies in the non-Colorado studies P50 suppression would not qualify as an endophenotype for schizophrenia. These differences might be explained by the differences in methodology e.g. lower levels of sound intensity, differences in filter settings and subjects' position. Finally we make some recommendations for future research based on the outcomes of this meta-analysis.

Download full-text


Available from: Lo J Bour
    • "Patients with schizophrenia often show a diminished response decrease from the 1st to the 2nd click (for review de Wilde et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess whether the response decrement of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) after stimulus repetition is affected by an interplay between sensitization and habituation. AEPs were recorded in 18 healthy participants. Stimulation consisted of trains with eight tones. The 6th stimulus of each train was a frequency deviant. The N100 amplitude to the 1st stimulus of the train was quantified in each trial. Trials with initially strong N100 responses and with initially weak N100 responses were averaged separately. For the total trial sample, the N100 and P200 amplitudes decreased from the 1st to the 2nd stimulus of the train but not thereafter. Trials with an initially strong N100 response were qualified by likewise larger N100 amplitudes to the 2nd stimulus, as compared to trials with initially weak N100 responses, and were characterized by a pronounced N100 amplitude decrease from standards to deviants. Our findings are difficult to reconcile with the view that the response decrement of AEP components after stimulus repetition is modulated by sensitization and habituation, as no evidence for either of these two processes could be obtained. The study provides further evidence against habituation as underlying mechanism for the AEP decrement after stimulus repetition. Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · May 2015 · Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Source
    • "Generally, the utility of P50 paired-click measures has been limited by their unestablished reliability, unknown effects of time differences in peak selection methodology and rater blinding, poor signal-to-noise ratio, sound intensity, seating position and long protocol (de Wilde et al., 2007a, 2007b; Dalecki et al., 2011). In spite of controversies surrounding the P50 ERP, reduced P50 ratio in schizophrenia has been confirmed metaanalytically (Bramon et al., 2004; de Wilde et al., 2007a, 2007b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Individuals with an "Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome" (APS) have a 20-40% chance of developing a psychotic disorder within two years; however it is difficult to predict which of them will become ill on the basis of their clinical symptoms alone. We examined whether P50 gating deficits could help to discriminate individuals with APS and also those who are particularly likely to make a transition to psychosis. Method: 36 cases meeting PACE (Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation) criteria for the APS, all free of antipsychotics, and 60 controls performed an auditory conditioning-testing experiment while their electroencephalogram was recorded. The P50 ratio and its C-T difference were compared between groups. Subjects received follow-up for up to 2 years to determine their clinical outcome. Results: The P50 ratio was significantly higher and C-T difference lower in the APS group compared to controls. Of the individuals with APS who completed the follow-up (n=36), nine (25%) developed psychosis. P50 ratio and the C-T difference did not significantly differ between those individuals who developed psychosis and those who did not within the APS group. Conclusion: P50 deficits appear to be associated with the pre-clinical phase of psychosis. However, due to the limitations of the study and its sample size, replication in an independent cohort is necessary, to clarify the role of P50 deficits in illness progression and whether this inexpensive and non-invasive EEG marker could be of clinical value in the prediction of psychosis outcomes amongst populations at risk.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · Schizophrenia Research
  • Source
    • "When it is inadequate, higher brain functions are flooded with a sensory overload and subjects evidence cognitive fragmentation and behavioral disturbances (Ancín et al., 2011; Venables, 1967). There is a large body of literature to suggest that a significant proportion of patients with schizophrenia have sensory gating impairments (Bramon et al., 2004; De Wilde et al., 2007; Potter et al., 2006). Some studies (Adler et al., 1990; Ancín et al., 2011; Cabranes et al., 2012; Carroll et al., 2008; Lijffijt et al., 2009; Sánchez‐Morla et al., 2008), but not all (Olincy and Martin, 2005; Patterson et al., 2009) have also revealed similar gating deficits in bipolar disorder patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory sensory gating deficits have been reported in subjects with bipolar disorder, but the hemispheric and neuronal origins of this deficit are not well understood. Moreover, gating of the auditory evoked components reflecting early attentive stage of information processing has not been investigated in bipolar disorder. The objectives of this study were to investigate the right and left hemispheric auditory sensory gating of the M50 (preattentive processing) and M100 (early attentive processing) in patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder by utilizing magnetoencephalography (MEG). Whole-head MEG data were acquired during the standard paired-click paradigm in 20 bipolar I disorder patients and 20 healthy controls. The M50 and the M100 responses were investigated, and dipole source localizations were also investigated. Sensory gating were determined by measuring the strength of the M50 and the M100 response to the second click divided by that of the first click (S2/S1). In every subject, M50 and M100 dipolar sources localized to the left and right posterior portion of superior temporal gyrus (STG). Bipolar I disorder patients showed bilateral gating deficits in M50 and M100. The bilateral M50 S2 source strengths were significantly higher in the bipolar I disorder group compared to the control group. The sample size was relatively small. More studies with larger sample sizes are warranted. Bipolar subjects were taking a wide range of medications that could not be readily controlled for. These findings suggest that bipolar I disorder patients have auditory gating deficits at both pre-attentive and early attentive levels, which might be related to STG structural abnormality.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · Journal of Affective Disorders
Show more