Determination of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) IgG subclasses - Comparison of three immunoprecipitation assays (IPAs)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
Clinical & Experimental Immunology (Impact Factor: 3.04). 11/2007; 150(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03473.x
Source: PubMed


IgG subclasses of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD(65)) antibodies (GADA) may reflect the immunological state in the pancreas of GADA-positive patients with autoimmune diabetes. The use of biotin-conjugated antibodies and streptavidin Sepharose are used commonly in immunoprecipitation assays (IPA) based on (125)I- or (35)S-labelled antigens to capture IgG subclasses directed against IA-2 or GAD(65). We have compared three different immunoprecipitation assays for the determination of GADA IgG subclasses. Two of the assays were based on the biotin and streptavidin systems provided in a solid (immobilized) or liquid (mobilized) phase binding environment. The third assay was based on N-hydroxysuccinimide (immobilized) interaction with primary amines (i.e. lysine residues) on the antibody. We found the liquid phase binding assay (LPBA) to be the most stable assay, with a comparatively low coefficient of variation and background.

Download full-text


Available from: Magnus Hillman, Dec 03, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus is divided into three parts. The first part talks about establishing a normal range for a laboratory test. Before discussing assay methods for the quantitation of glucose and the detection of diabetes, the chapter takes the mystery out of the “normal range”. It discusses the concept of normal and abnormal populations, the probability factor in diagnosing disease, and the effect of reproducibility on assay sensitivity and specificity. The second part presents modern techniques for the quantitation of glucose. It explains methods of historical interest, and modern-day methods of measuring glucose. The third part talks about symptoms and tools for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The tools for the diagnosis of diabetes are urinary glucose, fasting blood glucose (FBG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
    No preview · Article · Feb 2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Some women with gestational diabetes (GDM) present with autoantibodies associated with type 1 diabetes. These are usually directed against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) and suggested to predict development of type 1 diabetes. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if GADA IgG subclasses at onset of GDM could assist in predicting postpartum development. Of 1225 women diagnosed with first-time GDM only 51 were GADA-positive. Total GADA was determined using ELISA. GADA subclasses were determined with radioimmunoassay. Approximately 25% of GADA-positive women developed type 1 diabetes postpartum. Titers of total GADA were higher in women that developed type 1 diabetes (142.1 vs 74.2 u/mL; p=0.04) and they also had lower titers of GADA IgG4 (index =0.01 vs 0.04; p=0.03). In conclusion we found that that women with high titers of total GADA but low titers of GADA IgG4 were more prone to develop type 1 diabetes postpartum.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Clinical Immunology