A Randomized Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Treatment-Naive and -Experienced HIV-1-Infected Patients

University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92013, USA.
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (Impact Factor: 4.56). 01/2008; 46(4):433-42. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318156f029
Source: PubMed


To improve the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by defining the proportion of patients with and predictors of above or below target protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) concentrations.
This 48-week, multicenter, open-label clinical trial randomized patients to TDM versus standard of care (SOC). Serial pharmacokinetics, including a week-2 3-sample sparse collection, and expert committee TDM recommendations were given to TDM-arm patients' providers.
Seventy-four (39%) of 190 patients had week-2 concentrations outside of targets and 122 (64%) of 190 had nontarget exposure at least once over 48 weeks. Providers accepted 75% of TDM recommendations. Among patients with below-target concentrations, more TDM-arm than SOC-arm patients achieved targets (65% vs. 45%; P = 0.09). Increased body weight and efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir use were significant predictors of nontarget concentrations. Patients at target and patients who achieved targets after TDM-directed dose modifications trended toward greater viral load reductions at week 48 than patients with below-target exposures (HIV RNA reductions: 2.4, 2.3, and 1.9 log10 copies/mL, respectively; P = 0.09).
Most patients had nontarget PI and/or NNRTI concentrations over 48 weeks. TDM recommendations were well accepted and improved exposure. Patients below TDM targets trended toward worse virologic response.

48 Reads

  • No preview · Article · Nov 2006 · Value in Health
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atazanavir (ATV) is a new azapeptide protease inhibitor recently approved and currently used at a fixed dose of either 300 mg once per day (q.d.) in combination with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) or 400 mg q.d. without boosting. ATV is highly bound to plasma proteins and extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Since ATV plasma levels are highly variable and seem to be correlated with both viral response and toxicity, dosage individualization based on plasma concentration monitoring might be indicated. This study aimed to assess the ATV pharmacokinetic profile in a target population of HIV patients, to characterize interpatient and intrapatient variability, and to identify covariates that might influence ATV disposition. A population analysis was performed with NONMEM with 574 plasma samples from a cohort of 214 randomly selected patients receiving ATV. A total of 346 randomly collected ATV plasma levels and 19 full concentration-time profiles at steady state were available. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were an oral clearance (CL) of 12.9 liters/h (coefficient of variation [CV], 26%), a volume of distribution of 88.3 liters (CV, 29%), an absorption rate constant of 0.405 h(-1) (CV, 122%), and a lag time of 0.88 h. A relative bioavailability value was introduced to account for undercompliance due to infrequent follow-ups (0.81; CV, 45%). Among the covariates tested, only RTV significantly reduced CL by 46%, thereby increasing the ATV elimination half-life from 4.6 h to 8.8 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ATV were adequately described by a one-compartment population model. The concomitant use of RTV improved the pharmacokinetic profile. However, the remaining high interpatient variability suggests the possibility of an impact of unmeasured covariates, such as genetic traits or environmental influences. This population pharmacokinetic model, together with therapeutic drug monitoring and Bayesian dosage adaptation, can be helpful in the selection and adaptation of ATV doses.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2006 · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lopinavir is a protease inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV infection. It is coformulated with low doses of ritonavir in order to enhance its pharmacokinetic profile. After oral administration, plasma concentrations of lopinavir can vary widely between different HIV-infected patients. To develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir administered simultaneously in a population of HIV-infected adults. The model sought was to incorporate patient characteristics influencing variability in the drug concentration and the interaction between the two compounds. HIV-infected adults on stable therapy with oral lopinavir/ritonavir in routine clinical practice for at least 4 weeks were included. A concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and blood samples were collected immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after a morning lopinavir/ritonavir dose. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. First, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed for lopinavir and for ritonavir separately. The pharmacokinetic parameters, interindividual variability and residual error were estimated, and the influence of different patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was explored. Then, a simultaneous model estimating the pharmacokinetics of both drugs together and incorporating the influence of ritonavir exposure on oral clearance (CL/F) of lopinavir was developed. Population analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM version V software). The bias and precision of the final model were assessed through Monte Carlo simulations and data-splitting techniques. A total of 53 and 25 Caucasian patients were included in two datasets for model building and model validation, respectively. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were described by one-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination. The presence of advanced liver fibrosis decreased CL/F of ritonavir by nearly half. The volume of distribution after oral administration (Vd/F) and CL/F of lopinavir were reduced as alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations increased. CL/F of lopinavir was inhibited by ritonavir concentrations following a maximum-effect model (maximum inhibition [Imax] = 1, concentration producing 50% of the I(max) [IC50] = 0.36 mg/L). The final model appropriately predicted plasma concentrations in the model-validation dataset with no systematic bias and adequate precision. A population model to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was developed and validated in HIV-infected patients. Bayesian estimates of the individual parameters of ritonavir and lopinavir could be useful to predict lopinavir exposure based on the presence of advanced liver fibrosis and the AAG concentration in an individual manner, with the aim of maximizing the chances of treatment success.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2008 · Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Show more