Article

Disparities in Obesity Rates: Analysis by ZIP-code Area

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Social Science & Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.89). 01/2008; 65(12):2458-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Obesity in the United States has been linked to individual income and education. Less is known about its geographic distribution. The goal of this study was to determine whether obesity rates in King County, Washington State, at the ZIP code scale were associated with area-based measures of socioeconomic status and wealth. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed. At the ZIP code scale, crude obesity rates varied six-fold. In a model adjusting for covariates and spatial dependence, property values were the strongest predictor of the area-based smoothed obesity prevalence. Geocoding of health data provides new insights into the nature of social determinants of health. Disparities in obesity rates by ZIP code area were greater than disparities associated with individual income or race/ethnicity.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Colin D Rehm
    • "Although considerable attention is given to the analysis of the determinants of obesity, relatively little attention has been paid to the spatial pattern of obesity that may originate from neighbourhood surroundings in which individuals live, work and play (Chen and Wen 2010b; Duncan et al. 2012; Hollands et al. 2013). This is in spite of the fact that there are a growing number of studies suggesting spatial clustering of obesity at a different scale of analysis in Canada (Hollands et al. 2013; Lebel et al. 2010; Pouliou and Elliott 2009; Schuurman et al. 2009) and elsewhere (Drewnowski et al. 2007; Gallos et al. 2012; Lahti-Koski et al. 2008; Michimi and Wimberly 2010b; Mobley et al. 2004; Schlundt et al. 2006; Vanasse et al. 2006) and failure to account for the existence of spatial pattern in the analysis of outcomes may produce inconsistent parameter estimates (LeSage and Pace 2004). This paper, therefore, fills this gap by employing spatial panel-data estimation technique. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines spatial pattern of adult obesity in Canada from 2000/01 to 2009/10, and analyzes factors associated with obesity and body mass index (BMI). The analysis is based on a panel data set constructed at the health region (HR) level using five confidential Canadian Community Health Surveys. We found that obesity rates are not distributed randomly across HRs in Canada (Moran’s I, 2000/01: 0.501 and 2009/10: 0.659 [p<0.001]). Therefore, accounting for the spatial pattern of obesity was necessary in order to obtain reliable parameter estimates from regression analyses. We estimated the random- and fixed-effects specifications for the spatial autoregressive and spatial error models. The Hausman specification tests suggested that the fixed- effects models were preferred to that of the random-effects models. The results showed that the proportions of immigrants and homeowners are inversely related to BMI and obesity, while household income, fruits & vegetables consumption, physical activity and smoking are negatively related to BMI. These findings highlight the importance of socioeconomic and behavioural factors affecting adult obesity in Canada even after spatial heterogeneity was accounted for. Thus, a comprehensive and multi-faceted strategy is required to combat adult obesity in Canada.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2015 · Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
  • Source
    • "One can identify at least two subfields in the health economics literature that are related to this paper. First, a relatively large set of studies—in particular in the epidemiological and public health literature—focuses on geographical variation in health, health care, or health care expenditures as well as their determinants (Di Matteo and Di Matteo, 1998; Di Matteo, 2005; Drewnowski et al., 2007; Lahti-Koski et al., 2008; Michimi and Wimberly, 2010; Voigtländer et al., 2010; Regional Science and Urban Economics xxx (2014) xxx–xxx ☆ Peter Eibich gratefully acknowledges generous support under " BASEII " by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF; " Federal Ministry of Education and Research " , 16SV5537). We would like to thank Adam Lederer for excellence in editing this paper. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper uses Hierarchical Bayes Models to model and estimate spatial health effects in Germany. We combine rich individual-level household panel data from the German SOEP with administrative county–level data to estimate spatial county-level health dependencies. As dependent variable we use the generic, continuous, and quasi-objective SF12 health measure. We find strong and highly significant spatial dependencies and clusters. The strong and systematic county-level impact is equivalent to 0.35 standard deviations in health. Even 20 years after German reunification, we detect a clear spatial East–west health pattern that equals an age impact on health of up to 5 life years for a 40-year old.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · Regional Science and Urban Economics
  • Source
    • "television viewing habits. Following previous work on economic disparities in obesity, students were asked to provide the zip code of their parents’ address as a proxy for socioeconomic status [38]. Data from the 2011 American Community Survey, collected by the US Census, were used to determine the average income for each zip code. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advertising has been implicated in the declining quality of the American diet, but much of the research has been conducted with children rather than adults. This study tested the effects of televised food advertising on adult food choice. Participants (N = 351) were randomized into one of 4 experimental conditions: exposure to food advertising vs. exposure to non-food advertising, and within each of these groups, exposure to a task that was either cognitively demanding or not cognitively demanding. The number of unhealthy snacks chosen was subsequently measured, along with total calories of the snacks chosen. Those exposed to food advertising chose 28% more unhealthy snacks than those exposed to non-food-advertising (95% CI: 7% - 53%), with a total caloric value that was 65 kcal higher (95% CI: 10-121). The effect of advertising was not significant among those assigned to the low-cognitive-load group, but was large and significant among those assigned to the high-cognitive-load group: 43% more unhealthy snacks (95% CI: 11% - 85%) and 94 more total calories (95% CI: 19-169). Televised food advertising has strong effects on individual food choice, and these effects are magnified when individuals are cognitively occupied by other tasks.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · BMC Public Health
Show more