Article

Validation of a Tibetan Translation of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25 and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire

Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Assessment (Impact Factor: 3.29). 10/2007; 14(3):223-30. DOI: 10.1177/1073191106298876
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

This study sought to translate and validate the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL) and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) in a Tibetan population. Translated questionnaires were administered to 57 Tibetan survivors of torture/human rights abuses living in the United States and receiving services in a torture treatment program. Participants were evaluated to determine if they met criteria for major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Coefficient alpha for the HSCL Anxiety subscale (.89), Depression subscale (.92), and the HTQ (.89) were high. Diagnostic accuracy using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis generated good classification accuracy for anxiety (.89), depression (.92), and PTSD (.83). However, although sensitivity and specificity for HSCL subscales were quite high, the HTQ generated low sensitivity (.33), partly because of a low rate of PTSD. Results support the reliability and validity of the HSCL but suggest further study of the HTQ with this population is required.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sophia Banu, Aug 13, 2015
  • Source
    • "HSCL-25 has 15 questions measured by a 4-point response scale (1 = 'Not at all', 2 = 'A little', 3 = 'Quite a bit', and 4 = 'Extremely') to identify depressive symptoms (Parloff et al., 1954). According to a study by Lhewa et al. (2007) and Silove et al. (2007), HSCL-25 has been widely used and previously verified as reliable when used with Asian populations (such as Cambodian, Chinese, and Vietnamese), with a coefficient alpha of .89 for the Anxiety subscale and .92 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A study was conducted in the greater Houston area in the United States with 1840 Asian American participants where 413 (22.5%) were 55 years and older and 12.6 percent had depressive symptoms. Logistic regression analysis found that the likelihood of being depressed was significantly increased among individuals with anxiety symptoms (odds ratio (OR) = 769.36), at least a high school education (OR = 21.756), a greater number of generations living in the household (OR = 3.789), and chronic pain (OR = 2.604). Conversely, being married reduced the likelihood of being depressed by 89.5 percent (OR = .105). Implications focus on help-seeking behaviors of older Asian Americans in relation to their mental health needs.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · International Social Work
  • Source
    • "In general, this literature supports the conclusion that differing response patterns and, therefore, a lack of scalar invariance are problematic for comparing scores from psychological assessments across culturally defined populations. Findings from the clinical literature suggesting that similar issues may pose particular problems in the clinical assessment of PTSD include widely varying PTSD scores across postconflict settings (de Jong et al., 2001), extremely low scores among Tibetan refugees (Lhewa, Banu, Rosenfeld, & Keller, 2007; Sachs et al., 2008), high scores among Latino combat veterans within the United States (Pole, Best, Metzler, & Marmar, 2005), and severity differences between Mexican and U.S. hurricane survivors (Norris, Perilla, & Murphy, 2001). To date there has been no direct empirical test of scalar invariance in PTSD scores among refugees or asylum seekers. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the central role of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in international humanitarian aid work, there has been little examination of the measurement invariance of PTSD measures across culturally defined refugee subgroups. This leaves mental health workers in disaster settings with little to support inferences made using the results of standard clinical assessment tools, such as the severity of symptoms and prevalence rates. We examined measurement invariance in scores from the most widely used PTSD measure in refugee populations, the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ; Mollica et al., 1992), in a multinational and multilingual sample of asylum seekers from 81 countries of origin in 11 global regions. Clustering HTQ responses to justify grouping regional groups by response patterns resulted in 3 groups for testing measurement invariance: West Africans, Himalayans, and all others. Comparing log-likelihood ratios showed that while configural invariance seemed to hold, metric and scalar invariance did not. These findings call into question the common practice of using standard cut-off scores on PTSD measures across culturally dissimilar refugee populations. In addition, high correlation between factors suggests that the construct validity of scores from North American and European measures of PTSD may not hold globally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Psychological Assessment
  • Source
    • "A number of studies find that despite a high prevalence of potentially traumatizing events (imprisonment, torture, religious and cultural persecution, mass displacement), rates of psychological distress are extremely low and that coping activities (primarily religious) appeared to mediate the psychological effects of trauma exposure (Holtz 1998; Ketzer and Crescenzi 2002; Lhewa et al. 2007; Ruwanpura et al. 2006; Sachs et al. 2008). Despite the robustness of these findings, some question whether these Tibetan respondents are truly " resilient " or if they simply avoid identifying symptoms of mental distress. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental health in the Tibetan refugee community has been studied extensively, but like most research on political violence, these studies focus almost exclusively on trauma. Studies suggest this exile community seems to be unusually resilient; but from where does this capacity to thrive stem? On the basis of ethnographic research in Dharamsala, India, conducted over 14 months, this article demonstrates how Tibetans conceive of resilience as a learned and active process of making the mind more spacious and flexible. Drawing on extended participant observation and in-depth interviews with 80 Tibetan refugees, this work explores why negative emotions associated with trauma exposure are considered toxic and how many Tibetans exposed to political violence engage in a Buddhist practice known as mind training (lojong in Tibetan) to abate its harmful effects. Attending to culturally sanctioned responses to political violence and displacement, this study challenges the notion that trauma is a universal experience.
    Full-text · Dataset · Sep 2013
Show more