Neural basis of the emotional Stroop interference effect in major depression

Neuroimaging Research Group, Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Psychological Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.94). 03/2008; 38(2):247-56. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291707001523
Source: PubMed


A mood-congruent sensitivity towards negative stimuli has been associated with development and maintenance of major depressive disorder (MDD). The emotional Stroop task assesses interference effects arising from the conflict of emotional expressions consistent with disorder-specific self-schemata and cognitive colour-naming instructions. Functional neuroimaging studies of the emotional Stroop effect advocate a critical involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during these processes.
Subjects were 17 medication-free individuals with unipolar MDD in an acute depressive episode (mean age 39 years), and 17 age-, gender- and IQ-matched healthy volunteers. In an emotional Stroop task, sad and neutral words were presented in various colours, and subjects were required to name the colour of words whilst undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Overt verbal responses were acquired with a clustered fMRI acquisition sequence.
Individuals with depression showed greater increases in response time from neutral to sad words relative to controls. fMRI data showed a significant engagement of left rostral ACC (BA 32) and right precuneus during sad words in patients relative to controls. Additionally, rostral ACC activation was positively correlated with latencies of negative words in MDD patients. Healthy controls did not have any regions of increased activation compared to MDD patients.
These findings provide evidence for a behavioural and neural emotional Stroop effect in MDD and highlight the importance of the ACC during monitoring of conflicting cognitive processes and mood-congruent processing in depression.

Download full-text


Available from: Nicholas David Walsh, Feb 25, 2014
    • "Stress exposure has been shown to induce a state of neural hypervigilance, in which the amygdale switches to a state of highly sensitive, yet unspecific, processing (e.g., van Marle et al., 2009, but also overall reduced activity has been reported (Pruessner et al., 2008; Khalili-Mahani et al., 2010)). Patients suffering from stress-related mental disorders display similarly increased amygdala responsivity (Drevets, 2003; Etkin and Wager, 2007), and a compromised ability to suppress its processing of emotional information (Mitterschiffthaler et al., 2008). The exact contribution of cortisol signaling herein is currently however unknown. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stress exposure is known to precipitate psychological disorders. However, large differences exist in how individuals respond to stressful situations. A major marker for stress sensitivity is HPA-axis function. Here we studied how inter-individual variance in both basal cortisol levels and stress-induced cortisol responses predicts differences in neural vigilance processing during stress exposure. Implementing a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, 120 healthy male participants were exposed to a stress-induction and control procedure, followed by an emotional perception task (viewing fearful and happy faces) during fMRI scanning. Stress-sensitivity was assessed using physiological (salivary cortisol levels) and psychological measures (trait questionnaires). High stress-induced cortisol responses were associated with increased stress sensitivity as assessed by psychological questionnaires, a stronger stress-induced increase in medial temporal activity, and greater differential amygdala responses to fearful as opposed to happy faces under control conditions. In contrast, high basal cortisol levels were related to relative stress resilience as reflected by higher extraversion scores, a lower stress-induced increase in amygdala activity, and enhanced differential processing of fearful compared to happy faces under stress. These findings seem to reflect a critical role for HPA-axis signaling in stress coping; higher basal levels indicate stress-resilience, whereas higher cortisol responsivity to stress might facilitate recovery in those individuals prone to react sensitively to stress.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
    • "Several studies have consistently found heightened amygdala , in - sula and anterior cingulate cortex activation , regions that are crucial for the processing of emotional information , in clinically depressed patients relative to non - depressed subjects during the passive viewing of negatively valenced material ( Lee et al . , 2007 ; Mitterschiffthaler et al . , 2008 ; Peluso et al . , 2009 ) , suggesting that biases in encoding of negative information in depression may be associated with functional abnormalities in these brain areas . In addition , sustained amygdala activation has been also associated with increased self - reported rumination , a key factor in the maintenance of depressed mood ( S"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Previous studies suggest that autonomic reactivity during encoding of emotional information could modulate the neural processes mediating mood-congruent memory. In this study, we use a point-process model to determine dynamic autonomic tone in response to negative emotions and its influence on long-term memory of major depressed subjects. Methods: Forty-eight patients with major depression and 48 healthy controls were randomly assigned to either neutral or emotionally arousing audiovisual stimuli. An adaptive point-process algorithm was applied to compute instantaneous estimates of the spectral components of heart rate variability [Low frequency (LF), 0.04-0.15Hz; High frequency (HF), 0.15-0.4Hz]. Three days later subjects were submitted to a recall test. Results: A significant increase in HF power was observed in depressed subjects in response to the emotionally arousing stimulus (p=0.03). The results of a multivariate analysis revealed that the HF power during the emotional segment of the stimulus was independently associated with the score of the recall test in depressed subjects, after adjusting for age, gender and educational level (Coef. 0.003, 95%CI, 0.0009-0.005, p=0.008). Limitations: These results could only be interpreted as responses to elicitation of specific negative emotions, the relationship between HF changes and encoding/recall of positive stimuli should be further examined. Conclusions: Alterations on parasympathetic response to emotion are involved in the mood-congruent cognitive bias observed in major depression. These findings are clinically relevant because it could constitute the mechanism by which depressed patients maintain maladaptive patterns of negative information processing that trigger and sustain depressed mood.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Source
    • "The Emotional Stroop task continues to be widely used to study attentional biases for threat as a function of early childhood trauma (Wingenfeld et al., 2009), attachment (Atkinson et al., 2009), borderline personality disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (Cisler et al., 2011), among others. It has also been used to identify the neural sources associated with emotion (Mitterschiffthaler et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is widely believed that threatening stimuli in our environment capture attention. Much of the core evidence for attentional capture by threatening stimuli comes from the Emotional Stroop task. Yet recent evidence suggests that the Emotional Stroop task does not measure attentional capture (e.g., Algom et al., 2004). The present paper assesses whether threat words can capture attention using a modified Stroop Dilution procedure (e.g., Kahneman & Chajczyk, 1983), where attentional capture by a threat word is inferred from a reduction in color-word interference for threat words compared to non-threat words (emotional Stroop Dilution). The outcome of the present experiments indicates that threat words can capture attention, but only when task demands do not require that a word be attended. It is suggested that threat words produce (1) cognitive slowing, and influence two processes of selective attention (2) attentional capture and (3) the ability to filter irrelevant dimensions of an attended stimulus. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Acta psychologica
Show more